Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of disodium 4-amino-6-[[4-[(2,4-diaminophenyl)diazenyl]phenyl]]-3-((E)-[4-((E)-(2,4-diaminophenyl)diazenyl]phenyl )diazenyl)-5-hydroxynaphthalene-2,7-disulphonate and disodium 4-amino-6-((E)-(4-aminophenyl)diazenyl)-3-((E)-(4-((E)-(2,4-diaminophenyl)diazenyl)phenyl)diazenyl)-5-hydroxynaphthalene-2,7-disulfonate
EC number: 951-695-0 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Not mutagenic
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- other: experimentakresult on similar substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1993
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Pre-incubation test. Screening program: strain TA98 placed in standard plates. Evaluation without metabolic activation.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Metabolic activation system:
- No
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range 20-5000 µg/plates: 20, 100, 500, 2500, 5000 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- NPD
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: 2500-5000 µg/plate - Conclusions:
- Negative
- Executive summary:
Non mutagen; no increase of revertants has been observed.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- other: experimental resulta on similar substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Chinese Hamster ceU line V79, clone 65/3, Dr. D. Wild, Freiburg, Germany
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- no data
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- In the preliminary toxicity test with and without metabolic activation 12 concentrations of the tested substance were tested. The concentrations selected ranged from 0.24 to 500.0 µg/ml and separated by 2-fold intervals.
In the part with metabolic activation the highest concentration produced an acute growth inhibition of 62.70%. In the part without metabolic activationthe substance exerted a complete growth inhibitory effect at the highest concentration of 500.0 µg/ml. The next lower concentrationsof 250.0 and 125.0 µg/ml revealed an acute growth inhibitory effect of 98.46 and 72.56% respectively.
Accordingly, four concentrations were selected for the original experiment ranging from 18.52 to 500.0 µg/ml and from 4.63 to 125.0 µg/ml in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, respectively.
In the part with metabolic activation, the growth inhibition determined after treatment at the highest concentration of 500.0 µg/ml showed a mean value of 6.91%. After expression growth was inhibited by 13.51%.
In the absence of metabolic activation no significant growth inhibitory effect was seen after treatment and expression.
The highest concentration of 500.0 µg/ml tested in the original experiment with activation was determined to be the highest suitable concentration due to solubility limitations in the vehicle. Therefore the same concentration range was tested in the respective confirmatory experiment, although no severe toxiticy was reached. In the part without metabolic activation a concentration range of 9.26 to 250.0 µg/ml was selected for the confirmatory experiment in order to reach a more pronounced toxicity at the highest concentration. In the presence of metabolic activation no significant acute cytotoxicity was obtained at the highest concentration. After expression growth was inhibited by 9.54%.
In the part without activation, the mean growth inhibition at the highest concentration of 250.0 µg/ml was 27.91% in spite of the increased concentration. - Vehicle / solvent:
- No data
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- not specified
- Evaluation criteria:
- Cytotoxicity is determined my measuring the relative cloning efficiency (survival) of the cultures after the treatment period.
Mutant frequency is determined by seeding known numbers of cells in medium containing the selective agent to detect mutant cells, and in medium without selective agent to determine the cloning efficiency (viability).
After the incubation time, colonies are counted. The mutant frequency is derived from the number of mutant colonies in selective medium and the number of colonies in non-selective medium. - Statistics:
- No data
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: cell line V79, clone 65/3
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative without metabolic activation
negative with metabolic activation
Based on the results of the performed experiments and under the given experimental conditions, it is concluded that the tested substance and its metabolites did not show any mutagenic activity in this forward mutation system. - Executive summary:
Direct Black 19 was tested for mutagenicity, in details for the evalutation of properties to induce gene mutations.
The mutagenicity studies were conducted following OECD 476, gene mutation test with Chinese Hamster cell V79.
The studies were performed in the absence and in the presence of metabolic activation. A dose range with different doses was used. The tested substance shows no mutagenic activity.
