Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-004-7 | CAS number: 77-09-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The test substance is negative in assays for mutation in Salmonella and mammalian cells (references 7.6.1-1 and 7.6.1-2), for DNA adducts and DNA strand breaks. In vitro chromosome aberrations are observed at cytotoxic concentrations. At high doses, a weak induction of micronuclei in mouse bone marrow increase with chronic treatment. A mechanistic study on chromosome aberrations in vitro suggests that chromosome damage occurs by indirect mechanisms above a threshold concentration. Such indirect mechanisms may well contribute to the reported in vivo cytogenetic effects in vivo.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The detailed protocol and these data are presented in Mortelmans, K.; Haworth, S.; Lawlor, T.; Speck, W.; Tainer, B.; Zeiger, E., Salmonella mutagenicity tests. II. Results from the testing of 270 chemicals. Environ. Mutagen. 1986, 8 (Suppl 7) 1-119.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HIS operon (S. thyphimurium)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
The S-9 (9,000 x g supernatant) fractions of Aroclor 1254-induced, male Sprague-Dawley rat and male Syrian hamster livers were prepared as described previously [Haworth et al., 1983]. The S-9 mixes were prepared immediately prior to use and contained either 10% or 30% S-9; occasionally, 5% S-9 was also used. All chemicals were tested in the absence of metabolic activation, and with rat and hamster S-9 fractions. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 3.3, 10, 33, 100, 333, and 1000 µg/plate (Laboratory Case Western Reserve University)
0, 3.3, 10, 33, 100, and 220 µg/plate (Laboratory EG&G Mason Research Institute) - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
Salmonella typhimurium strains were obtained from Dr. Bruce Ames (University of California, Berkeley) and stored as recommended [Maron and Ames,1981]. Cultures were grown at 37°C overnight, with shaking, in Oxoid #2 broth, or in defined minimal medium supplemented with biotin (0.8 µg/mL) and histidine (40 µgiml). The phenotypes of the strains were analyzed at the time of their use in mutagenicity assays.
The preincubation procedure was performed [Haworth et al., 1983], with some differences, as described below.
The test chemical (0.05 mL), overnight culture of Salmonella (0.10 mL), and S-9 mix or buffer (0.50 mL), were incubated at 37°C, without shaking, for 20 min. The top agar was added and the contents of the tubes were mixed and poured onto the surface of petri dishes containing Vogel-Bonner medium [Vogel and Bonner, 1956]. Histidine-independent (his+) colonies arising on these plates were counted following two days incubation at 37°C. Plates were machine counted (New Brunswick; Artek) unless precipitate was present which interfered with the count, or the color of the test chemical on the plate reduced the contrast between the colonies and the agar. At the discretion of the investigators, plates with low numbers of colonies, containing precipitated test chemical, or having excessivelyreduced contrast because of chemical color, were counted by hand.
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 2 days
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: no data - Evaluation criteria:
- 1) mutagenic response: a dose-related, reproducible increase in the number of revertants over background, even if the increase was less than twofold;
2) nomutagenic response: when no increase in the number of revertants was elicited by the chemical;
3) questionable response: when there was an absence of a clear-cut dose-related increase in revertants; when the dose-related increases in the number of revertants were not reproducible; or when the response was of insufficient magnitude to support a determination of mutagenicity.
The initial determination of mutagenic, nonmutagenic, or equivocal was made by the testing laboratory; the final determination was made by the project officer (E.Z.). The chemicals were decoded by the chemical repository (Radian Corporation) only after the mutagenicity or nonmutagenicity of the chemicals had been determined. - Statistics:
- no data
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- >220 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- >220 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- >220 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- >220 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- With and without addition of S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, Phenolphthalein was not mutagenic under the experimental conditions described.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this assay was to provide information on the genotoxic potential of the test item. The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test item were performed using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains Salmonella strains TA 98, TA 100, TA1535, and TA1537. Studies were performed in two different laboratories. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from Aroclor 1254 -pretreated rats and hamster was used. Two independent experimental series were performed without and with 10 % S9 mix, respectively. The test item was dissolved in DMSO and tested at concentrations up to 1000 µg/plate. Toxicity to the bacteria was observed at concentrations larger than 220 µg/plate with and without S9 mix.
Each treatment with the test materials used as positive controls led to a clear increase in revertant colonies, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used.
