Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 244-848-1 | CAS number: 22224-92-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
For the risk assessment according to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH), a NOEC of 0.313 mg a.i./kg soil dw is used.
Additional information
The substance is registered for the tonnage band of 10-100 tonnes/year. Therefore, only data requirements according to Annex VII to VIII of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) apply. Hence, data on terrestrial toxicity are not required. However, experimental data on bee, non-target arthropods other than bees, non-target soil meso- and macrofauna, terrestrial plants as well as soil microorganisms were submitted with the original Fenamiphos plant protection product dossier (IIA, Point 8.3.2 and 8.5 Annex III point 10.5.1) and evaluated in the Draft Assessment Report (DAR) (Vol. 3, Annex B, Point 9.5 and 9.9, November 2003). Results from the studies were included in the EFSA conclusion (EFSA Scientific Report (2006) 62, 1-81). The available key information is summarised below and considered for the Risk Assessment according to REACH.
Effects on bees
This point was covered in the original plant protection product dossier (IIA, Point 8.3.2 and 8.5 Annex III point 10.5.1) and evaluated in the Draft Assessment Report (DAR) (Vol. 3, Annex B, Point 9.5 and 9.9, November 2003). Results from the studies were included in the EFSA conclusion (EFSA Scientific Report (2006) 62, 1-81).
Available key information is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Ecotoxicological endpoints for bees
Organism | Study type and duration | Test substance | Origin | Ecotoxicological endpoint/conclusion* | |
Honey bee | Acute toxicity, 48 h | a.s. | IIA 8.3.1.1/01 | LD50 contact: [µg a.s./bee]: LD50 oral: [µg a.s./bee]: | 0.28 0.45 |
Bumblebee | Acute toxicity, 48 h | a.s. | IIA 8.3.1.1/02 | LD50 contact: [µg a.s./bee]: | 1.59 |
Bumblebee | Tunnel tests in greenhouses. 28 days exposure. | 240 CS 4.8 & 10 kg a.s./ha | IIIA 10.4.5/01 | No effects on mortality, pollination, consumption of sugar solution and growth of bumblebee colonies. |
* From the EFSA Scientific Report list of endpoints or Draft Assessment Report (2003). Volume 3, Annex B9.4.
Effects on non-target arthropods other than bees
This point was covered in the original Fenamiphos plant protection product dossier (IIA, Point 8.3.2 and 8.5 Annex III point 10.5.1) and evaluated in the Draft Assessment Report (DAR) (Vol. 3, Annex B, Point 9.5 and 9.9, November 2003). Results from the studies were included in the EFSA conclusion (EFSA Scientific Report (2006) 62, 1-81).
The risk of exposure to non-target arthropods is negligible as the product will only be applied by drip irrigation in greenhouses and residue levels in crops are expected to be very low due to the rapid metabolism of the active substance.
The toxicity profile of the test substance and its major metabolites to non-target arthropods other than bees is summarised in Tables CA 8.3.2-1 and CA 8.3.2-2. Studies were conducted on Aphidius rhopalosiphi, Typhlodromus pyri, Chrysoperla carnea and Poecilus cupreus. A further study on the soil dwelling Poecilus cupreus after application of Nemacur 240 CS by drip irrigation was also carried out (Gray 2005b, Annex III, Point 10.5.1)). Toxicity studies on soil-dwelling Folsomia candida and Hypoaspis aculifer species are available..
