Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 288-315-1 | CAS number: 85711-55-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
in vitro EPISKIN(TM) 15 min - 42h skin irritation test (OECD439):
The mean tissue viability attained after treatment with WS400101 was 92.8 ± 2.4% and validity of the assay was confirmed, both for the negative and the positive controls. Therefore, WS400101 was predicted to be not irritant to the skin.
Eye irritation, rabbit with neat WS400101:
Mean irritation score 24, 48 and 72 h for each of 3 animals:
1.3 to 2.7 for corneal opacity; 1.0 for iris lesion; 2.7 to 3.0 for redness of conjunctivae; 2.0 to 3.3 for oedema of conjunctivae (chemosis);
In addition, one animal was killed at 9 days after treatment, because of irreversible corneal lesions (opacity grade 3 with area of pannus).
Conclusion: Classification and labelling as “Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)" [REGULATION (EC) 1272/2008].
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method) of 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: L’Oreal. In Vitro Skin Irritation Test: Human Epidermis Model EPISKIN, EPISKIN Skin Irritation Test 15min - 42 hours, Standard Operating Procedure: February 2009 Version 1.8.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- An error in the cited SOP was not adopted. Instead, correctly, 10 mg test substance + 90 μL water were used for checking the coloring potential of the test substance
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Types of Treatment in the Main Test
- Negative control: Sterile Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with magnesium and calcium, dose volume 10 µl/tissue sample.
- Test Substance: WS400101, dose 10 µl/tissue sample.
- Positive control: 5% Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) in distilled water, dose volume 10 µl/tissue sample. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 15 ± 0.5 minutes with the test substance, negative or positive control at room temperature
- Details on study design:
- Test System
EPISKIN human epidermis skin constructs consisting of normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes and forming a multilayered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis with a functional multilayered stratum corneum (matrix: collagen type 1 coated with type IV collagen).
Principle of the Test – Main Test
Irritant substances are sufficiently cytotoxic to cause cell deaths in the cell layers. Therefore, cell viability of the multilayers was determined by measurement of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity assessed by reduction of MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) to a soluble, blue coloured, formazan salt. Depending on the percentage of tissue viability attained (compared to negative control viability) a test substance is classified as skin irritating or not skin irritating.
Pre-Tests – Checking for Interference of the Test Substance with the Assay
It was demonstrated, that the intrinsic colour and the colouring potential of the test substance, WS400101, in contact with water did not interfere with the assay. However, direct reduction of MTT by WS400101 itself without the involvement of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity could not be ruled out, as there was a change of colour in a WS4000101/MTT solution during the pre-test. Therefore in the main test, water killed tissues (which have no metabolic activity but absorb and bind the test substance like viable tissues) were included in addition to the live tissues. In addition, the pH of the test substance was estimated to be approximately 8.5 using pH indicator paper.
Main Test
Each treatment group (test substance, negative/positive controls) comprised 3 live (viable) tissue samples placed into wells of 12 well plates containing 2 mL pre-warmed maintenance medium per well. In addition test substance treated and untreated water killed tissues, each in triplicate, were included in the main test and processed further in a similar manner as the live tissue samples.
Tissue Processing and Quantitative Determination of Cell Viability
Incubation of the tissues prior to treatment in maintenance medium:
- Live tissue samples: ≥ 24 h at 37 ± 2° C in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air
- Thawed, water killed tissues: ≥ 1 h at room temperature
Positive and negative control preparations and the test substance were dispensed over each assigned tissue sample using a positive displacement pipette and 7 minutes afterwards positive controls were re-spread with a curved flat spatula. Test material was spread over the tissue to make contact with the whole surface of the tissue.
After the 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment period, residual test substance or positive control substance was removed by rinsing each tissue with 25 mL sterile DPBS and gently swabbing as appropriate. Inserts were blotted on absorbent paper to remove remaining DPBS.
