Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 615-712-2 | CAS number: 720-94-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 4 March 2014 - 10 May 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Test method according to OECD 471. GLP study.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 014
- Report date:
- 2014
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4,4,4-trifluoro-1-(4-methylphenyl)butane-1,3-dione
- EC Number:
- 615-712-2
- Cas Number:
- 720-94-5
- Molecular formula:
- C11H9F3O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 4,4,4-trifluoro-1-(4-methylphenyl)butane-1,3-dione
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: 4,4,4-Trifluoro-1-(4-methylphenyl)-1,3-butanedione
- Physical state: slightly coloured crystalline powder
- Analytical purity: 99.9%
- Lot/batch No.: M13696C
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine-requiring gene in Salmonella typhimurium and Tryptophan-requiring gene in the strain of Escherichia coli.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix from rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Initial Mutation Test:
TA98 and TA1537, -S9; TA100 and TA1535, +/- S9: 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5, 0.1581; 0.05 and 0.0158 μg/plate
TA99 and TA1537, +S9; E coli WP2 uvrA, +/- S9: 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5 and 0.1581 μg/plate
Confirmatory Mutation Test:
TA98 and TA1537, -S9; TA100 and TA1535, +/- S9: 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5, 0.1581 and 0.05 μg/plate
TA99 and TA1537, +S9; E coli WP2 uvrA, - S9: 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5, 0.1581 and 0.05 μg/plate
E coli WP2 uvrA, + S9: 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5 and 0.158 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solubility of the test item was examined using Distilled water, Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and Acetone. The test item was insoluble in Distilled water. The formulation at 100 mg/mL concentration using Acetone as vehicle was suitable for the test, while the test item was only partially soluble in DMSO at the same concentration. Therefore, Acetone was selected for vehicle (solvent) of the study.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Untreated
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acetone, DMSO and distilled water
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA100, TA1535, -S9 (2 µg/plate)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene-diamine
- Remarks:
- TA98, -S9 (4 µg/plate)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- TA1537, -S9 (50 µg/plate)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- WP2 uvrA, -S9 (2 µg/plate)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- all Salmonella strains, +S9 (2 µg/plate) and WP2 uvrA, +S9 (50 µg/plate)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Plate incorporation (initial mutation test):
Molten top agar was prepared and kept at 45°C. 2 mL of top agar was aliquoted into individual test tubes (3 tubes per control or concentration level). The equivalent number of minimal glucose agar plates was properly labelled. The test item (or controls) and other components (top agar, overnight culture of test strain, phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) or S9 mix) were prepared freshly and added to the overlay (45°C). This solution was mixed and poured on the surface of minimal agar plates. After preparation, the plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours.
Pre-incubation (confirmatory mutation test):
Before the overlaying, the test item formulation (or vehicle/solvent or reference control), the bacterial culture and the S9 mix or phosphate buffer was added into appropriate tubes to provide direct contact between bacteria and the test item (in its vehicle/solvent). The tubes (3 tubes per control or concentration level) were gently mixed and incubated for 20 min at 37ºC in a shaking incubator. After the incubation period, 2 mL of molten top agar was added to the tubes; the content was mixed up and poured onto minimal glucose agar plates as described for the standard plate incorporation method. After preparation, the plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 replicates per dose and controls.
EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA:
The colony numbers were determined by manual counting.
Visual examination of the plates was performed, precipitation or signs of growth inhibition (if any) were recorded.
The mean number of revertants per plate, the standard deviation and the mutation factor values were calculated. - Evaluation criteria:
- Criteria for a Positive Response:
A test item was considered mutagenic if:
- a dose–related increase in the number of revertants occurred and/or;
- a reproducible biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurred in at least one strain with or without metabolic activation.
An increase was considered biologically relevant if:
- the number of reversions is more than two times higher than the reversion rate of the negative (solvent) control in Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA bacterial strains;
- the number of reversions is more than three times higher than the reversion rate of the negative (solvent) control in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535 and TA1537 bacterial strains.
According to the guidelines, statistical method may be used as an aid in evaluating the test results. However, statistical significance should not be the only determining factor for a positive response.
