Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 220-099-6 | CAS number: 2627-95-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation assay / Ames test): negative
with and without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains
TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA 1538 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA
(equivalent to OECD TG 471) (Microbiological Associates, 1992).
Cytogenicity in mammalian cells: not required: in vivo micronucleus
result available.
Mutagenicity in mammalian cells: negative with and without metabolic
activation in L5178Y cells (OECD TG 476) (BSL Bioservice, 2012).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1992-09-21 - 1992-11-23
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- The restrictions are that the only positive control used with metabolic activation was 2-aminoanthracene.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US EPA Standards 40 CFR 792 and 340 CFR 160
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- the only positive control used with metabolic activation was 2-aminoanthracene
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine operon (Salmonella) tryptophan operon (E. coli)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: the test article formed a solution in acetone - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene, all TA strains at 1.0 µg/plate, WP2 uvrA at 10 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, WP2 uvrA with metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- TA98 without metabolic activation 1.0 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA1535 without metabolic activation 1.0 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- TA1537 without metabolic activation 75 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- TA1538 without metabolic activation 1.0 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- WP2 uvrA without metabolic activation 1000 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
ACTIVATION: S9 mix contained 10% S9 and glucose-6-phosphate and NADP as co-factors. 500 µl of S9 mix was added to 2 ml top agar giving a final concentration of approximately 2% S9.
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 hours at 37+/- 2ºC
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine deficient agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicate plates, experiment repeated
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: condition of background lawn
OTHER: - Evaluation criteria:
- For the test article to be evaluated positive, it must cause a dose-related increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one tester strain with a minimum of two increasing concentrations of test article. Data sets for strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA 1538 will be judged positive if the increase in mean revertants is equal to or greater than three times the mean vehicle control value. Data sets for strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrA will be judged positive if the increase in mean revertants is equal to or greater than two times the mean vehicle control value.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- Precipitate but no appreciable toxicity was observed
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- Precipitate but no appreciable toxicity was observed
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: occurred between 1000 and 5000 µg/plate, did not interfere with test.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: cytotoxicity was not evident at any concentration - Conclusions:
- 1,1,3,3-Tetramethyl-1,3-divinyldisiloxane has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria in a reliable study which was conducted according to a protocol that is equivalent to OECD TG 471, and in compliance with GLP. No evidence of a test-substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without metabolic activation in the initial or the repeat experiments using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, 100, 1535, 1537 and 1538, and E.coli WP2uvrA. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: IWGT Recommendations
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- (Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Germany)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Liver S9 of Wistar Phenobarbital and ß-Naphthoflavone-induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-experiment: 0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 mM (+/-S9); Experiment I: 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 mM (+/-S9); Experiment II: 0.5, 1.5, 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 8.5, 9.5, 10.0 mM (+S9); 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 mM (-S9)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- THF (0.25% v/v final concentration in the samples)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- treatment medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation : 2.5 µg/ml
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- treatment medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation 200 and 300 µg/ml
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- treatment medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation 10 µg/ml
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: suspended in medium
DURATION: 4 h (short-term exposure), 24 h (long-term exposure)
Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 h
Selection time (if incubation with selection agent): about 14 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assay) 5 µg/ml trifluorothymidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: two separate experiments (I+II) with single exposure; cells were seeded in 4 plates and evaluated
NUMBER OF CELLS SEEDED: 2000 cells per well
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: relative total growth (RTG) - Evaluation criteria:
- The test item is considered mutagenic if following criteria are met:
-The induced mutant frequency meets or exceeds the Global Evaluation factor (GEF) of 126 per 10^6 cells
- A dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency is detected.
Besides, combined with a positive effect in the mutant frequency, an increased occurrence of small colonies (≥40% of total colonies) is an indication for potential clastogenic effects and/or chromosomal aberrations.
According to the OECD guideline, the biological relevance is considered first for the interpretation of results. Statistical methods might be used as an aid in evaluation the test result.
