Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 217-461-0 | CAS number: 1860-26-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2014-03-04 until 2015-04-02
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- 22 Jan 2001
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-ethyl-N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)hexylamine
- EC Number:
- 217-461-0
- EC Name:
- 2-ethyl-N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)hexylamine
- Cas Number:
- 1860-26-0
- Molecular formula:
- C24H51N
- IUPAC Name:
- tris(2-ethylhexyl)amine
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- Crl:WI(Han)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services GmbH, Germany
- Purity: 99.7 %
- Age at study initiation: about 10-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: body weight of the pregnant animals on day 0 varied between 151.5 – 195.7 g
- Housing: individually (Makrolon type M III cages)
- Diet: ad libitum (Kliba maintenance diet mouse/rat “GLP”, meal, supplied by Provimi Kliba SA, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland)
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: yes
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
For the test substance preparations the specific amount of test substance was weighed, topped up with corn oil in a graduated flask and intensely mixed by shaking until it is dissolved.
DOSING SOLUTIONS PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of dosing solution: at the beginning of the administration period and thereafter at intervals
- Storage temperature of dosing solution: room temperature
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle: not specified
- Amount of vehicle: 4 mL/kg bw/d (substance in vehicle) - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The analytical investigations of the test substance preparations were carried out at the Analytical Chemistry Laboratory of Experimental Toxicology and Ecology of BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Analytical verifications of the stability of the test substance in corn oil over a period of 7 days at room temperature were conducted prior to the start of the study. - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: purchased timed pregnant
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- GD 6-19
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- On GD 20, the females were sacrificed in a randomized order and examined macroscopically. The fetuses were removed from the uterus and investigated.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice a day on working days or once a day on Saturdays, Sundays
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: All animals were weighed on GD 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 19 and 20. The body weight change of the animals was calculated based on the obtained results.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption: The consumption of food was recorded for the intervals GD 0-1, 1-3, 3-6, 6-8, 8-10, 10-13, 13-15, 15-17, 17-19 and 19-20.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20
- Organs examined/Tissue fixed:
1. All gross lesions
2. Adrenal glands
3. Kidneys
4. Liver
5. Mesenteric lymph nodes
6. Ovaries
7. Spleen
8. Stomach
9. Small intestine - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Head examinations: No - Statistics:
- DUNNETT-test (twosided); FISHER'S EXACT test (onesided); WILCOXON-test (onesided); KRUSKAL-WALLIS test
- Indices:
- The conception rate (in %) was calculated according to the following formula:
number of pregnant animals/number of fertilized animals x100
The preimplantation loss (in %) for each individual pregnant animal which underwent scheduled sacrifice was calculated according to the following formula:
number of corpora lutea – number of implantations/number of corpora lutea x 100
The postimplantation loss (in %) for each individual pregnant animal which underwent scheduled sacrifice was calculated according to the following formula:
number of implantations – number of live fetuses/number of implantations x100 - Historical control data:
- Was used to assess whether observed differences were within historical control range.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Some females (7 out of 25) of the high-dose group (500 mg/kg bw/d) and some females (5 out of 25) of the mid-dose group (150 mg/kg bw/d) showed transient salivation towards the end of the administration period. Salivation persisted in the respective animals for a few minutes after daily gavage dosing (i.e. up to 10 minutes) and was initially observed on GD 15.
No further clinical signs or changes of general behavior, which may be attributed to the test substance, were detected in any female at dose levels of 50, 150 or 500 mg/kg bw/d during the entire study period. - Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- There were no test substance-related or spontaneous mortalities in any females of all test groups (0, 50, 150 or 500 mg/kg bw/d).
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean body weights and the average body weight gain of the low-, mid- and high-dose dams (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) were generally comparable to the concurrent control group throughout the entire study period. This includes the statistically significant increased body weight gain value in test group 3 on GD 8-10.
