Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-603-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- data is from experimental report.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 978
- Report date:
- 1978
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: method described in the 'Code of Federal Regulations', Title 16, Section 1500.42.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Eye irritation test was conducted by using the given test chemical on rodents.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- octasodium 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulphonato[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[imino(6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino(1-hydroxy-3-sulphonatonaphthalene-6,2-diyl)azo]]bisnaphthalene-1,5-disulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 68110-30-5
- Molecular formula:
- C58H30Cl2N14Na8O26S8
- IUPAC Name:
- octasodium 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulphonato[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[imino(6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino(1-hydroxy-3-sulphonatonaphthalene-6,2-diyl)azo]]bisnaphthalene-1,5-disulphonate
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- Name of the test chemical: Octasodium 2,2'-[(2,2'-disulphonato[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis[imino(6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino (1-hydroxy-3-sulphonatonaphthalene-6,2-diyl)azo]]bisnaphthalene-1,5-disulphonate
Molecular formula: C58H30Cl2N14Na8O26S8
Molecular weight: 1850.3 g/mol
Smiles Notation: [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].c1(c(cc(cc1)Nc1nc(nc(n1)Cl)Nc1cc2cc(c(c(c2cc1)O)\N=N\c1c(c2cccc(c2cc1)S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])c1c(cc(cc1)Nc1nc(nc(n1)Cl)Nc1cc2cc(c(c(c2cc1)O)\N=N\c1c(c2cccc(c2cc1)S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-]
InChI: 1S/C58H38Cl2N14O26S8.8Na/c59-53-65-55(61-27-7-11-31-25(19-27)21-45(105(89,90)91)47(49(31)75)73-71-39-17-15-35-37(51(39)107(95,96)97)3-1-5-41(35)101(77,78)79)69-57(67-53)63-29-9-13-33(43(23-29)103(83,84)85)34-14-10-30(24-44(34)104(86,87)88)64-58-68-54(60)66-56(70-58)62-28-8-12-32-26(20-28)22-46(106(92,93)94)48(50(32)76)74-72-40-18-16-36-38(52(40)108(98,99)100)4-2-6-42(36)102(80,81)82;;;;;;;;/h1-24,75-76H,(H,77,78,79)(H,80,81,82)(H,83,84,85)(H,86,87,88)(H,89,90,91)(H,92,93,94)(H,95,96,97)(H,98,99,100)(H2,61,63,65,67,69)(H2,62,64,66,68,70);;;;;;;;/q;8*+1/p-8/b73-71+,74-72+;;;;;;;;
Substance Type: Organic
Physical State: Solid
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Sex: male
- Weight at study initiation: 2.5 - 3.5 kg bodyweight
- Housing:were housed individually in suspended galvanized and stainless steel cages (from Cope and Cope Ltd.), measuring 0.6 x 0.6 x 0.4 m high and fitted with mesh floors and automatic watering
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): complete pelleted rabbit diet; Diet RAG modified, from Labsure Animal Foods, Poole, Dorset; ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): water; ad libitum
- Acclimation period:All rabbits were held for a minimum period of seven days before entering the study.
- Identification: Each animal was weighed and allocated by random selection to the appropriate test group, in which it was identified by numbered ear-tag.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Room temperature was controlled within the range 15 0 ± 2 0 C
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):lighting was restricted to 14 hours in each period of 24 hours
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 100mg
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single exposure
- Observation period (in vivo):
- The eyes were examined and the grades of ocular reaction were graded at 1 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after instillation
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- no data available
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 male rabbits
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): not washed
- Time after start of exposure: The treated eyes were not washed after instillation of the test chemical
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize method for scoring of ocular lesions
Results and discussion
In vivo
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 2.6
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Single ocular instillation of test chemical, without rinse, into the conjunctival sac resulted in immediate pain reactions varying from practically no initial pain i.e. a few blinks only in one animal, to moderate initial pain in two animals with rubbing of eyes with paws. Three rabbits presented an intermediate response with reflex closure of the eyes without rubbing. Subsequent eye irritation consisted of occasional minor redness and chemosis of the conjunctiva up to 24 hours after treatment in five rabbits. The sixth animal showed greater irritation, with initial discharge at one hour, grade 2 chemosis up to 48 hours, persistent grade 1 conjunctival redness to Day 7 and corneal opacity for four days, never exceeding one-half the total area and clearing by Day 7. These responses resulted in an Irritation Score of 2.6.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Scoring of Ocular responses elicited by single instillation of 100mg of the test chemical, without rinse
Animal number |
Time |
Hour
|
days |
Pain evaluation class |
|||||||
Region of eye |
Response |
||||||||||
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
4 |
7 |
14 |
|||||
305 |
Cornea |
Opacity A |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
|
Area B |
|||||||||||
Ulceration I |
|||||||||||
Stippling II |
|||||||||||
SCORE = A*B*C*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
IRIS |
Value A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Score = A*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
CONJUNCTIVA |
Redness A |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Chemosis B |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Discharge C Necrosis or ulceration
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Score = 2 (A+B+C) |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Total score |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
027 |
Cornea |
Opacity A |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
|
Area B |
|||||||||||
Ulceration I |
|||||||||||
Stippling II |
|||||||||||
SCORE = A*B*C*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
IRIS |
