Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-546-0 | CAS number: 12270-13-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water and sediment: simulation tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: sewage treatment simulation testing
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- For justification of read-across please refer to IUCLID section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 6 h
- Key result
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable because of methodological limitations
- Remarks:
- Only parent substance was analysed. No information is available on potential metabolites. No conclusion can be made whether the test substance was subject to ultimate biodegradation.
- Transformation products:
- not measured
- Details on transformation products:
- No analysis were conducted to indentify potential transformation products.
- Evaporation of parent compound:
- no
- Remarks:
- Due to the low vapour pressure of the substance (see IUCLID section 4.6) significant evaporation of the parent substance is not expected.
- Volatile metabolites:
- not measured
- Residues:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Parent substance was analysed in influent, effluent, sludge and liquid phase of activated sludge units. No information on potential metabolites available.
- Details on results:
- RESULTS OF SUPPLEMENTARY EXPERIMENTS:
- Only slight (but non-significant) reduction of the dehydrogenase activity at the end of the test.
- No inhibition of nitrification.
- No degradation observed in subsequent OECD 302 C (MITI II Test), neither with non-adapted nor adapted sludge from Husmann units. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- A conclusion on the ulitmate biodegradation of the test substance cannot be made.
- Executive summary:
The degradation of the test substance was investigated in a experiment that was conducted in accordance with OECD Guideline 303 A (Activated Sludge Units). The test was conducted in duplicate using Husmann units (mean retention time: 6 h). The TOC concentration of the organic medium was 60 -70 mg/L, the mean test substance concentration in the influent was 77 µg/L, which was stated to be similar to real-life conditions (-> STP influent concentration at production sites). The total test duration was 31 days.
Despite of continuous addition of the test substance to the activated sludge units and high initial adsorption of the test substance to sewage sludge, the test substance did not accumulate in the test system (-> sewage sludge). At the end of the test only < 20 % of the total amount of test substance applied in the test was adsorbed to sludge, < 6 % of the total test substance amount of the influent could be found in the effluent. Analysis results of test substance adsorbed to sludge would indicate biodegradation of the test substance. Complete degradation of the test substance could however not be demonstrated to due methodological limitations (only parent substance was analysed, degradation products were not analysed).
In the subsequent degradation test that was conducted according to OECD 302 C (MITI II Test) with non-adapted and adapted sewage sludge from the Husmann units, the test substance did not degrade (0 % after 20 days).
This information is used in a read-across approach in the assessment of the substance to be registered.
For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: sewage treatment simulation testing
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Justification for type of information:
- For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Duration of test (contact time):
- d
- Key result
- % Degr.:
- 0
- Parameter:
- TOC removal
- Sampling time:
- 31 d
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- No elimination was observed after 31 days under the conditions of OECD 303 A.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradation of the test item was investigated under the conditions of OECD Test Guideline 303 A (Simulation Test - Aerobic Sewage Treatment: Activated Sludge Units). The TOC concentration of the organic medium was ca. 100 mg/L, the applied test substance concentration was 20 mg/L.
The elimination of the test substance after 31 days was reported to be 0 %.
This information is used in a read-across approach in the assessment of the substance to be registered.