Criteria for a Negative Response:
A test article was considered non-mutagenic if it produced neither a dose-related increase in the number of revertants nor a reproducible biologically relevant positive response at any of the dose groups, with or without metabolic activation. - Statistics:
- The mean number of revertants per plate, the standard deviation and the mutation factor values were calculated for each concentration level of the test item and for the controls using Microsoft ExcelTM software.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- (see below)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The observed revertant counts in the preliminary experiment were mostly in the normal range at the non-cytotoxic concentrations (minor differences were detected in some sporadic cases, but they were without biological significance and considered as biological variability of the test system). Strong inhibitory, cytotoxic effect of the test item was detected on the plates in TA98 at 5000, 2500, 1000, 316 and 100 μg/plate +/- S9 and at 31.6 μg/plate -S9; in TA100 at 5000, 2500, 1000, 316, 100 and 31.6 μg/plate +/- S9; and in E. coli WP2 uvrA at 5000, 2500, 1000, 316 and 100 μg/plate +/- S9. No insolubility was observed on the plates in the preliminary experiment.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: Strong inhibitory, cytotoxic effect of the test item was seen in the Initial Mutation Test in TA98 and TA1537at 158.1, 50 and 15.81 μg/plate -S9 and at 500, 158.1 and 50 μg/plate +S9; in TA100 and TA1535 at 158.1, 50 and 15.81 μg/plate +/- S9; and in E. coli WP2 uvrA at 500, 158.1 and 50 μg/plate -S9 and at 500 and 158.1 μg/plate +S9. Similar effect was seen in the Confirmatory Mutation Test in TA98 and TA1537 at 50, 15.81 and 5 μg/plate -S9 and at 158.1, 50 and 15.81 μg/plate +S9; in TA100 and TA1535 at 50, 15.81 and 5 μg/plate -S9 and at 50 and 15.81 μg/plate +S9; and in E. coli WP2 uvrA at 158.1, 50 and 15.81 μg/plate -S9 and at 500, 158.1 and 50 μg/plate +S9. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Initial Mutation Test:
Concentrations (µg/plate) |
Mean values of revertants / Mutation factor (MF) |
Salmonella typhimuriumtester strains |
Escherichia coli |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
WP2uvrA |
|||||||
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
500 |
Mean |
-- |
0.0 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
MF |
-- |
0.00 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
158.1 |
Mean |
0.0 |
3.3 |
0.0 |
12.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.7 |
15.0 |
MF |
0.00 |
0.14 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.15 |
0.40 |
|
50 |
Mean |
2.7 |
18.0 |
5.3 |
47.0 |
0.0 |
4.3 |
1.0 |
2.3 |
17.7 |
27.7 |
MF |
0.13 |
0.75 |
0.07 |
0.46 |
0.00 |
0.37 |
0.14 |
0.32 |
0.57 |
0.74 |
|
15.81 |
Mean |
20.3 |
22.7 |
51.7 |
99.0 |
6.3 |
9.7 |
5.0 |
9.3 |
35.3 |
35.0 |
MF |
1.02 |
0.94 |
0.64 |
0.97 |
1.46 |
0.83 |
0.71 |
1.27 |
1.14 |
0.94 |
|
5 |
Mean |
21.3 |
27.7 |
86.0 |
98.3 |
8.3 |
11.7 |
5.3 |
10.0 |
38.0 |
42.7 |
MF |
1.07 |
1.15 |
1.06 |
0.96 |
1.92 |
1.00 |
0.76 |
1.36 |
1.23 |
1.14 |
|
1.581 |
Mean |
22.0 |
30.0 |
83.3 |
88.3 |
12.0 |
11.0 |
5.3 |
9.3 |
29.0 |
41.7 |
MF |
1.10 |
1.25 |
1.02 |
0.87 |
2.77 |
0.94 |
0.76 |
1.27 |
0.94 |
1.12 |
|
0.5 |
Mean |
19.7 |
27.3 |
76.3 |
93.0 |
11.3 |
12.0 |
4.0 |
7.3 |
33.7 |
37.0 |
MF |
0.98 |
1.14 |
0.94 |
0.91 |
2.62 |
1.03 |
0.57 |
1.00 |
1.09 |
0.99 |
|
0.1581 |
Mean |
15.7 |
26.7 |
83.0 |
101.3 |
11.0 |
12.3 |
4.3 |
9.3 |
37.3 |
33.3 |
MF |
0.78 |
1.11 |
1.02 |
0.99 |
2.54 |
1.06 |
0.62 |
1.27 |
1.20 |
0.89 |
|
0.05 |
Mean |
23.0 |
-- |
90.3 |
95.3 |
12.3 |
12.0 |
8.0 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
MF |
1.17 |
-- |
1.11 |
0.93 |
2.85 |
1.03 |
1.14 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Confirmatory Mutation Test:
Concentrations (µg/plate) |
Mean values of revertants / Mutation factor (MF) |
Salmonella typhimuriumtester strains |
Escherichia coli |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
WP2uvrA |
|||||||
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
500 |
Mean |
-- |
- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
0.3 |
MF |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
0.01 |
|
158.1 |
Mean |
-- |
11.0 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
1.7 |
1.0 |
7.7 |
MF |
-- |
0.58 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
0.25 |
0.03 |
0.21 |
|
50 |
Mean |
5.0 |
22.3 |
8.3 |
62.0 |
0.0 |
8.3 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
1.7 |
12.3 |
MF |
0.23 |
1.18 |
0.10 |
0.52 |
0.00 |
0.86 |
0.00 |
0.90 |
0.05 |
0.35 |
|
15.81 |
Mean |
9.7 |
29.7 |
27.3 |
103.3 |
3.7 |
12.3 |
2.7 |
10.7 |
16.3 |
17.3 |
MF |
0.44 |
1.56 |
0.32 |
0.86 |
0.52 |
1.28 |
0.62 |
1.60 |
0.52 |
0.49 |
|
5 |
Mean |
15.7 |
28.7 |
57.7 |
110.0 |
8.0 |
14.3 |
4.0 |
7.7 |
21.3 |
38.7 |
MF |
0.71 |
1.51 |
0.68 |
0.92 |
1.14 |
1.48 |
0.92 |
1.15 |
0.68 |
1.08 |
|
1.581 |
Mean |
22.3 |
26.3 |
61.0 |
103.0 |
5.0 |
9.3 |
5.3 |
9.7 |
21.7 |
39.0 |
MF |
1.02 |
1.39 |
0.72 |
0.86 |
0.71 |
0.97 |
1.23 |
