Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 305-729-0 | CAS number: 95009-01-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Everlan SL65 was mutagenic in the reverse mutation analysis of Salmonella typhimurium (OECD TG471).
Everlan SL65 was positive effect under the condition of in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test (OECD TG473).
Everlan SL65 was positive effect under the condition of in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test (OECD TG476).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Sep. 20, 2016 - Dec 8, 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- OECD 471:1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Source of Cell: MOLTOX, molecular Toxicology, Inc.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- mitomycin C
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Evaluation criteria:
- for the groups treated with an without S9 mix, the range of natural reverse mutant colony number were as following: (CFU/plate)
Tester Strains With S9 mix without S9 mix
TA98 32-51 22-51
TA100 197-386 166-326
TA102 378-487 262-407
TA1535 18-41 17-43
TA1537 9-26 6-25 - Statistics:
- statistic via SPSS software, p < 0.05 (One-Way ANOVA).
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- According to OECD 471 test method, Everlan SL65 was mutagenic in the reverse mutation analysis of Salmonella typhimurium.
- Executive summary:
This test using the procedures outlined in the SuperLub Study Plan for M62-151100105001EN which is based on the SOP for the OECD 471 (SOPF-203) and OECD 471 (OECD, 1997). The results of this OECD 471 test forEverlan SL65show that test validity criteria was met.
Based on the preliminary assay results, 5mg/plate was set as the highest dose in this study. In the mutagenicity assay, five doses of Everlan SL65 at 0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 and 5mg/plate, concurrent negative and strain-specific positive controls were tested in tester strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 in triplicate with or without S9 Mix activation. At least one dose in four tester strains of Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 of test groups, the results showed that the number of revertants increase twice more than negative controls group. Based on the data obtained from this study, it was concluded that under the test condition, Everlan SL65 was mutagenic in the reverse mutation analysis of Salmonella typhimurium.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- July 25, 2016 - Dec 30, 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- OECD 476:2015
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Remarks:
- CHO-K1
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Source of cells: Food Industry Research and Development Institute
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Remarks:
- CHO-K1
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- According to OECD 476 test method, Everlan SL65 was positive effect under the condition of in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test.
- Executive summary:
This test using the procedures outlined in the SuperLub Study Plan for M62-151100112001EN which is based on the SOP for the OECD 476 (SOPF-240) and OECD 476 (OECD, 2015). The results of this OECD 476 test for Everlan SL65 show that test validity criteria was met. Based on the results of the cell viability test, 2.0mg/mL was set as the highest dose in this study. In the gene mutation test, four doses of Everlan SL65 at 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0mg/mL, negative and positive controls were tested in five repetitions with or without S9 Mix. The mutation frequency was significantly different from the negative control group for 0.5-2.0 mg/mL of the test groups in the presence of S9 Mix. Based on the data obtained from this study, it was concluded that under the test condition, Everlan SL65 was positive effect in mammalian cell gene mutation test (in vitro).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Dec 02,2015 - Dec 14, 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- OECD 473:2014
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- other: In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Remarks:
- CHO-K1
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Source of cells: Food Industry Research and Development Institute
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Remarks:
- CHO-K1
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- According to OECD 473 test method, Everlan SL65 was positive effect under the condition of in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test.
- Executive summary:
This test using the procedures outlined in the SuperLub Study Plan for M62-151100106002EN which is based on the SOP for the OECD 473 (SOPF-207) and OECD 473 (OECD, 2014). The results of this OECD 473 test for Everlan SL65 show that test validity criteria was met.
Based on the results of the cell viability test, 2.0 mg/mL as the highest dosage was used to perform the test in 3-hours treatment with or without S9 Mix and 1.0 mg/mL as the highest dosage was used to perform the test in 20-hours treatment without S9 Mix. In the chromosome aberration test, three doses of Everlan SL65, negative and positive controls were tested in triplicate with or without S9 Mix. In test group, the cell proportions with abnormal chromosome in all dosage with S9 Mix for 3 hours and in highest dosage without S9 Mix for 20 hours gave the similar reaction as the positive controls. Based on the data obtained from this study, it was concluded that under the test condition, Everlan SL65 was positive effect in mammalian chromosome aberration test (in vitro).
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Characteristics of five Salmonella typhimurium strains
Test strain |
Histidine requirement |
uvrB mutation |
rfa mutation |
Ampicillin resistance |
TA98 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
TA100 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
TA102 |
+ |
ϴ |
+ |
+ |
TA1535 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
ϴ |
TA1537 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
ϴ |
+ means had the characteristic; ϴ means did not have the characteristic
Table 2. Toxicity of the test article of Salmonella typhimurium TA100
Group |
Test article (mg/plate) |
Reverse mutant colony number (CFU/plate) |
With S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
213 |
Positive control groupa |
1228 |
|
Test group |
|
|
5 |
348 |
|
2.5 |
716 |
|
1.25 |
415 |
|
0.625 |
353 |
|
0.3125 |
282 |
|
Without S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
202 |
Positive control group |
781 |
|
Test group |
|
|
5 |
486 |
|
2.5 |
446 |
|
1.25 |
350 |
|
0.625 |
302 |
|
0.3125 |
228 |
a Positive control group: With S9 Mix: 2-Aminoanthracene (4.0μg/plate).