The corrected body weight gain of test groups 1-3 (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) revealed no difference of any biological relevance to the corresponding control group. Moreover, mean carcass weights remained also unaffected by the treatment. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean food consumption of the dams in test groups 1, 2 and 3 (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) was generally comparable to the concurrent control group throughout the study. This includes the slightly, but statistically significantly increased food consumption values in test group 2 (150 mg/kg bw/d) on GD 15-17 and in test group 3 (500 mg/kg bw/d) on GD 3-6 and GD 15-17.
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In dams of test group 3 (500 mg/kg bw/d) red blood cell (RBC) counts, hemoglobin and hematocrit values were decreased. Hemoglobin values were already lower compared to controls in rats of test group 2 (150 mg/kg bw/d). However, in this test group this was the only altered red blood cell parameter and the mean was within the historical control range (hemoglobin 6.3-7.7 mmol/L). Therefore, in this test group the reduced hemoglobin value was regarded as incidental and not treatment-related. In dams of test groups 2 and 3 (150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d), total white blood cell counts, absolute lymphocyte, monocyte and large unstained cell (LUC) counts were increased. However all values apart from the absolute monocyte counts in test group 3 (500 mg/kg bw/d) were within historical control ranges (WBC 3.58-6.00 Giga/L; absolute lymphocyte counts 1.89- 3.85 Giga/L; absolute monocyte counts 0.10-0.15 Giga/L; absolute LUC counts 0.01-0.03 Giga/L). Therefore, the changes of the total white and the differential blood cell counts were regarded as incidental and not treatment-related. The mean of the absolute monocyte counts in test group 3 which was marginally above the historical control range was also regarded at least as not adverse.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In dams of test groups 1, 2 and 3 (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities were higher compared to controls. In test groups 1 and 2 the increase was marginal (less than 2fold); thus the alteration was regarded as treatment-related, but not adverse. In dams of test group 3 (500 mg/kg bw/d) cholesterol and triglyceride values were increased. Cholesterol levels were already higher in test group 2 (150 mg/kg bw/d), but this was the only relevantly changed clinical chemistry parameter in this test group and therefore it was regarded in this test group as treatment-related but not adverse (ECETOC Technical report No. 85, 2002).
In dams of test groups 1, 2 and 3 (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d), total bilirubin values were decreased. A hypoplastic anemia as cause for this decrease is not probable because of the short application time of the compound for 14 days. More probably an increased conjugation rate in the liver cells coupled with an accelerated excretion via bile was the cause for the lower bilirubin values. This effect was regarded as treatment-related but not adverse.
In dams of test groups 1, 2 and 3 (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d), calcium levels were higher compared to controls, but the values were within the historical control range (calcium 2.36- 2.68 mmol/L). In dams of test group 1 (50 mg/kg bw/d) total protein and albumin levels were higher compared to controls, but the change was not dose-dependent. Therefore, the mentioned alterations were regarded as incidental and not treatment-related.
Details are given table 1. - Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean gravid uterus weights of the animals of test group 1-3 (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) were not influenced by the test substance. The differences between these groups and the control group revealed no dose-dependency and were assessed to be without biological relevance.
The mean placental weights of the low-, mid- and high-dose groups (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) were comparable to the corresponding control group.
Details are given in table 2. - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All findings occurred only individually. They were considered to be incidental or spontaneous in origin and without any relation to treatment.
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no test substance-related and/or biologically relevant differences between test groups 0, 1, 2 and 3 (0, 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) in the mean number of implantation sites or in the the number of resorptions.
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no test substance-related and/or biologically relevant differences between test groups 0, 1, 2 and 3 (0, 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) in the mean number of implantation sites and in the values calculated for the pre- and the postimplantation losses.
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no test substance-related and/or biologically relevant differences between test groups 0, 1, 2 and 3 (0, 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) in viable fetuses.
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The conception rate was 92% in the low-dose group (50 mg/kg bw/d) and 100% in the control, mid- and high-dose groups (0, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d). With these rates, a sufficient number of pregnant females were available for the purpose of the study. There were no test substance-related and/or biologically relevant differences between test groups 0, 1, 2 and 3 (0, 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) in conception rate.
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no test substance-related and/or biologically relevant differences between test groups 0, 1, 2 and 3 (0, 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) in the mean number of corpora lutea.
