Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Oxidising properties

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2010-09-20 to 2010-09-24
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test O.1 (Test for oxidizing solids)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Contact with:
powdered cellulose
Duration of test (contact time):
3 min
Sample tested:
reference: 3:7 mixture potassium bromate + cellulose
Parameter:
mean burning time
Result:
83 s
Sample tested:
reference: 2:3 mixture potassium bromate + cellulose
Parameter:
mean burning time
Result:
56 s
Sample tested:
4:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
Parameter:
mean burning time
Result:
247 s
Sample tested:
1:1 sample-to-cellulose ratio
Parameter:
mean burning time
Result:
222 s

Reference mixtures from Potassium bromate and Cellulose

Potassium bromate – Cellulose

Test 1

Test 2

Test 3

Test 4

Test 5

Average

3:7

83 s

90 s

93 s

86 s

65 s

83 s

2:3

54 s

67 s

51 s

64 s

44 s

56 s

Mixtures from test item and Cellulose

Test item – Cellulose

Test 1

Test 2

Test 3

Test 4

Test 5

Average

4:1

249 s

225 s

254 s

242 s

264 s

247 s

1:1

2469 s

211 s

227 s

212 s

215 s

222 s

In all tests with the test item and Cellulose in the ratio 4:1, the mixture decomposed flameless very slowly over the complete pile. In each case, the power supply was switched off after 3 min.

In all tests with the test item and Cellulose in the ratio 1:1, the mixture decomposed with a light bluish flame very slowly over the complete pile. In each case, the power supply was switched off after 3 min.

The mean burning times of the test item-to-Cellulose ratio 4.1 and 1:1 were significantly greater than the mean burning time of a 3:7 mixture of Potassium bromate and Cellulose.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Read-across from another form of vanadium with a higher oxygen content (i.e. V2O5 with an oxygen content of 44 %) to NaVO3 (oxygen content of 39 %) indicates that NaVO3 does not have any oxidising potential.

GHS and EC 1272/2008 (CLP-Guideline)
Sodium metavanadate does not need to be classified as oxidizing solid according to GHS and EC 1272/2008 (CLP-Guideline) Annex 1: 2.14.

UN-Transport regulations
Sodium metavanadate does not need to be classified as oxidizing solid in Division 5.1 according to the UN-Transport Regulations.

Description of key information

Oxidizing properties are not considered relevant for sodium metavanadate based on chemical structure and oxygen content.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Oxidising properties:
non oxidising

Additional information

In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2008 Annex VII Section 7.13, Column 2, the study does not need to be conducted as NaVO3 does not contain a surplus of oxygen or any structural groups that have a tendency to react exothermally with combustible material (oxygen content is 39 %).

Furthermore, forms of vanadium with a higher oxygen content (i.e. V2O5) are not oxidising according to a study performed in accordance with transport of dangerous goods UN-Test O.I: Read-across from another form of vanadium with a higher oxygen content (i.e. V2O5 with an oxygen content of 44 %) to NaVO3 (oxygen content of 39 %) indicates that NaVO3 does not have any oxidising potential.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Sodium metavanadate does not need to be classified as oxidizing solid according to GHS and EC 1272/2008 (CLP-Guideline) Annex 1: 2.14.

Sodium metavanadate does not need to be classified as oxidizing solid in Division 5.1 according to the UN-Transport Regulations.