Value A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Score = A*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
CONJUNCTIVA |
Redness A |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Chemosis B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Discharge C Necrosis or ulceration
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Score = 2 (A+B+C) |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Total score |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
830 |
Cornea |
Opacity A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
|
Area B |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
||||
Ulceration I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stippling II |
|||||||||||
SCORE = A*B*C*5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
|
||||
IRIS |
Value A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Score = A*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
CONJUNCTIVA |
Redness A |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|||
Chemosis B |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Discharge C Necrosis or ulceration
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Score = 2 (A+B+C) |
8 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
||||
Total score |
8 |
16 |
7 |
17 |
17 |
0 |
|
||||
832
|
Cornea |
Opacity A |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
|
Area B |
|||||||||||
Ulceration I |
|||||||||||
Stippling II |
|||||||||||
SCORE = A*B*C*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
IRIS |
Value A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Score = A*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
CONJUNCTIVA |
Redness A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Chemosis B |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Discharge C Necrosis or ulceration
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Score = 2 (A+B+C) |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Total score |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
||||
838 |
Cornea |
Opacity A |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
|
Area B |
|||||||||||
Ulceration I |
|||||||||||
Stippling II |
|||||||||||
SCORE = A*B*C*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
IRIS |
Value A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Score = A*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
CONJUNCTIVA |
Redness A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Chemosis B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Discharge C Necrosis or ulceration
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Score = 2 (A+B+C) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Total score |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
981 |
Cornea |
Opacity A |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
|
Area B |
|||||||||||
Ulceration I |
|||||||||||
Stippling II |
|||||||||||
SCORE = A*B*C*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
IRIS |
Value A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Score = A*5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
CONJUNCTIVA |
Redness A |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||
Chemosis B |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Discharge C Necrosis or ulceration
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Score = 2 (A+B+C) |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Total score |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
||||
Primary irritation score |
|
2.56 |
|
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not irritating
- Conclusions:
- Single ocular instillation of test chemical, without rinse, into the conjunctival sac resulted in immediate pain reactions varying from practically no initial pain i.e. a few blinks only in one animal, to moderate initial pain in two animals with rubbing of eyes with paws. Three rabbits presented an intermediate response with reflex closure of the eyes without rubbing. Subsequent eye irritation consisted of occasional minor redness and chemosis of the conjunctiva up to 24 hours after treatment in five rabbits. The sixth animal showed greater irritation, with initial discharge at one hour, grade 2 chemosis up to 48 hours, persistent grade 1 conjunctival redness to Day 7 and corneal opacity for four days, never exceeding one-half the total area and clearing by Day 7. These responses resulted in an Irritation Score of 2.6. Hence, based on the observations and scores, it was considered to be not irritating to rabbit eyes.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed according to method described in the 'Code of Federal Regulations', Title 16, Section 1500.42 to predict the potential for damage to the conjunctiva, cornea and iris in a single exposure of the given test chemical for indeterminate duration in the rabbit. 100 mg of the undiluted test chemical was instilled into the left eye of 6 male New Zealand White rabbits. The untreated eyes served as controls.The treated eyes remained unwashed throughout the study. The eyes were examined and the grades of ocular reaction were graded at 1 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after instillation.The eyes were also evaluated for Pain upon instillation of the test chemical. The ocular reactions were graded according to the method of Draize. For each animal, the scores for the cornea, iris and conjunctiva were added for each of the 24, 48 and 72 hour time periods to give a total score/animal/time period. Then the total scores so obtained were added together and divided by 18.The resultant value was the Irritation Score. Single ocular instillation of test chemical, without rinse, into the conjunctival sac resulted in immediate pain reactions varying from practically no initial pain i.e. a few blinks only in one animal, to moderate initial pain in two animals with rubbing of eyes with paws. Three rabbits presented an intermediate response with reflex closure of the eyes without rubbing. Subsequent eye irritation consisted of occasional minor redness and chemosis of the conjunctiva up to 24 hours after treatment in five rabbits. The sixth animal showed greater irritation, with initial discharge at one hour, grade 2 chemosis up to 48 hours, persistent grade 1 conjunctival redness to Day 7 and corneal opacity for four days, never exceeding one-half the total area and clearing by Day 7. These responses resulted in an Irritation Score of 2.6. Hence, based on the observations and scores, it was considered to be not irritating to rabbit eyes.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.