Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-485-7 | CAS number: 218141-16-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.9 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 123.4 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The substance has shown not to cause reproduction effects up to 50 mg/kg bw/d in an OECD 422 study covering the full developmental period. At this level some local irritation in the stomach was observed in the absence of systemic effects. A developmental toxicity study (OECD 414) in rats showed no developmental toxicity up to 75 mg/kg bw, at which level maternal toxicity consisted of local irritation in the stomach. In this case the DNEL for systemic toxicity is based in highest level tested in 90-day (OECD 408) study showing no local effects in stomach and showing no systemic toxicity at 50 mg/kg bw/d, the highest dose level tested.
The corrected 8 hr inhalation NOAEC for workers is NOAEL * 1/0.38 * 6.7/10 (light exercise). Additionally a correction for differences between human and experimental exposure conditions of 1.4 is added (5 d/w versus experimental daily exposure): 8hr-NOAEC workers = NOAEL(50 mg/kg) * 1.76 * 1.4 = 123.4 mg/m3.
The suggested default factor of 2 to address uncertainty with respect to possible differences in absorption between inhalation and oral route has been not been applied based on the following considerations: Profiling information suggests a high oral absorption and QSAR estimates an uptake of 90%, and a higher absorption via inhalation is not realistic. Due to low vp, exposure is only possible as aerosol. If any exposure via inhalation does occur, this can only be in the form of larger droplets, as the use does not include fine spraying or mists. Droplets will deposit mainly on upper airways, and will be subsequently swallowed following mucociliary transportation to pharynx. This result to no principal difference in absorption compared to oral route. And finally, Etheramine 10i has relative low systemic toxicity, and effects are characterized by local irritation first, which would limit substantial absorption via respiratory route.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator). No specific concerns; starting point is NOAEL.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.7 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other:
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 70 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The substance has shown not to cause reproduction effects up to 50 mg/kg bw/d in an OECD 422 study covering the full developmental period. At this level some local irritation in the stomach was observed in the absence of systemic effects. A developmental toxicity study (OECD 414) in rats showed no developmental toxicity up to 75 mg/kg bw, at which level maternal toxicity consisted of local irritation in the stomach. In this case the DNEL for systemic toxicity is based in highest level tested in 90-day (OECD 408) study showing no local effects in stomach and showing no systemic toxicity at 50 mg/kg bw/d, the highest dose level tested. Extrapolation from oral NOAEL represents a worst case situation, as dermal absorption is considered to be lower compared to oral absorption. The dermal NOAEL for workers isadditionally corrected for differences between human and experimental exposure conditions with a factor of 1.4 (5 d/w versus experimental daily exposure): 8hr-NOAEC workers = NOAEL(50 mg/kg) * 1.4 = 70 mg/kg bw/day.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.74 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other:
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 37 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The substance has shown not to cause reproduction efects up to 50 mg/kg bw/d in an OECD 422 study covering the full developmental period. At this level some local irritation in the stomach was observed in the absence of systemic effects. A developmental toxicity study (OECD 414) in rats showed no developmental toxicity up to 75 mg/kg bw, at which level maternal toxicity consisted of local irritation in the stomach. In this case the DNEL for systemic toxicity is based in highest level tested in 90-day (OECD 408) study showing no local effects in stomach and showing no systemic toxicity at 50 mg/kg bw/d, the highest dose level tested.
The corrected 8 hr inhalation NOAEC for general population is NOAEL(50 mg/kg) * 1/1.35 (for 60 kg subject) mg/m3 = 37.0 mg/m3.
The suggested default factor of 2 to address uncertainty with respect to possible differences in absorption between inhalation and oral route has been not been applied based on the following considerations: Profiling information suggests a high oral absorption and QSAR estimates an uptake of 90%, and a higher absorption via inhalation is not realistic. Due to low vp, exposure is only possible as aerosol. If any exposure via inhalation does occur, this can only be in the form of larger droplets, as the use does not include fine spraying or mists. Droplets will deposit mainly on upper airways, and will be subsequently swallowed following mucociliary transportation to pharynx. This result to no principal difference in absorption compared to oral route. And finally, Etheramine 10i has relative low systemic toxicity, and effects are characterized by local irritation first, which would limit substantial absorption via respiratory route
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.25 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other:
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The substance has shown not to cause reproduction effects up to 50 mg/kg bw/d in an OECD 422 study covering the full developmental period. At this level some local irritation in the stomach was observed in the absence of systemic effects. A developmental toxicity study (OECD 414) in rats showed no developmental toxicity up to 75 mg/kg bw, at which level maternal toxicity consisted of local irritation in the stomach. In this case the DNEL for systemic toxicity is based in highest level tested in 90-day (OECD 408) study showing no local effects in stomach and showing no systemic toxicity at 50 mg/kg bw/d, the highest dose level tested.Extrapolation from oral NOAEL represents a worst case situation, as dermal absorption is considered to be lower compared to oral absorption.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.25 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other:
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The substance has shown not to cause reproduction efects up to 50 mg/kg bw/d in an OECD 422 study covering the full developmental period. At this level some local irritation in the stomach was observed in the absence of systemic effects. A developmental toxicity study (OECD 414) in rats showed no developmental toxicity up to 75 mg/kg bw, at which level maternal toxicity consisted of local irritation in the stomach. In this case the DNEL for systemic toxicity is based in highest level tested in 90-day (OECD 408) study showing no local effects in stomach and showing no systemic toxicity at 50 mg/kg bw/d, the highest dose level tested.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (DNEL calculator)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Additional information - General Population
No exposure of the general population to C10i-etheramine is foreseen based on the uses indicated in this dossier that are limited to industrial manufacture and formulation. Also assessment of indirect exposure is not needed as the tonnage is not above 1000 tpa, and the substance not is classified as CMR or toxic (R48 or STOT-RE).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.