Table 2: Ecotoxicological endpoints on non-target arthropods other than bees
Organisms | Duration / Exposure | Test Subst. / Mode of application | Appl. Rate (g a.s./ha) | Origin | Endpoint(s)* | |
Parasitoids | ||||||
Aphidius rhopalosiphi | Spray deposits on glass plates; 48 h exposure | 240 CS / | 0.023 – 0.928 | IIA 8.3.2/01 | Mort., LR50 [g a.s./ha] | 0.175 |
Aphidius rhopalosiphi | Spray deposits on Tomato plants | 240 CS / | 1 - 33.6 | IIA 8.3.2/02 | Mort., LR50 [g a.s./ha] Fec., NOEC [g a.s./ha] | 14.1 14.2
|
Predatory mites | ||||||
Typhlodromus pyri | Spray deposits on glass plates; Mort. 7 d Fec. (eggs / female) at 14 d | 240 CS / | 0.25 - 4 | IIA 8.3.2/03 | Mort., LR50 [g a.s./ha] Fec., NOEC [g a.s./ha] | 1.7 ≥ 1 |
Typhlodromus pyri | Spray deposits on glass plates; Mort. 7 d Fec. (eggs / female) at 14 d | 240 CS / | 1 - 33.6 | IIA 8.3.2/04 | Mort., LR50 [g a.s./ha] Fec., NOEC [g a.s./ha] | 13.8 14.2 |
Foliage dwelling predators | ||||||
Chrysoperla carnea | Spray deposits on tomato leaves; 7 d | 240 CS / | 5.4 - 108 | IIA 8.3.2 05 | Mort., LR50 [g a.s./ha] Rep., NOEC [g a.s./ha] | 33.3 > 1.6 |
Ground dwelling predators | ||||||
Poecilus cupreus | Treated LUFA 2.1 soil; Mort. rate; number of cons. pupae per beetle; Test duration: 22 d | 240 CS / | 52 - 516 | IIA 8.3.2/07 | Mort., LR50 [g a.s./ha] Feed rate., NOEC [g a.s./ha] | 219
163 |
Poecilus cupreus | Sandy loam treated soil Mort. and predation 21 d exposure | 240 CS / drip irrigation treatment | 10 | IIIA 10.5.2/01 below | No effects on survival, behaviour and predation rate. | |
Folsomia candida (collembola) | Repro. 28 d | 240 CS / incorporation | 0.313, 0.625, 1.25, 2.50, 5 and 10 mg a.s./kg soil | II A 8.6./03 | LC50 (mort.): [mg a.s./kg d.wt.soil] NOEC (mort.): [mg a.s./kg d.wt.soil] NOEC(repro.): [mg a.s./kg d.wt.soil] | 4.07
1.25
0.313 |
Hypoaspis aculeifer (soil mite) | Mort. 14 d | 240 CS / | 0.0013, 0.013, 0.133, 1.33 mg a.s./kg soil | III A 10.6.2/06 | LC50 (mort.): [mg a.s./ha] d.wt.soil NOEC (mort.) [mg a.s./kg d.wt.soil] the highest concentration tested. | > 1.33
> 1.33 |
Folsomia candida (collembola) | Repro.56 d | 240 CS / | 10kg a.s./ha 117 DAT soil residue FEN:0.12 mg/kg + FOX 0.17mg/kg + FON 0.02 mg/kg | III A 10.5.2/02 below | adult mort. [%] in treated greenhouse soil untreated greenhouse soil OECD soil |
100
100
0 |
* From the EFSA Scientific Report list of endpoints or Draft Assessment Report (2003). Volume 3, Annex B9.5 and 9.7.
Effects on Non-Target Soil Meso- and Macrofauna
This point was covered in the original plant protection product dossier (IIA, Point 8.3.2 and 8.5 Annex III point 10.5.1) and evaluated in the Draft Assessment Report (DAR) (Vol. 3, Annex B, Point 9.5 and 9.9, November 2003). Results from the studies were included in the EFSA conclusion (EFSA Scientific Report (2006) 62, 1-81).
Table 3 summarises the ecotoxicological endpoints for effects of the test substance on earthworms.
