Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 293-261-7 | CAS number: 91052-99-2 A complex combination of hydrocarbons obtained from distillation of the butadiene-free C4 fraction of a naphtha steam-cracking process. It consists predominantly of branched olefinic hydrocarbons having carbon numbers of C8, C12, C16 and C20 and boiling in the range of approximately 105°C to 120°C (221°F to 248°F).
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 12 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Test type:
- other: QSAR
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.746 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted EL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were >1000 and 0.746 mg/L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted EL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were >1000 and 0.746 mg/L, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 16 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Test type:
- other: QSAR
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL10
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted EL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were >1000 and >1000 mg/L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted EL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were both above 1000 mg/L. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 20 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Test type:
- other: QSAR
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL10
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted EL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were both above 1000 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted EL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were both above 1000 mg/L.. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 8 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Test type:
- other: QSAR
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 2.18 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.418 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted EL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were 2.18 and 0.418 mg/L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted EL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were 2.18 and 0.418 mg/L, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: QSAR calculation, reliable with restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- Measured data are not available for this endpoint for Category B. Due to the practical difficulties associated with the ecotoxicity testing of Category B (highly variable composition), the use of QSAR toxicity estimates of individual constituents, groups of constituents or read-across constituents is an appropriate alternative. The ECOSAR model is a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to apply to this substance as it is based on a related chemical dataset that calculates the toxicity of neutral organic hydrocarbons whose mode of action is non-polar narcosis. The endpoint calculated here is therefore a reasonable estimate of its baseline toxicity.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- (Q)SAR model reporting (QMRF)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The ECOSAR class program has been developed primarily for the evaluation of neutral organic compounds and organic classes with excess toxicity. The QSARs in the ECOSAR program are developed for chemical classes based on measured test data that have been submitted by industry or they are developed by other sources for chemicals with similar structures, e.g., phenols. Using the measured aquatic toxicity values and estimated Kow values, regression equations can be developed for a class of chemicals. Toxicity values for new chemicals may then be calculated by inserting the Kow value into the regression equation and correcting the resultant value for the molecular weight of the compound.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Program: ECOSAR v.1.11 (Epi Suite 4.1)
UVCB: CAS number: 42278-27-3 Representative SMILES structure: C=C(C)CCC(C)CCC(C)CCC(C)CCC(C)C - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- not applicable
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- not applicable
- Test organisms (species):
- other: green algae
- Details on test organisms:
- not applicable
- Test type:
- not specified
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- not applicable
- Hardness:
- not applicable
- Test temperature:
- not applicable
- pH:
- not applicable
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not applicable
- Salinity:
- not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- not applicable
- Details on test conditions:
- not applicable
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: ChV
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.001 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Details on results:
- The ChV, or Chronic Value, is defined as the geometric mean of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC). This can be mathematically represented as: ChV = 10^([log (LOEC x NOEC)]/2). The estimated EC50 and ChV values were 0.000396 and 0.000514 mg/L, respectively. However, the chemical is not soluble enough to measure this predicted effect, since its water solubility is 0.0000202 mg/L.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- not applicable
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- Calculated value
- Conclusions:
- The predicted 96-hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were 0.000396 and 0.000514 mg/L, respectively. These values are above the water solubility of the substance, i.e., 0.0000202 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The ECOSAR model was used as a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to predict the baseline toxicity of 1-Propene, 2-methyl-, pentamer (CAS 42278-27-3) for green algae. The 96 -hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were predicted to be 0.000396 and 0.000514 mg/L, respectively. These values area bove the water solubility of the substance, i.e., 0.0000202 mg/L.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: QSAR calculation, reliable with restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- Measured data are not available for this endpoint for Category B. Due to the practical difficulties associated with the ecotoxicity testing of Category B (highly variable composition), the use of QSAR toxicity estimates of individual constituents, groups of constituents or read-across constituents is an appropriate alternative. The ECOSAR model is a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to apply to this substance as it is based on a related chemical dataset that calculates the toxicity of neutral organic hydrocarbons whose mode of action is non-polar narcosis. The endpoint calculated here is therefore a reasonable estimate of its baseline toxicity.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- (Q)SAR model reporting (QMRF)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The ECOSAR class program has been developed primarily for the evaluation of neutral organic compounds and organic classes with excess toxicity. The QSARs in the ECOSAR program are developed for chemical classes based on measured test data that have been submitted by industry or they are developed by other sources for chemicals with similar structures, e.g., phenols. Using the measured aquatic toxicity values and estimated Kow values, regression equations can be developed for a class of chemicals. Toxicity values for new chemicals may then be calculated by inserting the Kow value into the regression equation and correcting the resultant value for the molecular weight of the compound.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Program: ECOSAR v.1.11 (Epi Suite 4.1)
UVCB: CAS number: 7756-94-7 Representative SMILES structure: CC(C)CCC(C)CCC(C)=C - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- not applicable
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- not applicable
- Test organisms (species):
- other: green algae
- Details on test organisms:
- not applicable
- Test type:
- not specified
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- not applicable
- Hardness:
- not applicable
- Test temperature:
- not applicable
- pH:
- not applicable
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not applicable
- Salinity:
- not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- not applicable
- Details on test conditions:
- not applicable
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.098 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: ChV
- Effect conc.:
- 0.059 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Details on results:
- The ChV, or Chronic Value, is defined as the geometric mean of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC). This can be mathematically represented as: ChV = 10^([log (LOEC x NOEC)]/2).