All observed differences are considered to reflect the normal range of fluctuations for animals of this strain and age.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic toxicity
- Effect level:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical biochemistry
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: No adverse effects on fetuses.
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, treatment-related
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean fetal weights of test groups 1-3 (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) were not influenced by the test substance. This includes the statistically significantly higher mean fetal body weight in test group 3, which was well within the historical control range (both sexes combined: mean 3.5 g [2.5 – 5.1 g]). Therefore it was regarded as incidental and not treatment-related.
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The sex distribution of the fetuses in test groups 1-3 (50, 150 and 500 mg/kg bw/d) was comparable to the control fetuses.
- External malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- An external malformation was recorded, each, for one control fetus and one fetus of test group 3 (500 mg/kg bw/d), as shown in table 3. For the affected fetuses, these external findings were associated either with skeletal or visceral malformations. The total incidence of external malformations in treated animals did not differ significantly from the control group and was comparable to the historical control data.
No external variations were recorded.
One unclassified external observation, i.e. blood coagulum around placenta, was recorded in one fetus of the high-dose group (500 mg/kg bw/d). This finding was not considered biologically relevant. - Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Some skeletal malformations were detected in all test groups including the control (test groups 0-3; 0, 50, 150 or 500 mg/kg bw/d), as shown in table 5. One control fetus had associated external findings. The incidences of these malformations were neither statistically significantly different from control nor dose-dependent and therefore, not considered biologically relevant.
For all test groups, skeletal variations of different bone structures were observed, with or without effects on corresponding cartilages. The observed skeletal variations were related to several parts of fetal skeletons and appeared without a relation to dosing. However, the incidence of ‘dumbbell ossification of thoracic centrum (unchanged cartilage)’ was statistically significantly increased in test group 2 (150 mg/kg bw/d). This finding showed no relation to dosing and can be found in the historical control data at a higher frequence. The overall incidences of skeletal variations were also comparable to the historical control data. - Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Soft tissue malformations occurred in one fetus, each, of the control and the high-dose group (0 and 500 mg/kg bw/d). One male high-dose fetus had multiple visceral malformations, i.e. swollen liver lobes (in addition lobular pattern [nutmeg liver]), small kidneys, unexpanded lungs (in addition fused lung lobes), enlarged heart, misshapen and interrupted palatal rugae (in addition to high-arched palate). These visceral findings were associated with an external malformation. The overall incidences of soft tissue malformations were comparable to those found in the historical control data. Details on soft tissue effects are given in table 4.
Five soft tissue variations, i.e. misshapen palatal rugae, short innominate, malpositioned carotid branch, dilated renal pelvis and dilated ureter, were detected. In the majority of cases, the incidences were neither statistically significantly nor dose-dependently changed in comparison to the concurrent control group. However, the incidence of ‘short innominate’ was statistically significantly increased in test group 2 (150 mg/kg bw/d). This finding showed no dose-dependency and was therefore assessed to be without biological relevance. The overall incidences of soft tissue variations were comparable to those found in the historical control data.
Additionally, some isolated cartilage findings without impact on the respective bony structures, which were designated as unclassified cartilage observations, occurred in all test groups. The observed unclassified cartilage findings were related to the skull, the vertebral column, the ribs and the sternum and did not show any relation to dosing.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- other: No adverse effects in fetuses.
