Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-911-5 | CAS number: 1066-33-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 62.5 mg/m³
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 160.7 mg/m³
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 62.5 mg/m³
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 160.7 mg/m³
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 57 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Additional information - workers
Ammonium hydrogencarbonate is a naturally occurring substance, which rapidly dissociates in biological fluids to yield ammonium ions (NH4+) and hydrogencarbonate ions (HCO3-), which further disintegrate to NH3, CO2and H2O depending on the temperature. Ammonia and ammonium ions are integral components of normal metabolic processes and play an essential role in the physiology of man and other species.
Ammonium hydrogencarbonate as a human food ingredient is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the US FDA. It is also widely used in industrial uses (in cooling baths, in fire extinguishers, in the manufacture of porous plastics and ceramics, dyes, and pigments, in catalyst system for the stiffening of tobacco), in therapeutic and agricultural uses.
A national exposure survey conducted in 1983 including 18 industries with 2082 facilities counted 38228 employees to come in contact with ammonium hydrogencarbonate.
Therefore, long-term dermal and inhalative intakes are the possible exposure routes for worker, whereas oral, dermal and inhalative intakes are the possible exposure routes for consumer. Together with the fact that no substance-related local effects could be determined, only the DNELs for long-term systemic effects are derived since they have greater toxicological significance:
The DNELs for dermal long-term exposure are derived from the no observed effect level obtained in an oral repeated dose toxicity study with ammonium chloride. The ammonium ion, which is the cation in both ammonium chloride and ammonium hydrogencarbonate is relevant for the acute oral toxicity of both substances as well as repeated dose toxicity. Therefore, the available data for ammonium chloride can be used to assess the repeated dose toxicity of ammonium hydrogencarbonate.
Since no substance-related effects were noted, a NOAEL of 684 mg/kg bw/day was estimated after treatment for 70 days with ammonium chloride (Arnold, 1997). Results reported by Lina et. al. (2004) indicate an even higher NOAEL for ammonium chloride but the NOAEL of 684 mg/kg bw/day was chosen as worst case assumption due to the read across from ammonium hydrogencarbonate to ammonium chloride.
The DNEL for long-term exposure via inhalation for the worker is derived from the European limit value - eight hours for ammonia of 14 mg/m3. Ammonium hydrogencarbonate has a vapor pressure of 78.5 hPa at 25.4 °C and disintegrates to NH3, CO2and H2O depending on the temperature. Therefore the limit value for ammonia can be used and corrected as follows: Ammonia has a molar mass of 17.03 g/mol and ammonium hydorgencarbonate of 76.06 g/mol. The European limit value - eight hours for ammonia of 14 mg/m3 can therefore be corrected by a factor of (76.06/17.03) leading to a limit value - eight hour for ammonium hydrogencarobate of 62.5 mg/m3 for the worker. The respective European short term limit value for ammonia of 36 mg/m3 can be modified accordingly leading to a short term limit value for ammonium hydrogencarbonate of 160.7 mg/m3 for the worker. These DNELs cover both systemic and local effects.
For the DNEL of systemic dermal effects a correction of the starting point is not required, since the observed no effect level of 684 mg/kg bw/day (oral) was derived in 70-day repeated dose toxicity study (Arnold, 1997).
Subsequently, following assessment factors are taken into account for the final DNEL calculation: interspecies differences (4), remaining differences (1), intraspecies differences (3), exposure duration (2). These assessment factors are sufficient as outlined in the technical report Nr. 86 of ECETOC in 2003.
An additional assessment factor (0.5) was used to consider the different absorption properties of the skin and after oral intake.
As a consequence, the resulting DNEL for long-term dermal systemic effects is 57 mg/kg bw/d for workers.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 13.33 mg/m³
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 143.91 mg/m³
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 13.33 mg/m³
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 143.91 mg/m³
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 34.2 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 17.1 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 34.05 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Additional information - General Population
Ammonium hydrogencarbonate is a naturally occurring substance, which rapidly dissociates in biological fluids to yield ammonium ions (NH4+) and hydrogencarbonate ions (HCO3-), which further disintegrate to NH3, CO2and H2O depending on the temperature. Ammonia and ammonium ions are integral components of normal metabolic processes and play an essential role in the physiology of man and other species.
