Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-224-3 | CAS number: 79-77-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, BASF AG
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (E)-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-buten-2-one
- EC Number:
- 201-224-3
- EC Name:
- (E)-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-buten-2-one
- Cas Number:
- 79-77-6
- Molecular formula:
- C13H20O
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-en-1-yl)but-3-en-2-one
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): lonon R
- Test substance No.: 02/0449-1
- Physical state: liquid / colorless - yellowish
- Analytical purity: 97.8% (Analytical Report: 02L00370)
- Lot/batch No.: continuous production
- Date of production: October 09, 2002
- Stability under test conditions: under storage conditions was confirmed by reanalysis (Analytical Report 03L00294)
- Storage condition of test material: Refrigerator, protected from light
- Other: Analytical laboratory: Analytical Department, BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen/Rhein, Germany
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: Time-mated Wistar rats (CrIGIxBrIHan:WI)
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Germany
- Animal identification: by ear tattoo
- Age at study initiation: 70 - 84 days
- Weight at study initiation: 148 .0 - 183.6 g
- Housing: singly from day 0 - 20 p .c. in type DK III stainless steel wire mesh cages supplied by BECKER & CO., Castrop-Rauxel, FRG (height : 15 cm, length: 37,5 cm, width: 21 cm; floor area about 800 cm2)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, ground Kliba maintenance diet rat/mouse/hamster meal (PROVIMI KLIBA SA, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, drinking water of tap water quality from water bottles
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24°
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
ANALYSES
- Food: assayed for chemical as well as for microbiological contaminants
- Water: regularly assayed for chemical contaminants by the municipal authorities of Frankenthal and by Technical Services of BASF Aktiengesellschaft as well as for the presence of microorganisms by a contract laboratory
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency):prepared at the beginning of the administration period and thereafter at intervals, which took into account the analytical results of the stability verification .
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): weighed in a graduated beaker (depending on the dose group), topped up with olive oil Ph .Eur./DAB, and subsequently thoroughly mixed using a magnetic stirrer.
VEHICLE
- Lot/batch no. (if required): Ph .Eur./DAB
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 ml/kg bw olive oil
- Concentration in vehicle: 500, 2000 and 8000 mg/100 ml - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples of the test substance solutions were sent to the analytical laboratory twice during the study period (at the beginning and towards the end) for verification of the concentrations.
Since the test substance preparations were true solutions, investigations concerning homogeneity were not necessary . - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: purchased timed pregnant:
The animals were mated by the breeder ("time-mated") and supplied on day 0 post coitum (= detection of vaginal plug / sperm). The animals arrived on the same day (i.e. day 0 p.c.) at the experimental laboratory. The following day was designed "day 1" post coitum (p.c.). Animals were assigned to the test groups by taken random selection. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- day 6 through day 19 post coitum (p.c)
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Duration of test:
- On day 20 p.c., all surviving females were sacrificed
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
25, 100, and 400 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The following doses were chosen for the present full-scale toxicity study in Wistar rats. The oral route was selected since this has proven to be suitable for the detection of a toxicological hazard.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes, check for mortality
- Time schedule: twice a day on working days or once a day (Saturday, Sunday or on public holidays) (days 0- 20 p .c.).
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: at least once a day, or more often when clinical signs of toxicity were elicited (days 0- 20 p .c.).
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: on days 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 19 and 20 p.c.
The body weight change of the animals was calculated from these results
CORRECTED BODY WEIGHT GAIN (net maternal body weight change): Yes
- Time schedule: calculated after terminal sacrifice (terminal body weight on day 20 p.c. minus weight of the unopened uterus minus body weight on day 6 p.c.)
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Time schedule: With the exception of day 0, the consumption of food was determined on the same days as was body weight
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day # 20
- Organs examined: liver, uterus, ovaries - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: dead fetuses
- Other: calculations of conception rate and pre- and postimplantation losses - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes:half per litter per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: all per litter - Statistics:
- - two-sided Dunetts: Food consumption, body weight, body weight changes, corrected body weight gain (net maternal body weight change), carcass weight, weight of unopened uterus, number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, number of resorptions, number of live fetuses, proportion of preimplantation loss, proportions of postimplantation loss, proportions of resorptions, proportion of live fetuses in each litter, litter mean fetal body weight, litter mean placental weight
- two-sided Kruskal-Wallis test: liver weights
one-sided Fisher's Exact test: female mortality, females pregnant at terminal sacrifice, number of litters with fetal findings
- one-sided Wilcoxon test: proportions of fetuses with malformations, variations and/or unclassified observations in each litter - Historical control data:
- The historical control data used for interpretation of findings refer to the same test facility, the same rat strain and supplier of the animals and cover a period of about 24 months (June 2001 - June 2003, 15 studies)
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 400 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 400 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Result: no influence on gestational parameters, no adverse signs of developmental toxicity, no indications of teratogenic effects
TEST SUBSTANCE ANALYSES
The stability of the test substance suspensions over a period of 4 days (at 4°C) and the correct concentration of the test substance in the test preparation was demonstrated (always above 90% and below 110% of nominal concentrations).
MATERNAL TOXIC EFFECTS BY DOSE LEVEL
- Mortality and day of death: There were no substance-related or spontaneous mortalities in any of the groups.
- Clinical examinations: Each test group including the controls contained a sufficient number of females with implantation sites at necropsy (20 or more).
Clinical symptoms: All high dose and the majority (22 out of 25) of the mid dose animals showed transient salivation immediately after treatment on one or several days of the treatment period; however, the observed salivation persisted in the respective females only for a few minutes after the actual gavaging had taken place. After cessation of treatment on day 19 p.c., salivation did not occur any longer. The observed temporary salivation of the animals was considered to be substance-induced. It is very likely, that this finding was induced by bad taste of the test substance or local affection of the upper digestive tract. Salivation itself is not assessed as an adverse or toxic effect.
Additionally, 21 high dose dams showed dark-yellow discolored urine on gestation days 12 - 20 p.c. which is probably related to a chemical reaction of the test substance or its metabolites with the bedding or with components of the air and does not represent a toxicologically relevant finding. Comparable urine findings have been observed in a 4-week range finding study in Wistar rats with dietary administration of the test substance, Project No.: 30S0449/02045 (BASF AG, 2003).
No indications for disturbances of the general behavior, however, occurred in the control and low dose dams.
- Food consumption: The mean food consumption of the high dose dams was statistically significantly reduced (9% below the concurrent control value) at initiation of treatment (days 6 - 8 p.c.). On the following days of the treatment period, however, food consumption of the high dose rats reached or even exceeded control values. The food consumption of the females of low and mid dose dams was unaffected and did not show any statistically significant or biologically relevant differences in comparison to the controls.
The transient reductions in food consumption at 400 mg/kg bw were accompanied by corresponding impairments in body weight gain of these dams at initiation of dosing.
- Body weight data: The mean body weights of the low, mid and high dose rats were substantially similar to the concurrent control values.
A statistically significant impairment in mean body weight gain (about 29% below the concurrent control value) occurred in high dose group on treatment days 8 - 10 p.c.; on the other treatment days (i.e. days 6 - 8 and 10 - 19 p.c.) weight gains of the 400 mg/kg bw females were sometimes below and sometimes above those of the corresponding controls without attaining statistical significance. As the food consumption of these rats was also transiently diminished and the corrected body weight gain was also slightly decreased this was considered to be a substance-related sign of maternal toxicity.
Body weight gains of the dams at 25 and 100 mg/kg bw/day) were similar to those of the concurrent controls.