Without S9 Mix: Sodium azide (5μg/plate).
Table 3. Reverse mutation test of Salmonella typhimurium TA98
Group |
Test article (mg/plate) |
Reverse mutant colony number (CFU/plate) |
Average of coloniesa |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
|||
With S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
43 |
32 |
51 |
42 ± 10 |
Positive control groupb |
353 |
378 |
347 |
359 ± 16* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
102 |
109 |
92 |
101 ± 9* |
|
2.5 |
96 |
98 |
85 |
93 ± 7* |
|
1.25 |
101 |
87 |
130 |
106 ± 22* |
|
0.625 |
87 |
94 |
100 |
94 ± 7* |
|
0.3125 |
49 |
56 |
71 |
59 ± 11 |
|
Without S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
22 |
27 |
28 |
26 ± 3 |
Positive control group |
373 |
345 |
400 |
373 ± 28* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
37 |
39 |
63 |
46 ± 14 |
|
2.5 |
90 |
76 |
86 |
84 ± 7* |
|
1.25 |
59 |
67 |
76 |
67 ± 9* |
|
0.625 |
54 |
56 |
59 |
56 ± 3* |
|
0.3125 |
46 |
54 |
64 |
55 ± 9* |
a Average of colonies was shown as Mean ± S.D., the data were triplicate.
b Positive control group: With S9 Mix: Benzo [a] pyrene (4.0μg/plate).
Without S9 Mix: 4-Nitroquinoline-N-oxide (0.5μg/plate).
*Reverse mutant colony number were twice more than negative control group, ρ < 0.05 (One-Way ANOVA).
Table 4. Reverse mutation test of Salmonella typhimurium TA100
Group |
Test article (mg/plate) |
Reverse mutant colony number (CFU/plate) |
Average of coloniesa |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
|||
With S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
171 |
191 |
235 |
199 ± 33 |
Positive control groupb |
1553 |
1647 |
1498 |
1566 ± 75* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
485 |
362 |
414 |
420 ± 62* |
|
2.5 |
765 |
667 |
765 |
732 ± 57* |
|
1.25 |
691 |
619 |
561 |
624 ± 65* |
|
0.625 |
413 |
425 |
461 |
433 ± 25* |
|
0.3125 |
329 |
378 |
381 |
363 ± 29* |
|
Without S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
201 |
147 |
164 |
171 ± 28 |
Positive control group |
738 |
797 |
759 |
765 ± 30* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
498 |
422 |
560 |
493 ± 69* |
|
2.5 |
449 |
410 |
478 |
446 ± 34* |
|
1.25 |
488 |
479 |
555 |
507 ± 42* |
|
0.625 |
459 |
408 |
450 |
439 ± 27* |
|
0.3125 |
366 |
379 |
358 |
368 ± 11* |
a Average of colonies was shown as Mean ± S.D., the data were triplicate.
b Positive control group: With S9 Mix: 2-Aminoanthracene (4.0μg/plate).
Without S9 Mix: Sodium azide (5μg/plate).
*Reverse mutant colony number were twice more than negative control group, ρ < 0.05 (One-Way ANOVA).
Table 5. Reverse mutation test of Salmonella typhimurium TA102
Group |
Test article (mg/plate) |
Reverse mutant colony number (CFU/plate) |
Average of coloniesa |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
|||
With S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
482 |
478 |
410 |
457 ± 40 |
Positive control groupb |
1025 |
939 |
996 |
987 ± 44* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
528 |
596 |
487 |
537 ± 55 |
|
2.5 |
636 |
596 |
653 |
628 ± 29 |
|
1.25 |
583 |
646 |
576 |
602 ± 39 |
|
0.625 |
484 |
480 |
540 |
501 ± 34 |
|
0.3125 |
621 |
530 |
491 |
547 ± 67 |
|
Without S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
401 |
365 |
446 |
404 ± 41 |
Positive control group |
925 |
920 |
844 |
896 ± 45* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
533 |
534 |
383 |
483 ± 87 |
|
2.5 |
528 |
462 |
505 |
498 ± 34 |
|
1.25 |
589 |
461 |
490 |
513 ± 67 |
|
0.625 |
485 |
515 |
467 |
489 ± 24 |
|
0.3125 |
486 |
594 |
499 |
526 ± 59 |
a Average of colonies was shown as Mean ± S.D., the data were triplicate.
b Positive control group: With S9 Mix: 2-Aminoanthracene (10μg/plate).
Without S9 Mix: Mitomycin C (0.5μg/plate).
*Reverse mutant colony number were twice more than negative control group, ρ < 0.05 (One-Way ANOVA).
