Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
199.8 µg/cm²
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no DNEL required: short term exposure controlled by conditions for long-term

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

The substance is not acutely toxic via the oral or dermal routes (LD50 > 2000 mg/kg) and oral administration of test item to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 100, 300 and 750 mg/kg bw/day, was well tolerated in a 28-day repeated dose oral toxicity (NOAEL 750 mg/kg bw/day). Similar results were obtained during a reproductive/developmental screening study in which no substance-related effects relevant to humans were reported after administration of 100, 300 and 750 mg/kg bw/day (NOEL 100 mg/kg bw/day due to equivocal results for reproductive toxicity). No evidence of skin irritation/corrosion, serious eye damage/irritation was identified but the substance is classified as a skin sensitiser (1B) and an appropriate long-term local DNEL has been derived.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
199.8 µg/cm²
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no DNEL required: short term exposure controlled by conditions for long-term

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

The substance is not acutely toxic via the oral or dermal routes (LD50 > 2000 mg/kg) and oral administration of test item to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 100, 300 and 750 mg/kg bw/day, was well tolerated in a 28-day repeated dose oral toxicity (NOAEL 750 mg/kg bw/day). Similar results were obtained during a reproductive/developmental screening study in which no substance-related effects relevant to humans were reported after administration of 100, 300 and 750 mg/kg bw/day (NOEL 100 mg/kg bw/day due to equivocal results for reproductive toxicity). No evidence of skin irritation/corrosion, serious eye damage/irritation was identified but the substance is classified as a skin sensitiser (1B) and an appropriate long-term local DNEL has been derived.