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Clinical chemistry (enzymes and substrates + minerals) results of the female dams
Enzymes |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
G 0 / F |
G 1 /F 50 mg/kgbw/d |
G 2 /F 150 mg/kgbw/d |
G 3 /F 500 mg/kgbw/d |
|||||||
ALT |
Mean |
0.98 v |
1.10 * |
1.33 ** |
1.83 ** |
||||||
[µkat/L] |
S.d. |
0.12 |
0.21 |
0.17 |
0.29 |
||||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
||||||
|
Median |
1.01 |
1.10 |
1.35 |
1.79 |
||||||
AST |
Mean |
1.24 k |
1.28 |
1.22 |
1.34 |
||||||
[µkat/L] |
S.d. |
0.32 |
0.33 |
0.30 |
0.46 |
||||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
||||||
|
Median |
1.17 |
1.23 |
1.19 |
1.23 |
||||||
ALP |
Mean |
1.16 k |
1.03 |
1.02 |
0.92 |
||||||
[µkat/L] |
S.d. |
0.31 |
0.25 |
0.30 |
0.26 |
||||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
||||||
|
Median |
1.03 |
1.03 |
0.96 |
0.96 |
||||||
GGT_C |
Mean |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
[nkat/L] |
S.d. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
||||||
|
Median |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
Substrates + minerals |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
G 0 / F |
G 1 /F 50 mg/kgbw/d |
G 2 /F 150 mg/kgbw/d |
G 3 /F 500 mg/kgbw/d |
|
||||||
UREA |
Mean |
4.52 k |
4.72 |
4.58 |
4.69 |
|
|||||
[mmol/L] |
S.d. |
0.51 |
0.86 |
0.81 |
0.66 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
4.48 |
4.53 |
4.36 |
4.62 |
|
|||||
CREA |
Mean |
27.3 k |
26.2 |
27.1 |
26.8 |
|
|||||
[µmol/L] |
S.d. |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
3.1 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
27.6 |
26.8 |
26.8 |
26.8 |
|
|||||
GLUC |
Mean |
5.32 k |
5.43 |
5.39 |
5.45 |
|
|||||
[mmol/L] |
S.d. |
0.49 |
0.51 |
0.41 |
0.37 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
5.22 |
5.40 |
5.32 |
5.27 |
|
|||||
TBIL_C |
Mean |
1.26 v |
0.98 ** |
0.94 ** |
0.81 ** |
|
|||||
[µmol/L] |
S.d. |
0.25 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.22 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
1.23 |
1.00 |
0.92 |
0.75 |
|
|||||
TPROT |
Mean |
59.59 v |
61.63 * |
60.90 |
59.05 |
|
|||||
[g/L] |
S.d. |
2.06 |
3.37 |
3.51 |
3.88 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
59.76 |
61.49 |
60.09 |
59.04 |
|
|||||
ALB |
Mean |
35.10 v |
36.50 * |
36.03 |
34.73 |
|
|||||
[g/L] |
S.d. |
1.19 |
2.34 |
2.17 |
2.34 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
34.86 |
36.21 |
35.66 |
35.04 |
|
|||||
GLOB |
Mean |
24.49 k |
25.13 |
24.88 |
24.33 |
|
|||||
[g/L] |
S.d. |
1.11 |
1.49 |
1.51 |
1.73 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N Median |
25 24.54 |
23 24.94 |
25 24.85 |
25 24.62 |
|
|||||
CHOL |
Mean |
2.08 v |
2.24 |
2.41 ** |
2.53 ** |
|
|||||
[mmol/L] |
S.d. |
0.32 |
0.32 |
0.32 |
0.41 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
2.03 |
2.18 |
2.38 |
2.50 |
|
|||||
TRIG |
Mean |
5.28 v |
5.31 |
5.72 |
6.67 ** |
|
|||||
[mmol/L] |
S.d. |
1.68 |
2.23 |
1.81 |
1.78 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
5.01 |
5.45 |
5.89 |
6.66 |
|
|||||
INP |
Mean |
1.62 v |
1.71 |
1.68 |
1.54 |
|
|||||
[mmol/L] |
S.d. |
0.22 |
0.19 |
0.17 |
0.20 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
1.55 |
1.66 |
1.66 |
1.55 |
|
|||||
CA |
Mean |
2.55 v |
2.61 ** |
2.63 ** |
2.65 ** |
|
|||||
[mmol/L] |
S.d. |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.09 |
0.07 |
|
|||||
day 20 |
N |
25 |
23 |
25 |
25 |
|
|||||
|
Median |
2.56 |
2.62 |
2.63 |
2.65 |
|
Statistic Profile = Kruskal-Wallis + Wilcoxon test (two-sided), * p<=0.05, ** p <=0.01, X = Group excluded from statistics
v=KRUSKAL-WALLIS-WILCOX; k=KRUSKAL-WALLIS
Table 2: Absolute and relative organ weights of the female dams
Absolute weights |
Females |
||
Test group mg/kg bw/d |
1 (50 ) |
2 ( 150) |
3 ( 500) |
Adrenal glands |
102% |
108% |
114%** |
Liver |
104% |
113%** |
113%** |
Ovaries |
101% |
108% |
112%** |
Spleen |
103% |
108%* |
111%* |
Relative weights |
Females |
||
Test group mg/kg bw/d |
1 (50) |
2 (150) |
3 (500) |
Adrenal glands |
102% |
106% |
115%** |
Liver |
104% |
110%** |
113%** |
Ovaries |
101% |
106% |
112%** |
Spleen |
103% |
106% |
111%** |
*: p <= 0.05, **: p <= 0.01
Table 3: External examination of the fetuses
Total external observations |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Test group 0 0 mg/kgbw/d |