In both series of experiments, each performed with and without the addition of rat liver S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, the test item showed no increase in the number of revertants of any bacterial strain. These published data clearly indicate that the test item was not mutagenic under the described experimental conditions. With and without addition of S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, the test item was not mutagenic under the experimental conditions described.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HIS operon (S. thyphimurium)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
A supernatant fraction of homogenised liver centrifuged at 9000 g/10 min (S9) was prepared from Sprague-Dawley rats pretreated with Aroclor 1254 (Ames et al., 1975). A single batch of homogenized liver S9 fraction was employed in this study. Each day fresh S9 mix was prepared consisting of the following ingredients: MgCl2 (0.4 M), 20 µL, KCl (1.65 M) 20 µL, Glucose-6-phosphate (0.5 M) 5 µL, NADP (0.05 M) 40 µL, phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 7.4) 815 µL, S9 fraction 100 µL.This mix was stored on ice until required, then incorporated together with the test material and each of the bacteria strains as follows: 100 µL bacterial broth culture, 100 µL test compound solution in DMSO at various concentrations, and 500 µL S9 mix as required were added to each 2 mL of top agar at 42 °C - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 32, 100, 320, and 1000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Aflatoxin B1
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: daunomycin
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: duplicate
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
plate incorporation test; no further data available
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h before counting
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: no data available - Evaluation criteria:
- (a) dose dependent response
(b) reproducibility of the result - Statistics:
- no data
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without S9 at 1000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without S9 at 1000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without S9 at 1000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without S9 at 1000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without S9 at 1000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- With and without addition of S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, the test item was not mutagenic under the experimental conditions described.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this assay was to provide information on the genotoxic potential of the test item. The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test item were performed using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1538, TA 1535 and TA 1537. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from Aroclor 1254 -pretreated rats was used. Two independent experimental series were performed with and without S9 mix, respectively. The test item was dissolved in DMSO and tested at concentrations ranging from 32 to 1000 µg/plate. Toxicity to the bacteria was observed at 100 µg/plate without S9 mix. Daunomycin, 9 -aminoacridine, aflatoxin B1, 2 acetylaminofluorene, 4 -N-nitroquinoline-N-oxide, and methylmethansulfonate served as strain specific positive control test materials. Each treatment with the test materials used as positive controls led to a clear increase in revertant colonies, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used. In both series of experiments, each performed with and without the addition of rat liver S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, the test item showed no increase in the number of revertants of any bacterial strain. These published data clearly indicate that the test item was not mutagenic under the described experimental conditions.
