Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 300-947-2 | CAS number: 93964-99-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental start date: 10 Auguts 2016 Experimental completion date: 10 August 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- O,O-dibutyl hydrogen thiophosphate, compound with 1-octylamine (1:1)
- EC Number:
- 300-947-2
- EC Name:
- O,O-dibutyl hydrogen thiophosphate, compound with 1-octylamine (1:1)
- Cas Number:
- 93964-99-9
- Molecular formula:
- C8H19N.C8H19O3PS
- IUPAC Name:
- octan-1-amine dibutyl sulfanylphosphonate
- Reference substance name:
- Octylamine
- EC Number:
- 203-916-0
- EC Name:
- Octylamine
- Cas Number:
- 111-86-4
- Molecular formula:
- C8H19N
- IUPAC Name:
- octan-1-amine
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
impurity 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: X-19575 Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dibutyl ester, compd. with 1-octanamine, CASRN 93964-99-9
Physical state/Appearance: amber colored viscous liquid
Batch: X-019575-00-00
Purity: not supplied
Expiry Date: 01 June 2017
Storage Conditions: room temperature in the dark
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Eyes from adult cattle (typically 12 to 60 months old) were obtained from a local abattoir as a by-product from freshly slaughtered animals. The eyes were excised by an abattoir employee after slaughter, and were placed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) supplemented with antibiotics (penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 µg/mL). They were transported to the test facility over ice packs on the same day of slaughter. The corneas were refrigerated on arrival and used within 24 hours of receipt.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 mL
- Concentration (if solution): as supplied
VEHICLE
-Not applicable
Negative control (sodium chloride):
- Amount applied: 0.75 mL
- Lot/batch no/ 3011424
- Purity: 0.9%
Positive control (ethanol)
- Amount applied: 0.75 mL
- Lot/batch no: STBD7546V
- Purity: >99.8% - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 minutes
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 120 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- Preparation of Corneas
All eyes were macroscopically examined before and after dissection. Only corneas free of damage were used.
The cornea from each selected eye was removed leaving a 2 to 3 mm rim of sclera to facilitate handling. The iris and lens were peeled away from the cornea. The isolated corneas were immersed in a dish containing HBSS until they were mounted in Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) holders.
The anterior and posterior chambers of each BCOP holder were filled with complete Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) without phenol red and plugged. The holders were incubated at 32 ± 1 ºC for 60 minutes. At the end of the incubation period each cornea was examined for defects. Only corneas free of damage were used.
Selection of Corneas and Opacity Reading
The medium from both chambers of each holder was replaced with fresh complete EMEM.
A pre treatment opacity reading was taken for each cornea using a calibrated opacitometer (Annex 1). The average opacity for all corneas was calculated.
Three corneas with opacity values close to the median value of all corneas were allocated to the negative control. Three corneas were also allocated to the test item and three corneas to the positive control item.
Treatment of Corneas
The EMEM was removed from the anterior chamber of the BCOP holder and 0.75 mL of the test item or control items were applied to the appropriate corneas. The holders were gently tilted back and forth to ensure a uniform application of the item over the entire cornea. Each holder was incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 10 minutes.
At the end of the exposure period the test item and control items were removed from the anterior chamber and the cornea was rinsed three times with fresh complete EMEM containing phenol red before a final rinse with complete EMEM without phenol red. The anterior chamber was refilled with fresh complete EMEM without phenol red. A post-treatment opacity reading was taken and each cornea was visually observed.
The holders were incubated, anterior chamber facing forward, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 120 minutes.
After incubation the holders were removed from the incubator, the medium from both chambers was replaced with fresh complete EMEM and a final opacity reading was taken. Each cornea was visually observed.
Application of Sodium Fluorescein
Following the final opacity measurement the permeability of the corneas to sodium fluorescein was evaluated. The medium from the anterior chamber was removed and replaced with 1 mL of sodium fluorescein solution (4 mg/mL). The dosing holes were plugged and the holders incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 90 minutes.
Permeability Determinations
After incubation the medium in the posterior chamber of each holder was decanted and retained.
360 µL of medium representing each cornea was applied to a designated well on a 96 well plate and the optical density at 492 nm (OD492) was measured using the Anthos 2001 microplate reader.