- Corrected body weight gain (net maternal body weight change): The corrected body weight gains (terminal body weight on day 20 p.c. minus weight of the unopened uterus minus body weight on day 6 p.c.) of the dams of the low and mid dose groups revealed no differences of any biological relevance to the corresponding control group. The net weight change of the 400 mg/kg bw rats, however, was about 17% below the concurrent control value (not statistically significant). As food consumption and body weight gain of this group was also temporarily diminished, the effects on net body weight gain at the top dose are considered to be substance-related, borderline signs of maternal toxicity.
EXAMINATION OF THE DAMS AT TERMINATION
- Uterus weight: The mean gravid uterus weights of the animals of all test groups were not influenced by the administration of the test substance.
- Liver weight: Absolute and relative mean liver weights were statistically significantly increased at the mid and high dose groups and were about 9 or 29% (absolute) and 8 or 29% (relative) above control values. These weight increases, which are considered to be substance-induced, are indicative of hepatic changes primarily caused by microsomal enzyme induction. Absolute and relative liver weights of the low dose dams, however, were similar to the control values and did not show any toxicologically significant changes.
- Necropsy findings: There occurred no substance-related observations at necropsy in any of the dams of all test groups. Only very few spontaneous findings were recorded for single low and mid dose rats (one hydrometra in low dose female which consequently did not become pregnant, hemorrhagic thymus in one mid dose female). No association to the test compound was assumed for these findings due to their scattered occurrence without any relation to dosing.
- Reproduction data of dams: The conception rate reached 96% in the controls, 92% in the low and the high dose groups, and 100% in the mid dose. There were no substance-related and/or biologically relevant differences between the test groups in the conception rate, in the mean number of corpora lutea and implantation sites, the pre- and the postimplantation losses, and the number of resorptions and viable fetuses (see table below). The pre- and the postimplantation loss values in the 25 and 100 mg/kg groups, however, were above the upper ranges of the historical control values and the mean number of live fetuses/low dose dam was statistically significantly below the concurrent and the historical control value. These differences appeared without any dose-response relationship and thus are not considered to reflect any substance-induced effect. They can well be explained by the fact that one low dose dam and two mid dose dams resorbed all of their implants and thus had no viable fetuses (the same was also observed for one control dam). Moreover, one low dose, which had 7 implantation sites, resorbed 6 implants and had only one live fetus at terminal sacrifice. If these 5 rats are excluded from the calculation of the means, pre- and postimplantation loss values as well as the mean number of live fetuses/dam fit well into the historical control ranges with one unimportant exception (preimplantation loss value at 25 mg/kg bw/day).
Table: Pre- and postimplantation loss (PRI and POI) values and mean number of live fetuses per dam
Dose Control Low Mid High Historical
dose control range
PRI 6.0 14.4 12.7 4.7 8.7 (3.5-12.2)
Corrected 4.8 12.9* 8.7 4.7
POI 9.9 14.8 15.2 6.2 6.7 (3.7-11.3)
Corrected 6.0 7.3 7.9 6.2
Live fetuses 8.7 7.4* 8.2 8.6 8.8 (7.9-9.8)
per dam
Corrected 8.7 7.7 8.2 8.6
Corrected: exclusion of 5 dams, * P < = 0.05
EXAMINATION OF FETUSES
- Sex distribution of fetuses: The sex distribution of the fetuses in all test groups was comparable with that of the control fetuses.
- Weight of placentae: The mean placental weights in the substance-treated groups did not show any differences with toxicological relevance. The statistically significant increase of the mean placental weight of the high dose male fetuses (0.45g versus 0.41g in the control group; p <= 0.05) is not considered to demonstrate an adverse finding and the respective value was fully within the historical control range (0.32g-0.58g).
- Weight of fetuses: The mean fetal body weights in all test groups were not influenced by the test substance administration and were very similar to or even identical with concurrent control values.
