Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Vapour pressure

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
significant methodological deficiencies
Remarks:
The measurement was conducted above the SADT.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: ASTM E1782
Deviations:
not specified
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Measurement of vapour pressure with DSC ( Differential Scanning Calorimetry)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
Key result
Temp.:
58.7 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.92 mBar
Remarks on result:
other: measured result, not calculated by Antoine fit or Clausius Clapeyron
Temp.:
65.6 °C
Vapour pressure:
1.33 mBar
Remarks on result:
other: measured result, not calculated by Antoine fit or Clausius Clapeyron
Temp.:
71.3 °C
Vapour pressure:
2.01 mBar
Remarks on result:
other: measured result, not calculated by Antoine fit or Clausius Clapeyron
Temp.:
78.5 °C
Vapour pressure:
2.98 mBar
Remarks on result:
other: measured result, not calculated by Antoine fit or Clausius Clapeyron
Temp.:
100.1 °C
Vapour pressure:
11.4 mBar
Remarks on result:
other: measured result, not calculated by Antoine fit or Clausius Clapeyron
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
12.3 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: Estimation of the vapour pressure using EUSES.

- The test substance vapour pressure was measured in the temperature range of 58 °C up to 100 °C. Extrapolation was carried out, showing that error increases drastically with too far extrapolation

- The measurements were performed at tempertaures that are far above the SADT of the test substance. Handeling the test substance at these temperatures while doing the DSC test was possible because very low amounts were used and the measurements were very fast.

Conclusions:
At temperatures between 58 °C to 100 °C vapour pressure between 0.92 to 11.4 mBar were measured for 1,1-bis(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane.
Executive summary:

The vapour pressure of 1,1-bis(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane, 82 % in isododecane, was measured at various temperatures with vaccum DSC. The temperature range of the method is limited. The lower pressure limit depends on the capacity of the vacuumpump (about 0.5 mbar), the lower temperature limit of the DSC-apparatus (25 °C) or by the melting point of the product. The upper limit depends on the thermal stability of the product.In the case 1,1-bis(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane the lower pressure is limited by the pumpcapacity.The vapour pressure of 1,1-bis(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane in the temperature range of 58 °C to 100 °C was measured although the temperatures were above the SADT. That was feasible in this DSC test as the amounts used were low and the measurements were very fast. At temperatures between 58 °C to 100 °C vapour pressure between 0.92 to 11.4 mBar was measured for 1,1-bis(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane. Extrapolation of the obtained results showed that the error in the pressure will increase at extrapolation.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2020-03-12
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.4 (Vapour Pressure)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
static method
Key result
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
399 Pa
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
488 Pa

n

Temperature T

Pressure p

Temperature T

1/T

log p

 

°C

hPa

K

1/K

log Pa

1

20.0

4.1

293.15

0.00341122

2.6128

2

28.0

5.5

301.15

0.00332060

2.7404

3

36.1

7.3

309.25

0.00323363

2.8633

4

44.0

9.5

317.15

0.00315308

2.9777

5

51.9

12.8

325.05

0.00307645

3.1072

6

45.0

10.5

318.15

0.00314317

3.0212

7

37.0

8.1

310.15

0.00322425

2.9085

8

28.9

6.1

302.05

0.00331071

2.7853

9

21.0

3.9

294.15

0.00339963

2.5911

10

16.0

3.3

289.15

0.00345841

2.5198

 

Parameter

Value

Slope

-1536.607121

Intercept

7.842222637

Correlation coefficient r

-0.995809771

Coefficient of determination r2

0.991637099

 

Parameter

Value

Unit

Vapour Pressure (20.0 °C)

399

Pa

Vapour Pressure (25.0 °C)

488

Pa

Conclusions:
The estimated vapour pressure of the test item at 25 °C is 488 Pa.
Executive summary:

The vapour pressure of test item was measured using the static method according to OECD 104 resp. EU A.4. Ten pairs temperature/vapour pressure were used to calculate a regression from which vapour pressure at ambient temperature could be estimated. The vapour pressure at 20 and 25 °C was determined to be 399 and 488 Pa, respectively.

Description of key information

The estimated vapour pressure of the test item at 25 °C is 488 Pa.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Vapour pressure:
488 Pa
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

The vapour pressure of test item was measured using the static method according to OECD 104 resp. EU A.4. Ten pairs temperature/vapour pressure were used to calculate a regression from which vapour pressure at ambient temperature could be estimated. The vapour pressure at 20 and 25 °C was determined to be 399 and 488 Pa, respectively.

The study from 1996 was disregarded because the measurement was performed above the SADT of the sample. Therefore, the measured value is not representative for the test item. In comparison, the study from 2020 was performed with an improved method and according to relevant guidelines. Thus, the study from 2020 is seen as more reliable and used as key study.