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- not applicable
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- Calculated value
- Conclusions:
- The predicted 96-hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were 0.098 and 0.059 mg/L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The ECOSAR model was used as a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to predict the baseline toxicity of 1-Propene, 2-methyl-, trimer (CAS 7756-94-7) for green algae. The 96 -hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were predicted to be 0.098 mg/L and 0.059 mg/L, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: QSAR calculation, reliable with restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- Measured data are not available for this endpoint for Category B. Due to the practical difficulties associated with the ecotoxicity testing of Category B (highly variable composition), the use of QSAR toxicity estimates of individual constituents, groups of constituents or read-across constituents is an appropriate alternative. The ECOSAR model is a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to apply to this substance as it is based on a related chemical dataset that calculates the toxicity of neutral organic hydrocarbons whose mode of action is non-polar narcosis. The endpoint calculated here is therefore a reasonable estimate of its baseline toxicity.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- (Q)SAR model reporting (QMRF)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The ECOSAR class program has been developed primarily for the evaluation of neutral organic compounds and organic classes with excess toxicity. The QSARs in the ECOSAR program are developed for chemical classes based on measured test data that have been submitted by industry or they are developed by other sources for chemicals with similar structures, e.g., phenols. Using the measured aquatic toxicity values and estimated Kow values, regression equations can be developed for a class of chemicals. Toxicity values for new chemicals may then be calculated by inserting the Kow value into the regression equation and correcting the resultant value for the molecular weight of the compound.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Program: ECOSAR v.1.11 (Epi Suite 4.1)
Substance: CAS number: 25167-70-8 SMILES structure: C=C(CC(C)(C)C)C - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- not applicable
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- not applicable
- Test organisms (species):
- other: green algae
- Details on test organisms:
- not applicable
- Test type:
- not specified
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- not applicable
- Hardness:
- not applicable
- Test temperature:
- not applicable
- pH:
- not applicable
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not applicable
- Salinity:
- not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- not applicable
- Details on test conditions:
- not applicable
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.419 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: ChV
- Effect conc.:
- 0.57 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Details on results:
- The ChV, or Chronic Value, is defined as the geometric mean of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC). This can be mathematically represented as: ChV = 10^([log (LOEC x NOEC)]/2).
