Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 941-821-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1963
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Pre-GLP study following a method similar to a recognised OECD guideline. The source and target substances must have an aldehyde group at the 1-carbon position and either a terminal (10-position) or an internal alkene (9-position or 8-position; with the terminal alkyl group no larger than an ethyl group and/or should not multiply substituted). The substance alkyl chain length of the substance should be more than 6 carbons in length and less than 14 carbons in length and fulfil the mono-alkene definition. The substance should not have any branched akyl groups or side chains. The target and source share common structural elements in the same relative positions. The source and target have very similar physico-chemical properties and thus have similar expected toxicokinetic behaviour. The substances have similar in silico chemical reactivity predictions. This is observed within available in vivo toxicology testing where low level local and systemic toxicity is demonstrated and comparable between target and source. The substances therefore demonstrate chemical similarity.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 963
- Report date:
- 1963
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Undec-9-enal
- EC Number:
- 205-586-3
- EC Name:
- Undec-9-enal
- Cas Number:
- 143-14-6
- IUPAC Name:
- undec-9-enal
- Test material form:
- not specified
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: albino rabbits
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- not reported
Test system
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
- Concentration (if solution): not reported - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Each animal had 0.1 ml of the test sample instilled into the right eye with no further treatment. The untreated left eye of each animal served as its
own control. - Observation period (in vivo):
- Both the treated and control eyes were examined every twenty-four hours for four days and then again on the seventh day.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no
SCORING SYSTEM:
The scorings recorded were made according to the Draize scale for scoring ocular lesions.
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: not reported
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1,2,3,4,7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 80
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1,2,3,4,7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 10
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1,2,3,4,7
- Score:
- 11.3
- Max. score:
- 20
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 12
- Remarks on result:
- other: n=3; maximum category score =4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 8
- Remarks on result:
- other: n=3; maximum category score = 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 2.33
- Max. score:
- 9
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: n=3 ; maximum category score = 3
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.22
- Max. score:
- 12
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: n=3; maximum category score = 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No corneal opacityor iris congestion was observed. A diffuse redness of the vessels of the palpebral conjunctivae did occur. This injection was accompanied by a partial eversion of the lids and some discharge. On the 7th day observation of the conjuncitvae was normal.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Applicant recalcluated the scoring to the EU/GHS scoring criteria. Individual scoring was presented within the study report.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study the test material is considered to be irritating the eyes of albino rabbits.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye following a single application in albino white rabbits. The pre-GLP study was completed under a method similar to OECD 405. A volume of 0.1 ml of the test material was placed into one eye of 3 animals. The other eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made every 24 hour for 4 days and again on day 7 using scoring based on the Draize scale for scoring occular lesions. Instillation of the test material did not produce any corneal opacity or iris congestion. A diffuse redness of the vessels of the palpebral conjunctivae did occur. This injection was accompanied by a partial eversion of the lids and some discharge. On the seventh day of observation the conjunctivae were normal in all test animals. Under the conditions of this study the test material is considered to be irritating the eyes of albino rabbits.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.