Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-491-9 | CAS number: 96-23-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 22 February 2018 to 3rd July 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
Appearance: Colourless liquid
Batch: ZMG-197685
Purity/Composition: See Certificate of Analysis
Test item storage: At room temperature container flushed with
nitrogen
Stable under storage conditions until: 29 December 2018 (expiry date) - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- The batch of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol tested was a colourless liquid with a purity of 99.2%.
No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item. Preparation of the stock
solution was performed in the glovebox (nitrogen environment).
A stock solution of 10 g/L was prepared by adding 3.7 mL tests item, corresponding with
5.0 g, to 500 mL of Milli-RO water (tap water purified by reverse osmosis; Millipore Corp.,
Bedford, Mass., USA). Magnetic stirring for 18-22 minutes was applied to accelerate
dissolution and to ensure homogeneity. - Test organisms (species):
- activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
- Details on inoculum:
- Test system: Micro-organisms in activated sludge.
Source: Municipal sewage treatment plant: 'Waterschap Aa en Maas',
's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, receiving predominantly
domestic sewage.
Preparation of the sludge: The sludge was coarsely sieved (1 mm) and allowed to settle.
The supernatant was removed and ISO-medium was added. A
small amount of the sludge was weighed and dried overnight at
ca. 105°C to determine the amount of suspended solids (3.0 g/L
of sludge, as used for the test). The pH was 7.2 (combined
limit/range-finding test) or 7.9 (final test) on the day of testing.
The batch of sludge was used one day after collection; therefore
50 mL of synthetic medium (=sewage feed) was added per litre
of activated sludge at the end of the collection day. The sludge
was kept aerated at test temperature until use.
Medium: Adjusted ISO-medium, formulated using RO water (tap water
purified by reverse osmosis; GEON Waterbehandeling, BerkelEnschot,
The Netherlands) with the following composition:
CaCl2.2H2O 211.5 mg/L
MgSO4.7H2O 88.8 mg/L
NaHCO3 46.7 mg/L
KCl 4.2 mg/L
Rationale Recognized by international guidelines as the recommended
test system. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 3 h
- Remarks on exposure duration:
- 3 hours, during which aeration and stirring took place.
- Post exposure observation period:
- After the 3-hour contact time the oxygen consumption was
recorded for a period of approximately 10 minutes. During
measurement, the sample was not aerated but continuously
stirred on a magnetic stirrer. - Hardness:
- Not recorded
- Test temperature:
- The temperature continuously measured in the temperature control vessels ranged between 20 and 22°C during the test, and was slightly outside the range prescribed by the study plan (20 ± 2°C
- pH:
- The pH in all test vessels, before addition of sludge, was between 7.0 and 7.2. After the 3 hour exposure period the pH was between 8.0 and 8.4.
- Dissolved oxygen:
- the dissolved oxygen concentration at the start was above 60-70% saturation
(60% of air saturation is > 5 mg/L at 20°C) - Salinity:
- Not recorded
- Conductivity:
- Not recorded
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Rangefinding nominal concentrations: 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L
Final test nominal concentrations: 0, 1, 3.2, 10, 32, 100, 320, 1000 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- Contact time: 3 hours, during which aeration and stirring took place.
Vessels: All glass open bottles/vessels.
Milli-RO / Milli-RO water Tap water purified by reverse osmosis (Millipore Corp.,
Bedford, Mass., USA).
Synthetic medium 16 g peptone
(=sewage feed) 11 g meat extract
3 g urea
0.7 g NaCl
0.4 g CaCl2..2H2O
0.2 g MgSO4.7H2O
2.8 g K2HPO4
Dissolved in Milli-RO water, made up to 1 litre
and filtered. The pH was within 7.5 ± 0.5.
Air supply Clean, oil-free air.
Aeration The aeration was adjusted in such a way that the dissolved
oxygen concentration at the start was above 60-70% saturation
(60% of air saturation is > 5 mg/L at 20°C) and to maintain the
sludge flocs in suspension.
Test set up 5 replicates per test group and 6 replicates for the control.
Performance of the test
The synthetic medium (=sewage feed, 16 mL) and an appropriate amount of the test item stock were mixed and made
up to 250 mL with Milli-RO water.
The pH was determined. Thereafter, 250 mL activated sludgewas added. This was the start of the test.
After the 3-hour contact time the oxygen consumption was recorded for a period of approximately 10 minutes. During
measurement, the sample was not aerated but continuously stirred on a magnetic stirrer.
The pH was determined in the remaining part of the reaction mixture. This procedure was repeated for all test/reference item
concentrations and controls.
