Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2009-05-20
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ICCVAM Test Method Evaluation Report: Appendix G, ICCVAM recommended HET-CAM Method Protocol (Nov. 2006)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Background Review Document; „Current Status of In Vitro Test Methods for Identify-ing Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants: Hen’s Egg Test - Chorioallantoic Mem-brane Test Method (March 2006, NIH Publication No. 06-4515)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
not applicable
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,3,12,12-tetramethoxy-2,13-dioxa-7,8-dithia-3,12-disilatetradecane; 5-(7,7-dimethoxy-2-oxo-8-oxa-3-thia-1-aza-7-silanonan-1-yl)-1-[(7,7-dimethoxy-2-oxo-8-oxa-3-thia-1-aza-7-silanonan-1-yl)methyl]-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane; [3-({[(3-isocyanato-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexyl)methyl]carbamoyl}sulfanyl)propyl]trimethoxysilane; [3-({[(5-isocyanato-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexyl)methyl]carbamoyl}sulfanyl)propyl]trimethoxysilane
EC Number:
700-534-0
Cas Number:
117172-56-2
Molecular formula:
Not applicable: UVCB substance, see section 1.2 and 1.4. The UVCB substance consits of differnt products consiting of differnt isomers: Product I and Product II cannot analytically be distinguished and moreover, Product I-III are expected to consist of isomers that can neither analytically be identified nor quantified.
IUPAC Name:
3,3,12,12-tetramethoxy-2,13-dioxa-7,8-dithia-3,12-disilatetradecane; 5-(7,7-dimethoxy-2-oxo-8-oxa-3-thia-1-aza-7-silanonan-1-yl)-1-[(7,7-dimethoxy-2-oxo-8-oxa-3-thia-1-aza-7-silanonan-1-yl)methyl]-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane; [3-({[(3-isocyanato-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexyl)methyl]carbamoyl}sulfanyl)propyl]trimethoxysilane; [3-({[(5-isocyanato-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexyl)methyl]carbamoyl}sulfanyl)propyl]trimethoxysilane
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Reaction products of 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propane-1-thiol and 5-isocyanato-1-(isocyanatomethyl)-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane (1:1)
IUPAC Name:
Reaction products of 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propane-1-thiol and 5-isocyanato-1-(isocyanatomethyl)-1,3,3-trimethylcyclohexane (1:1)
Details on test material:
- Name of test material: Intermediate 36
- Colour: light yellow
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: >99%

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: chicken eggs

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: 3 eggs
Duration of treatment / exposure:
not applicable
Observation period (in vivo):
5 minutes (301 seconds)
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Intermediate 36 was tested using 6 eggs, for each of the 2 positive controls and for the negative control, 3 eggs were used.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Other effects:
not applicable

Any other information on results incl. tables

Experimental Observations

Test Group                      Time until Haemorrhage                     Time until Lysis              Time until Coagulation

seconds                                    seconds                            seconds

Negative Control :                         -                                                -                                      -

Negative Control:                     -                                                - -

Negative Control - - -

Positive Control (0.1 N NaOH) 9, 31, 22

Positive Control (0.1 N NaOH) 8, 33, 19

Positive Control (0.1 N NaOH) 8, 34, 20

Positive Control (1% SDS) 14, 54, -

Positive Control (1% SDS) 12, 58, -

Positive Control (1% SDS) 15, 59, -

Intermediate 36: - - -

Intermediate 36: - - -

Intermediate 36 : - - -

Intermediate 36: - - -

Intermediate 36: - - -

Intermediate 36: - - -

- : no reaction observed after 301 seconds.

The positive controls induced a severe irritation on the blood vessels, the irritation score for the positive controls lay within the demanded range. The negative control showed no irritation. The test item was tested pure. A mean irritation score of 0.0 was calculated, corresponding to a classification as “not irritant”. No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome. The test is considered valid.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other:
Conclusions:
A mean irritation score of 0.0 was calculated, corresponding to a classification as “not irritant”. No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome.
Executive summary:

This in vitro study was performed to assess the irritating potential of Intermediate 36 by detection of damages in blood vessels under the chorionallantoic membrane of incubated chicken eggs (nine days old). Observation time was 5 minutes at room temperature. Physiological sodium chloride solution was used as negative control, sodium dodecyl sulfate (1% solution) and sodium hydroxide (0.1 N solution) were used as positive controls. The positive controls induced a severe irritation on the blood vessels, the irritation score for the positive controls lay within the demanded range. The negative control showed no irritation. The test item was tested pure. A mean irritation score of 0.0 was calculated, correspond-ing to a classification as "not irritant". No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome. The test is considered valid.