Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 938-677-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 3 December 1993 - 17 December 1993
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: A GLP study performed to a standardised guideline with a sufficient level of detail to assess the quality of the submitted data.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 994
- Report date:
- 1994
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- This study was performed before using a strain capable of detecting cross-linking became standard for the bacterial reverse mutation method. This is not considered to affect the reliability of the study and the results are considered to be accurate and valid. Additionally the substance is not associated with mutagenic effects as observed in other in vitro tests.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Potassium Zirconium Carbonate
- IUPAC Name:
- Potassium Zirconium Carbonate
- Test material form:
- not specified
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine operon
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: ues
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
- Additional information on strains used:
The strain used were obtained in 1976 from Professor B N Ames, Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, and stored in liquid nitrogen since that time until used.
All these strains contain mutations in the histidine operon, thereby imposing a requirement for histidine in the growth medium. Three mutations in the histidine operon are involved:
his G 46 in TA 1535 and TA 100
his C 3076 in TA 1537
his D 3052 in TA 1538 and TA 98
his G 46 is a mis-sense mutation which is reverted to prototrophy by a variety of mutagens that cause base-pair substitutions.
his C 3076 contains a frameshift mutation which appears to have added a -G- -C- base-pair resulting in -GGGG- -CCCC-. This mutation is reverted by 9-aminoacridine, ICR-191 and epoxides of polycyclic hydrocarbons.
his D 3052 also contains a frameshift mutation with the sequence -CGCGCG- -GCGCGC- which is reverted with the deletion of 2 base-pairs -CG- -GC-. It is readily reverted by aromatic amines and derivatives.
All 5 strains contain the deep rough (rfa) mutation, which deletes the polysaccharide side chain of the lipopolysaccharide coat of the bacterial cell surface. This deletion increases cell permeability to more hydrophobic substances and, furthermore, greatly decreases the pathogenicity of these organisms.
The second deletion, through uvrB, renders the organisms incapable of DNA excision repair and thus more susceptible to mutagenicity. These 2 deletions include the nitrate reductase (chi) and biotin (bio) genes also.
Differences between TA 1535 and TA 1538, on the one hand, and the corresponding TA 100 and TA 98 strains, on the other hand, are due to a plasmid the latter pair contains. A plasmid, R-Utrecht (pKM101), was originally shown to increase the sensitivity of the his G 46 mutation in S. typhimurium to methyl methanesulphonate and trimethyl phosphate. The particular R-factor in TA 100 and TA 98 (pKM101) carries resistance to ampicillin. It is not yet clear why the presence of this particular R-factor should increase the sensitivity of strains TA 1535 and TA 1538 to the mutagenicity of certain chemicals. The involvement of an error-prone repair mechanism has been postulated.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 10000 µg per plate.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Sterile ultra-pure water was included as the vehicle control.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Preparation of Bacteria
Samples of each strain were grown by culturing for 16 h at 37°C in nutrient broth (25 g Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2./litre). These cultures were kept for up to 2 days at +4°C to allow relevant checks to be performed but fresh cultures were used for the experiments.
Preparation of the Assay Plates
Diluted agar (0.6% Difco Bacto-agar, 0.6% NaCl) was autoclaved and, just before use, 5 ml of sterile 1.0 mM L-histidine.HCl, 1.0 mM biotin solution was added to each 100 ml of soft agar and thoroughly mixed. This molten agar, maintained in a water bath at 45°C, was dispensed in 2 ml volumes into small sterile tubes to which were added in order:
0.5 ml S9 mix or 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4
0.1 ml bacteria (ca 2 x 10^9 cells/ml)
0.1 ml solvent or test solution
The tube contents, which were continually cooling, were mixed and then poured in minimal medium plates prepared in-house. These plates contained 25 ml of 1.5% BBL purified agar in Vogel-Bonner Medium E (Vogel et al (1956)) with 2% glucose. When the soft agar had set, the plates were inverted and incubated at 37°C for 2 days whereupon colonies were counted using a Biotran III automated counter (New Brunswick Incorporated, NJ, USA) at maximum sensitivity ie colonies of 0.1 mm or more in diameter counted. The plates were also examined for precipitates and, microscopically, for microcolony growth.
Toxicity Test
A toxicity test using strain TA 100 only was performed in the presence and absence of S9 mix to establish suitable dose levels for the mutation tests. One plate of each of the following concentrations of the test material was used:
33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 10000 µg per plate.
Mutation Tests
Two independent mutation tests were conducted using 5 bacterial strains (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100). The dose levels used in both of these experiments and selected on the basis of the results of the toxicity test, were 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 10000 µg per plate.