Referenceopen allclose all
Revertant/plate | Quotient | |||
Dose µg/plate | - S9 | M | DS | -S9 |
Negative control | 29 29 18 |
25 | 6 | 1.0 |
20 | 19 13 24 |
19 | 6 | 0.7 |
100 | 26 26 26 |
26 | 0 | 1.0 |
500 | 31 29 28 |
29 | 2 | 1.2 |
2500 | 31 30 24 |
28 | 4 | 1.1 |
5000 | 32 31 33 |
32 | 1 | 1.3 |
Positive control | 608 572 666 |
615 | 47 | 24.3 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Not mutagenic
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- other: experimental resulta on similar substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Mollegard Deutshland
- Number: 85 (50 male and 35 female)
- Age at study initiation: between 6 and 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 27-48 g for male, 23-37 g for female
- Housing: mouse were housed in Macrolon Type 2 cages in optimal hygienic conditions.
- Diet: Granular Altromin N 1326
- Water: municipal water ad libitum
- Acclimation period:at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2°C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 10 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10 times/h
- Photoperiod: 12 h light / 12 h dark - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Acqueous solution of ultra - amylopectin (0.7%) with the addiction of two drops of Tween 80 (polysorbate) per 10 ml of solution.
- Details on exposure:
- single oral administration for the tested item
single oral administration for the negative control
single intraperitoneal application for the positive control - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- one single application
- Frequency of treatment:
- single oral administration for the tested item
single oral administration for the negative control
single intraperitoneal application for the positive control - Post exposure period:
- 24 h and 48 h
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1600 mg/kg
Basis:
nominal in water - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
800 mg/kg
Basis:
nominal in water - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
400 mg/kg
Basis:
nominal in water - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1200 mg/kg
Basis:
nominal in water - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Dose 1600 mg/kg: Observation time: 48 h, 5 male and 5 female
Dose 1600 mg/kg: Observation time: 24 h, 5 male and 5 female
Dose 800 mg/kg: Observation time: 24 h, 5 male and 5 female
Dose 400 mg/kg: Observation time: 24 h, 5 male and 5 female
Dose 1200 mg/kg: Observation time: 24 h, 5 male and 5 female
Positive control: Dose 80 mg/kg, Observation time: 24 h, 5 male and 5 female
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- Name: cyclophosphamide
Supplier: SIGMA CHMIE Gmbh
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 80 mg/kg
- Application volume: 0.1 ml/10 g body weight
- Solvent: water for injection
The preparations of the positive control substance were freshly prepared before administration. - Tissues and cell types examined:
- The cells suspension was obtained from the extraction of bone marrow from the medullary canal of femurs.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- The cells suspension was treated and the specimens colored following Pappenheimer's method.
2000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal were examined microscopically in order to determine the presence and the number o micronuclei.
- Evaluation criteria:
- The classification of micronuclei was performed using the following criteria:
- Micronuclei are round, rarely oval or crescent shaped.
- They have a sharp contour.
- They are uniformly colored and are approximately from 1/20 to 1/5 of the diameter of the erythrocytes.
- It is usually only a micronucleus present.
The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was determined individually for each animal by counting a total of 1000 erythrocytes. - Statistics:
- The statistics of the test were riported in the study report.
The calculations were performed using the program MUTAI (SOP M/EDV/036) performed on a 386 AT DIGICOM. The program is written in PowerBASIC and is extensively tested. - Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
No cytotoxic effect of the test substance were observed.
No potential of chromosomal damages were observed.
- Executive summary:
This end point was assessed following the OECD 474 and it was performed in GLP conditions. Micronuclei arise as a result of damage to the chromosomes or the spindle apparatus through a mutagenic active substance during the mitotic cell division in proliferating bone marrow cells. The results show no increased incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes
The calculated frequency of the micronuleated polychromatic erythrocytes of the groups treated with the substance was between 0,17 and 0,42 %.The observed frequency corresponds to the data reported in the literature which is related to the spontaneous rate of occurrence of micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes.
Hence a potential of chromosomal damages or damage to the mitotic apparatus could be excluded for the tested substance.
Reference
No
signs of systemic intoxication were observed in female
mice for the sigle oral doses of 1600,
800 and 400 mg/kg.
The
highest
dose of
1600 mg/kg
causes the death of 2 male mice within 24h.
Conseguently the dose was lowered to 1200 mg/kg. The
other doses of 800 and 400 mg/kg were tolerate without
symptoms.
The results show no citotoxic effect of any chromosomal damages.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Not mutagenic based on available data both in vitro and in vivo.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.