Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP and guideline confirmed study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Method

Target gene:
his / trp
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254-induced rodent liver microsomes fractions
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
5000, 2500, 1250, 625, 312.5 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
Remarks:
Migrated to IUCLID6: In the absence of S-9 mix, in DMSO; for TA1535, TA100 and WP2 uvrA
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
Remarks:
Migrated to IUCLID6: In the absence of S-9 mix, in DMSO; for TA1538 and TA98
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
Migrated to IUCLID6: In the absence of S-9 mix, in DMSO; for TA1537
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
congo red
Remarks:
Migrated to IUCLID6: In the presence of S-9 mix, in DMSO; for TA1538 and TA98
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-Aminoanthracene; in the presence of S-9 mix, in DMSO; for TA1535, TA100 and WP2 uvrA
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Preincubation period: without agar 30min

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates for each dose level

NUMBER OF colonies EVALUATED: all
Evaluation criteria:
The mean number of revertant colonies for all treatment groups is compared with those obtained for
solvent control groups.
Statistics:
No statistical analysis was performed.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:

Four concentrations of test substance were assessed for toxicity using the six tester strains. The highest concentration was 50 mg/ml of test substance in the chosen solvent, which provided a final concentration of 5000 µg/plate. Three 10-fold serial dilutions of the highest concentration were also tested. The chosen solvent, dimethyl sulphoxide, was used as the negative control.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

It is concluded that, when tested in dimethyl sulphoxide, the test item shows no evidence of mutagenic activity in this bacterial system.
Executive summary:

In this in vitro assessment of the mutagenic potential of the test article, histidine dependent auxotrophic mutants of Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100) and a tryptophan dependent mutant of Escherichia coli (WP2 uvrA) were exposed to the test substance, diluted in dimethyl sulphoxide which was also used as a negative control.

Two independent mutation tests were performed, in the presence and absence of liver preparations from Aroclor 1254-induced rats and un-induced Syrian hamsters. A 30 minutes at 30°C preincubation stage was included in both tests.

In the preliminary dose range finding study with dose levels of up to 5000 /µg/plate no toxicity was observed. A top dose level of 5000 /µg/plate was chosen for the subsequent mutation study. Other dose levels used in the mutation assays were: 2500, 1250, 625, 312.5 /µg/plate.

No evidence of mutagenic activity was seen at any dose level in either mutation test. The concurrent positive control compounds demonstrated the sensitivity of the assay and the metabolising activity of the liver preparations.

It is concluded that, when tested in dimethyl sulphoxide the test substance was not mutagenic in this bacterial system.