1.45 |
0.69 |
1.09 |
|
0.5 |
Mean |
20.7 |
30.3 |
76.0 |
109.0 |
5.3 |
11.0 |
5.3 |
8.3 |
21.7 |
34.0 |
MF |
0.94 |
1.60 |
0.90 |
0.91 |
0.76 |
1.14 |
1.23 |
1.25 |
0.69 |
0.95 |
|
0.1581 |
Mean |
24.3 |
27.0 |
82.0 |
103.7 |
6.0 |
10.0 |
7.3 |
10.3 |
20.0 |
32.7 |
MF |
1.11 |
1.42 |
0.97 |
0.86 |
0.86 |
1.03 |
1.69 |
1.55 |
0.64 |
0.92 |
|
0.05 |
Mean |
18.0 |
29.3 |
92.0 |
120.7 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
7.7 |
11.0 |
29.3 |
-- |
MF |
0.82 |
1.54 |
1.09 |
1.01 |
1.19 |
0.86 |
1.77 |
1.65 |
0.94 |
-- |
|
0.01581 |
Mean |
18.0 |
-- |
80.3 |
113.7 |
11.0 |
11.7 |
5.3 |
-- |
- |
-- |
MF |
0.82 |
-- |
0.95 |
0.95 |
1.57 |
1.21 |
1.23 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
In the initial mutation test, the highest revertant rate was observed in TA1535 at 0.05 μg/plate -S9 (the mutation factor value was 2.85). Higher numbers of revertant colonies compared to the Acetone control plates were detected at several concentrations in this strain. However, there was no dose response, the observed mutation factor value remained below the biologically relevant threshold limit and the numbers of revertant colonies were within the historical control range. Furthermore, higher number of revertant colonies compared to the Acetone control were detected for untreated control (MF: 2.77) and Distilled water control (MF: 2.08) without metabolic activation also in this strain, indicating a higher than usual variability in this case.
In the confirmatory mutation test, the highest revertant rate was observed in TA1537 at 0.05 μg/plate concentration -S9. The observed mutation factor value was 1.77. However, no clear dose-dependent relationship was observed, and the observed mutation factor value was well below the biologically relevant threshold value. The number of revertant colonies was within the historical control range.
Higher numbers of revertant colonies compared to the vehicle (solvent) control were detected in the main test in some other sporadic cases. However, no dose-dependence was observed in those cases and they were below the biologically relevant threshold value. The numbers of revertant colonies were within the historical control range in each case, so they were considered as reflecting the biological variability of the test.
Sporadically, lower revertant counts compared to the vehicle (solvent) control were observed in the main test at some non-cytotoxic concentrations. However, no background inhibition was recorded and the mean numbers of revertant colonies were in the historical control range in all cases, thus they were considered as biological variability of the test system.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative (with and without metabolic activation)
The test item had no mutagenic activity in the applied bacterium tester strains under the test conditions used in this study. - Executive summary:
The test item was tested for potential mutagenic activity using the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay according to OECD Guideline 471 (GLP study). The experiments were carried out using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (S9 fraction prepared from the livers of rats). Based on the results of the Solubility Test, the test item was dissolved in Acetone. Concentrations of 5000; 2500; 1000; 316; 100; 31.6 and 10 μg/plate were examined in the Range Finding Test. Based on the results of the Range Finding Test, the test item concentrations in the main tests were as follows:
Initial Mutation Test:
TA98 and TA1537, -S9; TA100 and TA1535, +/- S9: 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5, 0.1581; 0.05 and 0.0158 μg/plate
TA99 and TA1537, +S9; E coli WP2 uvrA, +/- S9: 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5 and 0.1581 μg/plate
Confirmatory Mutation Test:
TA98 and TA1537, -S9; TA100 and TA1535, +/- S9: 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5, 0.1581 and 0.05 μg/plate
TA99 and TA1537, +S9; E coli WP2 uvrA, - S9: 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5, 0.1581 and 0.05 μg/plate
E coli WP2 uvrA, + S9: 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581, 0.5 and 0.158 μg/plate
In the Initial Mutation Test and Confirmatory Mutation Test, none of the observed revertant colony numbers were above the respective biological threshold value. There were no consistent dose-related trends and no indication of any treatment effect. In all test item treated groups, the numbers of revertant colonies were below the biological relevance when compared with the solvent controls and were mostly within the historical control range and were within the normal biological variability of the test system. Strong inhibitory, cytotoxic effect of the test item was detected in the Initial Mutation Test and Confirmatory Mutation Test in all examined bacterial strains with or without metabolic activation. The tests were considered to be valid. In conclusion, the test item had no mutagenic activity in the bacterium tester strains under the test conditions used in this study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.