Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-138-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The experimental phases of the study were performed between 28th February 2012 and 11th December 2012.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of relevant results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5395 (In Vivo Mammalian Cytogenetics Tests: Erythrocyte Micronucleus Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium glucoheptonate
- EC Number:
- 250-480-2
- EC Name:
- Sodium glucoheptonate
- Cas Number:
- 31138-65-5
- Molecular formula:
- C7H13O8.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- Sodium(3R, 4S, 5R, 6R)-2,3,4,5,6,7-hexahydroxyheptanoate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- Sponsor's identification: Sodium Glucoheptonate
Description : Dark brown liquid
Batch number: 921000100
Purity: 50.5% active ingredient (accounted for in principle)
Date received : 09 February 2012
Expiry date : 09 February 2015
Storage conditions: Room temperature, in the dark
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Sufficient albino Hsd: ICR (CD-1®) strain mice were obtained from Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK. At the start of the main test the mice weighed 21 to 30g and were approximately six to ten weeks old. After a minimum acclimatisation period of five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by tail marking and a number written on a colour coded cage card.
The animals were housed in groups of up to seven in solid-floor polypropylene cages with wood-flake bedding. Free access to mains drinking water and food (Harlan Teklad 2014C Global Certified Rodent Diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25°C and 30 to 70%, respectively. Any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was approximately fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours light and twelve hours darkness.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- The vehicle was supplied as a 10x concentrated solution by Gibco, as follows:
Supplier's identification : Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline Solution
Supplier's lot number: 938281
In-house serial number : V-5241
Date received : 02 November 2011
Expiry date : 01 May 2013
Storage conditions : Room temperature - Details on exposure:
- A range-finding toxicity test was performed to determine a suitable dose level and route of administration for the micronucleus test. The dose level selected should ideally be the maximum tolerated dose level or that which produces some evidence of toxicity up to a maximum recommended dose of 2000 mg/kg. The range-finding toxicity test was also used to determine if the main test was to be performed using both sexes or males only. With no evidence of toxicity via the oral route, and following discussions with the Sponsor, it was considered necessary to investigate the intraperitoneal route of administration to maximise exposure of the test item.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 or 48 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- Groups, each of seven male mice, were dosed once only via the intraperitoneal route with the test item at 2000, 1000 or 500 mg/kg. One group of mice from each dose level was killed by cervical dislocation 24 hours following treatment and a second group dosed with test item at 2000 mg/kg was killed after 48 hours.
- Post exposure period:
- Immediately following termination (i.e. 24 or 48 hours following dosing), the animals were dissected and the slide preparation had begun.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2000, 1000 or 500 mg/kg
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 7 males per dose group (2000, 1000 or 500 mg/kg)
Two additional groups of male mice were included in the study; one group (seven mice) was dosed via the intraperitoneal route with the vehicle alone (PBS).
A second group (five mice) was dosed orally with cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide is a positive control item known to produce micronuclei under the conditions of the test. - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- The positive control item was supplied by Acros Organics, as follows:
Supplier's identification: Cyclophosphamide
Supplier's lot number : A0302605
In-house serial number : R-5359
Date received : 27 April 2012
Expiry date : 27 April 2014
Storage conditions: Approximately 4°C in the dark
For the purpose of this study the positive control item was freshly prepared as required as a solution at the appropriate concentration in distilled water.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Immediately following termination (i.e. 24 or 48 hours following dosing), both femurs were dissected from each surviving animal, aspirated with foetal bovine serum and bone marrow smears prepared following centrifugation and re-suspension.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Immediately following termination (i.e. 24 or 48 hours following dosing), both femurs were dissected from each surviving animal, aspirated with foetal bovine serum and bone marrow smears prepared following centrifugation and re-suspension. The smears were air-dried, fixed in absolute methanol, stained in May-Grunwald/Giemsa, allowed to air-dry and a cover slip applied using mounting medium.
Stained bone marrow smears were coded and examined blind using light microscopy at x1000 magnification. Where possible, the incidence of micronucleated cells per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE-blue stained immature cells) per animal was scored. Micronuclei are normally circular in shape, although occasionally they may be oval or half-moon shaped, and have a sharp contour with even staining. In addition, the number of normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE-pink stained mature cells) associated with 1000 erythrocytes was counted; these cells were also scored for incidence of micronuclei. The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was calculated together with appropriate group mean values and standard deviations. - Evaluation criteria:
- A comparison was made between the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes occurring in each of the test item groups and the number occurring in the vehicle control group.
A positive mutagenic response would be demonstrated when a statistically significant, dose-responsive, toxicologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed for either the 24 or 48-hour kill times when compared to the vehicle control group.
If these criteria were not fulfilled, then the test item would be considered non-genotoxic under the conditions of the test.
