Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 29th March 2011 to 29th November 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: A GLP study performed in compliance with appropriate guidelines.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.7 (Repeated Dose (28 Days) Toxicity (Oral))
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA OPPTS 870.3050 Repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study in rodents
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese METI, MHLW and MOE Guidelines of 21 November 2003 for a twenty-eight day repeat dose oral toxicity study
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): CN-3384A
- Physical state: solid
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd, Oxon., UK
- Age at study initiation: 6-8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 184-230 g (males); 14-182 g (females)
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: individually in solid floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Rodent 2014C Teklad Global Certified Diet ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: nine days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 2 ºC
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15%
- Air changes (per hr): at least fifteen changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light/12 hours dark
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 20th May 2011 To: 1st July 2011
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Test substance samples were analysed by HPLC using the following conditions:
HPLC: Agilent Technologies 1200
Column: Phenogel 10µ (300 x 7.8 mm id)
Mobile phase: tetrahydrofuran
Flow rate: 1 mL/min
UV detector wavelength: 230 nm
Injection volume: 25 µL
Retention time: ~8 to 10 minutes - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Five
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: based on 7 day range-finding test (Liwska and Mullee, 2011)
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: 14 days
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- MORBIDITY/MORTALITY: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: immediately before dosing, up to 30 minutes, one hour and five hours after dosing.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: day 1 prior to dosing and then at weekly intervals and after terminal kill. Recovery group animals were also weighed on days 36 and 43.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: 28 days for non-recovery animals and 42 days for recovery animals
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No
- Animals fasted: No
- Parameters checked: haemoglobin, haematocrit, erythrocyte count, total leucocyte count, differential leucocyte count (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils), erythrocyte indices (mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration), prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, platelet count, reticulocyte count
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: 28 days for non-recovery animals and 42 days for recovery animals
- Animals fasted: No
- Parameters checked: blood urea, total protein, albumin, albumin/globulin ratio, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, inorganic phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, gamma glutamyltranspeptidase, total bilirubin, bile acids and creatine
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: during final week of dosing for non-recovery animals and final week of treatment-free period for recovery animals.
- Parameters checked: volume, pH, glucose, bilirubin, specific gravity, protein, ketones, urobilinogen, blood
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: before initial dosing and once weekly thereafter.
- Parameters measured: motor activity, forelimb/hindlimb grip strength, sensory reactivity - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
- Thyroid hormone assessment: at termination, serum was taken from blood samples from each animal and analysed for Triiodothyronine (T3), Thyroxine (T4) and Thyroxine Stimulating Hormone (TSH).
- Gross examination: Full external and internal examination of all animals.
- Organ weights: adrenals, brain, epididymides, heart, kidneys, liver, ovaries, pituitary, prostate and seminal vesicles, spleen, testes, thymus, thyroid/parathyroid, uterus with cervix
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Adrenals, aorta (thoracic), bone and bone marrow, brain, caecum, colon, duodenum, epididymides, eyes, gross lesions, heart, ileum, jejunum, kidneys, liver, lungs, lymph nodes, mammary gland, muscle (skeletal), oesphagus, ovaries, pancreas, pituitary, prostate, rectum, salivary glands, sciatic nerve, seminal vesicles, skin (hind limb), spinal cord, spleen, stomach, testes, thymus, thyroid/parathyroid, trachea, urinary bladder, uterus with cervix, vagina - Statistics:
- Data were processed to give group mean values and standard deviations where appropriate.
Where appropriate, quantitative data were analysed by Provantis™ Tables and Statistics Module. For each variable, the most suitable transformation of the data was found, the use of possible covariates checked and the homogeneity of means assessed using ANOVA or ANCOVA and Bartlett's test. The transformed data were analysed to find the lowest treatment level that showed a significant effect, using the Williams Test for parametric data or the Shirley Test for non-parametric data. If no dose response was found, but the data showed homogeneity of means, the data were analysed by a stepwise (Dunnett) parametric or Steel (non-parametric) test to determine significant differences from the control group. Finally, if required, pair-wise tests were performed using the Student t-test (parametric) or the Mann-Whitney U test (non-parametric).
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- no effects observed
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
There were no unscheduled deaths during the study. No animals of either sex from all treatment groups showed clinical signs of treatment-related toxicity.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
No significant differences were detected in mean body weights in animals of either sex throughout this study when treated animals were compared to controls. However, statistically significant differences in mean body weight gains were evident in females of all treatment groups during week 4. In the absence of a true dose related response and there being no actual mean body weight loss among treatment groups, when compared to the control, the intergroup differences were considered not to be treatment-related.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE/FOOD EFFICIENCY
No treatment-related effects were detected on mean food intake or mean food efficiency during the study when treated animals were compared to the controls.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study)
There were no treatment-related effects detected in mean daily water consumption. Males treated at 1000 mg/kg bw/day showed a slight increase in water consumption during the final two weeks of the treatment period. Observations of this nature are commonly observed following the oral administration of an unpalatable test substance preparation and in isolation are not considered to represent systemic toxicity.
HAEMATOLOGY
Non-recovery 1000 mg/kg bw males showed a statistically significant increase in mean erythrocyte count and a significant reduction in mean lymphocyte count. These individual mean values were within the normal ranges for rats of this strain and age used for the study. In addition, these differences were not found in any of the treatment groups. Therefore, the intergroup differences were not considered to be biologically relevant.