This was followed by incubation of each insert at 37 ± 2° C in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 first for 42 ± 1 h in wells each containing 2 mL maintenance medium and then for 3 hours ± 5 minutes in wells each containing 2 mL of 0.3 mg/mL MTT. Finally the tissue samples were processed further and formazan was extracted by vortexing and storage in acidic isopropanol, 500 µL/sample, at 2-8°C in the dark over a minimum of 70 hours. The absorbance was quantitatively determined at 540 nm with acidified isopropanol (0.04 N HCl final concentration) as a blank. - Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- other: other: Negative Control Tissue viability as % of OD of negative controls
- Value:
- 100
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Basis: mean. Time point: Following 42 ± 1 h incubation in fresh maintenance medium, 3 h incubation in MTT solution and ≥70 h formazan extraction. Max. score: 100.0. Reversibility: other: not applicable to the EPISKIN skin irritation assay. Remarks: Mean OD of replicate blanks has been accounted for by subtraction. (migrated information)
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- other: other: WS400101 treated tissue viability as % of OD of negative controls
- Value:
- 92.8
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Basis: mean. Time point: Following 42 ± 1 h incubation in fresh maintenance medium, 3 h incubation in MTT solution and ≥70 h formazan extraction. Reversibility: other: not applicable to the EPISKIN skin irritation assay. Remarks: Mean OD of replicate blanks and of water killed tissues has been accounted for by subtraction. Therefore, a maximum possible score is not applicable.. (migrated information)
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- other: other: Positive Control Tissue viability as % of OD of negative controls
- Value:
- 26.7
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Basis: mean. Time point: Following 42 ± 1 h incubation in fresh maintenance medium, 3 h incubation in MTT solution and ≥70 h formazan extraction. Reversibility: other: not applicable to the EPISKIN skin irritation assay. Remarks: Mean OD of replicate blanks has been accounted for by subtraction. An accurate maximum possible score is not applicable.. (migrated information)
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- See Table 1
- Other effects:
- In a pre-test, direct reduction of MTT by WS400101 itself without the involvement of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity was disclosed. This was accounted for in the main test by inclusion of water killed tissues (which have no metabolic activity but absorb and bind the test substance like viable tissues) in addition to the live tissues.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: criteria specified in the OECD 439 test guideline.
Reference
Tabelle 1: Results of in vitro EpiSkin (TM) Skin Irritation Test |
|||||
Exposure Period: 15 ± 0.5 minutes |
|||||
|
OD 540* |
OD 540* |
OD 540* |
OD 540 |
Tissue Viability |
Negative Control |
0.734 |
0.716 |
0.753 |
0.734 ± 0.018 |
100.0 ± 2.5 |
WS400101 |
0.688 |
0.707 |
0.723 |
0.706 ± 0.017 |
92.8 ± 2.4** |
Positive Control |
0.199 |
0.295 |
0.095 |
0.196 ± 0.100 |
26.7 ± 13.6 |
* OD 540 of individual tissues = Mean Optical Density [wavelength 540 nm] of 2 measurements minus Mean OD of six blanks
Mean OD of six blanks ± standard deviation (s.d.) = 0.130 ± 0.004
** Derived from “true MTT reduction” OD 540 values, thus accounting for possible direct reduction of MTT by the test substance
Hence assay validity was confirmed both, for the negative and the positive controls, and the test material, WS400101, proved to be not irritating.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- of 2002
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- of 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
- Version / remarks:
- of 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese MAFF Test Data for Registration of Agricultural Chemicals, Eye Irritation (2-1-5), 12 Nohsan No. 8147, Agricultural Production Bureau, November 24, 2000.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Stock supply of healthy adult rabbits
- Number and Sex: 3 females
- Age on day of dosing (Day 1): 41 weeks
- Weight prior to dosing (Day 1): Minimum 3.95 kg, maximum 4.16 kg
- Housing: Individual housing in plastic cages with peforated floor
- Environmental enrichment: Small soft white untreated wood blocks
- Diet : Standard laboratory rabbit diet (125 g/animal/day). In addition, dietary supplement of hay
replaced by a supplement of wholemeal bread as from 2 days prior to dose instillation.
- Water: Drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 29 or 30 weeks prior to study start under laboratory conditions.
