Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Remarks:
In vivo study performed prior (1980) to REACH implementation.
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1980-09-29 - 1980-10-20 (experimental phase)
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Given information allows the conclusion the study was well performed according to adopted guidelines, given data allows also conclusions on classification according to Regulation 1272/2008.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980
Report date:
1980

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: 16 CFR Section 1500.42
Version / remarks:
The methods employed in the testing, evaluation and in the grading of the test material are similar to those described in Section 1500.42 - Federal Hazardous Substances Act Regulation CFR 16 P. 125.
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,3,4-thiadiazole-2,5-dithiol
EC Number:
214-014-1
EC Name:
1,3,4-thiadiazole-2,5-dithiol
Cas Number:
1072-71-5
Molecular formula:
C2H2N2S3
IUPAC Name:
1,3,4-thiadiazole-2,5-dithiol

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Albino
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: young adult
- Housing: The animals were housed and maintained in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act (Pub. L-94--279) 9 CFR Part 3.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
The first six rabbits did not have their eyes washed subsequent to instillation. The remaining three rabbits had the treated eyes washed after 30 seconds for 1 minute with tepid water (rate of flow approximately 1000 ml/minute).
Observation period (in vivo):
The treated eyes were examined at one, two, three, five, seven, fourteen and twenty-one days following instillation and washout of the test material into the eyes.
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The first six rabbits did not have their eyes washed subsequent to instillation. The remaining three rabbits had the treated eyes washed after 30 seconds for 1 minute with tepid water (rate of flow approximately 1000 ml/minute).

SCORING SYSTEM: Interpretation of the results was made in accordance with the Draize Scale of Scoring Ocular Lesions.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
3.55
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 21 days
Remarks on result:
probability of severe irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.89
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 21 days
Remarks on result:
probability of severe irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
Redness
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.45
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 21 days
Remarks on result:
probability of severe irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
3.22
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 21 days
Remarks on result:
probability of severe irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Based on the accompanying tables, the subject material is a primary ocular irritant within the definition of the Act-Reference: Section 1500.42 (b)(1)(2) and requires cautionary labelling with respect to that section.
The material is a severe ocular irritant in the unwashed eye. Washing reduces the degree and duration of the irritation substantially.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Study was performed scientifically reasonable similar to that described in Section 1500.42 ― Federal Hazardous Substances Act Regulations ― 16 CFR - P. 125 on 1,3,4-Thiadiazole-2,5-dithiole, and is sufficiently documented. Hence, the results can be considered as reliable to assess the irritating potential of 1,3,4-Thiadiazole-2,5-dithiole on the rabbit eye in vivo.
According to Regulation 1272/2008, classification as Irreversible effects on the eye/serious damage to eyes (Category 1), If, when applied to the eye of an animal, a substance produces:
— at least in one animal effects on the cornea, iris or conjunctiva that are not expected to reverse or have not fully reversed within an observation period of normally 21 days; and/or
— at least in 2 of 3 tested animals, a positive response of:
— corneal opacity ≥ 3 and/or
— iritis > 1,5
calculated as the mean scores following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material.
Further, these observations include animals with grade 4 cornea lesions and other severe reactions (e.g., destruction of cornea) observed at any time during the test, and lesions are not fully reversible within a 21-day observation period.
An OECD 405 guideline study suffices for classification, and according to the guideline, a substance shall not be removed for 24h, solids not until 1 hour after application unless corrosion effects are noted. Hence, the results gained with animals No 7-9 cannot be used for classification, as the substance was washed out after 30 seconds. So classification must be based on the results obtained from animals No 1-6 as here the substance was not washed out. In all six animals a corneal opacity score of 4 was observed in at least one time point, all observed effects were not fully reversible after 21 days, mean corneal opacity was ≥ 3 in 5/6 animals, and iritis was also > 1,5 in 5/6 animals. Hence, the substance must be classified as Eye dam. Cat. 1.
Executive summary:

In a primary eye irritation study (16 CFR Section 1500.41), 0.1 g unchanged 1,3,4-Thiadiazole-2,5-dithiole was instilled into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of young albino rabbits. In six rabbits, the eye was not washed out, in 3 the eye was rinsed after 30 seconds. Animals then were observed for 21days.  Irritation was scored by the method of Draize.

In all six animals a corneal opacity score of 4 was observed in at least one time point, all observed effects were not fully reversible after 21 days, mean corneal opacity was ≥ 3 in 5/6 animals, and iritis was also > 1,5 in 5/6 animals. The material is a severe ocular irritant in the unwashed eye. Washing reduces the degree and duration of the irritation substantially.

In this study, 1,3,4-Thiadiazole-2,5-dithiole is severely irritating to the eye, and must be classified as Eye Dam. Cat. 1 based on the criteria of Regulation 1272/2008.