A positive response for bone marrow toxicity would be demonstrated when the dose group mean polychromatic to normochromatic ratio was shown to be statistically significantly lower than the vehicle control group. - Statistics:
- All data were statistically analysed using appropriate statistical methods as recommended by the UKEMS Sub-committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing Report, Part III (1989). The data was analysed following a √(x +1) transformation using Student's t-test (two tailed) and any significant results were confirmed using the one way analysis of variance.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 500 to 2000 mg/kg
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: In animals dosed with the test item at 2000 mg/kg via the oral route, clinical signs were not observed in any of the animals. Therefore, with no evidence of toxicity the intraperitoneal route of administration was investigated to maximise exposure of the test item. Using the intraperitoneal route, the clinical signs hunched posture, ptosis, increased activity, and irritation and over grooming of the injection site were observed in animals dosed with the test item at and above 1000 mg/kg.
- Evidence of cytotoxicity in tissue analyzed: No
- High dose with and without activation: There was no mutagenic response in the highest dose group either with or without metabolic activation.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay):The test item was found not to produce a toxicologically significant increase in the frequency of micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes of mice under the conditions of the test.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): Statistically significant decreases in the PCE/NCE ratio were not observed in any of the test item dose groups when compared to the vehicle control group. However, the observation of clinical signs was taken to indicate that systemic absorption had occurred and exposure to the target tissue had been achieved.
- Statistical evaluation: There was no evidence of any statistically significant increases in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals dosed with the test item when compared to the vehicle control group.
There was no evidence of any statistically significant increases in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals dosed with the test item when compared to the vehicle control group.
The positive control group showed a marked increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes hence confirming the sensitivity of the system to the known mutagenic activity of cyclophosphamide under the conditions of the test.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Mortality Data and Clinical Observations:
There were no premature deaths seen in any of the dose groups in the main test. Clinical signs were observed in animals dosed with the test item at and above 1000 mg/kg in both the 24 and 48-hour dose groups, where applicable, and included hunched posture and ptosis.
Summary of group mean data
Treatment group |
Number of PCE with micronuclei per 2000 PCE |
PCE/NCE Ratio |
||
Group mean |
SD |
Group mean |
SD |
|
Vehicle control (PBS) 10 ml/kg 24-h sampling time |
1.0 |
1.2 |
0.84 |
0.27 |
Positive control (Cyclophosphamide) 50 mg/kg 24-h sampling time |
23.0*** |
8.4 |
0.95 |
0.20 |
Sodium glucoheptonate 2000 mg/kg 48-h sampling time |
2.0 |
1.6 |
1.27 |
0.47 |
Sodium glucoheptonate 2000 mg/kg 24-h sampling time |
2.1 |
2.9 |
1.56 |
0.43 |
Sodium glucoheptonate 1000 mg/kg 24-h sampling time |
0.9 |
1.6 |
1.91 |
0.94 |
Sodium glucoheptonate 500 mg/kg 24-h sampling time |
0.6 |
0.5 |
1.47 |
0.31 |
PCE = Polychromatic erythrocytes
NCE = Normochromatic erythrocytes
SD = Standard deviation
*** = P < 0.001
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to assess the potential of the test item to produce damage to chromosomes or aneuploidy when administered to mice. The method was designed to be compatible with the 1997 OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No.474 "Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test", Method B12 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008, the US EPA (TSCA) OPPTS 870.5395, EPA 712-C-98-226, August 1998 guidelines, and be acceptable to the Japanese METI/MHLW/MAFF guidelines for testing of new chemical substances.
Methods:
A range-finding test was performed to find suitable dose levels of the test item, route of administration, and to investigate if there was a marked difference in toxic response between the sexes. There was no marked difference in toxicity of the test item between the sexes; therefore the main test was performed using only male mice. Following discussions with the Sponsor, the micronucleus test was conducted using the intraperitoneal route in groups of seven mice (males) at the maximum recommended dose (MRD) of 2000 mg/kg and with 1000 and 500 mg/kg as the two lower dose levels. Animals were killed 24 or 48 hours later, the bone marrow extracted, and smear preparations made and stained. Polychromatic (PCE) and normochromatic (NCE) erythrocytes were scored for the presence of micronuclei.
Additional groups of mice were given a single intraperitoneal dose of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (7 male mice) or dosed orally with cyclophosphamide (5 male mice), to serve as vehicle and positive controls respectively. Vehicle and positive control animals were killed after 24 hours.
Results:
There were no premature deaths seen in any of the dose groups in the main test. Clinical signs were observed in animals dosed with the test item at and above 1000 mg/kg in both the 24 and 48-hour dose groups, where applicable, and included hunched posture and included hunched posture and ptosis.
Statistically significant decreases in the PCE/NCE ratio were not observed in any of the test item dose groups when compared to the vehicle control group. However, the observation of clinical signs was taken to indicate that systemic absorption had occurred and exposure to the target tissue had been achieved.
There was no evidence of any statistically significant increases in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals dosed with the test item when compared to the vehicle control group.
The positive control group showed a marked increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes hence confirming the sensitivity of the system to the known mutagenic activity of cyclophosphamide under the conditions of the test.
The test item was found not to produce a toxicologically significant increase in the frequency of micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes of mice under the conditions of the test.
Conclusion:
The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.