Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Report date:
2006

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.17 (Oxidising Properties (Solids))
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
466-070-3
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
209995-38-0
Molecular formula:
C8H5F3O2
IUPAC Name:
2-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)acetic acid

Results and discussion

Test results (Oxidising solids)open allclose all
Key result
Sample tested:
4:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
Parameter:
burning rate
Result:
0.27 mm/s
Key result
Sample tested:
1:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
Parameter:
burning rate
Result:
0.49 mm/s

Any other information on results incl. tables

Preliminary test: The test article was mixed with dried cellulose in the proportion 2 to 1 (w/w) and the mixture was formed into a small cone shaped pile.
The ignition source was applied to the cone, but no ignition or significant strong reaction was observed.


The maximum burning rate of the reference material was achieved with barium nitrate mixed with dried cellulose 60:40 (w/w).


Burning time (over 200 mm): 342 sec   Burning rate : 0.58 mm/sec


The burning rate of dried cellulose was:


Burning time (over 200 mm): 270 sec   Burning rate : 0.74 mm/sec


The test article was mixed with dried cellulose in various ratios and tested as following.


For all the mixtures the burning rates were higher than the value obtained for the reference mixture.

































































MixtureSample/cellulose (% w/w)Burning time over 200 mm (sec)Burning rate (mm/sec)
A10/903090.56
B20/803800.53
C30/704200.48
D40/603830.52
E50/504100.49
F60/403920.51
G70/305100.39
H80/207510.27
I90/10burning does not propagate 

In order to investigate a possible false positive hypothesis, the test was repeated on the same ratios of the mixture A and B, using silica gel instead of the test article. The results obtained are:























MixtureSilica gel/cellulose (% w/w)Burning time over 200 mm (sec)Burning rate (mm/sec)
A10/903820.52
B20/803700.54

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test sample is a non-oxidizing substance, according to the guideline in Official Journal L 283 A.17.