Registration Dossier

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
The study was performed between 26 January 2010 and 29 January 2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD GUIDELINE FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS 431
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent

Test animals

Species:
other: reconstituted human epidermis model
Strain:
other: reconstituted human epidermis model
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Not applicable

Test system

Type of coverage:
other: Topical
Preparation of test site:
other: Not applicable
Vehicle:
other: No vehicle used
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL

- The test Material was applied neat.

- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):
50 µl of of the test material was applied to the epidermis surface.

- Concentration (if solution):
The test material was used as supplied.

VEHICLE
No vehicle used
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3, 60 & 240 minutes post exposure incubation
Observation period:
Not applicable
Number of animals:
Not applicable
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure:
50 µl of the test material was applied to the epidermis surface.

- % coverage:
The test material was applied topically to the corresponding tissues ensuring uniform covering.

- Type of wrap if used:
None used

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done):
At the end of each exposure period, each tissue was removed from the well using forceps and rinsed using a wash bottle containing Phosphate Buffered Saline Dulbeccos (PBS) with Ca++ and Mg++. Rinsing was achieved by filling and emptying each tissue insert for approximately 40 seconds using a constant soft stream of PBS to gently remove any residual test material.

- Time after start of exposure:
3, 60 or 240 minutes post exposure

SCORING SYSTEM:
Quantitative MTT Assessment (percentage tissue viability)
The corrosivity potential of the test material was predicted from the relative mean tissue viabilities obtained after the 3, 60 and 240-minute treatments, compared to the mean of the negative control tissues (n=2) treated with 0.9% w/v sodium chloride solution. The relative mean viabilities were calculated in the following way:

mean OD540 of test material / mean OD540 of negative control x 100 = Relative mean tissue viability (percentage of negative control)

Classification of corrosivity potential was based on relative viabilities for each exposure time according to the following prediction model:

Treatment Time (minutes) Relative Mean Tissue viability Prediction
(% of negative control) EU Risk Phrase UN Packing Group
3 <35 Corrosive R35 I
3/60 =35 / <35 Corrosive R34 II
60/240 =35 / <35 Corrosive R34 III
240 =35 Non-Corrosive No label Non-Corrosive

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: Mean viability of cells expressed as a percentage
Run / experiment:
240 minutes exposure
Value:
139.8
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: Mean viability of cells expressed as a percentage
Run / experiment:
3 minutes exposure
Value:
140.9
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: Mean viability of cells expressed as a percentage
Run / experiment:
60 minutes exposure
Value:
148.9
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

In vivo

Irritant / corrosive response data:
The relative mean viability of the test material treated tissues was as follows:
240 minutes exposure                      :          139.8%
60 minutes exposure                        :          148.9%
3 minutes exposure                         :          140.9%
Other effects:
No

Any other information on results incl. tables

RESULTS

Direct MTT Reduction

The MTT solution containing the test material did not turn blue/purple. This was taken to indicate the test material did not reduce MTT.

Test Material, Positive Control Material and Negative Control Material

Mean OD540 values and viabilities for the negative control, positive control material and test material are given in Table 1.

The relative mean viability of the test material treated tissues was as follows:

240 minutes exposure                      :          139.8%

60 minutes exposure                        :          148.9%

3 minutes exposure                          :          140.9%

The qualitative evaluation of tissue viability is given in Table 2.

Following the 3, 60 and 240 Minute exposure periods the test material treated tissues appeared blue which was considered to be indicative of viable tissue.

Quality Criteria

The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control treated tissues was 9.1% relative to the negative control treated tissues following the 240-minute exposure period. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.

Table 1 : Mean OD540 Values and Viabilities for the Negative Control, Positive Control Material and Test Material

Material

Exposure Period

Mean OD540 of duplicate tissues

Relative mean % viability

Negative Control Material

240 Minutes

0.176

100*

Positive Control Material

240 Minutes

0.016

9.1

Test Material

240 Minutes

0.246

139.8

60 Minutes

0.262

148.9

3 Minutes

0.248

140.9


*=     The mean viability of the negative control tissues is set at 100%


Table 2 : Qualitative Evaluation of Tissue Viability (MTT uptake visual evaluation)

Material

Exposure Period

Tissue 1

Tissue 2

Negative Control Material

240 Minutes

-

-

Positive Control Material

240 Minutes

++

++

Test Material

240 Minutes

-

-

60 Minutes

-

-

3 Minutes

-

-

MTT visual scoring scheme
-          =         blue tissue (viable)
+         =         blue/white tissue (semi-viable)
++       =         tissue is completely white (dead)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
Conclusions:
The test material was considered to be Non-Corrosive to the skin and accredited the EU risk phrase of No label and a UN packing group Non-Corrosive.
Executive summary:

Introduction:  The purpose of this test is to evaluate the corrosivity potential of the test material using the EPISKINTM in vitro Reconstituted Human Epidermis (RHE) Model after treatment periods of 3, 60 and 240 minutes. This method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:

OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals No. 431 “In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test” (adopted 13 April 2004).

The EPISKINTM model is able to distinguish between corrosive and non-corrosive chemicals for all of the chemical types studied, and is also able to distinguish between known R35 (UN packing group I) and R34 (UN packing group II & III) chemicals.

Methods: 

Duplicate tissues were treated with the test material for exposure periods of 3, 60 and 240 minutes. At the end of the exposure period the test material was rinsed from each tissue before each tissue was taken for MTT loading. After MTT loading a total biopsy of each epidermis was made and placed into micro tubes containing acidified isopropanol for extraction of formazan crystals out of the MTT-loaded tissues. 

At the end of the formazan extraction period each tube was mixed thoroughly and duplicate 200 µl samples were transferred to the appropriate wells of a pre-labelled 96-well plate. The optical density was measured at 540 nm.

Data are presented in the form of % viability (MTT reduction in the test material treated tissues relative to negative control tissues).


Results: 

The relative mean viability of the test material treated tissues was:

240 minutes exposure                     :          139.8%
60 minutes exposure                       :          148.9%
3 minutes exposure                         :          140.9%

Quality criteria: 

The quality criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were satisfied.

Conclusion: 

The test material was considered to be Non-Corrosive to the skin and accredited the EU risk phrase of No label and a UN packing group Non-Corrosive.