Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2011
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
The experiment is scientifically acceptable, nevertheless the in vitro test followed a not yet validated method (pre-validation on going). Read across from a similar substance which has the same main component and with a different counter ion that does not influence the characteristics related to the specific end-point.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Keratinocytes play a key role in all phases of skin sensitization, and interleukin-18 (IL-18) has been shown to play a key proximal role in the induction of allergic contact sensitization. NCTC 2544 is a commercially available skin epithelial-like cell line originating from normal human skin, which posses a good expression of cytochrome P450-dependent enzymatic activities. THP-1 activation was used to assess the effects on dendritic cells activation (CD68 expression and IL-8 release). Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of both salts (0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, 0.031 µg/ml) or with PPD and LPS as positive controls for 24 h. CD86 expression was assessed by flow cytometry and IL-8 release by ELISA.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
other: THP-1 activation and NCTC2544/IL-18 assayes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methanaminium, N-[4-[[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]phenylmethylene]-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-ylidene]-N-methyl-, ethanedioate
EC Number:
241-922-5
EC Name:
Methanaminium, N-[4-[[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]phenylmethylene]-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-ylidene]-N-methyl-, ethanedioate
Cas Number:
18015-76-4
Molecular formula:
C23H25N2 x C2HO4
IUPAC Name:
4-{[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl](phenyl)methylidene}-N,N-dimethylcyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-iminium hydrogen oxalate
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Malachite Green Chloride
IUPAC Name:
Malachite Green Chloride

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
SI: 2.07
IL-8: ca 1600 (pg/ml); CD86: SI ca 2.0

In vitro / in chemico

Results
Remarks on result:
other: results are reported in the other sections

Any other information on results incl. tables

Both salts were cytotoxic in both cell lines at concentrations ≤ 1 g/ml.

Results are expressed as mean ± SD of 3-4 independent samples.

According to the prediction model method, a substance is considered as a sensitizer when the SI exceeds the value of 1.2 with a dose-related increase in intracellular IL-18 content. Both salts reach this threshold at concentration between 0.125 - 0.25 µg/ml. In general the dose response of the two salts are similar.

THP-1 ACTIVATION ASSAY

Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of both salts or with LPS as positive control for 24 h. CD86 expression ws assessed by flow cytometry and IL-8 release by ELISA.

Both salts induce a prodes: but statistically significant IL-8 release; furthermore both salts induce CD86 expression (SI≥ 1.5).

NCTC2544/IL-18 ASSAY

The CV80 (0.25 μg/ml) was used as the highest concentration tested for both salts. Intracellular IL-18 was evaluated by ELISA, results were normalized for the cellular protein.

TREATMENT  Intracellular IL-18 (pg/mg)  SI 
Control DMSO 5256±524 
 Chl 0.25μg/ml  6987±634  1.33 
 Chl 0.125μg/ml  6084±758  1.16 
 Chl 0.0625μg/ml  5258±459  1.00 
 Chl 0.031μg/ml  4791±294  0.91 
 Oss 0.25μg/ml  7767±593  1.48 
 Oss 0.125μg/ml  5943±209  1.13 
 Oss 0.0625μg/ml  5700±465  1.08 
 Oss 0.031μg/ml  4925±268  0.94 
 PPD 60 μg/ml  10900±1780  2.07 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
Conclusions:
Accordingly to the results, Malachite Green salts should be considered as contact sensitizers.
Executive summary:

Keratinocytes play a key role in all phases of skin sensitization, and interleukin-18 (IL-18) has been shown to play a key proximal role in the induction of allergic contact sensitization. NCTC 2544 is a commercially available skin epithelial-like cell line originating from normal human skin, which posses a good expression of cytochrome P450-dependent enzymatic activities. THP-1 activation was used to assess the effects on dendritic cells activation (CD68 expression and IL-8 release). Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of both salts (0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, 0.031 µg/ml) or with PPD and LPS as positive controls for 24 h. CD86 expression was assessed by flow cytometry and IL-8 release by ELISA.

According to the prediction model method, a substance is considered as a sensitizer when the SI exceeds the value of 1.2 with a dose-related increase in intracellular IL-18 content. Both salts reach this threshold at concentration between 0.125 - 0.25 µg/ml. In general the dose response of the two salts are similar. Furthermore, statistically significant release fo IL-8 vs vehicle treated cells and stimulation index ≥ 1.5 for CD86 expression are considered as positive results; both salts induce a prodes, but statistically significant IL-8 release and both salts induce CD86 expression (SI > 1.5), thuis they should be classified as senstitizers.

Conclusion

Malachite Green salts should be considered as contact sensitizers.