Histopathology
The corneas were retained after testing for possible conduct of histopathology. Each cornea was placed into a pre labeled tissue cassette fitted with a histology sponge to protect the endothelial surface. The cassette was immersed in 10% neutral buffered formalin.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- 1
- Value:
- 74.1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Individual and Mean Corneal Opacity and Permeability Measurements
Treatment |
Cornea Number |
Opacity |
Permeability (OD) |
In VitroIrritancy Score |
|||||
Pre-Treatment |
Post-Treatment |
Post Incubation |
Post-Incubation - Pre‑Treatment |
Corrected Value |
|
Corrected Value |
|||
Negative Control |
1 |
6 |
6 |
9 |
3 |
|
0.031 |
|
|
3 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
1 |
|
0.014 |
|
|
|
4 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
0 |
|
0.011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3* |
|
0.019¨ |
|
1.6 |
|
Positive Control |
2 |
4 |
35 |
36 |
32 |
30.7 |
0.273 |
0.254 |
|
5 |
4 |
32 |
33 |
29 |
27.7 |
0.860 |
0.841 |
|
|
6 |
5 |
33 |
33 |
28 |
26.7 |
1.066 |
1.047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.3· |
|
0.714· |
39.0 |
|
Test Item |
7 |
4 |
47 |
55 |
51 |
49.7 |
1.795 |
1.776 |
|
8 |
6 |
44 |
63 |
57 |
55.7 |
1.589 |
1.570 |
|
|
9 |
6 |
46 |
48 |
42 |
40.7 |
1.751 |
1.732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.7· |
|
1.693· |
74.1 |
OD= Optical density * = Mean of the post-incubation -pre‑treatment values ¨= Mean permeability ·= Mean corrected value
Corneal Epithelium Condition
The corneas treated with the test item were cloudy post treatment and post incubation. The corneas treated with the negative control item were clear post treatment and post incubation. The corneas treated with the positive control item were cloudy post treatment and post incubation.
Corneal Epithelium Condition Post Treatment and Post Incubation
Treatment |
Cornea Number |
Observation |
|
Post Treatment |
Post Incubation |
||
Negative Control |
1 |
clear |
clear |
3 |
clear |
clear |
|
4 |
clear |
clear |
|
Positive Control |
2 |
cloudy |
cloudy |
5 |
cloudy |
cloudy |
|
6 |
cloudy |
cloudy |
|
Test Item |
7 |
cloudy |
cloudy |
8 |
cloudy |
cloudy |
|
9 |
cloudy |
cloudy |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Category 1. UN GHS or EU CLP Causes serious eye damage.
- Executive summary:
Introduction
The purpose of this test was to identify test items that can induce serious eye damage and to identify test items not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test method is an organotypic model that provides short‑term maintenance of normal physiological and biochemical function of the bovine corneain vitro. In this test method, damage by the test item is assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability.
The test method can correctly identify test items (both chemicals and mixtures) inducing serious eye damage as well as those not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage, as defined by the United Nations (UN) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Items (GHS) and EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) of chemicals (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008), and it was therefore endorsed as scientifically valid for both purposes. Test items inducing serious eye damage are classified as UN GHS and EU CLP Category 1. Items not classified for eye irritation or serious eye damage are defined as those that do not meet the requirements for classification as UN GHS/ EU CLP Category 1 or 2 (2A or 2B), i.e. they are referred to as UN GHS/EU CLP No Category.
Method
The undiluted test item was applied for 10 minutes followed by an incubation period of 120 minutes. Negative and positive control items were tested concurrently. The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate anIn VitroIrritancy Score (IVIS).
Data Interpretation
The test item is classified according to the prediction model as follows:
IVIS
Classification
≤ 3
No category. Not requiring classification to UN GHS or EU CLP
> 3; ≤55
No prediction of eye irritation can be made
> 55
Category 1. UN GHS or EU CLP Causes serious eye damage
Results
TheIn Vitroirritancy scores are summarized as follows:
Treatment
In VitroIrritancy Score
Test Item
74.1
Negative Control
1.6
Positive Control
39.0
Conclusion
Category 1. UN GHS or EU CLP Causes serious eye damage.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