- Fetal external, soft tissue and skeletal observations:
The scattered occurrence of the few observed external, soft tissue and skeletal malformations in single fetuses of the controls, the low and mid dose group without a consistent pattern, without any dose-response relationship and/or at incidences, which are similar to historical control rates did not suggest any substance-induced origin of these findings. Most of the observed malformations were limited to one multiply malformed mid dose fetus. The external examination of this fetus revealed gastroschisis, anal atresia, malrotated left hindlimb, and a thread-like tail. During its skeletal evaluation additional malformations like severely malformed sternum and absent vertebrae were recorded. The other malformations that occurred were anasarca (in one control fetus), situs inversus (in one low dose fetus), and cleft sternum (in another control fetus).
If all different types of malformations are summarized, in total 2 of the 200 examined control fetuses [= 1.0%] in 2 out of 23 litters [= 8.7%], one of the 163 examined low dose fetuses [= 0.6%] in one out of 22 litters [= 4.5%], one of the 189 examined mid dose fetuses [= 0.5%] in one out of 23 litters [= 4.3%] and none of the 197 examined high dose fetuses (from 23 litters) showed malformations. The mean percentages of affected fetuses/litter with total malformations amounted to 0.8, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.0% at 0; 25; 100 or 400 mg/kg bw/day respectively. These low, non dose-related incidences did not suggest any relationship to the test substance.
External variations did not occur in any of the fetuses in this study. Soft tissue variations, exclusively in the form of dilated renal pelvis and/or ureters, and a broad range of skeletal variations occurred in all test groups including the controls. All fetal and litter incidences for these variations and the corresponding mean percentages of affected fetuses/litter did not show a clear relation to dosing, were not considered to be of any toxicological relevance and/or could be found at a comparable frequency in the historical control data. This statement included the statistically significantly increased occurrence of three variations (i.e. supraoccipital holes, bipartite ossification of thoracic centrum [with dumbbell-shaped cartilage of centrum] and supernumerary 14th rib [without cartilage]) at the mid dose group.
If all variations were summarized, in total 105 of the 200 examined control fetuses [= 53%] in all 23 litters [= 100%], 88 of the 163 examined low dose fetuses [= 54%] in all 22 litters [= 100%], 99 of the 189 examined mid dose fetuses [= 52%] in all 23 litters [= 100%] and 97 of the 197 examined high dose fetuses [= 49%] in all 23 litters [= 100%] showed variations. The mean percentages of affected fetuses/litter with total variations amounted to 52.8, 56.2, 52.9, and 50.8% at 0; 25, 100 or 400 mg/kg bw/day respectively. These incidences did not suggest a treatment-relationship, but reflect the usual biological variation inherent in the strain of rats used for this experiment.
A spontaneous origin was also assumed for the few unclassified cartilage observations which were recorded for several fetuses of all test groups. Distribution and type of these findings do not suggest any relation to treatment as the mean percentages of affected fetuses/litter with these findings amounted to 17.0, 18.5, 15.4, and 13.6% at 0; 25; 100 or 400 mg/kg bw/day, respectively.
The following substance-related findings were obtained:
Test group 3 (400 mg/kg body weight/day):
• transient salivation in all rats immediately after gavaging on days 6 - 19 p.c.
• discolored urine in a total of 21 out of 25 dams (days 12 - 20 p.c.)
• statistically significantly reduced food consumption on days 6 - 8 p.c. (about 9% below controls)
• statistically significant impairments in absolute body weight gain on days 8 -10 p.c.(about 29% below controls)
• lower corrected body weight gain (about 17% below controls) without attaining statistical significance
• statistically significantly increased absolute and relative liver weights (about 29% above controls)
• no substance-related effects on gestational parameters or fetuses
Test group 2 (100 mg/kg body weight/day):
• transient salivation in 22 out of 25 rats immediately after gavaging between treatment days 10 - 19 p.c.
• statistically significantly increased absolute and relative liver weights (about 8 or 9% above controls)
• no substance-related effects on gestational parameters or fetuses
Test group 1 (25 mg/kg body weight/day):
• no substance-related adverse effects on dams, gestational parameters or fetuses
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.