A test item is considered to be negative if the induced mutant frequency is below the GEF and the trend test is negative. - Statistics:
- The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test is applied to the mutation data to prove the dose groups for any significant difference in mutant frequency compared to the negative /solvent controls.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- RTG 40.6% at 8 mM and 43.4% at 10 mM, 24 h treatment without metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- 1,1,3,3-Tetramethyl-1,3-divinyldisiloxane has been tested in an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells. The study was conducted according to OECD TG 476 and in compliance with GLP conditions. No evidence of increase in mutant frequency was observed when tested with and without metabolic activation up to limit concentrations. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to L5178Y cells under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
The test item 1,3-diethenyl-1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane was assessed for its potential to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y.
The selection of the concentrations used in the main experiments was based on data from the pre-experiment. In Experiments I and II 10.0 mM (with and without metabolic activation) was selected as the highest concentration. Experiment I with and without metabolic activation and Experiment II with metabolic activation were performed as a 4 h short-term exposure assay. Experiment II without metabolic activation was performed as a 24 h long-term exposure assay.
The test item was investigated at the following concentrations:
Experiment I
with and without metabolic activation:
0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 mM
Experiment II
with metabolic activation:
0.5, 1.5, 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 8.5, 9.5, 10.0 mM
and without metabolic activation:
0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 mM
Precipitation of the test item was noted in the pre-experiment (with and without metabolic activation)at concentrations of 5 mM and higher, in Experiment I (with and without metabolic activation)at concentrations of 6 mM and higher and in Experiment II with metabolic activationat 7 mM and higher, and in Experiment II without metabolic activation at 6 mM and higher.
Growth inhibition was observed in Experiment II with and without metabolic activation.
In Experiment I with metabolic activation the relative total growth (RTG) was 105.0% for the highest concentration (10.0 mM) evaluated. The highest concentration evaluated without metabolic activation was 10.0 mM with a RTG of 109.7%. In Experiment II with metabolic activation the relative total growth (RTG) was 48.6% for the highest concentration (10.0 mM) evaluated. The highest concentration evaluated without metabolic activation was 10.0 mM with a RTG of 43.4%.
In Experiment I and II no biologically relevant increase of mutants was found after treatment with the test item (with and without metabolic activation).The Global Evaluation Factor of 126 was not exceeded by the induced mutant frequency at any concentration (GEF; defined as the mean of the negative/vehicle mutant frequency plus one standard deviation; data gathered from ten laboratories).
No dose-response relationship was observed.
Additionally, in Experiment I and II colony sizing showed no clastogenic effects induced by the test item under the experimental conditions (with and without metabolic activation).
EMS, MMS and B[a]P were used as positive controls and showed distinct and biologically relevant effects in mutation frequency. Additionally, MMS and B[a]P significantly increased the number of small colonies, thus proving the efficiency of the test system to indicate potential clastogenic effects. This study is classified as acceptable. This study satisfies the requirement for Test Guideline OPPTS 870.5300, OECD 476 for in vitro mutagenicity (mammalian forward gene mutation) data.
Referenceopen allclose all
Summary of results – Experiment I Revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
Dose µg/ml |
+/- metabolic activation |
Average revertants per plate |
|||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
TA1538 |
WP2 uvrA |
||
Solvent control |
- |
14 |
161 |
10 |
4 |
6 |
19 |
100 |
- |
17 |
151 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
14 |
333 |
- |
14 |
158 |
11 |
4 |
8 |
14 |
1000 |
- |
15 |
164 |
10 |
4 |
8 |
13 |
3333 |
- |
16 |
162 |
9 |
3 |
9 |
16 |
5000 |
- |
16 |
158 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
15 |
Positive control |
- |
195 |
