Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 252-173-9 | CAS number: 34730-59-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- (2001)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate
- EC Number:
- 252-173-9
- EC Name:
- Sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 34730-59-1
- Molecular formula:
- C4H12N2O3S.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium 2-(2-aminoethylamino)ethanesulfonate
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: Crl:WI(Han) (outbred, SPF-Quality)
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at delivery: 10-14 weeks
- Housing: individually in Makrolon cages (MIII type) on sterilized sawdust as bedding material.
- Diet and water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days prior to treatment
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 - 24°C
- Humidity (%): approximately 40-70 %
- Air changes (per hr): > 10 per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Remarks:
- (Elix, Milipore)
- Details on exposure:
- Administration volume: 10 mL/kg bw; actual dose volumes were calculated according to the latest body weight;
Appearance of formulations: clear solutions
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Formulations (w/w) were prepared daily within 5 hours prior to dosing and were homogenized to a visually acceptable level. Adjustment was made for density of the test substance. Correction was made for the purity/composition of the test substance. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Accuracy of dose formulations, homogeneity and stability of the test substance in formulations were confirmed.
No test substance was detected in the Group 1 formulations (control group). The concentrations analysed in the formulations of Groups 2, 3, and 4 were in agreement with the target concentrations (i.e. mean accuracies between 90% and 110%).
The formulations of Group 2 and Group 4 were homogeneous (i.e. coefficient of variation ≤ 10%).
Formulations at the entire range were stable when stored at room temperature under normal laboratory light conditions for at least 5 hours (i.e. relative difference ≤ 10%). The long term storage samples were stable at ≤-70°C for at least 23 days. - Details on mating procedure:
- Untreated females were mated at the Supplier, and were at Day 0 or 1 post-coitum on arrival at the Test Facility (Day 0 post-coitum is the day of
successful mating; confirmed by vaginal plug). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Days 6 - 20 p. c., inclusive
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily for 7 days per week, approximately the same time each day with a maximum of 6 hours difference between the earliest and latest
dose. - Duration of test:
- from day 0 or day 1 post-coitum to necropsy at day 21 p.c.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100, 300, 1000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 22 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: In order to set the dose levels for the main teratology study, a non-GLP dose range finding study was performed. Four groups of 6 females were exposed to 200, 500, or 1000 mg/kg bw/day for Days 6 to 20 post-coitum inclusive by oral gavage. These dose levels were based on a 28-day oral toxicity study (OECD 407) with AAS-Solution in which male and female rats received the test substance by oral gavage at dose levels of 0, 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day. In this study no toxicologically significant effects were noted up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Thus, the NOAEL for repeated dose toxicity was determined with 1000 mg/kg bw, corresponding to 2050 mg active ingredient/kg bw.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: At least once daily from Day 2 post-coitum onwards up to the day prior to necropsy.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Days 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21 post-coitum.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Days 2-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-15, 15-18 and 18-21 post-coitum.
WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Subjective appraisal was maintained during the study, but no quantitative investigation was introduced as no treatment related effect was suspected.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 21 with subsequently exsanguinated and subjected to an external, thoracic and abdominal examination, with special attention being paid to the reproductive organs. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- Each ovary and uterine horn of animals surviving to planned necropsy was dissected and examined as quickly as possible to determine:
- The number of corpora lutea.
- The weight of the (gravid) uterus.
- The number and distribution of live and dead fetuses.
- The number and distribution of embryo-fetal deaths (early and late resorptions).
- The weight of each fetus.
- The sex of each fetus from the ano-genital distance (during necropsy) and also from gonadal
inspections (during further fetal examination).
- Externally visible macroscopic fetal abnormalities. - Fetal examinations:
- External, visceral, and skeletal findings were recorded as developmental variations (alterations in anatomic structure that are considered to have no significant biological effect on animal health or body conformity and/or represent slight deviations from normal) or malformations (those structural
anomalies that alter general body conformity, disrupt or interfere with normal body function, or may be incompatible with life).
External:
Each viable fetus was examined in detail, weighed and sexed. All live fetuses were euthanized by administration of approximately 0.05 mL (=10mg) of sodium pentobarbital into the oral cavity using a small flexible plastic or metal feeding tube.
For late resorptions a gross external examination performed and thereafter resorptions were discarded.
Visceral (Internal):
Approximately one-half of the fetuses (live and dead) in each litter (all groups)were examined for visceral anomalies by dissection in the fresh (non-fixed) state. The thoracic and abdominal cavities were opened and dissected. This examination included the heart and major vessels. Fetal kidneys were examined and graded for renal papillae development. The sex of all fetuses was confirmed by internal examination.
The heads were removed from these fetuses and placed in Bouin's solution. Tissues were then transferred to a 70% aqueous ethanol solution for subsequent processing and soft-tissue examination of all groups using the Wilson sectioning technique. After examination, the tissues were stored in 10% buffered formalin. Any remaining tissues (from the fetuses used for fresh visceral examination) was discarded. The carcasses were processed and stained with Alizarin Red S (as described below), but not examined in first instance.