Test group 1 50 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 2 150 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 3 500 mg/kg bw/d |
Litter Fetuses |
N N |
25 257 |
23 210 |
25 261 |
25 262 |
Fetal incidence |
N (%) |
1 (0.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1 (0.4) |
Litter incidence |
N (%) |
1 (4.0) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1 (4.0) |
Affected fetuses/litter |
Mean% |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
Total external unclassified observations |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Test group 0 0 mg/kgbw/d |
Test group 1 50 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 2 150 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 3 500 mg/kg bw/d |
Litter Fetuses |
N N |
25 257 |
23 210 |
25 261 |
25 262 |
Fetal incidence |
N (%) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1 (0.4) |
Litter incidence |
N (%) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1 (4.0) |
Affected fetuses/litter |
Mean% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
mg/kg bw/d = milligram per kilogram body weight per day; N = number; % = per cent
Table 4: Soft tissue examination of the fetuses
Total soft tissue malformations |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Test group 0 0 mg/kgbw/d |
Test group 1 50 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 2 150 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 3 500 mg/kg bw/d |
Litter Fetuses |
N N |
25 121 |
22 99 |
25 125 |
25 124 |
Fetal incidence |
N (%) |
1 (0.8) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1 (0.8) |
Litter incidence |
N (%) |
1 (4.0) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1 (4.0) |
Affected fetuses/litter |
Mean% |
0.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
Total soft tissue variations |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Test group 0 0 mg/kgbw/d |
Test group 1 50 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 2 150 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 3 500 mg/kg bw/d |
Litter Fetuses |
N N |
25 121 |
22 99 |
25 125 |
25 124 |
Fetal incidence |
N (%) |
6 (5.0) |
2 (2.0) |
5 (4.0) |
7 (5.6) |
Litter incidence |
N (%) |
5 (20) |
2 (9.1) |
4 (16) |
5 (20) |
Affected fetuses/litter |
Mean% |
4.7 |
5.5 |
3.9 |
5.7 |
mg/kg bw/d = milligram per kilogram body weight per day; N = number; % = per cent
Table 5: Skeletal examination of the fetuses
Total skeletal malformations |
|
|
||||
|
|
Test group 0 0 mg/kgbw/d |
Test group 1 50 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 2 150 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 3 500 mg/kg bw/d |
|
Litter Fetuses |
N N |
25 136 |
23 111 |
25 136 |
25 138 |
|
Fetal incidence |
N (%) |
1 (0.7) |
1 (0.9) |
0.0 |
1 (0.7) |
|
Litter incidence |
N (%) |
1 (4.0) |
1 (4.3) |
0.0 |
1 (4.0) |
|
Affected fetuses/litter |
Mean% |
0.6 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
|
Total fetal skeletal variations |
|
|
||||
|
|
Test group 0 0 mg/kgbw/d |
Test group 1 50 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 2 150 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 3 500 mg/kg bw/d |
|
Litter Fetuses |
N N |
25 136 |
23 111 |
25 136 |
25 138 |
|
Fetal incidence |
N (%) |
133 (98) |
108 (97) |
132 (97) |
132 (96) |
|
Litter incidence |
N (%) |
25 (100) |
23 (100) |
25 (100) |
25 (100) |
|
Affected fetuses/litter |
Mean% |
97.7 |
97.2 |
96.9 |
95.4 |
|
Total unclassified cartilage observations |
|
|
||||
|
|
Test group 0 0 mg/kgbw/d |
Test group 1 50 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 2 150 mg/kg bw/d |
Test group 3 500 mg/kg bw/d |
|
Litter Fetuses |
N N |
25 136 |
23 111 |
25 136 |
25 138 |
|
Fetal incidence |
N (%) |
119 (88) |
94 (85) |
109 (80) |
110 (80) |
|
Litter incidence |
N (%) |
25 (100) |
22 (96) |
23 (92) |
24 (96) |
|
Affected fetuses/litter |
Mean% |
88.2 |
80.0 |
78.3 |
80.1 |
mg/kg bw/d = milligram per kilogram body weight per day; N = number; % = per cent
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The administration of the test substance to pregnant Wistar rats from implantation to one day prior to the expected day of parturition (GD 6-19) caused evidence of maternal toxicity, such as an anemia and altered liver cell metabolism.
