Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1982
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1982
Report date:
1982

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
8-day observation period
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dihydrogen (ethyl)[4-[4-[ethyl(3-sulphonatobenzyl)]amino]-2'-sulphonatobenzhydrylidene]cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene](3-sulphonatobenzyl)ammonium, disodium salt
EC Number:
223-339-8
EC Name:
Dihydrogen (ethyl)[4-[4-[ethyl(3-sulphonatobenzyl)]amino]-2'-sulphonatobenzhydrylidene]cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene](3-sulphonatobenzyl)ammonium, disodium salt
Cas Number:
3844-45-9
Molecular formula:
C37 H34 N2 Na2 O9 S3
IUPAC Name:
disodium 2-({4-[ethyl(3-sulfonatobenzyl)amino]phenyl}{4-[ethyl(3-sulfonatobenzyl)iminio]cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene}methyl)benzenesulfonate
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Water
EC Number:
231-791-2
EC Name:
Water
Cas Number:
7732-18-5
Molecular formula:
H2O
IUPAC Name:
water
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
aqueous solution with salts
Specific details on test material used for the study:
38% aqueous formulation, containing also salts and oxalic acid

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Vienna White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Mean body weights: males 2.8 kg, female 3.64 kg
One animal per cage (type: stainless steel, 40 x 51 cm); animal identification via ear tattoo.
The animals were housed in fully air-conditioned rooms with a room temperature of 20 - 24°C and a relative humidity of 30 - 70%. The day/night rhythm was 12 h light and 12 h dark.
A standardized animal laboratory diet (about 130 g/animal/day) and tap water (about 250 ml/animal/day) were offered.
Acclimatization period: at least 8 days before study start (same housing conditions as during the study).

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated skin of the same animal
Amount / concentration applied:
ca. 0.5 ml (ca. 0.19 g test substance)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
8 days
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
Clipping of the fur: at least 15 hours before study start
Application area: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
Applicaiton site: upper third of the dorsal and flank region
Removal of the test substance patches: after application with Lutrol and Lutrol/water (1:1)
Readins: 30 - 60 min after removal of the test patches as well as 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 8 d after application

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 - 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Time point:
other: 24-72h
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
The substance resulted in blue staining of the skin which interfered with scoring
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Erythema value not readible due to substance-coloured skin. In two animals, staining resolved within 8 days. In the other animal, stiaining was still visible after 8 days.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
An aqueous formulation containing 38% of the substance is not irritating to skin.