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- not applicable
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- Calculated value
- Conclusions:
- The predicted 96-hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were 1.419 and 0.570 mg/L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The ECOSAR model was used as a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to predict the baseline toxicity of 2,4,4-Trimethylpentene (CAS 25167-70-8) for green algae. The 96 -hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were predicted to be 1.419 and 0.570 mg/L, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: QSAR calculation, reliable with restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- Measured data are not available for this endpoint for Category B. Due to the practical difficulties associated with the ecotoxicity testing of Category B (highly variable composition), the use of QSAR toxicity estimates of individual constituents, groups of constituents or read-across constituents is an appropriate alternative. The ECOSAR model is a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to apply to this substance as it is based on a related chemical dataset that calculates the toxicity of neutral organic hydrocarbons whose mode of action is non-polar narcosis. The endpoint calculated here is therefore a reasonable estimate of its baseline toxicity.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- (Q)SAR model reporting (QMRF)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The ECOSAR class program has been developed primarily for the evaluation of neutral organic compounds and organic classes with excess toxicity. The QSARs in the ECOSAR program are developed for chemical classes based on measured test data that have been submitted by industry or they are developed by other sources for chemicals with similar structures, e.g., phenols. Using the measured aquatic toxicity values and estimated Kow values, regression equations can be developed for a class of chemicals. Toxicity values for new chemicals may then be calculated by inserting the Kow value into the regression equation and correcting the resultant value for the molecular weight of the compound.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Program: ECOSAR v.1.11 (Epi Suite 4.1)
Substance: CAS number: 91053-00-8 Representative SMILES structure: CC(C)CCC(C)CCC(C)CC=C(C)C - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- not applicable
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- not applicable
- Test organisms (species):
- other: green algae
- Details on test organisms:
- not applicable
- Test type:
- not specified
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- not applicable
- Hardness:
- not applicable
- Test temperature:
- not applicable
- pH:
- not applicable
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not applicable
- Salinity:
- not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- not applicable
- Details on test conditions:
- not applicable
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.007 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: Chemical may not be soluble enough to measure this predicted effect. If the effect level exceeds the water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES) are reported.
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: ChV
- Effect conc.:
- 0.006 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: Chemical may not be soluble enough to measure this predicted effect. If the effect level exceeds the water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES) are reported.
- Details on results:
- The ChV, or Chronic Value, is defined as the geometric mean of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC). This can be mathematically represented as: ChV = 10^([log (LOEC x NOEC)]/2). The estimated EC50 and ChV values were 0.007 and 0.006 mg/L, respectively. However, the chemical is not soluble enough to measure this predicted effect, since its water solubility is 0.001987 mg/L.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- not applicable
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- Calculated value
- Conclusions:
- The predicted 96-hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were 0.007 and 0.006 mg/L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The ECOSAR model was used as a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to predict the baseline toxicity of 2,4,4-Trimethylpentene (CAS 25167-70-8) for green algae. The 96 -hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were predicted to be 0.007 and 0.006 mg/L, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: QSAR calculation, reliable with restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- Measured data are not available for this endpoint for Category B. Due to the practical difficulties associated with the ecotoxicity testing of Category B (highly variable composition), the use of QSAR toxicity estimates of individual constituents, groups of constituents or read-across constituents is an appropriate alternative. The ECOSAR model is a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to apply to this substance as it is based on a related chemical dataset that calculates the toxicity of neutral organic hydrocarbons whose mode of action is non-polar narcosis. The endpoint calculated here is therefore a reasonable estimate of its baseline toxicity.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The ECOSAR class program has been developed primarily for the evaluation of neutral organic compounds and organic classes with excess toxicity. The QSARs in the ECOSAR program are developed for chemical classes based on measured test data that have been submitted by industry or they are developed by other sources for chemicals with similar structures, e.g., phenols. Using the measured aquatic toxicity values and estimated Kow values, regression equations can be developed for a class of chemicals. Toxicity values for new chemicals may then be calculated by inserting the Kow value into the regression equation and correcting the resultant value for the molecular weight of the compound.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Program: ECOSAR v.1.11 (Epi Suite 4.1)
UVCB: CAS number: 97280-83-6 Representative SMILES structure: C=C(C)CCCCCCCCC - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- not applicable
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- not applicable
- Test organisms (species):
- other: green algae
- Details on test organisms:
- not applicable
- Test type:
- not specified
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- not applicable
- Hardness:
- not applicable
- Test temperature:
- not applicable
- pH:
- not applicable
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not applicable
- Salinity:
- not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- not applicable
- Details on test conditions:
- not applicable
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.099 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: ChV
- Effect conc.:
- 0.059 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Details on results:
- The ChV, or Chronic Value, is defined as the geometric mean of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC). This can be mathematically represented as: ChV = 10^([log (LOEC x NOEC)]/2).