With and without addition of S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, the test item was not mutagenic under the experimental conditions described.
Referenceopen allclose all
Laboratory
Case Western Reserve University
Dose [µg/plate] |
TA 100 | ||
NA | 10 % HLI | 10 % RLI | |
0 | 87±0.9 | 113±12.8 | 128±3.5 |
3.3 | 82±1.2 | 96±5.6 | |
10 | 88±4.3 | 102±10.1 | 107±2.7 |
33 | 82±7.8 | 89±6.7 | 128±2.9 |
100 | 70±7.3 | 108±10.7 | 118±6.2 |
333 | t | 117±9.3 | 126±4.0 |
1000 | 103±15.4 | ||
Control | 1641±38.6 | 2007±217.0 | 1586±45.0 |
Dose [µg/plate] |
TA 1535 | ||
NA | 10 % HLI | 10 % RLI | |
0 | 5±1.8 | 13±0.3 | 11±1.2 |
3.3 | 6±1.7 | ||
10 | 7±1.5 | 12±3.5 | 11±1.9 |
33 | 5±0.7 | 10±1.7 | 7±1.0 |
100 | 4±1.5 | 9±2.4 | 11±2.1 |
333 | t | 11±2.0 | 10±2.1 |
1000 | 12±3.3 | 16±2.3 | |
Control | 1081±144.9 | 133±6.8 | 287±19.9 |
Dose [µg/plate] |
TA 1537 | ||
NA | 10 % HLI | 10 % RLI | |
0 | 9±2.6 | 11±1.5 | 15±1.0 |
3.3 | |||
10 | 9±1.8 | 9±1.5 | 11±0.6 |
33 | 9±0.9 | 12±0.9 | 11±1.2 |
100 | 10±1.2 | 9±0.3 | 13±1.8 |
333 | 7±0.9 | 9±2.1 | 13±1.8 |
1000 | t | t | t |
Control | 113±39.5 | 194±5.9 | 158±41.7 |
Dose [µg/plate] |
TA 98 | ||
NA | 10 % HLI | 10 % RLI | |
0 | 25±2.2 | 30±4.3 | 31±5.8 |
3.3 | |||
10 | 21±2.9 | 30±4.2 | 30±1.5 |
33 | 21±3.5 | 27±2.0 | 31±2.3 |
100 | 20±4.1 | 31±0.9 | 22±3.5 |
333 | 17±0.9 | 23±4.0 | 19±2.8 |
1000 | t | t | t |
Control | 92±4.0 | 966±33.4 | 681±66.8 |
Laboratory EG&G Mason Research Institute
Dose [µg/plate] |
TA 100 | ||
NA | 10 % HLI | 10 % RLI | |
0 | 176±6.2 | 197±12.8 | 169±6.8 |
3.3 | 170±4.5 | 196±5.6 | 173±11.8 |
10 | 180±4.7 | 211±10.1 | 166±14.7 |
33 | 163±3.4 | 198±6.7 | 177±1.5 |
100 | 184±79.0 | 204±10.7 | 191±7.2 |
220 | 132±2.7 s | 226±9.3 s | 168±6.9 s |
Control | 1072±48.0 | 691±21.4 | 617±8.8 |
Dose [µg/plate] |
TA 1535 | ||
NA | 10 % HLI | 10 % RLI | |
0 | 28±7.0 | 11±1.2 | 14±0.6 |
3.3 | 26±1.9 | 12±0.0 |
12±2.3 |
10 | 19±3.3 | 12±1.9 | 11±0.7 |
33 | 21±3.7 | 13±4.2 | 17±1.8 |
100 | 25±2.6 | 14±0.6 | 12±1.2 |
220 | t | 14±0.6 s | 15±4.7 s |
Control | 840±53.4 | 68±1.5 | 59±0.9 |
Dose [µg/plate] |
TA 1537 | ||
NA | 10 % HLI | 10 % RLI | |
0 | 7±1.2 | 9±2.0 | 9±2.1 |
3.3 | 6±2.3 |
9±2.2 |
8±0.3 |
10 | 7±0.7 | 7±1.2 | 10±1.0 |
33 | 5±2.0 | 11±1.2 | 7±0.6 |
100 | 11±1.5 | 9±0.3 | 11±1.8 |
200 | 4±1.0 s | 10±1.8 s | 5±0.3 s |
Control | 188±17.2 | 54±2.5 | 42±2.5 |
Dose [µg/plate] |
TA 98 | ||
NA | 10 % HLI | 10 % RLI | |
0 | 19±2.7 | 23±4.0 | 22±2.3 |
3.3 | 18±2.3 |
23±1.0 |
28±3.1 |
10 | 12±2.0 | 32±2.1 | 25±2.6 |
33 | 14±3.8 | 25±2.0 | 25±0.6 |
100 | 11±0.9 | 25±1.2 | 20±0.3 |
220 | 10±2.9 s | 23±5.0 s | 25±2.6 s |
Control | 1335±27.2 | 966±33.4 | 402±49.7 |
Abbreviations
NA, not activated
HLI, Aroclor 1254-induced hamster liver S-9
RLI, Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S-9
s, slight clearing of background lawn
t, complete clearing of background lawn (colonies not counted)
p, precipitate present in plates
x, precipitate present with toxicity
+, mutagenic
+W, weakly mutagenic
?, questionable response
- , nonmutagenic.
Dose [µg/plate] |
TA98 | TA100 | TA1535 | TA1537 | TA1538 | |||||
NA | 20 % RLI |
NA | 20 % RLI |
NA | 20 % RLI |
NA | 20 % RLI |
NA | 20 % RLI |
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
1000 | t | 44 | t | 105 | t | 14 | t | 7 | t | 13 |
320 | 32 | 47 | 154 | 134 | 28 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 23 | 31 |
100 | 30 | 46 | 139 | 124 | 39 | 24 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 28 |
32 | 31 | 47 | 145 | 126 | 35 | 22 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 26 |
0 | 29 | 40 | 146 | 116 | 36 | 22 | 10 | 17 | 21 | 33 |
Abbreviations
NA, not activated
RLI, Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S-9
t, indicates toxicity
- , nonmutagenic.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Additional information
Discussion
The genotoxicty of the test substance was studied in numerous assays in vitro and in vivo and the results are available in published literature. Summaries of those data have been generated by NTP, IARC and other expert committees. Below a short overview of the data is given that provides key information.
