Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-334-2 | CAS number: 10124-43-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral toxicity:
LD50(rat)= 768 mg cobalt sulfate heptahydrate/kg bw
Acute dermal toxicity:
Conduct of an acute dermal toxicity study for cobalt sulfate is unjustified since dermal uptake is considered negligible.
Acute inhalation toxicity:
Conduct of an acute inhalation toxicity study is technically not feasible, since a stable inhalation atmosphere cannot be generated with cobalt sulfate.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Spanish article translated into english. - The stability of the test item was missing. - According to the guideline, at least 5 rodents of the same sex should be used at each dose level and later at least one group of the other sex should be tested to establish that animals of this sex are not markedly more sensitive to the test substance. In the publication it was not clear how many animals were used at each dose level and it was also not clear how many males and females were used at the different dose levels. - Observation period was only 7 days instead of the recommended 14 days by the guideline. In the publication it was stated that animals rarely died after 48 hours, but it was not clear at which time point for certain animals did not die anymore. According to the guideline, the time of death should be recorded as precisely as possible. In addition, it was not mentioned how many animals showed signs of toxicity. - According to the guideline, the animals should be weighed, but nothing was stated about weighing the animals. - According to the guideline, clinical examination should be made at certain time intervals. In the publication was nothing stated about the time points at which observations were made. - According to the guideline, animals which die during the test are necropsied, and at the conclusion of the test the surviving animals are sacrificed and necropsied. In the publication it was only stated that surviving animals were sacrificed after 7 days. - According to the guideline, the volume administered to rodents should not exceed 1 ml/100g body weight, except in the cases of aqueous solutions where 2 ml/ 100 g may be used. Variability in the test volume should be minimised by adjusting the concentration to ensure a constant volume at all dose levels. There was no indication on what volume was administered to the rats and if it was at a constant volume.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , see "rational for reliability
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: Mean weight 192.5 +/- 22.3 g
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water:ad libitum
- Fasting period before study: Fasted for 24 hours before administration
No further information on the test animals was stated. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- Rationale for the selection of the dose levels: They chose the dose levels based on pre-tests with a small number of rats. It was tested at which dose no deaths occurred and at which dose all test animals died.
No further information on the oral exposure was stated. - Doses:
- 1000 mg/kh, 1110 mg/kg, 1232 mg/kg, 1368 mg/kg, 1520 mg/kg, 1685 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 8 or 10 animals (It was not clearly stated in the publication how many males and females were used per dose and if the genders were equally distributed.)
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 7 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: No data
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes
No further information on the study design was stated. - Statistics:
- Method for determination of LD50, and confidence limit according to Litchfield and Wilcoxon (1949).
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 1 330 mg/kg bw
- 95% CL:
- >= 1 220 - <= 1 450
- Mortality:
- Death occurred in 95 % of animals within the first 24 hours after administration. Most animals even died within the first 6 hours. Rats rarely died after 48 hours.
The following percentage of animals died at the different dose levels:
1000 mg/kg: 0 %
1110 mg/kg: 10 %
1232 mg/kg: 30 %
1368 mg/kg: 50 %
1520 mg/kg: 80 %
1685 mg/kg: 100 % - Clinical signs:
- other: Intoxication symptoms: (occurred shortly after intoxication) decrease of general activity and especially exploiting behaviour, frequency of "getting up"; increase of water consumption; deficit in motivity of hind legs, less pain sensitivity Clinical signs
- Gross pathology:
- No marcoscopic alterations were observed at the most significant organs.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 4 based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Cobalt sulphate heptahydrate is moderately toxic if administered orally.
LD50: 1330 mg/kg (Confidence interval: 1220 - 1450)
According to the EC Regulation No. 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations, the test item is classified as Category 4.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 768 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Additional information
Key study
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Weight of evidence information
Justification for classification or non-classification
The references Speijers (1982) and Llobet, Domingo (1983) are considered as the key studies for acute oral toxicity and will be used for classification. Female/male rats were dosed at 450, 675, 1000, 1500, 2250 mg/kg orally via gavage and at 1000, 1110, 1232, 1368, 1520, 1685 mg/kg orally via gavage respectively. During the conduct of the study mortalities occurred, thus the following LD50 values were derived:
· Speijers (1982): LD50 oral, rat = 1,330 mg cobalt sulfate heptahydrate /kg bw
· Llobet, Domingo (1983): LD50 oral, rat = 768 mg cobalt sulfate heptahydrate /kg bw
The classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as acutely toxic category 4 are met since the ATE is above 300 mg/kg body-weight and below 2,000 mg/kg body-weight.Cobalt sulfate will be classified as acutely toxic category 4 (H302).
Specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: oral
The classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure, oral are not met since the toxic effects observed in the acute oral toxicity test already leads to an acute oral toxicity classification. No additional effects in animals or humans are known that would justify a specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: oral classification.
Acute dermal toxicity
Conduct of an acute dermal toxicity study for cobalt sulfate is unjustified since dermal uptake is considered negligible.
Specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: dermal
Conduct of an acute dermal toxicity study for cobalt sulfate is unjustified since dermal uptake is considered negligible.
Acute inhalation toxicity and Specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure: inhalation
A study was originally designed to assess the acute inhalation toxicity of the test material in rats. The selected test method was in accordance with the following guidelines:
- OECD guideline 403 (May 1981),
- EC Guideline (Method B2 of Commission Directive 92/69/EEC, Annex V),
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Health Effects Test Guidelines, OPPTS 870.1300, Acute Inhalation Toxicity, August 1998, as well as
- Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Testing Guidelines for Toxicology Studies, 12 NohSan No. 8147 (2-1-3), 24 November 2000 (partially revised on 26 June 2001).
However, during preliminary tests attempting to generate a stable test atmosphere prior to the conduct of the study (performed on September 23, 2010), it was verified that a stable test atmosphere could not be generated as described in the attached document in the endpoint study record in IUCLID section 7.2.2. As a result, the main study involving animal testing could not be initiated due to lack of technical feasibility.
Further experimental testing is therefore not foreseen in accordance with regulation (EC) 1907/2006, Annex XI, Section 2.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.