Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 107 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), Shake Flask Method)
Version / remarks:
The method is described in Fujita, Iwasa & Hansch (1964) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86:5175
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Some methodological details are not reported (volume of the two phases, concentration of test substance, unclear if both phases have been analyzed)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
flask method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Specific details on test material used for the study:
TEST MATERIAL
- Name (as cited): Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
- Purity: not specified
Analytical method:
photometric method
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
1.12
Temp.:
20 °C
Remarks on result:
other: pH not specified
Conclusions:
The Log Pow of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether was determined to be 1.12.
Executive summary:

In a publication by Veith et al. (1980), experimental data on the estimation of the partition coefficient of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether are reported. The methodology used is similar to OECD Guideline No. 107 and the publication has been subject to peer-review. The data is thus considered reliable and has been assigned a reliability score of 2. The Log Pow of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether was determined to be 1.12.

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 107 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), Shake Flask Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The concentration of test substance was analyzed only in one phase. Measurement perfomed at "room temperature".
Type of method:
flask method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Test material (as cited): Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Purity: not specified
Analytical method:
other: Not specified
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
1.58
Conclusions:
Based on a shake-flask method, the Log Pow of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether was determined to be 1.58.
Executive summary:

In a review on partition coeffcients and their uses published by Leo et al. (1971), experimental data on the partition coefficient of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether are reported. The data was generated based on a shake-flask method, but no extra methodological details are provided. The Log Pow of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether was determined to be 1.58.

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Principle of test: calculation mtehod
- Short description of test conditions: not available
Type of method:
other: calculation method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Test material (as cited): Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Purity: not specified
Analytical method:
not specified
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
1.48
Type:
Pow
Partition coefficient:
29
Conclusions:
The Kow of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether is reported to be 29.
Executive summary:

A Kow value equal to 29 is reported for Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether in this collection of data published by US EPA. U.S. EPA reports are subjected to a formal review process. It is thus assumed that a variety of data sources have been consulted, that the test methodology and identity of the test substance has been evaluated, and that a reliable and representative value for the endpoint has been selected. Accordingly, this data was assigned a reliability score of 2.

Description of key information

Based on the results of a detailed study using a methodology similar to OECD Guideline No. 107 (shake-flask method), the Log Pow of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether was found to be equal to 1.12.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
1.12
at the temperature of:
20 °C

Additional information

In Veith et al. (in: Aquatic Toxicology, ASTM STP 707, 1980, pp. 116 -129.), the results of a detailed study using a methodology similar to OECD Guideline No. 107 (shake-flask method) are reported. In the conditions of the test, the Log Pow of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether was found to be equal to 1.12. The data originate from a peer-reviewed publication and is deemed reliable (reliability score of 2).

In a review on partition coeffcients and their uses published by Leo et al. (Chem. Rev., 1971, 71(6):525-616), experimental data on the partition coefficient of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether are reported. The data was generated based on a shake-flask method, but no extra methodological details are provided. The Log Pow of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether was determined to be 1.58.

In the databook entitled "Aquatic Fate Porcess Data for Organic Priority Pollutants" published by U.S. EPA (Mabey et al., 1982), a Kow value equal to 29 is reported for Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether. U.S. EPA reports are subjected to a formal review process. It is thus assumed that a variety of data sources have been consulted, that the test methodology and identity of the test substance has been evaluated, and that a reliable and representative value for the endpoint has been selected. Accordingly, this data was assigned a reliability score of 2.