Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 256-457-3 | CAS number: 49744-26-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2017-07-16 to 2017-07-20, with the definitive exposure phase from 2017-07-17 to 2017-07-20
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- p-[(5-cyano-1,6-dihydro-2-hydroxy-1,4-dimethyl-6-oxo-3-pyridyl)azo]-N-(2-ethylhexyl)benzamide
- EC Number:
- 250-205-6
- EC Name:
- p-[(5-cyano-1,6-dihydro-2-hydroxy-1,4-dimethyl-6-oxo-3-pyridyl)azo]-N-(2-ethylhexyl)benzamide
- Cas Number:
- 30449-81-1
- Molecular formula:
- C23H29N5O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-[(5-cyano-2-hydroxy-1,4-dimethyl-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridin-3-yl)diazenyl]-N-(2-ethylhexyl)benzamide
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Determination of the test item
The test concentration of Disperse Yellow 198 was analytically verified via HPLC-DAD in the saturated solution and the control at the start of the exposure (0 hours). At the start of the exposure (0 hours), sampling was carried out after preparation of the loading level. At the end of the exposure (72 hours), no analytical monitoring was carried out, because a measured test item concentration above LOD was not observed at the start of the exposure.
Test solutions
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Preparation of the Saturated solution
A saturated solution with a nominal loading of 10.0 mg test item/L was prepared once 24 hours prior to the start of the exposure. An appropriate amount of the test item was weighed out. The test item was applied onto a glass slide. The glass slide with the test item was inserted into a glass bottle with an appropriate amount of dilution water. The saturated solution was stirred for 24 hours (1100 rpm at room temperature) with a magnetic stirrer. Undissolved particles were removed by membrane filtration (membrane filter 0.45 µm, RC, MACHEREY-NAGEL). The filter was saturated in order to avoid adsorption during the filtration. The first 25 mL of the filtrate were discarded. The filtration was interrupted for 10 minutes to allow adsorption and saturation of the filter material with dissolved test item. Thereafter, the filtration was continued. The next 25 mL were discarded. The following filtrate, i.e. the saturated solution, was used as a limit concentration in the test. During filtration, the filter was always be kept covered.
The solution was checked via laser beam (Tyndall effect), which was negative.
Test loading
All terms related to concentration level are given as loading level because partly dissolved compounds and mixtures cannot be related to concentrations. One limit concentration were tested with a nominal loading of 10.0 mg/L. The limit loading is based on the results of a non-GLP preliminary range finding test.
Control
Six replicates (without test item) were incubated under the same conditions as the test loadings.
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata HINDÁK
- Strain: SAG 61.81
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): SAG, Pflanzenphysiologisches Institut der Universität Göttingen, Nikolausberger Weg 18, D-37073 Göttingen
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 3 days
- Method of cultivation: Fresh stocks were prepared every month on Z-Agar. Light intensity amounted to 2567 – 5130 lux corresponding to 35 - 70 µE ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1 for 24 h per day.
Study design
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- No
Test conditions
- Hardness:
- Not specified
- Test temperature:
- min.: 22.0 max.: 23.0 mean value: 22.5
- pH:
- Nominal test item loading pH-values
[mg/L] Start; 0 hours End; 72 hours
10.0 7.70 8.33
Control 7.91 8.75 - Dissolved oxygen:
- Not measured
- Salinity:
- Not measured, freshwater conditions
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 100% of the saturated solution
Measured: < LOQ - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): open, cotton wool plugs
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: sterile 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, test volume 100 mL
- Aeration: Test containers were placed on a rotary shaker and oscillated at appr. 70 rpm
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): None
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): One application at test start
- Initial cells density: Nominal: approximately 2 - 5 x 10^3 cells/mL, Actual: mean 6839 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: Mean 1914404 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water:
Composition of Dilution Water
according to the guideline
Component Concentration [mg/L]
NH4Cl 15
MgCl2 x 6 H2O 12
CaCl2 x 2 H2O 18
MgSO4 x 7 H2O 15
KH2PO4 1.6
FeCl3 x 6 H2O 0.064a2EDTA x 2 H2O 0.1
H3BO3 0.185
MnCl2 x 4 H2O 0.415
ZnCl2 3 x 10^-3
Na2MoO4 x 2 H2O 7 x 10^-3
CoCl2 x 6 H2O 1.5 x 10^-3
CuCl2 x 2 H2O 1 x 10^-5
NaHCO3 50
pH 8.1 ± 0.2
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 24 h
- Light intensity and quality: Approximately 4440 to 8880 lux, corresponding to 60 to 120
µE ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1, mean value: 5771 lux,
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
-Chlorophyll a-fluorescence
The cell density was measured daily via Chlorophyll a-fluorescence, excitation at 436 nm, emission at 685 nm. Dilution water was used as a background signal. No self-fluorescence was found in the preliminary range finding test at the saturated solution. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Potassium dichromate)
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOEL
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LOEL
- Effect conc.:
- > 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10/20/50
- Effect conc.:
- > 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOEL
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: yield
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LOEL
- Effect conc.:
- > 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: yield
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL10/20/50
- Effect conc.:
- > 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: yield
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test):
- Unusual cell shape: No
- Colour differences: No
- Flocculation: No
- Adherence to test vessels: No
- Aggregation of algal cells: No
- Other: The saturated solution was visually clear throughout the exposure period.
