Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 240-367-6 | CAS number: 16260-09-6
PBT assessment
Administrative data
PBT assessment: overall result
- PBT status:
- the substance is not PBT / vPvB
- Justification:
8.1.1. PBT/vPvB criteria and justification
8.1.1.1. Assessed substance: Substance itself
8.1.1.1.1. Persistence assessment
Persistence P
According to ready biodegradable studies (Z)-N-octadec-9-enylhexadecan-1-amide (CAS No. 16260-09-6) is not readily biodegradable according to the OECDcriteria (42% (ThO2) after 30 days (OECD 301 D) and 27% (ThO2) after 42 days (DGXI/400/84)). Simulation tests investigating the degradation of the substance in sediment/water and in soil are available.
The degradation of (Z)-N-octadec-9-enylhexadecan-1-amide (CAS No. 16260-09-6) has been investigated in OECD 308. The decline of the test substance in the overall system corresponded to estimated DT50 values of 19.6 days (Calwich Abbey Lake) and 25.2 days (Emperor Lake) with final mineralization range of 42% at 105 days (Calwich Abbey Lake) and 40.6% at 105 days (Emperor Lake).
In OECD 307, the substance degraded slowly in four different soils incubated under aerobic conditions with estimatedDT50 values, for primary degradation, between 226 and 418 days with final mineralization range from 8.5% at 120 days (Kennett soil) to 15.4% at 120 days (South Witham soil).
Based on the data presented above the substance is considered to meet the vP criterion.
Conclusion on P / vP properties: vP (P)
8.1.1.1.2. Bioaccumulation assessment
Evidence of non-B / non-vB properties
Criteria based on Annex XIII of REACH
-Not B / vB based on BMF <= 1 kg/kg: OECD 305, GLP study, dietary exposure
BMF (GLP study, kinetic, corrected for growth) = 0.582 kg food / kg fish
Other evidence of non-B / non-vB properties
Biomagnification of the substance is investigated by an OECD 305 by dietary route. A BMF of 0.582 kg food / kg fish (kinetic, lipid corrected) was determined.
Conclusion on B / vB properties: not B/vB
8.1.1.1.3. Toxicity assessment
Evidence of non-T properties
Criteria based on Annex XIII of REACH
-Not T based on criteria laid down in Annex XIII of REACH:
· All available short-term effect concentrations are > 0.1 mg/L (fish, aquatic invertebrates, algae) and no long-term effects with NOEC or EC10 <0.01 mg/L were determined for the substance. No effect was observed.
· Substance is not classified as carcinogenic (category 1 or 2), mutagenic (category 1 or 2), or toxic for reproduction (category 1, 2 or 3) according to Directive 67/548/EEC (or the DSD) or carcinogenic (category 1A or 1B), germ cell mutagenic (category 1A or 1B), or toxic for reproduction (category 1A, 1B or 2) according to Regulation EC No 1272/2008 (or CLP Regulation) (see also section "3. Classification and labelling"):
Conclusion on T properties: not T
8.1.2. Summary and overall conclusions on PBT or vPvB properties
Overall conclusion:
Based on the assessment described in the subsections above the submission substance is not a PBT / vPvB substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