707 |
355 |
224 |
279 |
150 |
Solvent control |
+ |
28 |
177 |
11 |
8 |
11 |
20 |
100 |
+ |
24 |
189 |
11 |
7 |
8 |
19 |
333 |
+ |
20 |
185 |
14 |
5 |
11 |
18 |
1000 |
+ |
21 |
186 |
8 |
8 |
14 |
18 |
3333 |
+ |
22 |
184 |
12 |
5 |
12 |
16 |
5000 |
+ |
26 |
174 |
10 |
7 |
13 |
11 |
Positive control |
+ |
1948 |
1269 |
37 |
39 |
228 |
374 |
Summary of results – Experiment II
Dose µg/ml |
+/- metabolic activation |
Average revertants per plate |
|||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
TA1538 |
WP2 uvrA |
||
Solvent control |
- |
11 |
123 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
15 |
100 |
- |
12 |
111 |
11 |
4 |
7 |
15 |
333 |
- |
8 |
113 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
12 |
1000 |
- |
14 |
120 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
3333 |
- |
9 |
121 |
10 |
4 |
5 |
15 |
5000 |
- |
15 |
151 |
12 |
5 |
8 |
10 |
Positive control |
- |
123 |
386 |
297 |
301 |
295 |
145 |
Solvent control |
+ |
19 |
137 |
14 |
4 |
13 |
20 |
100 |
+ |
18 |
139 |
12 |
7 |
10 |
15 |
333 |
+ |
19 |
144 |
7 |
6 |
14 |
19 |
1000 |
+ |
23 |
139 |
11 |
6 |
14 |
14 |
3333 |
+ |
20 |
143 |
10 |
6 |
7 |
10 |
5000 |
+ |
22 |
150 |
13 |
9 |
14 |
15 |
Positive control |
+ |
817 |
814 |
51 |
95 |
818 |
410 |
Summary: Experiment I and II with and without metabolic activation
|
Dose level (mM) |
RCE % |
RTG % |
MF (mutants/10x6 cells) |
IMF (mutants/10x6 cells) |
GEF exceeded |
Statistical significance |
Precipitate |
Exp 1 with S9 |
Negative controls |
100.0 |
92.8 |
115.1 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
114.0 |
109.1 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
|||
Solvent controls |
100.0 |
100.0 |
109.6 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
|
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
|||||
0.2 |
121.1 |
130.3 |
92.1 |
-17.0 |
- |
- |
- |
|
0.5 |
95.7 |
97.6 |
123.1 |
13.6 |
- |
- |
- |
|
1.0 |
102.9 |
104.9 |
122.8 |
13.3 |
- |
- |
- |
|
2.0 |
119.3 |
127.0 |
109.1 |
-0.4 |
- |
- |
- |
|
4.0 |
95.7 |
99.9 |
134.2 |
24.6 |
- |
- |
- |
|
6.0 |
112.3 |
108.1 |
105.0 |
-4.5 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
8.0 |
104.4 |
107.1 |
113.0 |
3.5 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
10.0 |
102.9 |
105.0 |
139.3 |
29.8 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
Positive control |
91.7 |
78.4 |
545.2 |
435.6 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
|
||||||||
Exp II with S9 |
Negative controls |
84.9 |
82.8 |
75.0 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
94.1 |
100.9 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
|||
Solvent controls |
100 |
100.0 |
76.1 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
|
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
|||||
0.5 |
79.1 |
62.8 |
63.1 |
-13.0 |
- |
- |
- |
|
1.5 |
84.9 |
74.5 |
90.5 |
14.4 |
- |
- |
- |
|
3.0 |
94.1 |
85.1 |
89.1 |
12.9 |
- |
- |
- |
|
5.0 |
90.0 |
87.8 |
114.4 |
38.2 |
- |
+ |
- |
|
7.0 |
80.2 |
62.7 |
70.1 |
-6.1 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
8.5 |
86.2 |
63.1 |
91.0 |
14.8 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
9.5 |
86.2 |
55.5 |
102.2 |
26.1 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
10.0 |
73.6 |
48.6 |
70.7 |
-5.4 |
- |
- |
+ |
|
Positive control |
68.6 |
53.4 |
644.7 |
568.6 |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
Dose level (mM) |
RCE % |
RTG % |
MF (mutants/10x6 cells) |
IMF (mutants/10x6 cells) |
GEF exceeded |
Statistical significance |
Precipitate |
|
Exp 1 without S9 |
Negative controls |
114.2 |
127.5 |
111.6 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
|
100.0 |
107.1 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||||
Solvent controls |
100.0 |
100.0 |
95.9 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||||||
0.2 |
95.8 |
108.4 |
86.8 |
-9.1 |
- |
- |
- |
||
0.5 |
83.0 |
90.7 |
155.8 |
59.9 |
- |
+ |
- |
||
1.0 |
86.7 |
89.6 |
120.6 |
24.7 |
- |
- |
- |
||
2.0 |
95.8 |
107.7 |
137.0 |
41.1 |
- |
+ |
- |
||
4.0 |
84.2 |
87.0 |
110.4 |
14.5 |
- |
- |
- |
||
6.0 |
98.6 |
102.1 |
90.3 |
-5.5 |
- |
- |
+ |
||
8.0 |
98.6 |
95.6 |
98.2 |
2.3 |
- |
- |
+ |
||
10.0 |
102.9 |
109.7 |
88.9 |
-7.0 |
- |
- |
+ |
||
Positive control 1 |
78.5 |
68.4 |
689.9 |
594.0 |
+ |
+ |
- |
||
Positive control 2 |
64.2 |
51.3 |
527.7 |
431.8 |
+ |
+ |
- |
||
|
|||||||||
Exp II withoutS9 |
Negative controls |
102.9 |
107.8 |
138.1 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
|
92.8 |
92.4 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||||
Solvent controls |
100.0 |
100.0 |
114.7 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||
/ |
/ |
/ |
- |
||||||
0.2 |
98.4 |