Non-recovery males from all treatment groups showed a statistically significant reduction in mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC). Both in the absence of a dose-related response, and as both haematocrit and haemoglobin values for all non-recovery male treatment groups were comparable to the control, the intergroup differences for MCHC were considered not biologically relevant.
Recovery 1000 mg/kg bw males showed a statistically significant reduction in mean activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) whilst recovery 1000 mg/kg bw/day females showed statistically significant increases in mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean total leucocyte count (WBC) and mean lymphocyte count (TLC). The reduction in male mean APTT was not a similar effect seen in any non-recovery treated males and, therefore, was considered not biologically relevant. Increases in female MCHC, mean WBC and mean TLC were considered not treatment-related as both the haematocrit and haemoglobin values for all recovery treatment group females were comparable to the controls, regarding MCHC. In the case of increased WBC and TLC, this could suggest an infection which is unrelated to treatment.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Statistically significant mean increases in glucose, albumin/globulin ratio and chloride concentration together with statistically significant mean reduction in phosphorus were evident in 1000 mg/kg bw/day males. All non-recovery treatment group males showed a statistically significant mean reduction in triglyceride levels and 1000 mg/kg bw/day recovery males also showed a statistically significant mean increase in chloride concentration. Non-recovery 1000 mg/kg bw/day females showed a statistically significant mean increase in sodium and chloride concentrations. The effect on chloride concentration was also extended to 300 mg/kg bw/day females. The majority of individual values were within the normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used for this study and as such were considered not to be treatment-related.
Non-recovery males from all treatment groups showed a statistically significant increase in calcium concentration. An increasing dose related response was revealed. Since the values showed an increase and not a decrease and the recovery makes revealed normal levels of calcium when compared to controls, the intergroup differences of non-recovery males were not considered to be biologically relevant.
Recovery 1000 mg/kg bw/day males showed a statistically significant mean reduction in aspartate aminotransferase. Recovery females showed a mean reduction in alanine aminotransferase which was within normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used for this study. In the absence of similar effects in non-recovery animals at the end of the dosing period, the intergroup differences were not considered to be of toxicological significance.
URINALYSIS
No treatment-related effects were detected.
NEUROBEHAVIOUR
No treatment-related changes in behavioural parameters, functional performance or sensory reactivity were observed.
All inter- and intra-group differences in urination, defecation and transfer arousal scores were considered to be a result of normal variation for rats of the strain and age used in this study. Differences were either more predominate in the control, equivalent to the control, transient or not dose dependent and therefore considered not to be test treatment related.
A statistically significant increase in hind and fore limb grip strength was detected for males treated with 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. In the absence of any supporting or associated effects of neurotoxicity, these increased findings were considered not biologically relevant.
All inter- and intra-group differences in sensory reactivity scores were considered to be a result of normal variation for rats of the strain and age used for this study and, therefore, are not found to be treatment-related.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
There were no toxicologically significant effects noted when assessing the absolute and relative organ weights.
A statistically significant mean reduction in adrenal weight, both absolute and relative to body weight, was detected for non-recovery 1000 mg/kg bw/day animals of either sex when compared to the controls. The effect also extended to 30 and 300 mg/kg bw/day non-recovery females. There was no evidence of a dose related response in non-recovery females or any histopathological correlates observed in the adrenals of treated animals of either sex. In addition, all individual absolute and the majority of relative values were found to be within normal ranges for rats of the strain and age used for this study. Therefore the significant mean reduction in adrenal weight changes were considered not to be toxicologically significant.
GROSS PATHOLOGY
No toxicologically significant macroscopic abnormalities were detected. One non-recovery control female had distended vagina with narrowed vaginal opening with off white fluid at necropsy. One recovery control male had small and flaccid testes and small epididymides at necropsy. These effects were seen in control animals and are therefore not treatment-related.
HISTOPATHOLOGY
There were no treatment-related microscopic abnormalities detected. All morphological changes were those that are commonly observed in laboratory-maintanied rats of the age and strain employed for this study. There were no differences in incidence or severity between control and treatment groups (non-recovery and recovery) that were considered to be of any toxicological significance.
OTHER FINDINGS
There were no treatment-related effects noted when assessing levels of T3, T4 and TSH. Non-recovery males showed a statistically significant mean increase in T4 levels. In the absence of a similar effect present in males treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day, this finding is not considered to be treatment-related.
Effect levels
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test, the oral administration of the test substance to rats by gavage at 30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day did not result in any treatement-related or toxicologically significant effects. The NOAEL for the test substance was determined to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
In a GLP compliant study conducted in accordance with standardised guidelines OECD 407, EU Method B.7., EPA OPPTS 870.3050 and appropriate Japanese guidelines, the repeat oral toxicity of the test substance was determined.
The test substance was administered by oral gavage to three groups consisting of five male and five female rats for twenty-eight consecutive days at dose levels of 30, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day. A control group of five males and five females was dosed with the vehicle alone. Two recovery groups (each of five males and five females) were also treated with either 1000 mg/kg bw/day or to the vehicle alone for twenty-eight consecutive days and were then maintained without treatment for an additional fourteen days.
Clinical signs, body weight changes, food and water consumption were monitored during the study. Haematology, blood chemistry and urinanalysis were evaluated for all non-recovery group animals at the end of the treatment period and for all recovery group animals at the end of the treatment-free period.
There were no unscheduled deaths observed or clinical signs of toxicity detected during the study. No treatment-related changes were observed in any of the parameters measured during the study.
Under the conditions of the test, the NOAEL for systemic toxicity was determined to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.