For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
Referenceopen allclose all
Test substance analysis in the Husmann units:
Unit 1 |
Influent |
Cumulative values [µg test substance per time period] |
Balance [%] (Sludge, total in relation to influent) |
|||
Time period |
Influent, total |
Sludge |
Effluent |
Sludge, total |
||
26.10. – 28.10.1992 |
911 |
911 |
994 |
30 |
1024 |
112.40 |
28.10. – 30.10.1992 |
917 |
1828 |
1675 |
53 |
1728 |
94.53 |
30.10. – 02.11.1992 |
1740 |
3568 |
2622 |
99 |
2721 |
76.26 |
02.11. – 03.11.1992 |
629 |
4197 |
3446 |
116 |
3562 |
84.87 |
03.11. – 04.11.1992 |
839 |
5036 |
3276 |
143 |
3419 |
67.89 |
04.11. – 06.11.1992 |
1342 |
6378 |
3380 |
199 |
3579 |
56.11 |
06.11. – 09.11.1992 |
1908 |
8286 |
4186 |
318 |
4504 |
54.36 |
09.11. – 11.11.1992 |
1064 |
9350 |
4194 |
431 |
4625 |
49.47 |
11.11. – 13.11.1992 |
1187 |
10537 |
4194 |
446 |
4640 |
44.04 |
13.11. – 16.11.1992 |
1423 |
11960 |
4598 |
563 |
5161 |
43.15 |
16.11. – 18.11.1992 |
1338 |
13298 |
4208 |
644 |
4852 |
36.49 |
18.11. – 20.11.1992 |
1149 |
14447 |
3586 |
706 |
4292 |
29.71 |
20.11. – 23.11.1992 |
1600 |
16047 |
2980 |
776 |
3756 |
23.41 |
23.11. – 25.11.1992 |
1294 |
17341 |
2374 |
824 |
3198 |
18.44 |
25.11. – 27.11.1992 |
1264 |
18605 |
2160 |
847 |
3007 |
16.16 |
Unit 2 |
Influent |
Cumulative values [µg test substance per time period] |
Balance [%] (Sludge, total in relation to influent) |
|||
Time period |
Influent, total |
Sludge |
Effluent |
Sludge, total |
||
26.10. – 28.10.1992 |
918 |
918 |
1052 |
15 |
1024 |
111.55 |
28.10. – 30.10.1992 |
917 |
1835 |
1838 |
69 |
1907 |
103.92 |
30.10. – 02.11.1992 |
1730 |
3565 |
2622 |
171 |
2793 |
78.35 |
02.11. – 03.11.1992 |
641 |
4206 |
3088 |
209 |
3297 |
78.39 |
03.11. – 04.11.1992 |
856 |
5062 |
3215 |
264 |
3479 |
68.73 |
04.11. – 06.11.1992 |
1342 |
6404 |
2935 |
352 |
3287 |
51.33 |
06.11. – 09.11.1992 |
1901 |
8305 |
2733 |
418 |
3151 |
37.94 |
09.11. – 11.11.1992 |
1103 |
9408 |
2737 |
514 |
3251 |
34.56 |
11.11. – 13.11.1992 |
1230 |
10638 |
2781 |
562 |
3343 |
31.43 |
13.11. – 16.11.1992 |
1467 |
12105 |
3129 |
718 |
3847 |
31.78 |
16.11. – 18.11.1992 |
1350 |
13455 |
3117 |
767 |
3884 |
28.87 |
18.11. – 20.11.1992 |
1172 |
14627 |
3119 |
809 |
3928 |
26.85 |
20.11. – 23.11.1992 |
1659 |
16286 |
2919 |
941 |
3860 |
23.70 |
23.11. – 25.11.1992 |
1294 |
17580 |
2727 |
1021 |
3748 |
21.32 |
25.11. – 27.11.1992 |
1322 |
18902 |
2331 |
1077 |
3408 |
18.03 |
Degradation of the organic medium:
Unit 1 |
Unit 2 |
||||||
Date |
Influent mg/L TOC |
Effluent mg/L TOC |
% Elimination |
Date |
Influent mg/L TOC |
Effluent mg/L TOC |
% Elimination |
20.10.92 |
68.5 |
8.67 |
87.34 |
20.10.92 |
94.4 |
8.25 |
87.19 |
21.10.92 |
69.7 |
12.47 |
82.11 |
21.10.92 |
64.5 |
11.51 |
82.16 |
22.10.92 |
69.7 |
8.83 |
87.33 |
22.10.92 |
64.5 |
10.08 |
84.37 |
23.10.92 |
68.4 |
10.96 |
83.98 |
23.10.92 |
64.5 |
9.58 |
85.15 |
26.10.92 |
67 |
6.81 |
89.84 |
26.10.92 |
64.2 |
6.67 |
89.61 |
28.10.92 |
64.9 |
4.16 |
93.59 |
28.10.92 |
61.7 |
4.19 |
93.21 |
30.10.92 |
71 |
2.74 |
96.14 |
30.10.92 |
69.4 |
2.70 |
96.11 |
02.11.92 |
63.4 |
2.63 |
95.85 |
02.11.92 |
68.3 |
2.74 |
95.99 |
04.11.92 |
72.4 |
4.11 |
94.32 |
04.11.92 |
72.7 |
3.91 |
94.62 |
06.11.92 |
68.4 |
4.52 |
93.39 |
06.11.92 |
69.6 |
5.03 |
92.77 |
09.11.92 |
72.3 |
7.55 |
89.56 |
09.11.92 |
69.6 |
