Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Hydrolysis

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From May 28, 2003 to June 11, 2003
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 111 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Radiolabelling:
no
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Buffers:
- pH: 1.2
- Composition of buffer:
Hydrochloric acid: 0.0065 mol/dm3
Potassium chloride: 0.005 mol/dm3

- pH: 4
- Composition of buffer:
Potassium hydrogen phthalate: 0.005 mol/dm3

- pH: 7
- Composition of buffer:
Disodium hydrogen orthophosphate (anhydrous): 0.003 mol/dm3
Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate: 0.002 mol/dm3
Sodium chloride: 0.002 mol/dm3

- pH: 9
- Composition of buffer:
Disodium tetraborate: 0.001 mol/dm3
Sodium chloride: 0.002 mol/dm3

Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Type of test flasks: Stoppered glass flasks
- Lighting: Solutions were shielded from the light
TEST MEDIUM
- Preparation of samples: Prepared in stoppered glass flasks at a nominal concentration of 0.001 g/L in the four buffer solutions
- Identity and concentration of co-solvent: Acetonitrile (1 %)
Duration:
24 h
pH:
1.2
Initial conc. measured:
0.032 mg/L
Duration:
0.5 h
pH:
4
Initial conc. measured:
0.917 mg/L
Duration:
1 h
pH:
7
Initial conc. measured:
0.99 mg/L
Duration:
1 h
pH:
9
Initial conc. measured:
0.555 mg/L
Number of replicates:
Two
Positive controls:
no
Negative controls:
no
Statistical methods:
Not applicable
Preliminary study:
- Estimated half life at pH 4, 7 and 9 at 25 °C: < 1 d
- Hydrolysis after 2.4 h: > 50 %
- Results indicated the need of definitive test to estimate the rate constant and t1/2

Test performance:
Not applicable
Transformation products:
not measured
Details on hydrolysis and appearance of transformation product(s):
Not applicable
% Recovery:
>= 45.9 - <= 51.5
pH:
4
Temp.:
25 °C
Duration:
0.5 h
% Recovery:
>= 64 - <= 69.5
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
Duration:
1 h
% Recovery:
>= 49 - <= 55.2
pH:
9
Temp.:
25 °C
Duration:
1 h
Key result
pH:
4
Temp.:
25 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
1.69 h-1
DT50:
0.41 h
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Key result
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
1.9 h-1
DT50:
0.36 h
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Key result
pH:
9
Temp.:
25 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
2.07 h-1
DT50:
0.34 h
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Details on results:
TEST CONDITIONS
- pH, sterility, temperature and other experimental conditions maintained throughout the study: Yes
Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, rate constant and estimated half-life were found to be 1.692 h-1 and 0.410 h (at pH 4), 1.9044 h-1 and 0.364 h (at pH 7), and 2.0664 h-1 and 0.336 h (at pH 9), respectively. Under physiologically important conditions (pH 1.2, 37°C), the test substance was found to degrade almost instantaneously in the media, with only 3.45% of the fortified concentration remaining at the time zero initial analysis.
Executive summary:

A study was performed to assess the hydrolytic stability of the test substance according to OECD Guideline 111, in compliance with GLP. Based on the results of a preliminary study, the test was conducted at pH 4, 7 and 9 at 25 ± 0.5°C, and at pH 1.2 at 37 ± 0.5°C for 24 h. Under the study conditions, rate constant and estimated half-life were found to be 1.692 h-1 and 0.410 h (at pH 4), 1.9044 h-1 and 0.364 h (at pH 7), and 2.0664 h-1 and 0.336 h (at pH 9), respectively. Under physiologically important conditions (pH 1.2, 37°C), the test substance was found to degrade almost instantaneously in the media, with only 3.45% of the fortified concentration remaining at the time zero initial analysis (Woolley and Mullee, 2003).

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Half-life for hydrolysis:
0.4 h
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

A study was performed to assess the hydrolytic stability of the test substance according to OECD Guideline 111, in compliance with GLP. Based on the results of a preliminary study, the test was conducted at pH 4, 7 and 9 at 25 ± 0.5°C, and at pH 1.2 at 37 ± 0.5°C for 24 h. Under the study conditions, rate constant and estimated half-life were found to be 1.692 h-1 and 0.410 h (at pH 4), 1.9044 h-1 and 0.364 h (at pH 7), and 2.0664 h-1 and 0.336 h (at pH 9), respectively. Under physiologically important conditions (pH 1.2, 37°C), the test substance was found to degrade almost instantaneously in the media, with only 3.45% of the fortified concentration remaining at the time zero initial analysis (Woolley and Mullee, 2003).

The hydrolysis products of m-TMXDI are comparable to those of other aliphatic and aromatic diisocyanates. Under environmentally relevant conditions (i.e. low concentrations of m-TMXDI, pH = 7), an insoluble urea and possibly also polyurea are formed (Allnex, pers. comm.; Pemberton and Tury, 2004; Heimbachet al., 1996; Yakabeet al., 1999; Turyet al., 2003; cited in Environment Canada/Health Canada, 2008). In specific cases (i.e. high dispersion combined with low concentrations), tetramethyl-m-xylene diamine may also be produced (Sopac and Boltromejuk, 1974; cited in Environment Canada/Health Canada, 2008).


The structure of the urea and polyurea are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Structure of the urea and possible polyurea formed by hydrolysis of m-TMXDI
under environmentally relevant conditions

The structure of tetramethyl-m-xylene diamine is presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Structure of tetramethyl-m-xylene diamine potentially formed by hydrolysis of m-TMXDI under specific conditions (i.e. high dispersion combined with low concentrations)

 

References

Environment Canada/Health(2008). Screening assessment for the challenge. Benzene, 1,3-bis(1-isocyanato-1-methylethyl)-(tetramethyl-m-xylylene diisocyanate). Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number 2778-42-9.https://www.ec.gc.ca/ese-ees/9C2F9934-38D3-4940-A472-5DD238B6076D/batch2_2778-42-9_en.pdf.

Heimbach F, Jaeger K and Sporenberg W (1996).Fate and biological effects of polymeric MDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate and homologues) in small artificial ponds. Ecotox Environ. Safety 33:143-153.

Pemberton D and Tury B (2004). TDI industry risk assessment: sections on physico-chemical properties, environmental exposures and environmental effects. GIL report 2004/E.

Sopac ED and Boltromejuk LP (1974). Gig. Sanit. 7:10-13.

Tury B, Pemberton D and Bailey RE (2003). Fate and potential environmental effects of methylenediphenyl diisocyanate and toluene diisocyanate released into the atmosphere. J. Air and Waste Manage. Assoc. 53:61-66.

Yakabe Y, Henderson KM, Thompson WCet al.(1999). Fate of methylenediphenyl diisocyanate and toluene diisocyanate in the aquatic environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33(15):2579-2583.