Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 209-795-0 | CAS number: 593-51-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
LD50 was observed at the dose level of 1600 mg/kg bw in range of1600 to 3200 mg/kg.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from peer reveiw publication
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To evaluate the acute toxicity of Methylamine hydrochloride in rats.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Methylamine hydrochloride (methanaminium chloride)
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): CH5N.Cl H
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 67.5184 g/mole
- Substance type: Organic - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on oral exposure:
- No data available.
- Doses:
- 1600 to 3200 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- No data available.
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- No data available.
- Statistics:
- No data available.
- Preliminary study:
- No data available.
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 1 600 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- 1 600 - 3 200
- Remarks on result:
- other: 50 % mortality observed
- Mortality:
- 50 % mortality was observed.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No data available.
- Gross pathology:
- No data available.
- Other findings:
- No data available.
- Interpretation of results:
- Toxicity Category IV
- Conclusions:
- LD50 was considered to be 1600 mg/kg for Methylamine hydrochloride in rats by oral administration.
- Executive summary:
In a acute oral toxicity study, rats were treated with methanaminium chloride orally. The LD50 was observed at the dose level of 1600 mg/kg bw in the range of 1600 to 3200 mg/kg.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 1 600 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 2 and from peer-reviewed journal
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity:
In different studies, Methanaminium chloride has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for Methanaminium chloride along with the study available on structurally similar read across substance Methylamine (CAS: 74-89-5). The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental data.
In a study by Kinney et al (Inhalation Toxicology, 2:29-39, 1990), rats were administered methanaminium chloride orally to gauge the acute oral toxicity. The LD50 was observed at the dose level of 1600 mg/kg bw in range of1600 to 3200 mg/kg.
In another prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for methanaminium chloride. The LD50 was estimated to be 1296 mg/kg bw when Sprague-Dawley male and female rats were orally exposed with 4- methanaminium chloride.
Also it is further supported experimental data by MAK Collection (MAK Value Documentation, 146–153, 2012) on structurally similar read across substance Methylamine (CAS: 74-89-5), rats were treated with Methylamine orally as 40 % solution. LD50 was considered to be 698 mg/kg bw (547 – 1007 mg/kg) when rat were treated with Methylamine orally.
Thus, based on the above predictions and study on Methanaminium chloride and its read across substances and by conceding the weight of evidence, it can be concluded that LD50 value is less than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, Methanaminium chloride can be classified as “Category IV” of acute oral toxicity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above predictions and study on Methanaminium chloride and its read across substances and by conceding the weight of evidence, it can be concluded that LD50 value is less than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, Methanaminium chloride can be classified as “Category IV” of acute oral toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