Triplicate plates were prepared for each bacterial strain and dose level in both the presence and absence of S9 mix.
Quality Control
At the times that the experiments were conducted, each strain was tested for its resistance to ampicillin (indicating the presence of pKM101) and sensitivity to ultraviolet (u.v.) light and crystal violet (indicating persistence of the uvrB and rfa mutations). In addition, the following control groups were established, triplicate plates being poured for each mean datum point.
1. Sterile ultra-pure water, 0.1 ml per plate, used as the test compound vehicle, in both the presence and the absence of S9 mix.
2. With S9 Mix:
2-Aminoanthracene (2-AAN), 2 µg per plate with TA 1535 and TA 1537 and 0.5 µg per plate with TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100, used to demonstrate activity of the S9 mix and the mutability of the bacteria.
3. Without S9 Mix:
Sodium azide (NaN3), 1 µg per plate, with TA 1535 and TA 100; 2-nitrofluorene (2-NF), 1 µg per plate, with TA 1538 and TA 98; 9-aminoacridine (9-AA), 80 µg per plate, with TA 1537. These substances served as an aid to strain identification and to demonstrate the mutability of the bacteria. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test was considered acceptable if for each strain:
i) the bacteria demonstrated their typical responses to crystal violet, ampicillin and u.v. light.
ii) at least 2 of the vehicle control plates were within the following ranges: TA 1535, 4-30; TA 1537, 1-20; TA 98, 10-60; TA 100, 60-200 and TA 1538, 5-35.
iii) on at least 2 of the positive control plates there were x 2 the mean vehicle control mutant numbers per plate, or in the case of TA 100, x 1.5 the mean vehicle control mutant numbers per plate.
If the mean colony count on the vehicle control plates was less than 10 then a value of 10 was assumed for assessment purposes. In such cases a minimum count of 20 was required on at least 2 of the positive control plates.
iv) no toxicity or contamination was observed in at least 4 dose levels.
v) in cases where a mutagenic response was observed, that no more than one dose level was discarded before the dose which gave the highest significant mean colony number.
Where these criteria were met, a significant mutagenic response was recorded if there was:
i) for S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538 and TA 98, at least a doubling of the mean concurrent vehicle control values at some concentration of the test substances and, for S. typhimurium strain TA 100, a 1.5-fold increase over the control value. If the mean colony count on the vehicle control plates was less than 10 then a value of 10 was assumed for assessment purposes. In such cases a minimum count of 20 was required before a significant mutagenic response was identified.
ii) a dose related response, although at high dose levels this relationship could be inverted because of, for example, (1) toxicity to the bacteria generally, (2) specific toxicity to the mutants and (3) inhibition of foreign compound metabolising enzymes where mutagens require metabolic activation by the liver.
iii) a reproducible effect in independent tests.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Toxicity Test
No toxicity to the bacteria was observed and there was no precipitation of the test material.
Quality Control
All strains of S. typhimurium were sensitive to crystal violet, whereas only the plasmid-containing strains, TA 98 and TA 100, were resistant to ampicillin. The strains were also tested for sensitivity to u.v. light emitted over a period of 10 s from a CAMAG u.v. lamp set at 254 nm. Increased sensitivity to u.v. light was demonstrated. These results are consistent with the known properties of these bacteria.
Vehicle Control Groups
The vehicle control values were within the normal ranges experienced in this laboratory and reported in the literature with these strains of S. typhimurium.
Positive Control Groups
The results obtained in the positive control groups were within the normal ranges expected for each bacterial strain and activation condition.
Test Rejection
All tests were acceptable according to the study criteria.
Test Material Results
The results obtained in both experiments were very similar.
No mutagenic activity was observed in any of the 5 bacterial strains, in any condition.
There was no toxicity to the bacteria and no precipitation of the test material occurred. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
It was concluded that the test material was not mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium when tested in sterile ultra-pure water up to a predetermined maximum limit. - Executive summary:
The test material was tested for mutagenic activity in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 at concentrations ranging from 33 to 10000 µg per plate according to OECD test Method 471.
The tests were conducted on agar plates in the presence and absence of an Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver preparation and co-factors (S9 mix) required for mixed-function oxidase activity.
Concurrent positive controls demonstrated the sensitivity of the assay and the metabolising activity of the S9 mix.
No mutagenic activity was observed in any of the 5 bacterial strains used, in any condition.
There was no toxicity to the bacteria and no precipitation of the test material was observed.
It was concluded that the test material was not mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium when tested in sterile ultra-pure water up to a predetermined maximum limit.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.