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- not applicable
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- Calculated value
- Conclusions:
- The predicted 96-hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were 0.099 and 0.059 mg/L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The ECOSAR model was used as a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to predict the baseline toxicity of Hydrocarbons, C4, 1,3-butadiene-free, polymd., triisobutylene fraction (CAS 91053-01-9) for green algae. The 96 -hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were predicted to be 0.099 and 0.059 mg/L, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: QSAR calculation, reliable with restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- Measured data are not available for this endpoint for Category B. Due to the practical difficulties associated with the ecotoxicity testing of Category B (highly variable composition), the use of QSAR toxicity estimates of individual constituents, groups of constituents or read-across constituents is an appropriate alternative. The ECOSAR model is a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to apply to this substance as it is based on a related chemical dataset that calculates the toxicity of neutral organic hydrocarbons whose mode of action is non-polar narcosis. The endpoint calculated here is therefore a reasonable estimate of its baseline toxicity.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- (Q)SAR model reporting (QMRF)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The ECOSAR class program has been developed primarily for the evaluation of neutral organic compounds and organic classes with excess toxicity. The QSARs in the ECOSAR program are developed for chemical classes based on measured test data that have been submitted by industry or they are developed by other sources for chemicals with similar structures, e.g., phenols. Using the measured aquatic toxicity values and estimated Kow values, regression equations can be developed for a class of chemicals. Toxicity values for new chemicals may then be calculated by inserting the Kow value into the regression equation and correcting the resultant value for the molecular weight of the compound.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Program: ECOSAR v.1.11 (Epi Suite 4.1)
UVCB: CAS number: 9003-29-6 Representative SMILES structure: C=C(CC)C(C)C(C)CC(CC)C(C(C)C) - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- not applicable
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- not applicable
- Test organisms (species):
- other: green algae
- Details on test organisms:
- not applicable
- Test type:
- not specified
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- not applicable
- Hardness:
- not applicable
- Test temperature:
- not applicable
- pH:
- not applicable
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not applicable
- Salinity:
- not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- not applicable
- Details on test conditions:
- not applicable
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.007 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: ChV
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.006 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Details on results:
- The ChV, or Chronic Value, is defined as the geometric mean of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC). This can be mathematically represented as: ChV = 10^([log (LOEC x NOEC)]/2). The estimated EC50 and ChV values were 0.007 and 0.006 mg/L, respectively. However, the chemical is not soluble enough to measure this predicted effect, since its water solubility is 0.00197 mg/L.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- not applicable
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- Calculated value
- Conclusions:
- The predicted 96-hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were 0.007 and 0.006 mg/L, respectively. These values are above the water solubility of the substance, i.e., 0.00197 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The ECOSAR model was used as a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to predict the baseline toxicity of Polybutene (Butene, homopolymer) (CAS 9003-29-6) towards green algae. The 96 -hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were predicted to be 0.007 and 0.006 mg/L, respectively. These values are above the water solubility of the substance, i.e., 0.00197 mg/L.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: QSAR calculation, reliable with restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- Measured data are not available for this endpoint for Category B. Due to the practical difficulties associated with the ecotoxicity testing of Category B (highly variable composition), the use of QSAR toxicity estimates of individual constituents, groups of constituents or read-across constituents is an appropriate alternative. The ECOSAR model is a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to apply to this substance as it is based on a related chemical dataset that calculates the toxicity of neutral organic hydrocarbons whose mode of action is non-polar narcosis. The endpoint calculated here is therefore a reasonable estimate of its baseline toxicity.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- (Q)SAR model reporting (QMRF)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The ECOSAR class program has been developed primarily for the evaluation of neutral organic compounds and organic classes with excess toxicity. The QSARs in the ECOSAR program are developed for chemical classes based on measured test data that have been submitted by industry or they are developed by other sources for chemicals with similar structures, e.g., phenols. Using the measured aquatic toxicity values and estimated Kow values, regression equations can be developed for a class of chemicals. Toxicity values for new chemicals may then be calculated by inserting the Kow value into the regression equation and correcting the resultant value for the molecular weight of the compound.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Program: ECOSAR v.1.11 (Epi Suite 4.1)
UVCB: CAS number: 91053-01-9 Representative SMILES structure: CC(C)CCC(C)CCC(C)C - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- not applicable
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- not applicable
- Test organisms (species):
- other: green algae
- Details on test organisms:
- not applicable
- Test type:
- not specified
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- not applicable
- Hardness:
- not applicable
- Test temperature:
- not applicable
- pH:
- not applicable
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not applicable
- Salinity:
- not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- not applicable
- Details on test conditions:
- not applicable
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.078 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: ChV
- Effect conc.:
- 0.048 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR prediction value
- Details on results:
- The ChV, or Chronic Value, is defined as the geometric mean of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC). This can be mathematically represented as: ChV = 10^([log (LOEC x NOEC)]/2).
