Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction products of 1-(substitutedphenyl)urea coupled with diazotated potassium sodium substituted-5-{[2-(substituted)ethyl]sulfonyl}benzenesulfonate, further condensed with 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine, further converted with disubstituted benzene-1,4-disulfonic acid in aq. sodium hydroxide
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Acute Toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was conducted between 27 October 2015 and 24 November 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.1 bis (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese MAFF, 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- fixed dose procedure
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Female Wistar (RccHan™:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The females were nulliparous and non pregnant. After an acclimatization period of at least 5 days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals were 8 to 12 weeks of age. The body weight variation did not exceed ±20% of the mean body weight at the start of treatment.
The animals were housed in groups of up to four in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately 3 to 4 hours after dosing, free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analyzed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that would reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25 °C and 30 to 70% respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give 12 hours continuous light and 12 hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.
Justification
Rats are the preferred species of choice as historically used for safety evaluation studies and are specified in the appropriate test guidelines.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- Test Item Formulation and Experimental Preparation
For the purpose of the study the test item was freshly prepared, as required, as a solution in distilled water.
The test item was formulated within 2 hours of being applied to the test system. It is assumed that the formulation was stable for this duration.
No analysis was conducted to determine the homogeneity, concentration or stability of the test item formulation. This is an exception with regard to GLP and has been reflected in the GLP compliance statement. - Doses:
- A single animal was treated at 300 mg/kg at a concentration of 30 mg/mL.
In the absence of toxicity at a dose level of 300 mg/kg, an additional animal was treated at 2000 mg/kg at a concentration of 200 mg/mL.
In the absence of toxicity at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg, an additional group of 4 animals were treated at 2000 mg/kg. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- A single animal was treated at 300 mg/kg.
Five animals were treated at 2000 mg/kg. - Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- Procedure
In the absence of data regarding the toxicity of the test item, 300 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose. A single female animal was treated with 300 mg/kg at a concentration of 30 mg/mL (dose volume 10 mg/kg).
In the absence of toxicity at a dose level of 300 mg/kg, an additional animal was treated at 2000 mg/kg at a concentration of 200 mg/mL (dose volume 10 mg/kg). In the absence of toxicity at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg, an additional group of 4 female animals were treated at 2000 mg/kg at a concentration of 200 mg/mL (dose volume 10 mg/kg).
A total of five animals were therefore treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg in the study.
All animals were dosed once only by gavage, using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe. The volume administered to each animal was calculated according to the fasted body weight at the time of dosing. Treatment of animals was sequential. Sufficient time was allowed between each dose group to confirm the survival of the previously dosed animals.
Clinical observations were made 30 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours after dosing and then daily for 14 days. Morbidity and mortality checks were made twice daily.
Individual body weights were recorded on Day 0 (the day of dosing) and on Days 7 and 14.
At the end of the observation period the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.
Evaluation of Data
Evaluation of data included identification of the number of animals that died during the study (or that were killed for humane reasons), and determination of the nature, severity, onset and duration of the toxic effects. If possible, the signs of evident toxicity were described. Evident toxicity refers to the toxic effects of sufficient severity that administration of the next higher dose level could result in development of severe signs of toxicity and probable mortality. Effects on body weights and abnormalities noted at necropsy were also identified.
Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item was made. - Statistics:
- No data
Results and discussion
- Preliminary study:
- Dose Level - 300 mg/kg
Mortality
There was no mortality.
Clinical Observations
No signs of systemic toxicity were noted during the observation period. Orange colored stained urine was noted during the day of dosing.
Body Weight
The animal showed expected gains in body weight over the observation period.
Necropsy
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Effect levels
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- Dose Level - 2000 mg/kg: There were no deaths.
- Clinical signs:
- Dose Level - 2000 mg/kg: No signs of systemic toxicity were noted during the observation period.
- Body weight:
- Dose Level - 2000 mg/kg: All animals showed expected gains in body weight over the observation period.
- Gross pathology:
- Dose Level - 2000 mg/kg: No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data -300mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Effects Noted After Dosing |
Effects Noted During Period After Dosing |
||||||||||||||||
½ |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
300 |
1-0 Female |
0U |
0U |
0U |
0U |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 = No signs of systemic toxicity
U = Orange colored stained urine
Individual Body Weights and Body Weight Changes -300mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number |
Body Weight (g) at Day |
Body Weight Gain (g) |
|||
0 |
7 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
||
300 |
1-0 Female |
190 |
207 |
226 |
17 |
19 |
Individual Necropsy Findings -300 mg/kg
Dose Level |
Animal Number |
Time of Death |
Macroscopic Observations |
300 |
1-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data -2000mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Effects Noted After Dosing |
Effects Noted During Period After Dosing |
||||||||||||||||
½ |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
2000 |
2-0 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3-0 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3-1 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3-2 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3-3 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 = No signs of systemic toxicity
Individual Body Weights and Body Weight Changes -2000mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number |
Body Weight (g) at Day |
Body Weight Gain (g) During Week |
|||
0 |
7 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
||
2000 |
2-0 Female |
150 |
166 |
176 |
16 |
10 |
3-0 Female |
164 |
181 |
202 |
17 |
21 |
|
3-1 Female |
179 |
197 |
214 |
18 |
17 |
|
3-2 Female |
178 |
199 |
219 |
21 |
20 |
|
3-3 Female |
176 |
192 |
207 |
16 |
15 |
Individual Necropsy Findings -2000mg/kg
Dose Level |
Animal Number |
Time of Death |
Macroscopic Observations |
2000 |
2-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
3-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
3-1 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
3-2 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
3-3 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight (Globally Harmonized Classification System - Unclassified).
- Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat.
Methods
Following a sighting test at dose levels of 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg, a further group of four fasted females was given a single oral dose of test item, as a solution in distilled water, at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight. Clinical signs and body weight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
Results
Mortality. There were no deaths.
Clinical Observations. There were no signs of systemic toxicity. Orange colored stained urine was noted in the initial animal, treated at a dose level of 300 mg/kg body weight.
Body Weight. All animals showed expected gains in body weight.
Necropsy. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Conclusion
The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight (Globally Harmonized Classification System-Unclassified).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.