The medium temperature was recorded continuously in a temperature control vessels. The temperature control vessels
were identically prepared compared to the control vessels. A temperature control vessel with a REES sensor was placed in
each fume cupboard of the climate room. Oxygen recording Determination of oxygen was performed with multiple oxygen
sensors connected to a BlueBox (GO-Systemelektronik GmbH,Germany), a multichannel measuring and controlling system.
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-dichlorophenol
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- <= 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 18 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 55 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 449 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Details on results:
- The combined limit/range-finding showed 15%, 47% and 63% inhibition of the respiration rate at a concentration of 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L, respectively. Therefore, the expected EC50 was between a concentration of 100 and 1000 mg/L.
There was no oxygen uptake from abiotic processes.
Acceptability of the Test
The mean control oxygen uptake rate exceeded 20 mg oxygen per one gram of activated sludge (dry weight of suspended solids) in an hour (34 mg oxygen per one gram of activated sludge in the final test).
The coefficient of variation of oxygen uptake in control replicates did not exceed 30% at the end of the definitive test (4%).
The EC50 of 3,5-dichlorophenol was in the accepted range of 2 to 25 mg/L for total respiration (6.0 mg/L in the final test).
Since all criteria for acceptability of the test were met, this study was considered to be valid.
All test conditions and acceptability criteria prescribed by the study plan were met.
The effects observed were in agreement with what was expected based on the results of the combined limit/range-finding test. The results of this test allowed for reliable determination of a NOEC and ECx values.
No statistically significant inhibition of the respiration rate of the sludge was recorded at 10 mg 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol per liter (for more information on statistics see Appendix 4). At higher concentrations the inhibitory effect of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol on aerobic waste water (activated sludge) bacteria increased with increasing concentration, ranging from 18% inhibition at 32 mg/L to 67% at 1000 mg/L. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The EC50 of 3,5-dichlorophenol was in the accepted range of 2 to 25 mg/L for total respiration (6.0 mg/L in the final test).
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Interpretation of results
ECx
For the reference item, calculation of the EC50 value was based on a 3-parameter logistic cumulative distribution function (CDF) using non-linear regression analysis, with the percentages of respiration inhibition versus the logarithms of the corresponding concentrations of the reference item.
For the test item, calculation of the ECx value was based on probit analysis using linear maximum likelihood regression, with the percentages of respiration inhibition versus the logarithms of the corresponding concentrations of the test item.
NOEC determination
An effect was considered to be significant if statistical analysis of the data obtained for the test concentrations compared with those obtained in the control revealed significant inhibition of the respiration rate (Williams Multiple Sequential t-test Procedure, α=0.05, one-sided, smaller).
Calculations were performed with ToxRat Professional v. 3.2.1 (ToxRat Solutions® GmbH, Germany). - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, under the conditions of this present test 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol was not toxic to waste water bacteria (activated sludge) at or below a concentration of 10 mg/L (NOEC).
The EC10 was 18 mg/L (95% confidence interval: 12 - 26 mg/L).
The EC20 was 55 mg/L (95% confidence interval: 41 - 70 mg/L).
The EC50 was 449 mg/L (95% confidence interval: 371 - 557 mg/L).
- Executive summary:
The objective of the study was to evaluate 1,3 -dichloro-2-propanol for its ability to adversely affect aerobic microbial treatment plants and, if possible, to determine the EC50and/or the no - observed effect concentration (NOEC).
The influence of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol on the respiration rate of activated sludge was investigated after a contact time of 3 hours.
The study procedures described in this report were based onthe OECD guideline No. 209, 2010.
The batch of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol tested was a colourless liquid with a purity of 99.2%. No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item. Preparation of the stock solution was performed in the glovebox (nitrogen environment).
The test started with the preparation of a stock solution of 10 g/L. Magnetic stirring was applied to accelerate dissolution and to ensure homogeneity. Volumes ofthe clear and colourlessstock solution corresponding to the test concentration were then added to the test media. Optimal contact between the test item and test medium was ensured by applying continuous aeration and stirring during the 3 hour exposure period. Thereafter, oxygen consumption was recorded for approximately 10 minutes.
The final test was performed based on the result of a preceding combined limit/range-finding test. Seven concentrations were tested, ranging from 1.0 to 1000 mg/L and increasing with a factor 3.2. Five replicates per concentration and six replicates for an untreated control group were tested.
No statistically significant inhibition of the respiration rate of the sludge was recorded at 10 mg 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol per liter. At higher concentrations the inhibitory effect of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol on aerobic waste water (activated sludge) bacteria increased with increasing concentration, ranging from 18% inhibition at 32 mg/L to 67% at 1000 mg/L.
The batch of activated sludge was tested for sensitivity with the reference item
3,5-dichlorophenol, and showed normal sensitivity.The study met the acceptability criteria prescribed by the study plan and was considered valid.
1,3-dichloro-2-propanol was not toxic to waste water (activated sludge) bacteria at a concentration of 10 mg/L (NOEC).