Routine analysis of the batch of diet used for nutrients, possible contaminants and microorganisms and of the drinking water were conducted or available at the testing facility.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Air conditioned animal room set at:
- Temperature (°C): 18 ± 2°C
- Relative Humidity (%): 40 to 70%
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs artificial light per 24 hrs
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 mL of undiluted test substance was administered into the conjunctival sac of one eye per rabbit (right eye). The contralateral eye (left eye) remained untreated to serve as a control.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The eyes were not rinsed after treatment, but in two of the three animals (#1 and #3) the treated eye was flushed with saline at 24 and 48 hours after treatment. For the other animal (#2) flushing of the eye with saline was not reported.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 21 days for two animals, the other animal (# 3) was killed at 9 days after instillation for humane reasons.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 adult female rabbits
- Details on study design:
- EYE EVALUATION:
Before treatment start both eyes of each animal were investigated to ensure that there was no pre-existing corneal damage, iridial inflammation or conjunctival irritation.
One animal (the sentinel # 1) was initially treated and in the absence of a severe effect the remaining two animals were committed to the study.
Eyes were evaluated at approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7, 14 and 21 days after test substance instillation adopting the numerical scoring system listed in Table 1 in the field below. The animal killed for humane reasons at 9 days after instillation (Day 10) had a final check for ocular lesions on this day. As from 24 h post treatment staining with fluorescein supported the recognition of corneal lesions.O
Equipment used for eye evaluation: Ophthalmoscope or pencil beam torch - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over 3 animals and 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1.9
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- as in one animal (# 3) area of pannus at 9 days after instillation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- mean over 4 time points
- Time point:
- other: 48 h, 72 h, 7 days, 9 days
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- as area of pannus at 9 days after instillation
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal killed at 9 days after instillation for humane reasons
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Area of corneal opacity
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over 3 animals and 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1.9
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: Corneal ulceration or opacity were not evident
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over 3 animals and 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- within 9 days in one animal (#3)
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- within 9 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal killed at 9 days after instillation for humane reasons
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over 3 animals and 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2.8
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 9 days in one animal (#3)
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2.7
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2.7
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 9 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal killed at 9 days after instillation for humane reasons.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over 3 animals and 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2.6
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: within 9 days in one animal (#3)
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- mean over 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 3.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 9 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal killed at 9 days after instillation for humane reasons
- Irritation parameter:
- other: discharge
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over 3 animals and 3 time points
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 2.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: often mucoid discharge
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- In two animals corneal opacity (grade 1 or 2), iritis (grade 1), conjunctival redness (grades 1, 2 and/or 3), chemosis (grades 1 to 2 in one animal and grades 1 to 4 in the other animal) and discharge (grades 1 to 3) were seen until 72 hours or 7 days after instillation. One of these animals was entirely free from ocular findings by 7 days after instillation the other animal by 14 days after instillation.
However, the third animal was more severely affected, in particular regarding corneal and conjunctival findings: Translucent and nacreous areas of corneal opacity were evident from 48 hours after instillation and nine days after instillation an area of pannus formation was apparent. Due to the irreversible nature of these corneal findings, this animal was humanely sacrificed immediately after the examination at nine days after instillation. In addition, an ulcer under the top eyelid was evident at nine days after instillation. - Other effects:
- Observation of the animals for defined behavioural criteria led to the conclusion that instillation of the test substance induced practically no initial pain response. Any other signs of systemic toxicity or ill health were not evident.
Signs of reaction to treatment comprised the head of all animals being held slightly to the right on the day of administration, the right periorbital area being sensitive to touch 24 hours after instillation in one animal (#2), and hairloss on the right upper eye lid in two animals (#1 and #3) nine days after instillation or from fourteen days after instillation. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
In view of the high viability of WS400101 treated tissue samples during the in vitro skin irritation study, the attained result does not necessitate any classification and labelling regarding skin irritation according to EU classification rules [REGULATION (EC) 1272/2008].
The irreversible corneal lesions in one animal in the in vivo eye irritation study necessitate classification of WS400101 as “Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)" [REGULATION (EC) 1272/2008].
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