77.9 |
125.4 |
10.7 |
- |
- |
- |
||
0.5 |
109.3 |
108.9 |
125.4 |
10.7 |
- |
- |
- |
||
1.0 |
95.6 |
70.9 |
141.5 |
26.8 |
- |
- |
- |
||
2.0 |
94.2 |
87.1 |
154.6 |
39.9 |
- |
+ |
- |
||
4.0 |
104.4 |
94.1 |
137.1 |
22.4 |
- |
- |
- |
||
6.0 |
80.4 |
60.0 |
219.6 |
104.9 |
- |
+ |
+ |
||
8.0 |
106.0 |
40.6 |
122.1 |
7.4 |
- |
- |
+ |
||
10.0 |
79.3 |
43.4 |
172.9 |
58.3 |
- |
+ |
+ |
||
Positive control 1 |
39.9 |
19.6 |
3112.8 |
2998.1 |
+ |
+ |
- |
||
Positive control 2 |
42.7 |
26.0 |
1509.2 |
1394.5 |
+ |
+ |
- |
||
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Micronucleus assay (oral gavage administration): negative (OECD TG 474)
(Bioreliance, 2012).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan, Frederick, MD
- Age at study initiation: 6 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 27.7 - 34.9 grams for males and 24.4 -29.5 grams for females
- Assigned to test groups randomly: [yes, under following basis: ] 5 males and 5 females per test group
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: 5 mice per sex per approved Micro-Barrier cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°F): 72 ± 3°F
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20%
- Air changes (per hr): 10 per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour light/dark cycle
IN-LIFE DATES: 6 weeks of age on 11th April 2012 To: 26th April 2012 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: corn oil
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: based on Sponsor information
- Concentration of test material in vehicle:
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal): 80%
- Type and concentration of dispersant aid (if powder):
- Lot/batch no. (if required):
- Purity: - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: appropriate amount of test substance weighed and combined with 80% target volume of vehicle. After vortexing, remaining volume of vehicle was added. Dosing solutions were 100, 200 and 400 mg/ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Negative and positive controls and all treatment groups - 24 hour. Negative control and highest treatment group - 48 hours.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Test compound and controls were dosed once by oral gavage.
- Post exposure period:
- The negative and positve controls and treatment groups were sacrificed 24 hours after administration of test substance. The negative control and highest treatment group were sacrificed 48 after administration of test substance.
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- dosing formulations were analysed: 200 and 400 mg/ml solutions met acceptance criteria (85-115% of target concentration; 100 mg/ml solution was below this range (~84.5%)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- dosing formulations were analysed: 200 and 400 mg/ml solutions met acceptance criteria (85-115% of target concentration; 100 mg/ml solution was below this range (~84.5%)
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- dosing formulations were analysed: 200 and 400 mg/ml solutions met acceptance criteria (85-115% of target concentration; 100 mg/ml solution was below this range (~84.5%)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males and 5 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- - positive control substance: cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): standard guideline positive control
- Route of administration: oral gavage
- Doses / concentrations: 50 mg/kg - Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrrow was collected from all treatment groups and polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE's), 2000 were scored per animal thus 10,000 per treatment group, and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE's) were examined for micronuclei.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: dose limit
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): no further information
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Following euthanasia, the femurs were exposed, and the bone marrow was aspirated into syringe with fetal bovine serum. The bone marrow was centrifuged and the supernatant drawn off. The cell pellet was re-suspended and a small drop of bone marrow suspension was spead onto a clean glass slide (2 slides per mouse). The slides were air dried, fixed in methanol and stained with acridine orange.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Slides were coded randomly. Bone marrow cells were evaluated using a flourescent microscope. 2000 PCE's were scored for micronuclei per animal. The corresponding NCE's were scored for micronuclei.