10.39 |
85.07 |
11.11.92 |
70.9 |
2.08 |
97.07 |
11.11.92 |
68.4 |
2.37 |
96.54 |
13.11.92 |
69.4 |
2.50 |
96.40 |
13.11.92 |
66.8 |
3.66 |
94.52 |
16.11.92 |
73.5 |
3.13 |
95.74 |
16.11.92 |
72.2 |
3.46 |
95.21 |
18.11.92 |
67.1 |
2.84 |
95.77 |
18.11.92 |
68.5 |
3.44 |
94.98 |
20.11.92 |
66.9 |
2.95 |
95.59 |
20.11.92 |
64.1 |
3.45 |
94.62 |
23.11.92 |
67.7 |
3.48 |
94.86 |
23.11.92 |
66.8 |
3.89 |
94.18 |
25.11.92 |
69.4 |
3.57 |
94.86 |
25.11.92 |
67.2 |
3.31 |
95.07 |
Mean elimination: |
92.43 |
Mean elimination: |
91.74 |
Description of key information
The elimination of the test substance was investigated in two separate experiments which were conducted in accordance with OECD Guideline 303 A (Activated Sludge Units).
The first test was conducted 1989 over a total test duration of 31 days (Stutz, 1990). Elimination was followed by determination of the TOC concentration of the effluent. The TOC concentration of the organic medium applied in the test was 100 mg/L, while the TOC concentration of the test substance was 20 mg/L. No elimination could be observed in this study.
This is however surprising, as the test substance is a cationic compound which is expected to highly adsorb to sludge particles.
The documentation of this study is very poor and is not sufficient for the assessment of the study results. Therefore, it is considered not reliable and is not further considered in the assessment.
The second study was conducted 1992 over a period of 31 days using duplicate Husmann units (Schnalke et al., 1993). The TOC concentration of the organic medium was 60 -70 mg/L. The mean test substance concentration applied in the influent was rather low (77 µg/L, but still in line with OECD 303 A) and similar to real-life conditions. At the beginning of the test, a high initial adsorption of the test substance to sewage sludge could be observed. Although test substance was continuously added to the test vessels, the test substance did not accumulate in the sludge: only < 20 % of the total amount of test substance applied in the test was adsorbed to sludge at the end of the test. Less than 6 % of the total test substance amount of the influent could be detected in the effluent.
In the subsequent degradation test that Schnalke et al. (1993) conducted according to OECD 302 C (MITI II Test) with non-adapted and adapted sewage sludge from the Husmann units, the test substance did not degrade (0 % after 20 days).
Biodegradation in Continuous Activated Sludge tests can only directly be determined when the test material is non-sorptive. As only the parent substance was analysed and degradation products were not considered, complete degradation of the test substance could not be demonstrated. Furthermore, the OECD 303 A test does in general not provide a definitive degradation half-life that can be compared directly to the persistence criteria as defined in REACH Annex XIII.
However, the results from the OECD 303 A test may be used to estimate the removal of the test substance in sewage treatment plants (STP), the resulting effluent concentration, and the concentration in the receiving aquatic environment.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
This information is used in a read-across approach in the assessment of the substance to be registered.
For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.