The effect parameters for the inhibition of the respiration rate are presented below.
Parameter
1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
Concentration (mg/L)
NOEC
10
EC10
18 (12 - 26 mg/L)
EC20
55 (41 - 70 mg/L)
EC50
449 (371 - 557 mg/L)
( ) Between brackets the 95% confidence intervals are given.
Reference
Final Test – Overview of the Results
Treatment |
Concentration (mg/L) |
Mean respiration rate |
% Inhibition of the respiration rate (mean value) |
|
(mg O2/L h) |
(mg O2/g h)¹ |
|||
Control |
0 |
51.27 |
34.18 |
|
T1 |
1.0 |
56.00 |
37.33 |
-9.23 |
T2 |
3.2 |
51.30 |
34.20 |
-0.07 |
T3 |
10 |
49.08 |
32.72 |
4.27 |
T4 |
32 |
42.25 |
28.17* |
17.59 |
T5 |
100 |
36.68 |
24.45* |
28.46 |
T6 |
320 |
31.58 |
21.06* |
38.39 |
T7 |
1000 |
17.20 |
11.47* |
66.45 |
¹) The amount of suspended solids in the final test mixture was 1.5 g/L.
* Statistically significantly different compared to control.
Combined Limit/Range-Finding Test – Respiration Rate/Inhibition,
pH Values
Replicate |
Concentration (mg/L) |
pH |
Respiration rate |
% Inhibition respiration rate (mean value) |
||
Start |
End |
(mg O2/L.h) |
(mg O2/g.h)¹ |
|||
C 1 |
0 |
7.4 |
7.0 |
43.79 |
29.19 |
|
C 2 |
0 |
7.4 |
6.7 |
41.36 |
27.57 |
|
C 3 |
0 |
7.4 |
6.7 |
44.29 |
29.53 |
|
C 4 |
0 |
7.4 |
6.6 |
44.16 |
29.44 |
|
C 5 |
0 |
7.4 |
6.7 |
41.40 |
27.60 |
|
C 6 |
0 |
7.4 |
6.4 |
46.34 |
30.89 |
|
C Mean |
|
|
|
43.56 |
29.04 (RC) |
|
SD |
|
|
|
1.91 |
1.27 |
|
CV (%) |
|
|
|
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R 1 |
1.0 |
7.4 |
7.0 |
46.39 |
30.93 |
-6.50 |
R 2 |
3.2 |
7.4 |
7.7 |
30.94 |
20.63 |
28.97 |
R 3 |
10 |
7.4 |
7.8 |
10.72 |
7.15 |
75.39 |
R 4 |
32 |
7.6 |
7.8 |
4.72 |
3.15 |
89.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T 1 |
10 |
7.4 |
7.1 |
37.00 |
24.67 |
15.05 |
T 2 |
100 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
23.22 |
15.48 |
46.69 |
T 3a |
1000 |
7.4 |
7.6 |
15.06 |
10.04 |
65.42 |
T 3b |
1000 |
7.4 |
7.6 |
16.39 |
10.93 |
62.37 |
T 3c |
1000 |
7.4 |
7.6 |
16.75 |
11.17 |
61.54 |
T3 Mean |
|
|
16.07 |
10.71 (RT)* |
63.11 (IT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA |
1000 |
7.4 |
7.3 |
0.20 |
0.13 |
99.54 |
C: Control
R: Reference item, 3,5-dichlorophenol
T: Test item, 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
TA: Abiotic control of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
SD: Standard deviation
CV: Coefficient of variation
RT: Total respiration with 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
RC: Total respiration in the control
IT: % inhibition of total respiration relative to RC
¹ The amount of suspended solids in the final test mixture was 1.5 g/L.