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: No - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The toxicity of potassium dichromate (SIGMA ALDRICH, batch number MKBV0900V, purity 99.0 %, CAS RN 7778-50-9) to the unicellular freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined over a period of 72 hours from 2017-04-18 to 2017-04-21. The reference item toxicity is in the valid range following test facility SOPS.
EC50-Values of the Reference Item
based on nominal concentrations mg/L, (0-72 hours)
Current Study Valid Range (average ± 3 x SD)
Growth Rate inhibition
ErC50 0.559 0.754 ± 0.518
95% confidence interval 0.538 – 0.581
Yield inhibition
EyC50 0.320 0.398 ± 0.291
95% confidence interval 0.242 – 0.341
SD = Standard deviation - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- EL-values and statistical analyses
EL-values of the growth rate and yield inhibition were estimated empirically based on the results of the single treatment level (Limit test design).
NOEL and LOEL values
NOEL/LOEL were determined by calculation of statistical significance of growth rate and yield. As a standard, a t-test was used for NOEL/LOEL calculations. When running a t-test a Normality test and an Equal Variance test were done first. The SHAPIRO-WILK-Test was used to test for normal distribution of data. The Levene median test was used for equal variance. P-values for both Normality and Equal Variance tests are 0.05. The -value (acceptable probability of incorrectly concluding that there is a difference) is =0.05.
Software
The data for the tables in this report were computer-generated and have been rounded for presentation from the full derived data. Consequently, if calculated manually based on the given data minor deviations may occur from these figures.
Calculations were carried out using software
•Excel, MICROSOFT CORPORATION
•SigmaPlot, SPSS INC.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Cell Densities
Nominal test item loading |
Replicate |
Cell density [cells/mL] |
|||||||||
[mg/L] |
No. |
0 hours |
24 hours |
48 hours |
72 hours |
||||||
10.0 |
1 |
6839 |
28483 |
275569 |
1958850 |
||||||
2 |
6839 |
26712 |
243687 |
1964643 |
|||||||
3 |
6839 |
26753 |
230976 |
1818226 |
|||||||
4 |
6839 |
31830 |
289836 |
2091163 |
|||||||
5 |
6839 |
28234 |
283563 |
1915018 |
|||||||
6 |
6839 |
31350 |
346261 |
2317694 |
|||||||
Mean |
6839 |
28894 |
278315 |
2010932 |
|||||||
Control |
1 |
6839 |
29477 |
289637 |
2021642 |
||||||
2 |
6839 |
35584 |
296296 |
2274155 |
|||||||
3 |
6839 |
35084 |
318803 |
2065707 |
|||||||
4 |
6839 |
26818 |
248006 |
1828409 |
|||||||
5 |
6839 |
21039 |
232404 |
1709203 |
|||||||
6 |
6839 |
25404 |
174996 |
1587306 |
|||||||
Mean |
6839 |
28901 |
260024 |
1914404 |
Evaluation after 72 hours
Statistically
significant differences of growth rates and yield compared to
control
values are marked (+), not significant differences are marked (-).
