Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
07. Dec. - 23. Dec. 1998
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-Guideline study with acceptable restrictions (no analytical purity reported)
Justification for type of information:
refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1999
Report date:
1999

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no analytical purity reported
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no analytical purity reported
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Safepharm Laboratories Limited, Derby, UK
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
131459-39-7
Cas Number:
131459-39-7
IUPAC Name:
131459-39-7

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Sprague-Dawley CD (Crl:CD® (SD) IGS BR)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Ltd, Margate, Kent, UK
- Age at study initiation: 8 to 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 234 - 237g (males), 215 - 220g (females)
- Housing: in groups of up to 3 by sex in solid-floor polypropylene cages
- Diet: rat and mouse Diet No.1, Special Diets Services Limited, Witham, Essex, UK, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 21
- Humidity (%): 37 - 67
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 2.09 mL/kg

DOSAGE PREPARATION: The specific gravity was determined and used to calculate the appropriate dose volume for the required dose level.

CLASS METHOD
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: The available information suggested the starting dose.
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: animals were observed for death or overt signs of toxicity 0.5; 1; 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily; individual body weights were determined prior to dosing, on day 7 and day 14
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight, histopathology

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occurred during the study period.
Clinical signs:
other: No clinical signs of toxicity were observed up to the end of the 14-day observation period.
Gross pathology:
Necropsy and histopathological examination revealed no substance-related finding.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Bodyweight gain

Dose level   Bodyweight [g] at Day
mg/kg bw female 0 7 14
2000 1-0 220 259 280
1-1 217 251 258
1-2 215 249 272
male      
2-0 235 307 348
2-1 237 300 343
2-2 234 298 343

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified