Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
22 Jul - 14 Sep 2022
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2022
Report date:
2023

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
2006, corrected 28 July 2011
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,2-bis[(hexadecanoyloxy)methyl]propane-1,3-diyl dihexadecanoate
Cas Number:
18641-58-2
Molecular formula:
C69H132O8
IUPAC Name:
2,2-bis[(hexadecanoyloxy)methyl]propane-1,3-diyl dihexadecanoate

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Remarks:
UPLC-MS/MS
Details on sampling:
- Concentrations: Samples were taken after 0h, 24h and 72h from all test concentrations (i.e. test vessels at 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 10 and 20 μg/L inoculated with algae), from the abiotic control (i.e. test vessel at 5.0 μg/L without algae) and from the blank and the solvent controls. Stock solutions used for the preparation of test solutions were sampled as well. At the end of the exposure period, the replicates with algae were pooled at each concentration before sampling.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Samples were stored in a freezer (set to maintain -20°C) until analysis at the analytical laboratory of the Test Facility.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
yes
Remarks:
tetrahydrofuran (THF)
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Preliminary testing: A non-GLP saturation test was performed in order to select the most appropriate preparation procedure for test solutions. A loading rate of 100 mg/L was continuously stirred for 3 days and concentrations were measured every 24 hours after filtration using a 0.45 μm syringe filter. The measured concentrations in the samples taken after 24, 48 and 72 hours of magnetic stirring were 0.42, 0.63 and 0.33 μg/L by extrapolation of the calibration curve (i.e. below LOQ = 1 μg/L of analytical method in preliminary testing). Based on the obtained results, it was concluded that preparation of test solutions using solvent stocks was required to enable reliable quantification of the test material during the final test.
- Method: The test item was poorly water soluble under test conditions, as confirmed in preliminary testing. Therefore, to enable reliable preparation of test concentrations and reliable quantification of the test material, the test solutions were prepared using a suitable organic solvent according to the OECD Guidance Document 23. The preparation of the stock solutions for the final test, i.e. test material in tetrahydrofuran (THF), started with the highest concentration of 0.20 mg/mL. The highest concentrated stock solution was vigorously shaken to completely dissolve the test material in THF. The lower stock concentrations, i.e. 0.0125, 0.025, 0.050 and 0.10 mg/mL, were prepared by subsequent dilutions of the highest concentrated stock in THF. Subsequently, a volume of 100 μL of each stock solution was added to respectively 1.0 L test medium to obtain the according test concentrations. The mixtures were magnetically stirred for 15 minutes.
- Controls: Blank control (test medium only) and solvent control (prepared by adding 100 μL THF to 1.0 L test medium)
- Other controls: Abiotic control (i.e. test vessel at 5.0 μg/L without algae) to check maintenance of actual concentrations
- Chemical name of vehicle: Tetrahydrofuran (THF)
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium: 100 μL/L in all test concentrations and in solvent control. Organic solvent concentrations up to 100 μL/L are allowed according to OECD 201.
- Evidence of undissolved material: All test solutions were clear and colorless at the end of the preparation procedure.

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Strain: NIVA CHL 1
- Source: In-house laboratory culture
- Method of cultivation: The algae were cultured in OECD medium at a temperature of 21-24°C and continuously aerated and exposed to light (light intensity 60 to 120 μE/m2/s in wavelength range of 400 to 700 nm).
- Age of inoculum: A pre-culture was prepared from the algal stock culture 3 days before the start of the test under the same conditions as used in the test.

Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h

Test conditions

Test temperature:
22 - 23°C
pH:
8.0 - 8.2
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal: Controls (blank and solvent), 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 5.0 (abiotic control without algae), 10 and 20 μg/L
Measured (0h): < LOQ, 1.20, 2.29, 4.90, 5.05, 9.67 and 17.8 μg/L
Measured (24h): < LOQ, < LOQ, < LOQ, < LOQ, < LOQ, 1.10 and 0.876 μg/L
Measured (72h): < LOQ for all controls and all test concentrations
Measured (TWA): < LOQ, 0.21, 0.26, 0.34, 0.35, 1.3 and 1.5 μg/L

LOQ = 0.25 μg/L in the final test
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 100 mL, all-glass with aluminum caps, perforated for ventilation, containing 50 mL of test solution.
- Initial cells density: 1x10^4 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 218x10^4 cells/mL in the blank control and 233x10^4 cells/mL in the solvent control
- No. of vessels per concentration: 3 replicates. Extra replicates (1-2) per concentration were prepared without algae for sampling/effect parameters measurements
- No. of vessels per blank control: 6 replicates
- No. of vessels per vehicle control: 6 replicates

GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: Yes

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: OECD medium M2
- Culture medium different from test medium: OECD medium M1

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: Continuous
- Light intensity: 79 to 80 μE/m2/s
- Other: Vessels were distributed at random in the incubator and daily repositioned. During incubation the algal cells were kept in suspension by continuous shaking.

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of cell concentrations: At the beginning of the test, cells were counted using a microscope and a counting chamber. Thereafter, cell densities were determined by spectrophotometric measurement of samples at 680 nm using a spectrophotometer with immersion probe (path length = 20 mm). Test medium was used as blank and the extra replicates, without algae, as background for the treated solutions.

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 2
- Range finding study: Yes, a non-GLP range-finding test was performed at a loading rate of 100 mg/L. The test solution was stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 3 days and then the aqueous Saturated Solution (SS) was collected by filtration through a 0.45 μm membrane filter and used as the highest test concentration. Lower test concentrations were prepared by subsequent dilutions of the SS in test medium. No inhibition of algal growth rate or yield was found at any of the tested concentrations. An additional GLP range finding test was conducted using 0.25, 1.0 and 4.0 μg/L test concentrations (prepared using THF similarly as in the final test), a blank control and a solvent control. No significant inhibition of algal growth rate or yield was found at any of the test groups in the additional range-finding test.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
>= 1.5 µg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
> 1.5 µg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 1.5 µg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control: Yes
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid? Yes (dating March 2022)
- EC50 (72 h): 0.95 mg/L, 95% confidence limits: 0.87 - 1.0 mg/L
Reported statistics and error estimates:
ToxRat Professional v 3.3.0 (ToxRat Solutions® GmbH, Germany) was used to perform the statistical analysis. An effect was considered to be significant if statistical analysis of the data obtained for the test concentrations compared with those obtained in the control revealed significant inhibition of growth rate or inhibition of yield (Dunnett`s Multiple t-test Procedure, α=0.05, one-sided, smaller). This statistical comparison was preceded by a check on normal distribution of the data (Shapiro-Wilk’s Test) and a test for homogeneity of the variances (Levene’s test).
The ECx-values could not be determined because the observed effects were below 10%.

Any other information on results incl. tables

VALIDITY CRITERIA


The study fulfilled the validity criteria defined by the guideline (Table 1) and is thus considered valid and reliable.


Table 1: Validity criteria for OECD 201.


























Criterion from the guideline



Outcome



Validity criterion fulfilled



The biomass in the control cultures should have increased exponentially by a factor of at least 16 within the 72-hour test period.



Actual values: 218 in the blank control and 233 in the solvent control



Yes



The mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates (days 0-1, 1-2 and 2-3, for 72-hour tests) in the control cultures must not exceed 35%



Actual values: 26% in the blank control and 10% in the solvent control



Yes



The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during the whole test period in replicate control cultures must not exceed 7% in tests with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata.



Actual values: 1.3% in the blank control and 2.2% in the solvent control



Yes



ANALYTICAL RESULTS


The analytical findings are summarized in Table 2.


Table 2. Analytical results





























































Nominal concentration (μg/L)Measured concentration (μg/L) at 0hMeasured concentration (μg/L) at 24hMeasured concentration (μg/L) at 72hTWA (μg/L)
Controls (blank and solvent)<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ<LOQ
1.251.20<LOQ*<LOQ*0.21
2.52.29<LOQ*<LOQ*0.26
5.04.90<LOQ*<LOQ*0.34
5.0**5.05<LOQ*<LOQ*0.35
109.671.10<LOQ*1.3
2017.80.876<LOQ*1.5

*Limit of Quantification (LOQ) = 0.25 μg/L. Therefore, half of the LOQ (i.e. 0.125 μg/L) was used to calculate the time-weighted average exposure concentrations (TWA).


**Abiotic control (without algae)


 


BIOLOGICAL RESULTS
Biological findings are summarised in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6.


Table 3. Results in control replicates































































































































































































 



Individual Cell Densities [x104cells/mL]



Section-by-Section Growth Rates [day-1]



Growth rates [day-1]



CV growth [%]



Yields


[x104cells/mL]



CV yield


[%]



 



0 h



24 h


 



48 h



72 h



0 – 24 h



24 – 48 h



48 – 72 h



72 h



72 h



72 h


 



72 h


 



 


Blank Control



1.000



3.233



39.570



201.410



1.173



2.505



1.627



1.768



1.3



200.410



7.1



1.000



3.875



39.147



202.334



1.355



2.313



1.643



1.770



201.334



1.000



4.963



41.661



218.730



1.602



2.128



1.658



1.796



217.730



1.000



4.944



46.388



211.550



1.598



2.239



1.517



1.785



210.550



1.000



4.197



44.675



237.434



1.434



2.365



1.670



1.823



236.434



1.000



4.349



43.755



233.746



1.470



2.309



1.676



1.818



232.746



Mean



1.000



4.260



42.533



217.534



1.439



2.310



1.632



1.793



216.534



 


Solvent Control



1.000



6.671



40.228



214.998



1.898



1.797



1.676



1.790



2.2



213.998



12.4



1.000



6.702



37.779



196.209



1.902



1.729



1.647



1.760



195.209



1.000



7.666



47.821



251.649



2.037



1.831



1.661



1.843



250.649



1.000



8.690



44.859



230.742



2.162



1.641



1.638



1.814



229.742



1.000



6.993



40.191



225.212



1.945



1.749



1.723



1.806



224.212



1.000



8.723



51.890



278.278



2.166



1.783



1.680



1.876



277.278



Mean



1.000



7.574



43.795



232.848



2.018



1.755



1.671



1.815



231.848



Table 4. Results in treatments.












































































































































































































Nominal concentration


[μg/L]



Cell Densities [x104cells/mL]



Growth rates


[day-1]



CV growth


[%]



Yields


[x104cells/mL]



CV yield


[%]



0 h



24 h



48 h



72 h



72 h



72 h



72 h



72 h



1.25



1.000



7.378



44.159



213.352



1.788



1.1



212.352



6.2



1.000



7.308



42.711



225.828



1.807



224.828



1.000



9.243



46.738



241.237



1.829



240.237



Mean



1.000



7.976



44.536



226.806



1.808



225.806



2.5



1.000



6.449



37.240



199.363



1.765



2.0



198.363



11.2



1.000



7.166



39.551



197.409



1.762



196.409



1.000



9.068



43.486



239.339



1.826



238.339



Mean



1.000



7.561



40.092



212.037



1.784



211.037



5.0



1.000



6.984



40.408



221.013



1.799



1.9



220.013



10.1



1.000



6.940



36.685



197.248



1.761



196.248



1.000



9.029



48.391



241.314



1.829



240.314



Mean



1.000



7.651



41.828



219.858



1.797



218.858



10



1.000



5.901



33.713



183.285



1.737



2.9



182.285



14.9



1.000



6.835



40.830



226.365



1.807



225.365



1.000



7.547



46.367



247.137



1.837



246.137



Mean



1.000



6.761



40.303



218.929



1.794



217.929



20



1.000



6.657



38.038



208.280



1.780



0.7



207.280



3.8



1.000



6.937



42.716



214.148



1.789



213.148



1.000



7.178



44.906



224.248



1.804



223.248



Mean



1.000



6.924



41.887



215.559



1.791



214.559



Table 5. Yields/Growth rates and Percentage Inhibition for the Total Test Period





























































Nominal concentration


[μg/L]



Growth rate (mean)


[day-1]



Growth rate inhibition [%] compared to control



Yield (mean)


[x104cells/mL]



Yield inhibition [%] compared to control



72 h



72 h



72 h



72 h



Solvent control



1.815



 



231.8



 



1.25



1.808



0.39



225.8



2.6



2.5



1.784



1.7



211.0



9.0



5.0



1.797



1.0



218.9



5.6



10



1.794



1.2



217.9



6.0



20



1.791



1.3



214.6



7.5



Table 6. Effect values based on Initial Measured Concentrations and Average Exposure Concentrations (TWA)


























Effect parameters



Initial Measured Concentrations



Average Exposure Concentrations (TWA)



NOEC (growth and yield)



≥ 20 μg/L



≥ 1.5 μg/L



ErC10 and EyC10 (72 h)



> 20 μg/L



> 1.5 μg/L



ErC50 and EyC50 (72 h)



> 20 μg/L



> 1.5 μg/L


Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
For further details please refer to “Any other information on results incl. tables”.