Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Density

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
density, other
Remarks:
Absolute density
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 109 (Density of Liquids and Solids)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Density was measured using a stainless steel pycnometer cup.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
pycnometer method
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Lot 20160912
- Purity: 99.2%
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 1-August-2018
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Stability under test conditions: test substance stable at room temperature
Key result
Type:
density
Density:
0.761 g/cm³
Temp.:
23 °C
Conclusions:
The density of of MTDID 49220 was determined to be 0.761 g/cm3 at 23°C, using a pycnometer.
Executive summary:

The density of of MTDID 49220 was determined to be 0.761 g/cm3 at 23°C, using a stainless steel pycnometer cup. The method was similar to OECD TG 109, however information regarding the study was limited, and therefore the result is considered reliable with restrictions.

Endpoint:
density, other
Remarks:
absolute density
Type of information:
not specified
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
secondary literature
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Version / remarks:
No information provided regarding method.
Key result
Type:
density
Density:
0.789 g/cm³
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
temperature not specified
Conclusions:
MTDID 49220 has a density of 0.789 g/cm3 at an unspecified temperature, as reported on a Safety Data Sheet.
Executive summary:

MTDID 49220 has a density of 0.789 g/cm3 at an unspecified temperature, as reported on a Safety Data Sheet. No information was provided regarding the method used to determine the density, therefore the reliability of the result is not assignable.

Endpoint:
relative density
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
abstract
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Published data, but the original article was not obtained, therefore information regarding the method was not available.
Key result
Type:
relative density
Density:
0.771 other: dimensionless
Temp.:
18 °C
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Reference Temp, 4 °C
Conclusions:
MTDID 49220 has a specific gravity of 0.771 [18 °C / 4 °C] from a published article.
Executive summary:

MTDID 49220 has a specific gravity of 0.771 [18°C / 4 °C] from a published article. The result was obtained via a search of the Elsevier Publishing Reaxsys chemical database, but the original article could not be obtained. Since information regarding the methods utilized were not available, the reliability of this data is unassignable.

Description of key information

MTDID 49220 has a density of 0.761 g/cm3 at 23°C, determined with pycnometry method similar to OECD TG 109.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

In the key study, the density of of MTDID 49220 was determined using a stainless steel pycnometer cup. The method was similar to OECD TG 109, however information regarding the study was limited, and therefore the result is considered reliable with restrictions. Two other density values were available from sources for which reliability could not be assigned; these are not considered further.