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- not applicable
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- Calculated value
- Conclusions:
- The predicted 96-hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were 0.078 and 0.048 mg/L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The ECOSAR model was used as a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to predict the baseline toxicity of Trimers of butene (dodecene, branched) (CAS 97280-83-6) for green algae. The 96 -hour EC50 and ChV for green algae were predicted to be 0.078 mg/L and 0.0048 mg/L, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP, guideline, available as an unpublished report, acceptable with restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
No data reported - Details on sampling:
- At the start of the definitive test, two samples were taken from freshly-prepared control and test media; after 72 hrs, the contents of the replicate flasks for each group were pooled and further samples taken for analysis. Additional samples taken from two flasks containing tributene at nominal concentration of 100mg/L (no algal cells).
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- The appropriate volume of the test substance, corrected for a density of 0.77 g/mL and purity of 99.6% was added directly to a volumetric flask containing 1 litre of dilution medium, to give an initial concentration of 100 mg/L. The mixture was stirred overnight and left to stand for 4 hours. An aliquot of this mixture was removed from the lower mid-water portion of the resultant mixture for use in the test as a WAF.
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- Obtained from laboratory culture: Culture Collection of Algae and protozoa (CCAP) SAMS Research services Ltd. Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Dunbeg, Oban, Argyll, Scotland. Stored in an illuminated refrigerator. Sterile algal nutrient medium was inoculated with cells aseptically removed from the slope culture. These primary liquid cultures liquid cultures (100 mL) were incubated for approximately 3 days at temp. 21 - 25°C. Volumes of primary cultures were then aseptically transferred to fresh sterile algal nutrient medium to prepare secondary liquid cultures, incubated to provide inoculum of cell density of 1.68 x106 cells/mL.
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- No data reported
- Test temperature:
- 21.8-23.1°C
- pH:
- 7.53-9.42
- Dissolved oxygen:
- No data reported
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Water accommodated fraction: 100 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- 250 ml conical flasks, No renewal for 72 hours, initial cell density: 1 x 104 mg/L, continous lumination, 6 replicates, 6813 lux provided by 6 x 30 W 1 metre fluorescent tubes, determination of cell concentrations: electronic particle counter,
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 other: mg/L WAF
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 other: mg/L WAF
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Details on results:
- The cell numbers were counted daily to monitor growth and results expressed in terms of the area under the growth curve and growth rate.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- No data reported
- Conclusions:
- The ErC50 (72 hours) of tributene was >100 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
Due to the low solubility of tributene, the algae were exposed to the test substance as a Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF). This approach is defined as suitable for use for low solubile substances in the OECD 23: Guidance document on aquatic toxicity testing of difficult substances and mixtures. The study followed OECD guideline 201. The WAF loading rate of 100 mg/L was not shown to have an influence on the growth rate of the algae and so a ErC50 (72 hours) of >100mg/L was reported.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Up to 2009
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study followed standard guideline and was conducted according to GLP. There are major limitations in reporting, but study is considered reliable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Saturated solution were used in the study. This is the maximum concentration of the test item that can be achieved under the test conditions in the test medium.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Not reported
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
- Details on test organisms:
- Incubated in 500 ml flasks with dilution water at 21-24°C, light regime 12h/d
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 22-24°C
- pH:
- 7.84-8.51
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 19.2 mg/L was tested. This is the maximum concentration
- Details on test conditions:
- The test vessels used were sterile erlenmeyer flasks, volume 250 mL sealed with cotton wool plugs. The initial cell density was 2-5 x103 cells/mL. This was determined using a fluorometer. 6 replicates per limit concentration plus control were used. The light intensity during the study was 60-120 µ E. m2 s-1
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 19.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (initial)
- Basis for effect:
- other: growth rate and yield
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 19.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (initial)
- Basis for effect:
- other: growth rate and yield
- Details on results:
- No inhibiting effects on growth rate of alga were seen. The ErC50 after 72 hours is therefore considered to be >19.2 mg/L
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The ErC50 of the reference substance potassium dichromate was calculated as 0.69 mg/L (based on nominal concentrations)
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- No inhibiting effects on growth rate of alga were seen. The ErC50 after 72 hours of polybutene is therefore considered to be >19.2 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The study was conducted to guideline method, and meets the validity criteria. There are limitations in reporting, but the study is considered reliable for assessment. No inhibiting effects were seen on the growth rate at the concentration tested. The ErC50 after 72 hours of polybutene is therefore considered to be >19.2 mg/L. The findings of this study are used to read across for the other members of Category B- butylene oligomers.
