Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-425-9 | CAS number: 95-50-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Method similar to OECD guideline with some restrictions: 14 d tested
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Daphnia magna (ca. 12 hours old) were exposed to different concentrations of 1,2-dichlorobenzene for about 14 days until at least three broods were obtained. The animals in groups of 10 were kept in 500 mL closed bottles, completely filled with IRCHA standard water added with the test material, 8 mg/L dried wtight Selenastrum capricornutum and 200 mg/L wet weight commercial yeast. The bottles (3 replicates per test group) were kept in a climatic room at 20 °C with a 16 h light photoperiod. The solutions were changed every other day, at the same time the numbers of dead and newborn animals were observed and removed. Samples of water were taken for the gas-chromatographic analysis of the test concentration after 48 hours. During the test, the loss of compound did not exceed 15% of the initial value. Repeated measurements of pH and O2 in the test solutions did not show fluctuation higher than 10%. Fertility data were elaborated according to Winner and Farrel (1976) to obtain instantaneous growth rates, while multiple controntations in the variance analysis were adopted to find the concentrations which gave differences of r significant compared with the control.
Winner RW and Farrel MP (1976): J. Fish. Res. Board Canada, 33: 1685-1691 - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC16
- Effect conc.:
- 0.37 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- not specified
- Conc. based on:
- not specified
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: The EC16 is viewed as being the NOEC
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.55 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- not specified
- Conc. based on:
- not specified
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.4 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- not specified
- Conc. based on:
- not specified
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- The EC16 is reported as no effect concentration due to the accepted hypothesis that a reproductive impairment ranging from 10 to 20% could be considered in the range of natural variability.
- Conclusions:
- A 14 day reproduction toxicity test with Daphnia magna was performed under semi-static conditions with a daily renewal of the test solution. Reported endpoints were EC50 (14 d) of 0.55 mg/L 1,2 -dichlorobenzene, EC16 (14 d) of 0.37 mg/L and LOEC (14 d) of 0.4 mg/L. The EC16 is reported as NOEC due to the accepted hypothesis that a reproductive impairment ranging from 10 to 20% could be considered in the range of natural variability.
- Executive summary:
Calamari et al (1983).
A 14 day reproduction toxicity test with Daphnia magna was performed under semi-static conditions with a daily renewal of the test solution. Reported endpoints were EC50 (14 d) of 0.55 mg/L 1,2 -dichlorobenzene, EC16 (14 d) of 0.37 mg/L and LOEC (14 d) of 0.4 mg/L. The EC16 is reported as NOEC due to the accepted hypothesis that a reproductive impairment ranging from 10 to 20% could be considered in the range of natural variability.
Reference
Description of key information
A 14 day reproduction toxicity test with Daphnia magna was performed under semi-static conditions with a daily renewal of the test solution (Calamari et al, 1983). Reported endpoints were EC50 (14 d) of 0.55 mg/L, EC16 (14 d) of 0.37 mg/L and LOEC (14 d) of 0.4 mg/L. The EC16 was found to be the lowest endpoint for the long-term toxicity of the test substance to aquatic invertebrates. This value is reported as a NOEC due to the accepted hypothesis that a reproductive impairment ranging from 10 to 20% could be considered in the range of natural variability.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 0.37 mg/L
Additional information
A 14 day reproduction toxicity test with Daphnia magna was performed under semi-static conditions with a daily renewal of the test solution (Calamari et al, 1983). Reported endpoints were EC50 (14 d) of 0.55 mg/L, EC16 (14 d) of 0.37 mg/L and LOEC (14 d) of 0.4 mg/L. The EC16 was found to be the lowest endpoint for the long-term toxicity of the test substance to aquatic invertebrates. This value is reported as a NOEC due to the accepted hypothesis that a reproductive impairment ranging from 10 to 20% could be considered in the range of natural variability.
In another publication (Kühn et al, 1989), the long-term effect of 1,2-dichlorobenzene on Daphnia magna was investigated in a 21 day toxicity test according to the provisional procedure proposed by the Federal Environmental Agency (1984). The NOEC was determined at 0.63 mg/L.
Although Kühn et al (1989) investigated the toxiciy of 1,2 dichlorobenzene to Daphnia magna over 21 days, which is recommended by the OECD guideline, the reported NOEC was higher than the EC16 reported by Calamari et al, 1983. Therefore, as a worst case the EC16 of 0.37 mg/L, reported by Calamari et al (1983) has been selected to represent the long term toxicity of 1,2 dichlorobenzene to aquatic invertebrates.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.