The test substance was not mutagenic in several assays in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100 in the presence or absence of exogenous metabolic activation [1, 2]. It did not induce DNA damage in DNA repair-deficient strains of Bacillus subtilis [3]. The test item induced a positive increase in hprt but not Na+/K+ ATPase gene mutations or aneuploidy in Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells exposed for 48 hours [4]. The test substance did not induce sister chromatid exchange in Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence or absence of exogenous metabolic activation but a highly significant reproducible increase in chromosomal aberrations in test item-exposed Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence but not the absence of S9 activation was reported [5, 6]. The test item also induced a positive increase in chromosomal aberrations but not aneuploidy in SHE cells exposed for 6 (aberrations) or 48 (aneuploidy) hours [4]. Similarly, a dose-dependent increase in morphological transformation was induced by the test item in SHE cells exposed for 48 hours [4]. In vivo, the test substance induced an equivocal increase in DNA single-strand breaks in the peripheral blood leukocytes of female p53-deficient transgenic mice (C57B1/6 background) following dosed-feed exposure for 26 weeks and sampling at days 39, 92, 137, and 183 [7]. No increase was observed in the livers of treated mice sampled upon termination of exposure. Micronuclei were induced by phenolphthalein in male and female B6C3F1 mouse peripheral blood polychromatic (PCE) and normochromatic (NCE) erythrocytes via a variety of exposures including gavage for 2 to 3 days, or dosed feed for 4 to 14 days. Similarly, the test item induced micronuclei in the blood PCE of CD-1 mice after 14 weeks of continuous feed treatment. Micronuclei were also induced in the bone marrow of male B6C3F1 mice treated by gavage for 3 days or feed for 4 to 14 days. However, it should be noted that the doses applied in those studies were in general significantly higher than those to which humans would be exposed. No significant increases in micronuclei were observed in mouse bone marrow after only 2 days of gavage treatment or 3 days of feed treatment [6]. A significant increase in micronucleated erythrocytes was observed in a study on the effects of the test item at various concentrations in the diet of transgenic female mice heterozygous for the p53 gene, over a six-month period. Most of the micronuclei arise from whole chromosomes rather than chromosomal damage as shown by kinetochore analysis. The lowest effective dose (LED) for the induction of micronucleated erythrocytes was 200 ppm. Inconclusive evidence was found for DNA damage in blood leukocytes, and there was no evidence for DNA damage, apoptosis or necrosis in liver parenchymal cells [7]. Overall, the test substance is negative in assays for mutation in Salmonella and mammalian cells, for DNA adducts and DNA strand breaks. In vitro chromosome aberrations are observed at cytotoxic concentrations. At high doses, a weak induction of micronuclei in mouse bone marrow increases with chronic treatment. A mechanistic study on chromosome aberrations in vitro strongly suggests that chromosome damage occurs by indirect mechanisms above a threshold concentration [8]. Such indirect mechanisms may well contribute to the reported cytogenetic effects in vivo at high dose above a threshold concentration. The weight of evidence demonstrates that the test substance possess no direct mutagenic potential both in vitro and in vivo. However, evidence exists that the test item generates free radicals responsible for the indirect mutagenic potential observed.
References
1. Bonin, A.M., J.B. Farquharson, and R.S.U. Baker, Mutagenicity of arylmethane dyes in salmonella. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1981. 89(1): p. 21-34.
2. Mortelmans, K., et al., Salmonella mutagenicity tests. II. Results from the testing of 270 chemicals. Environ. Mutagen., 1986. 8 (Suppl 7) p. 1-119.
3. Kada, T., K. Tutikawa, and Y. Sadaie, In vitro and host-mediated "rec-assay" procedures for screening chemical mutagens; and phloxine, a mutagenic red dye detected. Mutation Research, 1972. 16(2): p. 165-74.
4. Tsutsui, T., et al., Cell-transforming activity and genotoxicity of phenolphthalein in cultured Syrian hamster embryo cells. International Journal of Cancer, 1997. 73(5): p. 697-701.
5. National Toxicology Program (NTP), Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Phenolphthalein (CAS no. 77-09-8) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies) - Technical Report 465, in Technical Report 465. 1996.
6. Witt, K.L., et al., Phenolphthalein: induction of micronucleated erythrocytes in mice. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1995. 341(3): p. 151-160.
7. Tice, R.R., et al., Measurement of micronucleated erythrocytes and DNA damage during chronic ingestion of phenolphthalein in transgenic female mice heterozygous for the p53 gene. Environmental & Molecular Mutagenesis, 1998. 31(2): p. 113-24.
8. Armstrong, M.J., et al., Induction of chromosome aberrations in vitro by phenolphthalein: mechanistic studies. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2000. 457(1-2): p. 15-30.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. The substance is harmonized classified for mutagenicity Cat.2 (H341) according to Annex VI of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.