Referenceopen allclose all
The growth rate was reported from the control and WAF loading rate of 100 mg/L
Description of key information
Two studies were available for streams in this category: Dodecene (CAS 97280-83-6, branched predominant carbon number of C12) and Polybutene (CAS 9003-29-6, predominant carbon number of C16). Huntingdon Life Sciences (2009b) report that due to the low solubility of dodecene, branched a WAF method was used to prepare the stock solution. The 72 hour EC50 was determined to be > 100 mg/L WAF and the NOEC was 100 mg/L WAF. Dr. U. Noack-Labortorien (2009) also used a WAF method was used to prepare the stock solution of butene, homopolymer due to the low solubility of the test substance. The 72 hour EC50 was determined to be > 19.2 mg/L and the NOEC was 19.2 mg/L.
In the absence of experimental data for the other streams in this category, this single result is supported by data predicted using ECOSAR modelling. ECOSAR modelling was used as key study to calculate the LC50 values of six representative Category B constituents and one representative read-across molecule, ranging from C8 to C20. The predicted 72 hour Er50 values for algae range from 0.000396 to 1.419 mg/L. The predicted 72 hour ChV values for algae range from 0.000514 to 0.570 mg/L.
In addition to the experimental and ECOSAR data, the aquatic toxicity for the main Category B constituents (C8, C12, C16 and C20 iso-olefins) was predicted by a QSAR, the PETROTOX v4.0 computer model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. The predicted EL50 values for Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata ranged from 2.18 to >1000 mg/L. The predicted EL10 values for Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata ranged from 0.418 to >1000 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
ECOSAR:
ECOSAR modelling was used as key study to predict the LC50 values of six representative Category B constituents and one representative read-across molecule, ranging from C8 to C20. The 72 hour Er50 and ChV values for algae are reported in the following table:
CAS 25167-70-8 | CAS 91053-01-9 | CAS 97280-83-6 | CAS 7756-94-7 | CAS 9003-29-6 | CAS 91053-00-8 |
CAS 42278-27-3 | |
Information Requirement | C8 (Read-across) | C12 (Category B) | C12 (Category B) | C12 (Category B) | C12 to C16 (Category B) | C16 (Category B) | C20 (Category B) |
Growth inhibition study on algae (96 h ErC50, mg/L) |
1.419 | 0.099 | 0.078 | 0.098 | 0.007* | 0.007* | 0.000396* |
Growth inhibition study on algae (ChV, mg/L) | 0.570 | 0.059 | 0.048 | 0.059 | 0.006* | 0.006* | 0.000514* |
* Chemical may not be soluble enough to measure this predicted effect. If the effect level exceeds the water solubility by 10x, typically no effects at saturation (NES) are reported
The ChV, or Chronic Value, is defined as the geometric mean of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC). This can be mathematically represented as: ChV = 10^([log (LOEC x NOEC)]/2).
PETROTOX:
The PETROTOX v4.0 model combines a partitioning model used to calculate the aqueous concentration of hydrocarbon constituents with the Target Lipid Model used to calculate acute and chronic toxicity of non-polar narcotic chemicals. PETROTOX computes toxicity based on the summation of the aqueous-phase concentrations of hydrocarbon block(s) that represent a hydrocarbon substance and membrane-water partition coefficients (KMW) that describe the partitioning of the hydrocarbons between the water and organism.
Species | Carbon No. | LL50 / EL50 (mg/L) | EL10 (mg/L) |
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata | C8 | 2.18 | 0.418 |
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata | C12 | >1000 | 0.746 |
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata | C16 | >1000 | >1000 |
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata | C20 | >1000 | >1000 |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.