OTHER: - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance is considered to induce a positive response if the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes at one or more doses is statistically elevated elative compared to the vehicle control.
- Statistics:
- Statistical significance was determined using the Kastenbaum-Bowman tables which are based on the binomial distribution.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not examined
- Remarks:
- No mortalities occurred. Diarrhea noted in one male mouse at 1000 mg/kg bw; piloerection noted in some male and all female, and diarrhea noted in 2 males and 2 females in 2000 mg/kg bw group
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- 1,1,3,3-Tetramethyl-1,3-divinyldisiloxane was tested in an in vivo mouse micronucleus assay according to OECD TG 474, in compliance with GLP. No evidence of a test substance related increase in the induction of micronucleus was observed after dosing orally by gavage at 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw. Appropriate positive and vehicle controls were included and gave expected results. Confirmation of test article exposure was provided by an oral gavage study to determine concentration of test article in the plasma. It is concluded that the test substance is not genotoxic under the conditions of the test.
Reference
Summary of Bone Marrow Micronucleus Analysis
Treatment (5 ml/kg bw) |
Sex and time (hrs) |
Mean of PCE/Total erythrocytes |
Mean of MPCE/2000 PCE |
Number of MPCE/PCE scored |
Solvent control |
M - 24 |
0.538 |
0.0 |
0 / 1000 |
F -24 |
0.546 |
0.1 |
1 / 1000 |
|
500 mg/kg bw |
M - 24 |
0.531 |
0.1 |
1 / 1000 |
F - 24 |
0.566 |
0.2 |
2 / 1000 |
|
1000 mg/kg bw |
M - 24 |
0.585 |
0.6 |
6 / 1000 |
F - 24 |
0.561 |
0.3 |
3 / 1000 |
|
2000 mg/kg bw |
M - 24 |
0.567 |
0.2 |
2 / 1000 |
F - 24 |
0.574 |
0.1 |
1 / 1000 |
|
Positive control |
M - 24 |
0.472 |
23.3 |
*233 / 1000 |
F - 24 |
0.462 |
15.5 |
*155 / 1000 |
|
Solvent control |
M - 48 |
0.433 |
0.3 |
3 / 1000 |
F - 48 |
0.544 |
0.2 |
2 / 1000 |
|
2000 mg/kg bw |
M - 48 |
0.527 |
0.1 |
1 / 1000 |
F - 48 |
0.581 |
0.0 |
0 / 1000 |
* = Statistically significant increase compared to vehicle control
PCE: polychromatic erythrocytes; MPCE; micronucleated PCE
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Information is available from reliable studies on 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-1,3-divinyldisiloxane from in vitro bacterial and mammalian mutagenicity studies and an in vivo micronucleus assay.
1,1,3,3-Tetramethyl-1,3-divinyldisiloxane has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria in a reliable study which was conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 471, and in compliance with GLP ( Microbiological Associates, 1992). No evidence of a test-substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without metabolic activation in the initial or the repeat experiments using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, 100, 1535, 1537 and 1538, and E.coli WP2uvrA. Appropriate positive, medium and solvent controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
1,1,3,3-Tetramethyl-1,3-divinyldisiloxane has been tested in an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells ( BSL Bioservice, 2012). The study was conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 476 and in compliance with GLP conditions. No evidence of increase in mutant frequency was observed when tested with and without metabolic activation up to limit concentrations. Appropriate positive, medium and solvent controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to L5178Y cells under the conditions of the test.
1,1,3,3-Tetramethyl-1,3-divinyldisiloxane was tested in an in vivo mouse micronucleus assay according to OECD Test Guideline 474 and in compliance with GLP (BioReliance, 2012). No evidence of a test substance related increase in the induction of micronucleus was observed. Appropriate positive and vehicle controls were included and gave expected results. Confirmation of test article exposure was provided by an oral gavage study to determine concentration of test article in the plasma. It is concluded that the test substance is not genotoxic under the conditions of the test.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity data, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-1,3-divinyldisiloxane is not classified for mutagenicity according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.