Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-156-4 | CAS number: 62722-22-9 1 - 2.5 moles ethoxylated
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 06-2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-{2-[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]ethoxy}ethyl prop-2-enoate
- Cas Number:
- 117646-83-0
- Molecular formula:
- C15H28O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-{2-[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]ethoxy}ethyl prop-2-enoate
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Test substance name: MI RAMER M1086
Appearance : Clear liquid
Manufacturing date: 2012-03-29
Supplier:Miwon Specialty Chemical Co., Ltd.
Receipt day: 2012-05-23
Deli very amount: 399.223 g(Gross)
Cas No.:117646-83-0
Lot No.:120329JY1
Purit y: 95.55 %
Expiration date: 2013-03-28 (Manufactured after 1 year)
Storage condition: Room temperature [(15 ~ 25)°C
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name : MIRAMER M1086
Supplier : Miwon Specialty Chemical Co., Ltd.
Manufactured date : 2012-03-29
Delivery date : 2012-05-23
Delivery amount : 399.223 g (Gross)
Appearance : Clear liquid
Lot No. : 120329JY1
Cas No. : 117646-83-0
Purity : 99.5 %
Molecular weight : 272
Storage condition : Room temperature (15-25°C)
Expiration date : 2013-03-28
Method
- Target gene:
- Base pair substitution type : Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535 and Escherichia coli WP2uvrA
Frame-shift type : Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA1537
The test strains listed below were chosen according to the OECD guidelines, and they are known to be very sensitive to mutagens and widely used in mutagenicity studies with bacteria. All of the test strains were purchased from Molecular Toxicology Inc. (2011-03 ~ 2011-05) and used after subculture following confirmation of genotypes.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preparation of test article:
The does range-finding test was performed at concentration levels of 50, 100, 500, 1000 and 5000 μg/plate (the highest concentration). Based on the dose range-finding test, 100 μg/plate was selected as the highest concentration of the main test, and the highest concentration was serially two-fold diluted to make 5 concentration levels.
Preparation of positive controls:
Sodium azide was dissolved in distilled water while other three positive controls were dissolved with DMSO, and then all of positive controls were stored at -20°C. These prepared positive items were thawed immediately before use. - Vehicle / solvent:
- The test article was soluble in DMSO, so DMSO was chosen as a vehicle and usedin diluting the test article. The chemicals described in OECD guideline were chosen as positive control article.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- furylfuramide
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Treatment of test article
Treatment of test article was tested by using pre-incubation method. 0.1 mL of test article, 0.5 mL of S9 mix (or sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) and 0.1 mL of bacterial culture were added to each dry heat sterilized test tube. This mixture was shaken for 20 minutes at 37°C using shaking incubator (120 rpm). Next, 2 mL of top agar was added to each test tude, and then the mixture in the test tubes was poured onto minimal glucose agar plate (one tube per plate). Vehicle control groups were treated with vehicle only, and each of positive control groups was treated with strain-specific positive controls. After the top agar was solidified, the plates were inverted and incubated at 37°C for about 48 hours. Then, the revertant colonise were counted. In order to check sterility in this test, the highest concentration of test article (0.1 mL) and S9 mix (0.5 mL) were mixed individually with 2 mL of top agar and poured onto agar plate in the same manner.
Dose range-finding test
Dose range-finding test was performed with the five test strains at dose levels of 0, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and 5000 μg/plate both in the absence (S9-) and presence (S9+) of S9 mix. Each dose group was assayed in triplicate.
Main test
100 μg/plate was selected as the highest concentration for the main test by considering the result of dose ranging-finding test, and the highest concentration was serially two-fold diluted to make 5 concentration levels (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μ g/plate). Each dose group was assayed in triplicate.
Conformation test was not performed.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Test article, MIRAMER M1086, was evaluated for its potential to induce reverse mutation in four histidine auxotroph strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537) and one tryptophan auxotroph strain of Escherichia coli (WP2uvrA ).
The test article, MIRAMER M1086, was dissolved and diluted with DMSO. Precipitation or anything unusual to report was not observed during the test article preparation.
The main test was performed at five concentration levels of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 μ g/plate with negative and positive controls in the absence and presence of metabolic activation system (S9 mix). There was no contamination from the test article and S9 mix used in the main test. The number of viable cell counted in overnight cell cultures for the five strains used in the test, measured by the serial dilution method, was 2.1 ~ 5.2×109 CFU/mL which was considered to be appropriate.
There was no reproducible increase in the number of revertant colonies compared to its vehicle control at any dose in any of the strains. The positive controls induced a marked increase in the number of revertant colonies as anticipated.
Therefore, it is considered that test article, MIRAMER M1086, showed no evidence of mutagenic potential at the concentration range tested in five test strains under the condition of this test. - Executive summary:
The test article, MIRAMER M1086, was evaluated for its potential to induce reverse mutation in the histidine auxotroph strains of Salmonella typhimurium such as TA100, TA1535, TA98 and TA1537 and in the tryptophan auxotroph strain of Escherichia coli WP2uvr A.
The test article was dissolved and diluted with DMSO. Based on the dose range-finding test which was performed at concentrations of 50, 100, 500, 1000 and 5000 μg/plate (the highest concentration), the main test was performed with the final concentrations of test article ranged 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μg/plate with negative and positive control in the absence and presence of metabolic activation system (S9
mix).
In this study, there was no significant increase in the number of revertant colonies compared to its vehicle control at any dose in any of the strains. In addition, antibacterial effects such as a decrease in the number of colonies were also not observed in any of the strains.
Therefore, these results of the bacterial reverse mutation assay showed that, under the conditions of this study, MIRAMER M1086 was considered not to induce a reverse bacterial mutation to the strains used in this test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
