Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-013-1 | CAS number: 102-20-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral toxicity: The acute oral toxicity was determined in a weight of evidence approach. The LD50 was determined to be >2000 mg/kg bw.
Acute dermal toxicity: A study was performed to assess the acute dermal toxicity of the test material in the Sprague-DawleyCD strain rat. The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Sprague-DawleyCD strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Value:
- 3 190 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Basic data given, acceptable, well documented publication, equivalent to guideline, no GLP study.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- GLP and guideline study
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity
A weight of evidence approach with 4 studies with different species was done to cover this endpoint.
Jenner (1964)
The potential of the test substance was tested in a study equivalent to OECD guideline 401. The test material was administered to 5 male and 5 female Osborne-Mendel rats per dose. Animals were subjected to an 18 hour predose fasting. All doses were given by intubation. The animals were observed over a 2 week period for mortality and/or systemic effects. LD50 results were calculated per Litchfield-Wilcoxon (1949). No further details were provided. The LD50 was determined to be 15390 mg/kg bw. Mortality occured between 4 h and 5 days. Depression soon after treatment and scrawny appearance for several days were observed during the study.
Zaitsev (1974) - rats
Groups of 6 white rats (of the same sex) were administered the test material in the form of a 20 - 45% solution in sunflower oil (2.0 - 5.0 mg/kg body weight). The animals were observed for 15 days, and the LD50 was calculated per Kerber's method. No further details were provided. The LD50 value was determined to be 3190 mg/kg bw.
Zaitsev (1974) - mice
Groups of 6 white mice (of the same sex) were administered the test material in the form of a 20 - 45% solution in sunflower oil (2.0 - 5.0 mg/kg body weight). The animals were observed for 15 days, and the LD50 was calculated per Kerber's method. No further details were provided. The LD50 value was determined to be 3190 mg/kg bw.
Zaitsev (1974) - guinea pigs
Groups of 6 guinea pigs (of the same sex) were administered the test material in the form of a 20 - 45% solution in sunflower oil (2.0 - 5.0 mg/kg body weight). The animals were observed for 15 days, and the LD50 was calculated per Kerber's method. No further details were provided. The LD50 value was determined to be 3190 mg/kg bw.
Conclusion: The potential of the acute oral toxicity of the test item was tested on rats, mice and guinea pigs. In a study equivalent to OECD guideline 401 the LD50 was determined to be 15390 mg/kg bw. This result is in line with 3 further studies performed on rats, mice and guinea pigs. The determined LD50 value was 3190 mg/kg bw. In conclusion it can be stated that the test substance is not acute oral toxic.
Acute dermal toxicity
The study was performed to assess the acute dermal toxicity of the test material in the Sprague-Dawley strain rat according to OECD guideline 402. A group of ten animals (five males and five females) was given a single, 24 -hour, semioccluded dermal application of undiluted test material to intact skin at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Mortality: There were no deaths. Clinical Observatians: There were no signs of systemic toxicity. Skin Irritation: There were no signs of dermal irritation. Bodyweight: All animals showed expected gains in bodyweight over the study period. Necropsy: No abnormalities were noted at necropsy. Conclusion. The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Sprague- Dawley strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008 (CLP). As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for acute oral and dermal toxicity under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the tenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2017/776.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.