* Statistically significantly different compared to control
Table6
Final Test –Respiration Rate/Inhibition, pH Values
|
Concentration (mg/L) |
pH |
Respiration rate |
% Inhibition respiration rate (mean value) |
||
Start |
End |
(mg O2/L.h) |
(mg O2/g.h)¹ |
|||
C 1 |
0 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
50.55 |
33.70 |
|
C 2 |
0 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
47.62 |
31.75 |
|
C 3 |
0 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
52.01 |
34.67 |
|
C 4 |
0 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
51.97 |
34.65 |
|
C 5 |
0 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
53.50 |
35.67 |
|
C 6 |
0 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
51.94 |
34.63 |
|
C Mean |
|
|
|
51.27 |
34.18 (RC) |
|
SD |
|
|
|
2.01 |
1.34 |
|
CV (%) |
|
|
|
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R 1 |
1.0 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
49.83 |
33.22 |
2.80 |
R 2 |
3.2 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
34.17 |
22.78 |
33.35 |
R 3 |
10 |
7.1 |
8.3 |
16.19 |
10.79 |
68.42 |
R 4 |
32 |
7.2 |
8.4 |
8.88 |
5.92 |
82.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T 1a |
1.0 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
62.43 |
41.62 |
-21.78 |
T 1b |
1.0 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
57.76 |
38.51 |
-12.67 |
T 1c |
1.0 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
55.22 |
36.81 |
-7.71 |
T 1d |
1.0 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
53.11 |
35.41 |
-3.60 |
T 1e |
1.0 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
51.47 |
34.31 |
-0.40 |
T 1 Mean |
|
|
|
56.00 |
37.33 (RT) |
-9.23 (IT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T 2a |
3.2 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
53.09 |
35.39 |
-3.56 |
T 2b |
3.2 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
52.50 |
35.00 |
-2.41 |
T 2c |
3.2 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
51.07 |
34.05 |
0.38 |
T 2d |
3.2 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
49.59 |
33.06 |
3.27 |
T 2e |
3.2 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
50.26 |
33.51 |
1.96 |
T 2 Mean |
|
|
|
51.30 |
34.20 (RT) |
-0.07 (IT) |
C: Control
SD: Standard deviation
CV: Coefficient of variation
R: Reference item, 3,5-dichlorophenol
T: Test item, 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
¹: The amount of suspended solids in the final test mixture was 1.5 g/L
RC: Total respiration in the control
RT: Total respiration with 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
IT: % inhibition of total respiration relative to RC
Final Test –
Respiration Rate/Inhibition, pH Values
Replicate |
Concentration (mg/L) |
pH |
Respiration rate |
% Inhibition respiration rate (mean value) |
||
Start |
End |
(mg O2/L.h) |
(mg O2/g.h)¹ |
|||
T 3a |
10 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
50.87 |
33.91 |
0.77 |
T 3b |
10 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
48.38 |
32.25 |
5.63 |
T 3c |
10 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
57.75 |
38.50 |
-12.65 |
T 3d |
10 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
41.16 |
27.44 |
19.71 |
T 3e |
10 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
47.23 |
31.49 |
7.87 |
T 3 Mean |
|
|
|
49.08 |
32.72 (RT) |
4.27 (IT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T 4a |
32 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
45.14 |
30.09 |
11.95 |
T 4b |
32 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
41.16 |
27.44 |
19.71 |
T 4c |
32 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
43.10 |
28.73 |
15.93 |
T 4d |
32 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
39.36 |
26.24 |
23.22 |
T 4e |
32 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
42.48 |
28.32 |
17.14 |
T 4 Mean |
|
|
|
42.25 |
28.17 (RT)* |
17.59 (IT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T 5a |
100 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
33.69 |
22.46 |
34.28 |
T 5b |
100 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
40.32 |
26.88 |
21.35 |
T 5c |
100 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
39.43 |
26.29 |
23.09 |
T 5d |
100 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
37.21 |
24.81 |
27.42 |
T 5e |
100 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
32.73 |
21.82 |
36.16 |
T 5 Mean |
|
|
|
36.68 |
24.45 (RT)* |
28.46 (IT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T6a |
320 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
33.95 |
22.63 |
33.78 |
T6b |
320 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
31.24 |
20.83 |
39.06 |
T6c |
320 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
29.15 |
19.43 |
43.14 |
T6d |
320 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
32.33 |
21.55 |
36.94 |
T6e |
320 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
31.25 |
20.83 |
39.04 |
T6 Mean |
|
|
|
31.58 |
21.06 (RT)* |
38.39 (IT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T7a |
1000 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
19.99 |
13.33 |
61.01 |
T7b |
1000 |
7.0 |
8.4 |
17.16 |
11.44 |
66.53 |
T7c |
1000 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
15.61 |
10.41 |
69.55 |
T7d |
1000 |
7.0 |
8.4 |
14.89 |
9.93 |
70.95 |
T7e |
1000 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
18.34 |
12.23 |
64.23 |
T7 Mean |
|
|
|
17.20 |
11.47 (RT)* |
66.45 (IT) |
T: Test item, 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
¹: The amount of suspended solids in the final test mixture was 1.5 g/L
RT: Total respiration with 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol
IT: % inhibition of total respiration relative to RC
*: Statistically significantly different compared to control
Description of key information
Under the conditions of this present test 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol was not toxic to waste water bacteria (activated sludge) at or below a concentration of 10 mg/L (NOEC).
The EC10 was 18 mg/L (95% confidence interval: 12 - 26 mg/L).
The EC20 was 55 mg/L (95% confidence interval: 41 - 70 mg/L).
The EC50 was 449 mg/L (95% confidence interval: 371 - 557 mg/L).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for microorganisms:
- 449 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
- 10 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.