In conclusion, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for maternal toxicity is 150 mg/kg bw/d.
There were no toxicologically relevant adverse fetal findings evident. Thus, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for prenatal developmental toxicity is 500 mg/kg bw/d.
The test substance is not teratogenic in rats. - Executive summary:
SUMMARY
METHODS
Tris-(2-ethylhexyl)amine was tested for its prenatal developmental toxicity in Wistar rats.
The test substance was administered as an oily solution to groups of 25 time-mated female Wistar rats by gavage at doses of 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg body weight/day (mg/kg bw/d) on gestation days (GD) 6 through 19. The control group, consisting of 25 females, was dosed with the vehicle (corn oil) in parallel. A standard dose volume of 4 mL/kg body weight was used for each test group.
At terminal sacrifice on GD 20, 23-25 females per group had implantation sites.
OBSERVATIONS
Food consumption and body weights of the animals were recorded regularly throughout the study period. The state of health of the animals was checked each day.
On GD 20, blood samples were obtained from all females by retrobulbar venous puncture following isoflurane anesthesia. After blood sampling all females were sacrificed by decapitation (under isoflurane anesthesia) and assessed by gross pathology (including weight determinations of the adrenal glands, kidneys, liver, ovaries, spleen, unopened uterus and placentas).
For each dam, corpora lutea were counted and number and distribution of implantation sites (differentiated between resorptions, live and dead fetuses) were determined. The fetuses were removed from the uterus, sexed, weighed and further investigated for external findings. Thereafter, one half of the fetuses of each litter were examined for soft tissue findings and the remaining fetuses for skeletal (inclusive cartilage) findings.
RESULTS
Analytics
The various analyses confirmed
• the stability of the test substance preparations over a period of 7 days at room temperature,
• the correctness of the prepared concentrations.
Effects
The following test substance-related adverse effects/findings were noted:
Test group 3 - 500 mg/kg bw/d:
Dams
• Decreased red blood cell (RBC) counts, hemoglobin and hematocrit values
• Increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities
• Increased cholesterol and triglyceride values
• Increased absolute and relative organ weights of liver and spleen
Fetuses
• No test substance-related adverse effects
Test group 2 - 150 mg/kg bw/d:
• No test substance-related adverse effects
Test group 1 - 50 mg/kg bw/d:
• No test substance-related adverse effects
CONCLUSION
Under the conditions of this prenatal developmental toxicity study, the oral administration of Tris-(2-ethylhexyl)amine to pregnant Wistar rats from implantation to one day prior to the expected day of parturition (GD 6-19) caused evidence of maternal toxicity, such as anemia and altered liver cell metabolism.
In conclusion, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for maternal toxicity is 150 mg/kg bw/d.
There were no toxicologically relevant adverse fetal findings evident.
Thus, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for prenatal developmental toxicity is 500 mg/kg bw/d.
The test substance is not teratogenic in rats.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.