Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 288-315-1 | CAS number: 85711-55-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.20 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- October 2012
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: At the beginning, after 24 hours and on day 7, all test and blank control solutions were measured. Test item was not detectable in the test solutions, neither in test solutions with nor without daphnia and algae. Thus, the number of analytical measurements was reduced. From day 14 until the end of the test, the test item concnetration was measured only in the control and the highest concentrated treatment (nominal 4.6 mg/L) in the old (with and without daphnia) and new solutions.
- Sampling method: Samples were diluted with an equal volume methanol before measurement (500 µL sample were mixed with 500 µL methanol in a HPLC vial).
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Samples were analysed without prior storage. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method:
A stock WAF containing the nominal load 4.6 mg/L was prepared by weighing the nominal load, adding the corresponding amount of dilution water and shaking vigorously for 23-24 hours. The resulting solution was filtrated through 0.45 μm filters. The lower treatments (2.3 / 1.1 / 0.11 / 0.011 mg/L) were prepared by dilution of the WAF with dilution water.
The highest test concentration (nominal 4.6 mg/L) was tested in the absence and presence of 10 mg/L of sodium salt of humic acid.
- Controls: dilution water with and without 10 mg/L of sodium salt of humic acid. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: water flee
- Strain/clone: STRAUSS
- Source: in-house culture originally obtained from the Umweltbundesamt (Federal Environment Agency) in Berlin, Germany in 2007
- Feeding during test
- Food type: green algae (Desmodesmus subspicatus)
- Amount: 0.20 mg organic carbon/animal/day
- Frequency: daily
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: none
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): same as test
- Type and amount of food: green algae (Desmodesmus subspicatus)
METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF EARLY INSTARS OR OTHER LIFE STAGES:
Similar to the method described in EN ISO 6341. 22.5 hours before the start of the test, the adult animals were separated from the young. 21.5 hours later, the adults were caught with the help of a glass tube, and the newborn daphnia, aged between 0 and 20 hours, were sieved from the medium and immediately placed into a 250 ml-beaker containing dilution water. After a settling-in period of 30 minutes, animals which showed no apparent damage were used for the test. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 267 mg CaCO3/L
- Test temperature:
- 18.9-24.5°C
- pH:
- 7.6-8.3
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 8.4-9.9 mg O2/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- nominal: 4.6, 2.3, 1.1, 0.11 and 0.011 mg/L (nominal concentrations were based on the results from a first experiment, where a NOEC could not be determined (< 4.6 mg/L loading rate)
measured: < LOD - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: glass beakers, nominal volume 100 mL
- Aeration: none
- Renewal rate of test solution: daily
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10
- Biomass loading rate: 80 mL/animal
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: deionised water with an enrichment of certail minerals was used in the test. The minerals which were added comply with the composition of Elendt- M4 medium (as stated in the OECD-Guideline)
- Ca/Mg ratio: 4:1
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16/8 hours
-Lighting: 1000 Lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- The test vessels were inspected for offspring daily. The newborn daphnids were counted and removed from the test vessel.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 2 and 10
- Range finding study
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study (based on loading rates):
short-term toxicity test to Daphnia: 48-h EL50 15 mg/L (tested concentrations: nominal 4.27, 9.39, 20.7, 45.5, and 100 mg/L as WAF)
first long-term toxicity test to Daphnia: NOEC < 4.5 mg/L (tested concentrations: nominal 4.6, 10, 22, 46, and 100 mg/Las WAF) - Reference substance (positive control):
- not required
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 2.3 - < 4.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: without humic acid
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 4.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: with humic acid (10 mg/L of sodium salt of humic acid)
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 4.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: without humic acid
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities: none
- Other biological observations: in replicates with humic acid (10 mg/L sodium salt of humic acid with or without nominal 4.6 mg/L test material) reproduction was inhibited (see Table 1 in "Any other information on results incl. tables")
- Mortality of control: blank control: 10% (1 out of 10); blank control with humic acid: 0%
- Other adverse effects control: none
- Abnormal responses: none - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Calculation of results was performed with the help of validated software (Microsoft Excel®). The estimation of the biological results was accomplished using the software Tox-Rat® Professional, version 3.2.1.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- mortality of parent animals in the blank control: ≤ 20%; mean surviving offspring in the blank control: ≥ 60
- Conclusions:
- The test material did not exhibit toxic effects on the reproduction of Daphnia up to its water solubility.
Reference
A clear decrease in the reproduction of the daphnia was observed in the control replicates with 10 mg/L sodium salt of humic acid (46%; see Table 1).
A slight but statistical significant decrease of 23% in the reproduction was observed only at the highest concentration tested (nominal 4.6 mg/L) in the absence of humic acid (see Table 1).
No difference in the reproduction was observed at the highest concentration tested in the presence of humic acid compared to the blank control with humic acid (HA) (see Table 1)
Table 1 Fecundity
Treatment |
Total Offspring |
Surviving Parent Animals |
Mean Offspring per Surviving Parent Animal |
Inhibition of Reproduction in % |
Blank Control |
965 |
9 |
107 | 0 |
Blank Control HA | 576 | 10 | 58 | 46 |
0.011 mg/L | 938 | 10 | 94 | 13 |
0.11 mg/L | 1017 | 10 | 102 | 5 |
1.1 mg/L | 982 | 10 | 98 | 8 |
2.3 mg/L | 769 | 8 | 96 | 10 |
4.6 mg/L | 823 | 10 | 82 | 23 |
4.6 mg/L HA | 490 | 9 | 54 | 49 |
The influence of the test material was additionally tested in the presence of humic acid to mimic environmental conditions. Although humic acid had a clear detrimental effect on the reproduction of the daphnia, the toxic effect of the test material itself as observed at the nominal concentration of 4.6 mg/L was no longer observed in the presence of humic acid.
Description of key information
21-d NOEC (based on loading rates) 2.3 mg/L for Daphnia magna (OECD 211, EU C.20)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 2.3 mg/L
Additional information
The results indicate that the test material is not toxic to the reproduction of Daphnia up to the limits of its water solubility and thus a PNEC cannot be determined.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.