Skeletal:
From the other one-half of the fetuses (live and dead) in each litter (all groups), the sex was confirmed by internal examination. All fetuses were eviscerated, fixed in 96% aqueous ethanol, macerated in potassium hydroxide and stained with Alizarin Red S. Skeletal examination was done for one-half of the fetuses (i.e. the fetuses with heads). The specimens were archived in glycerin with bronopol as preservative. A few bones were not available for skeletal examination because they were accidentally damaged or lost during processing. The missing bones were listed in the raw data; evaluation by the fetal pathologist and study director determined there was no influence on the outcome of the individual or overall skeletal examinations, or on the integrity of the study as a whole. - Statistics:
- The following statistical methods were used to analyze the data:
- If the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution, the Dunnett-test (many-to one t-test) based on a pooled variance estimate was applied for the comparison of the treated groups and the control group.
- The Steel-test (many-to-one rank test) was applied if the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
- The Fisher Exact-test was applied to frequency data.
- The Mann Whitney test was used to compare mean litter proportions (percent of litter) of the number of viable and dead fetuses, early and late resorptions, total resorptions, pre- and postimplantation loss, and sex distribution.
- Mean litter proportions (percent per litter) of total fetal malformations and developmental variations (external, visceral and skeletal), and each particular external, visceral and skeletal malformation or variation were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA test to determine intergroup differences. If the ANOVA revealed statistically significant (p<0.05) intergroup variance, Dunn’s test was used to compare the compound-treated groups to the control group.
All tests were two-sided and in all cases p < 0.05 was accepted as the lowest level of significance.
Group means were calculated for continuous data and medians were calculated for discrete data (scores) in the summary tables. Test statistics were calculated on the basis of exact values for means and pooled variances. Individual values, means and standard deviations might be rounded off before printing. Therefore, two groups might display the same printed means for a given parameter, yet display different test statistics values.
No statistics were applied for data on maternal survival, pregnancy status, group mean numbers of dead fetuses, early and late resorptions, and pre- and post-implantation loss. - Indices:
- For each litter the following calculations were performed:
Percent Pre-implantation loss, percent Post-implantation loss
The fetal developmental findings were summarized by: 1) presenting the incidence of a given finding both as the number of fetuses and the number of litters available for examination in the group; and 2) considering the litter as the basic unit for comparison, calculating the number of affected fetuses as a
mean litter proportion on a total group basis, i.e. percent Viable fetuses affected/litter
The following definitions were applicable for implantation data:
- Fetal (late) resorptions were defined as a dead fetus with external degenerative changes and presence of distinguishable features such as head or limbs.
- Embryonic (early) resorptions were defined as evidence of implantation without presence of distinguishable features such as head or limbs.
- Dead fetus was defined as a non-viable fetus without external degenerative changes and presence of distinguishable features such as head or limbs.
- Post-implantation loss included embryonic (early) resorptions and fetal (late) resorptions.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
No treatment related clinical signs were observed the animals at any of the dose levels 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day or vehicle controls.
Body weights and food consumption was unaffected by treatment.
All females, except two females treated at 300 mg/kg bw/day, at scheduled necropsy were pregnant and had litters with viable fetuses.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
There were no treatment related effects on litter size, sex ratio, fetal body weights, fetal morphological examination, fetal external, visceral and sceletal morphology.
Skeletal malformations occurred in two fetuses from Group 3 and three control fetuses and not in fetuses from the low and high dose groups. The malformations noted in Group 3 fetuses were vertebral anomaly with or without associated rib anomaly (fetus A063-03) and vertebral centra anomaly (fetus A059-10). Because these malformations occurred singly in Group 3, they were not considered to be treatment related. Besides, there were two control fetuses with a vertebral anomaly with or without associated rib anomaly, namely fetus A002-02 and A015-01. The first one (no. A002 - 02, which had exencephaly and open eye externally) had bent scapulae as well. The third skeletally malformed control fetus (no. A007-09) had a skull anomaly.
Skeletal variations were observed for 76.4%, 74.3%, 76.3% and 76.8% of fetuses per litter in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The variations noted were not considered treatment related as they occurred in the absence of a dose-related incidence and/or occurred infrequently.
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Executive summary:
In a prenatal developmental toxicity study performed according to OECD TG 414 mated female Wistar rats were assigned to four dose groups, each containing twenty-two animals. The test item was administered once daily by gavage from Day 6 to 20 post-coitum at doses of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The rats of the control group received the vehicle, water, alone.
No maternal toxicity and no treatment-related effects on the fetal development were observed in all treatment groups. In detail, litter size, sex-ratio, fetal body weight, and fetal morphological examinations (external, visceral and skeletal) were not affected by the treatment. In conclusion, based on the results of this prenatal developmental toxicity study the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for maternal and developmental effects of the test item was established as being 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.