Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
January 27, 2006 - June 7, 2006
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2006

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-methyl-4-oxo-3-(prop-2-en-1-yl)cyclopent-2-en-1-yl (1R)-2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-en-1-yl)cyclopropane-1-carboxylate
EC Number:
687-634-7
Cas Number:
231937-89-6
Molecular formula:
C19H26O3
IUPAC Name:
2-methyl-4-oxo-3-(prop-2-en-1-yl)cyclopent-2-en-1-yl (1R)-2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-en-1-yl)cyclopropane-1-carboxylate
Test material form:
liquid: viscous

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
200 microg/plate and 400 microg/plate in the absence and presence of metabolic activation, respectively, for all strains - based on cytotoxicity (inhibition of background bacterial lawn and reduction in number of colonies).
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other:
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Exposure up to 200 microg/plate in the absence and 400 microg/plate of test material in the presence of metabolic activation did not reveal any mutagenic effect when compared with the concurrent vehicle controls in the tester strains TA1537, TA1535, TA98, TA100 and TA102.
Executive summary:

Before conducting the mutagenicity test, the test material was evaluated for its possible cytotoxicity. Based on the results, 200 microg/plate and 400 microg/plate hence 200 microg/plate were selected as the highest concentrations to be tested in the absence and presence of metabolic activation respectively for all strains.
The test material was evaluated for its possible mutagenic effect at 6 dose levels in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. Duplicate plates were maintained for each test concentration of test material, negative, vehicle and positive controls. Two trials were conducted.