Table 3: Ecotoxicological endpoints for effects on earthworms
Organisms | Study type / Duration | Test Substance | Endpoint* |
Eisenia fetida | Acute, 14-d | a.s. | LC50: 888 mg as/kg d.wt.soil (10% OM) equivalent to 444 mg as/kg d.wt.soil for a soil with 5 % OM content. |
Eisenia fetida | Acute, 14-d | 240 CS | LC50: > 238mg as/kg d.wt.soil (10% OM) equivalent to > 119 mg as/kg d.wt.soil for a soil with 5 % OM content. |
Eisenia fetida | Reproduction | 400 EC 6, 10 & 40 kg as/ha | No adult mortality NOEC adult body weight < 6 kg a.s./ha NOEC reproduction < 6 kg a.s./ha |
Eisenia fetida | Reproduction | 240 CS (10 kg a.s./ha, aged residues)2 a.s. (0.12 mg/kg) + sulfone (0.02 mg/kg) at same concentrations as measured in soil used in the above test3 | No adult mortality High loss of body weight and no reproduction in both treated and control soil sampled from a greenhouse Using standard OECD earthworm soil. No adult mortality. No influence on reproduction (number of juveniles). NOEC 0.31 mg/kg d.wt.soil TTR. |
Earthworm Fauna | 1-y | 400 EC (10 and 40 kg as/ha) | Full recovery (number and biomass of earthworms) within a year at 10 kg a.s./ha not a 40 kg a.s./ha. |
* From the EFSA Scientific Report list of endpoints or Draft Assessment Report (2003). Volume 3, Annex B9.6.
2 Soil samples taken from greenhouse study with bumble bees after tomato harvest.
3 Concentrations of test substances corresponding to measured values in soil samples taken from greenhouse study with bumble bees after tomato harvest (Lechelt-Kunze 2002, Annex III, Point 10.6.1.2/02).
Effects on soil microorganisms
This point was covered in the original plant protection product dossier (IIA, Point 8.3.2 and 8.5 Annex III point 10.5.1) and evaluated in the Draft Assessment Report (DAR) (Vol. 3, Annex B, Point 9.5 and 9.9, November 2003). Results from the studies were included in the EFSA conclusion (EFSA Scientific Report (2006) 62, 1-81).
Table 4: Ecotoxicological endpoints for effects of the test substance and its major soil metabolites on nitrogen transformation
Test substance | Endpoint |
fenamiphos | >25% after 56 days at 13.3 and 133 mg/kg |
fenamiphos-sulfoxide | <25% after 56 days at 70 mg/kg |
fenamiphos-sulfone | <25% after 56 days at 74 mg/kg |
fenamiphos-sulfoxide-phenol | <25% after 42 days at 37 mg/kg |
Effects on terrestrial plants
In a herbicidal screening test a total of 11 mono- and dicotyledonous plant species were tested under controlled greenhouse conditions in natural soil. 21 d after spray treatment of the potted seeds, phytotoxic effects were evaluated.
All tested plants species showed no phytotoxic effects (0 % = no visual damage, normal growth) up to the highest application rate of 15000 g a.i./ha, corresponding to 20 mg a.i./kg soil dw.
Conclusion
A broad range of reliable study information on terrestrial toxicity of the test substance is available. The most critical effect value is considered as starting point for the derivation of the PNEC soil. The 28-d NOEC for reproduction to Folsomia candida was 0.313 mg a.i./kg soil dw and was chosen as the most reliable key value for the risk assessment.
References:
Balluff, M. (2002). Evaluation of the side-effects on bumble-bees (Bombus terrestris L.) of drip irrigation treatments of Nemacur 240 CS to tomato plants in greenhouse compartments. GAB Biotechnologie GmbH, report no.: 20013003/S1-BFBt.
Bielza, P. et al. (2000). Effects of Confidor 20 LS and Nemacur CS on bumblebees pollinating greenhouse tomatoes.
Annual meeting, Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms; 2000; Castello de la Plana, Spain. IOBC WPRS BULLETIN; 24, 4; 83-88. report no.: Not applicable (conference paper).
FOCUS (1997). Soil persistence models and EU registration. The final report of the work of the Soil Modelling Work group of FOCUS (FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their Use), 29.2.97.
