Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 931-299-4 | CAS number: 68390-94-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species: fish
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 12 Nov - 24 Dec 1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Circular on the Japanese Test Methods of New Chemical Substances, bioaccumulation test
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no control of water and fish and no vehicle control
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- according to the Japanese GLP Standard
- Radiolabelling:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling intervals/frequency for test organisms: 2, 3, 4 and 6 weeks after exposure
- Sampling intervals/frequency for test medium samples: twice in a week
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: analysis was conducted immediately after sampling, no storage
- Details on sampling and analysis of test organisms and test media samples (e.g. sample preparation, analytical methods):1) test media: no pre-treatment; 2) Fish samples: measurement of weight and length, added with ethanol and potassium hydroxide, heated to reflux, cooled and filtered with glass wool. - Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation of test solutions, spiked fish food or sediment:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: After test substance was mixed with crystal sugar and HCO-40, it was dissolved in ion-exchanged water
- Controls: dilution water
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): crystal sugar and HCO-40
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution(s) at different concentrations and in control(s)): 3000 mg/L in stock solution - Test organisms (species):
- Cyprinus carpio
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Koi
- Source: Sugishimafish farms, Yashiro, Japan
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): not stated
- Length at study initiation (mean): 9.6 cm
- Weight at study initiation (mean): 23.0 g
- Lipid content (mean): 3.9%
- Feeding during test: yes
- Food type: pellet mixed feed
- Amount: 2% of body weight
- Frequency: twice a day
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 52 days in an acclimation container and 7 days in a test container
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): 7 days: same as test
- Type and amount of food: pellet mixed feed, 2% of body weight
- Feeding frequency: twice a day
- Pretreatment: Treatment with Tetramycin (Pfeizer, Tokyo, Japan) and saline for 24 hours under a static condition - Route of exposure:
- aqueous
- Test type:
- flow-through
- Water / sediment media type:
- natural water: freshwater
- Total exposure / uptake duration:
- 6 wk
- Test temperature:
- 25 ± 2 °C
- Dissolved oxygen:
- concentration 1 (0.830 mg/L, nominal): 5.7 - 6.6 mg/L
concentration 2 (0.083 mg/L, nominal): 6.2 - 7.0 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 100 L container
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass,
- Aeration: not stated
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): proportional dilution
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): 800 mL/min, 1158 L/day
- No. of organisms per vessel: 15
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 1
- No. of vessels per control / vehicle control (replicates): not stated
- Biomass loading rate: no data
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: ground water
- Intervals of water quality measurement: once in 6 months
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: not stated
- Photoperiod: not stated
- Light intensity: not stated
RANGE-FINDING / PRELIMINARY STUDY
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Acute fish (Oryzias latipes) toxicity test was performed, and LC50 for 96 hours was determined as > 300 mg/L (based on a nominal concentration). - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations:
concentration 1: 0.830 mg/L (substance A: 0,290 mg/L and substance B: 0.826 mg/L)
concentration 2: 0.083 mg/L, (substance A: 0,029 mg/L and substance B: 0.0826 mg/L) - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Lipid content:
- 3.9 %
- Time point:
- start of exposure
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- < 0.7 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Time of plateau:
- 6 wk
- Calculation basis:
- steady state
- Remarks on result:
- other: refers to test substance
- Remarks:
- Conc.in environment / dose:0.830 mg/L
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- < 6.2 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Time of plateau:
- 6 wk
- Calculation basis:
- steady state
- Remarks on result:
- other: refers to test substance
- Remarks:
- Conc.in environment / dose:0.083 mg/L
- Details on results:
- - Mortality of test organisms: no data
- Behavioural abnormalities: no data
- Observations on body length and weight: determined but no data
- Other biological observations: no data
- Organ specific bioaccumulation: not determined
- Mortality and/or behavioural abnormalities of control: no data
- Loss of test substance during test period: no data
- Results with vehicle control: not performed - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species, other
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified. For more detail see field `overall remarks, attachments´.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
Vega version 1.1.4
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BCF Read-Across v1.1.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: Vega v1.1.4
- Model(s) used: BCF Read-Across version 1.1.0
Full reference and details of the used formulas can be found in:
Manganaro, A., Pizzo, F., Lombardo, A., Pogliaghi, A., Benfenati, E., 2016. Predicting persistence in the sediment compartment with a new automatic software based on the k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) algorithm. Chemosphere 144, 1624–1630.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- other: Fish
- Route of exposure:
- aqueous
- Test type:
- other: calculation
- Water / sediment media type:
- natural water: freshwater
- Details on estimation of bioconcentration:
- BASIS FOR CALCULATION OF BCF
- Estimation software: VegaNIC version 1.1.3, BCF Read-Across version 1.1.0
- Result based on calculated log Pow of: 7.21 - 7.92 - Type:
- other: log BCF
- Value:
- 1.727 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18 - C18
- Type:
- other: log BCF
- Value:
- 1.07 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18 - C16
- Type:
- other: log BCF
- Value:
- 1.08 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C16 - C16
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species, other
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified. For more detail see field `overall remarks, attachments´.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
Vega version 1.1.4
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
CAESAR v 2.1.14
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: Vega v1.1.4
- Model(s) used: CAESAR BCF Model version 2.1.14
Full reference and details of the used formulas can be found in:
Zhao, C., Boriani, E., Chana, A., Roncaglioni,A., Benfenati, E. A new hybrid system of QSAR models for predicting bioconcentration factors (BCF). Chemosphere (2008), 73, 1701-1707.
