Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 948-067-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- Annex V (Maximisation test). 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The skin sensitisation study was performed before adoption of the LLNA test in 2002.
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: reputable commercial supplier
- Age at study initiation: 8-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 389 - 450 g
- Housing: The animals were housed singly or in pairs in solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-23°C
- Humidity (%): 51-74%
- Air changes (per hr): ca. 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12h light and 12h dark - Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- other: arachis oil and Freud's Complete Adjuvant (1:1 mixture with distilled water)
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.1% w/v in arachis oil BP and 0.1% w/v in Freud's Complete Adjuvant (1:1 mixture with distilled water)
- Day(s)/duration:
- 7 days after intradermal induction the same sites of the animals were further induced by epicutaneous exposure with a 50% v/v concentration in arachis oil fixed for two days.
- Adequacy of induction:
- highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 50% and 25%
- Day(s)/duration:
- 1 day
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No. of animals per dose:
- Number of animals in test group: 10
Number of animals in negative control group: 5 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
For intradermal induction four concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5%) in arachis oil were used indicating that 0.1% caused mild to moderate skin irritation.
For topical induction 10, 25, 50, and 75% in arachis oil diluted substance was used indicating that 50% diluted substance caused mild irritation.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2 exposures, first intradermal induction followed after 7 days by topical induction with 50% diluted substance for 2 days.
- Exposure period: intradermal plus 2 days topical induction of the same animals
- Test groups: 1 test group of 10 animals
- Control group: 1 control group of 5 animals
- Site: shoulder region
- Frequency of applications:
- Duration:
- Concentrations:
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1 exposure
- Day(s) of challenge:
- Exposure period: 1 day
- Test groups:
- Control group:
- Site: flank region
- Concentrations: 50% n arachis oil to the right side, 25% in arachis oil to the left side
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 h and 48 h after challange
OTHER: - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 9
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 8
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 4
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 4
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 7
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Category 1 (skin sensitising), EU
Reference
see result tables attached as background material
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
In the Guinea pig maximisation skin sensitisation study a clear positive result was obtained leading to classification in Category 1 according to Regulation 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