Ammonium hydrogencarbonate as a human food ingredient is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the US FDA. It is also widely used in industrial uses (in cooling baths, in fire extinguishers, in the manufacture of porous plastics and ceramics, dyes, and pigments, in catalyst system for the stiffening of tobacco), in therapeutic and agricultural uses.
A national exposure survey conducted in 1983 including 18 industries with 2082 facilities counted 38228 employees to come in contact with ammonium hydrogencarbonate.
Therefore, long-term dermal and inhalative intakes are the possible exposure routes for worker, whereas oral, dermal and inhalative intakes are the possible exposure routes for consumer. Together with the fact that no substance-related local effects could be determined, only the DNELs for long-term systemic effects are derived since they have greater toxicological significance:
The DNEL for oral and dermal long-term exposure are derived from the no observed effect level obtained in an oral repeated dose toxicity study with ammonium chloride. The ammonium ion, which is the cation in both ammonium chloride and ammonium hydrogencarbonate is relevant for the acute oral toxicity of both substances as well as repeated dose toxicity. Therefore, the available data for ammonium chloride can be used to assess the repeated dose toxicity of ammonium hydrogencarbonate.
Since no substance-related effects were noted, a NOAEL of 684 mg/kg bw/day was estimated after treatment for 70 days with ammonium chloride (Arnold, 1997). Results reported by Lina et. al. (2004) indicate an even higher NOAEL for ammonium chloride but the NOAEL of 684 mg/kg bw/day was chosen as worst case assumption due to the read across from ammonium hydrogencarbonate to ammonium chloride.
The short-term acute oral DNEL for systemic effects was derived based on an acute toxicity study (BASF AG,1989). At a dose level of 681 mg/kg bw., no mortality and no clinical signs were observed. This value was therefore considered as the NOAEL for short-term acute systemic toxicity. A safety factor of 5 for the general population (intraspecies) and an interspecies factor of 4 (rat to human) was used to derive a DNEL of 34.05 mg/kg bw for short-term acute systemic toxicity by the oral route.
The DNEL for long-term exposure via inhalation for consumers is derived from the limit value - eight hour for ammonium hydrogencarobate of 62.5 mg/m3 for the worker. This limit value has to be corrected for the reduced breathing volume of 6.7 m3 (consumer) instead of 10 m3 (worker), the prolonged exposure duration of 24 hours (consumers) instead of 8 hours (worker) and 7 days (consumer) instead of 5 days (worker) as well as an intraspecies factor (3/5). The inhalation DNEL for the consumer is calculated as follows: 62.5 mg/m3 x (10/6.7) x (8/24) x (5/7) x (3/5) = 13.33 mg/m3. The respective short term DNEL for the consumer is calculated from the short term DNEL for the worker of 160.7 mg/m3 correcting for the inhalation volume (10 m3/6.7 m3) and an additional safety factor of (5/3) (worker to general population) leading to a short term inhalative consumer DNEL of 143.91 mg/m3. These DNELs cover both systemic and local effects.
For the DNEL of systemic oral and dermal effects a correction of the starting point is not required, since the observed no effect level of 684 mg/kg bw/day (oral) was derived in 70-day repeated dose toxicity study (Arnold, 1997).
Subsequently, following assessment factors are taken into account for the final DNEL calculation for the oral route: interspecies differences (4), remaining differences (1), intraspecies differences (5), exposure duration (2). These assessment factors are sufficient as outlined in the technical report Nr. 86 of ECETOC in 2003.
As a consequence, the resulting DNEL for long-term oral systemic effects is 17.1 mg/kg bw/d for the general population.
The following assessment factors are taken into account for the final DNEL calculation for the dermal route: interspecies differences (4), remaining differences (1), intraspecies differences (5), exposure duration (2). These assessment factors are sufficient as outlined in the technical report Nr. 86 of ECETOC in 2003.
An additional assessment factor (0.5) was used to consider the different absorption properties of the skin and after oral intake.
As a consequence, the resulting DNEL for long-term dermal systemic effects is 34.2 mg/kg bw/d for the general population.Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.