Lombardo A, Roncaglioni A, Boriani E, Milan C, Benfenati E. Assessment and validation of the CAESAR predictive model for bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish. Chemistry Central Journal (2010), 4 (Suppl 1).
R. Todeschini and V. Consonni (2009) Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics, Wiley-VCH U.S.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- other: Fish
- Route of exposure:
- aqueous
- Justification for method:
- minimised test method used to support BCF estimates based on QSAR
- Test type:
- other: calculation
- Water / sediment media type:
- natural water: freshwater
- Details on estimation of bioconcentration:
- BASIS FOR CALCULATION OF BCF
- Estimation software: Vega version 1.1.3, CAESAR v 2.1.14
- Result based on calculated log Pow of: 7.21 - 7.92 - Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 2 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18 - C18
- Type:
- other: log BCF
- Value:
- 0.2 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18 - C18
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 2 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18 - C16
- Type:
- other: log BCF
- Value:
- 0.29 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18 - C16
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 3 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C16 - C16
- Type:
- other: Log BCF
- Value:
- 0.41 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C16 - C16
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species, other
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified. For more detail see field `overall remarks, attachments´.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
Vega version 1.1.4
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
BCF Meylan Model v1.0.3
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: Vega v1.1.4
- Model(s) used: BCF Meylan Model version 1.0.3
Full reference and details of the used formulas can be found in:
Meylan W.M., Howard P.H., Boethling R.S. et al. Improved Method for Estimating Bioconcentration / Bioaccumulation Factor from Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient. 1999, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18(4): 664-672
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- other: fish
- Route of exposure:
- aqueous
- Justification for method:
- minimised test method used to support BCF estimates based on QSAR
- Test type:
- other: calculation
- Water / sediment media type:
- natural water: freshwater
- Details on estimation of bioconcentration:
- BASIS FOR CALCULATION OF BCF
- Estimation software: Vega version 1.1.3, Meylan Model version 1.0.3
- Result based on calculated log Pow of: 7.21 - 7.92 - Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 5 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18-C18
- Type:
- other: log BCF
- Value:
- 0.7 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18-C18
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 15 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18-C16
- Type:
- other: log BCF
- Value:
- 1.18 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C18-C16
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 46 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C16-C16
- Type:
- other: log BCF
- Value:
- 1.67 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Constituent C16-C16
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Measured concentration of test substance
|
|
2 weeks |
3 weeks |
4 weeks |
6 weeks |
0.830 mg/L |
A |
0.245 |
0.243 |
0.245 |
0.247 |
B |
0.727 |
0.717 |
0.722 |
0.733 |
|
C |
0.739 |
0.733 |
0.736 |
0.750 |
|
0.0830 mg/L |
A |
0.0258 |
0.0258 |
0.0264 |
0.0259 |
B |
0.0785 |
0.0777 |
0.0791 |
0.0773 |
|
C |
0.0790 |
0.0794 |
0.0807 |
0.0800 |
A: stearamide (composition of test material), B: N-ethyl-stearamide (composition of test material), C: 1,2-bis(stearoylamino)ethane (active substance)
Table 2. Result of BCF
|
|
2 weeks |
3 weeks |
4 weeks |
6 weeks |
0.830 mg/L |
A |
> 0.7 > 0.7 |
> 0.7 > 0.7 |
> 0.7 > 0.7 |
> 0.7 > 0.7 |
B |
> 0.4 > 0.4 |
> 0.4 > 0.4 |
> 0.4 > 0.4 |
> 0.4 > 0.4 |
|
C |
> 0.7 > 0.7 |
> 0.7 > 0.7 |
> 0.7 > 0.7 |
> 0.7 > 0.7 |
|
0.0830 mg/L |
A |
> 6.6 > 6.6 |
> 6.6 > 6.6 |
> 6.6 > 6.6 |
> 6.6 > 6.6 |
B |
> 3.8 > 3.8 |
> 3.8 > 3.8 |
> 3.8 > 3.8 |
> 3.8 > 3.8 |
|
C |
> 6.2 > 6.2 |
> 6.2 > 6.2 |
> 6.2 > 6.2 |
> 6.2 > 6.2 |
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
Description of key information
The substance has a low potential for bioaccumulation.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The low Pow calculated for the main substance components is > 10 indicating a limited potential for bioaccumulation. The bioavailability of the substance is assumed to be low since the substance is insoluble in water and has a high adsorption potential. This assumption is supported by experimental results and QSAR calculations available for the main substance components. The bioaccumulation potential of the substance was investigated in a flow-through test conducted with Cyprinus carpio as test organism (similar to OECD Guideline 305). The fish were exposed to test substance concentrations of 0.830 mg/L and 0.083 mg/L, respectively. Crystal sugar and HCO-40 were used as vehicles. The exposure period was 6 weeks. At the end of the test, estimated BCF values were <0.7 and <6.2 respectively. Further information was derived from QSAR calculations performed using the VEGA software models CAESAR v2.1.13, Meylan v1.0.2 and: Read-Across v1.0.2 (Vega version 1.1.4). The models were used to predict the BCF of the main substance components. All three models predict a low bioaccumulation potential for the main substance components. The CAESAR v2.1.13, estimated BCF values of 2 - 3 L/kg for the main substance components. The predicted BCF values by Meylan v1.0.2 ranged from 5-46 L/kg and the calculation with the Read-Across v1.0.2 model resulted in BCF values of 11.75 - 53.33 L/kg. Though the components are outside the applicability domain of the model and the results may not be fully reliable, the results support the experimentally derived low BCF of the substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.