Vinall, S. (2001). A laboratory test to determine the effects of FENAMIPHOS CS 240 on the parasitic wasp, Aphidius rhopalosiphi. Mambo-Tox Ltd., Southampton, U.K. Bayer AG, report no.: BAY-01-2.
Schuld, M. (2000). FENAMIPHOS CS 240: Toxicity to the aphid parasitoid, Aphidius rhopalosiphi (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) in an extended laboratory test. GAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Niefern-Oeschelbronn, Germany Bayer AG, report no.: 99472/02-NEAP.
Stratum, P. van (2002). A laboratory dose-response study to evaluate the effects of FENAMIPHOS CS 240 on survival and reproduction of the predaceous mite Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). MITOX Stichting Bevordering Duurzame Plaagbestrijding, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Bayer AG, report no.: B084TPL.
Adelberger, I. (2000). FENAMIPHOS CS 240: Toxicity to the predatory mite, Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari, Phytoseiidae) using an extended laboratory test. GAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Niefern-Oeschelbronn, Germany Bayer; AG, report no.: 99472/02-NETp.
Kemmeter, F. (2000). FENAMIPHOS CS 240: Determination of the LR50 (dose response) with the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea steph. (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) using an extended laboratory test. GAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Niefern-Oeschelbronn, Germany; Bayer AG, report no.: 99472/02-NECC.
Neumann, P. (2001). Acute effects of a spray application of FENAMIPHOS CS 240 on carabid beetles (Poecilus cupreus) under extended laboratory test conditions. Bayer AG, report no.: NNP/PC017.
Gray, J. (2005). Nemacur CS 240: Evaluation of the effects on the carabid beetle Poecilus cupreus in an extended laboratory study (drip irrigation). Huntingdon Life Sciences, report no.: IRV102/052088.
Heimbach, F. (1996). Acute toxicity of Nemacur CS 240 to earthworms. Bayer AG, report no.: HBF/RG 228.
Heimbach, F. (1994). Influence of Nemacur EC 400 on the reproduction of earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Bayer AG, Report no.: HBF/RG 201.
Lechelt-Kunze, C. (2002). Influence of fenamiphos, fenamiphos sulfoxide, and fenamiphos sulfone on the reproduction of earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Bayer AG, report no.: LKC/Rg 34/01.
Balluff, M. (2001). Sampling of soil containing aged residues after drip irrigation treatment of Nemacur 240 CS to tomato plants in greenhouse compartments. GAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Niefern-Oeschelbronn, Germany; Bayer AG, report no.: 20013003/S1-FS.
Anspach, T. (2001). Determination of the residues of fenamiphos and its metabolites fenamiphos sulfoxide and fenamiphos sulfone in soil specimens. Dr. Specht & Partner, Chemische Laboratorien GmbH, Hamburg, Germany; Bayer AG, report no.: Az.G01-0115.
Heimbach, F. (1986). Effect of Nemacur 400 EC on the earthworm fauna of a grassland area. Bayer AG, report no.: HBF/RGF 8.
Friedrich, S. (2001). Toxicity of Fenamiphos CS 240 on the reproduction of the collembola Folsomia candida. BioChem GmbH, Gerichshain, Germany; Bayer AG, report no.: 011048043.
Jacobs, G. (2002). SRA 3886 CS 240: Effects on survival of the predacious mite Hypoaspis aculeifer Canestrini (Acari: Laelapidae) in standard soil. MITOX Stichting Bevordering Duurzame Plaagbestrijding, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Bayer AG, report no.: B090HAE.
Carter, J.N. (2007). Nemacur CS 240 (fenamiphos). Effects on soil non target micro-organisms, nitrogen transformation. Huntingdon Life Sciences, Report no.: IRV0154/073726.
Meisner, P. (2001). Herbicidal screening data for fenamiphos CS 240. Bayer AG, Report no.: MPE NTP 19/01.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.