Nominal test item loading |
Replicate |
Growth rate |
Growth rate inhibition |
Yield |
Inhibition of yield |
||
[mg/L] |
No. |
[d-1] |
[%] |
[cells/mL] |
[%] |
||
10.0 |
1 |
|
1.89 |
-1 |
|
1952011 |
-2 |
2 |
|
1.89 |
-1 |
|
1957804 |
-3 |
|
3 |
|
1.86 |
1 |
|
1811387 |
5 |
|
4 |
|
1.91 |
-2 |
|
2084324 |
-9 |
|
5 |
|
1.88 |
0 |
|
1908179 |
0 |
|
6 |
|
1.94 |
-4 |
|
2310855 |
-21 |
|
Mean |
(-) |
1.89 |
-1 |
(-) |
2004093 |
-5 |
|
Control |
1 |
|
1.90 |
|
|
2014803 |
|
2 |
|
1.94 |
|
|
2267316 |
|
|
3 |
|
1.90 |
|
|
2058868 |
|
|
4 |
|
1.86 |
|
|
1821570 |
|
|
5 |
|
1.84 |
|
|
1702364 |
|
|
6 |
|
1.82 |
|
|
1580467 |
|
|
Mean |
|
1.88 |
|
|
1907565 |
|
Section-by-Section and Average
Specific Growth Ratesof the Control Group
(0 - 72 hours)
|
Replicate No. |
Specific growth rate [d-1] |
Mean (0 - 72 hours) |
SD ± |
CV |
Mean CV [%] |
||
section-by-section |
||||||||
0 - 24 hours |
24 - 48 hours |
48 - 72 hours |
||||||
Control |
1 |
1.46 |
2.29 |
1.94 |
1.90 |
0.414 |
21.8 |
22.4 |
2 |
1.65 |
2.12 |
2.04 |
1.94 |
0.251 |
13.0 |
||
3 |
1.64 |
2.21 |
1.87 |
1.90 |
0.288 |
15.1 |
||
4 |
1.37 |
2.22 |
2.00 |
1.86 |
0.445 |
23.9 |
||
5 |
1.12 |
2.40 |
2.00 |
1.84 |
0.653 |
35.5 |
||
6 |
1.31 |
1.93 |
2.21 |
1.82 |
0.457 |
25.2 |
||
|
|
|
Mean |
1.87 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
SD ± |
0.04 |
|
|||
|
|
|
CV [%] |
2.36 |
|
SD = Standard deviation CV = Coefficient of variation
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- In this study, Disperse Yellow 198 was found not to inhibit the growth of the freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata after 72 hours.
Effect values were determined as follows (based on nominal test item loading):
The EL50-values for inhibition of growth rate (ErL50) and yield (EyL50) after 72 hours were > 10.0 mg/L, respectively. The NOEL-values for both inhibition of growth rate and yield after 72 hours were 10.0 mg/L, respectively. - Executive summary:
The toxicity of Disperse Yellow 198 to the unicellular freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined according to the principles of OECD 201 and Council Regulation (EC) No. 266/2016/Method C.3 from 2017-07-16 to 2017-07-20, with the definitive exposure phase from 2017-07-17 to 2017-07-20 at the test facility. The aim of the study was the determination of NOEL, LOEL, EL10, EL20- and EL50-values of growth rate and yield over a period of 72 hours.
The study was conducted under static conditions with an initial cell density of 6839 cells/mL. A saturated solution with a nominal loading of 10.0 mg test item/L was prepared with dilution water 24±1 hour prior to the start of the exposure. An appropriate amount of the test item was weighed out. The saturated solution was stirred for 24 ±1hour (1100 rpm) with a magnetic stirrer at room temperature. Undissolved particles were removed by membrane filtration. The following filtrate, i.e. the saturated solution was used in the test.The solution was checked via laser beam (Tyndall effect), which was negative.
Six replicates were tested for the limit loading level and six for the control. The test media were colourless and clear throughout the test period. The environmental conditions were within the acceptable limits.
The measured concentration of the test item was even < LOD at the start of the exposure (0 hours), therefore no analysis at the end of the exposure was necessary.
All effect values given are based on the nominal test item loading of Disperse Yellow 198.
NOEL, LOEL, ELx-values of Disperse Yellow 198 (0 - 72 hours)
based on the nominal test item loadings
Growth Rate Inhibition
nominal test item loading [mg/L]NOEL
10.0
LOEL
> 10.0
ErL10
> 10.0
ErL20
> 10.0
ErL50
> 10.0
Yield Inhibition
nominal test item loading [mg/L]
NOEL
10.0
LOEL
> 10.0
EyL10
> 10.0
EyL20
> 10.0
EyL50
> 10.0
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.