Table 6. Reverse mutation test of Salmonella typhimurium TA1535
Group |
Test article (mg/plate) |
Reverse mutant colony number (CFU/plate) |
Average of coloniesa |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
|||
With S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
17 |
25 |
26 |
23 ± 5 |
Positive control groupb |
347 |
388 |
379 |
371 ± 22* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
111 |
120 |
118 |
116 ± 5* |
|
2.5 |
164 |
139 |
131 |
145 ± 17* |
|
1.25 |
76 |
74 |
81 |
77 ± 4* |
|
0.625 |
59 |
54 |
74 |
62 ± 10* |
|
0.3125 |
37 |
45 |
39 |
40 ± 4 |
|
Without S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
22 |
23 |
24 |
23 ± 1 |
Positive control group |
228 |
235 |
213 |
225 ± 11* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
40 |
38 |
44 |
41 ± 3 |
|
2.5 |
113 |
138 |
92 |
114 ± 23* |
|
1.25 |
88 |
83 |
87 |
86 ± 3* |
|
0.625 |
54 |
53 |
55 |
54 ± 1* |
|
0.3125 |
49 |
42 |
39 |
43 ± 5 |
a Average of colonies was shown as Mean ± S.D., the data were triplicate.
b Positive control group: With S9 Mix: 2-Aminoanthracene (4.0μg/plate).
Without S9 Mix: Sodium azide (0.4μg/plate).
*Reverse mutant colony number were twice more than negative control group, ρ < 0.05 (One-Way ANOVA).
Table 7. Reverse mutation test of Salmonella typhimurium TA1537
Group |
Test article (mg/plate) |
Reverse mutant colony number (CFU/plate) |
Average of coloniesa |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
|||
With S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
14 |
9 |
12 |
12 ± 3 |
Positive control groupb |
450 |
476 |
438 |
455 ± 19* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
89 |
96 |
74 |
86 ± 11* |
|
2.5 |
95 |
125 |
115 |
112 ± 15* |
|
1.25 |
63 |
94 |
102 |
86 ± 21* |
|
0.625 |
55 |
57 |
53 |
55 ± 2* |
|
0.3125 |
33 |
30 |
33 |
32 ± 2 |
|
Without S9 Mix |
Negative control group |
10 |
15 |
12 |
12 ± 3 |
Positive control group |
899 |
863 |
1020 |
927 ± 82* |
|
Test group |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
78 |
85 |
66 |
76 ± 10* |
|
2.5 |
40 |
64 |
62 |
55 ± 13* |
|
1.25 |
59 |
86 |
37 |
61 ± 25* |
|
0.625 |
72 |
60 |
54 |
62 ± 9* |
|
0.3125 |
44 |
40 |
41 |
42 ± 2* |
a Average of colonies was shown as Mean ± S.D., the data were triplicate.
b Positive control group: With S9 Mix: 2-Aminoanthracene (4.0μg/plate).
Without S9 Mix: 9-Aminoacridine (50.0μg/plate).
*Reverse mutant colony number were twice more than negative control group, ρ < 0.05 (One-Way ANOVA).
Table 1. Cell viability analysis
Group |
Test article |
Average colony numbersa |
Relative survival (%)b |
With S9 Mix |
Negative controlc |
167.4 ± 2.1 |
100.0 |
Positive controld |
153.2 ± 4.7 |
91.5 ± 2.8 |
|
Test groups (mg/mL) |
|
|
|
2.0 |
76.6 ± 3.8 |
45.8 ± 2.3 |
|
1.0 |
184.2 ± 2.9 |
110.0 ± 1.7 |
|
0.5 |
187.4 ± 5.8 |
111.9 ± 3.4 |
|
0.25 |
184.4 ± 4.6 |
110.2 ± 2.7 |
|
Without S9 Mix |
Negative controlc |
195.8 ± 2.9 |
100.0 |
Positive controld |
111.8 ± 11.3 |
57.1 ± 5.8 |
|
Test groups (mg/mL) |
|
|
|
2.0 |
105.0 ± 6.0 |
53.6 ± 3.1 |
|
1.0 |
158.8 ± 6.8 |
81.1 ± 3.5 |
|
0.5 |
154.0 ± 1.6 |
78.7 ± 0.8 |
|
0.25 |
183.4 ± 7.1 |
93.7 ± 3.6 |
a Values were expressed as Mean ± S.D., and tests were repeated 5 times.
b Relative survival = each colony numbers of the positive control or test groups / the average of colony numbers in the negative control × 100%, then calculated the Mean ± S.D..
c Negative control: Ham’s F-12 medium with 1% DMSO and 10% FBS (S9 Mix or not).
d Positive control: 4μg/mL B[a]P for the cell treated with S9 Mix, and 0.25μg/mL 4-NQO for the cells treated without S9 Mix.
Table 2. Mutation frequency analysis
Group |
Test article |
Average colony numbersa |
Mutation frequency (× 10-6)b |
With S9 Mix |
Negative controlc |
7.4 ± 0.9 |
18.9 |
Positive controld |
61.0 ± 9.9 |
187.7* |
|
Test groups (mg/mL) |
|
|
|
2.0 |
45.0 ± 11.0 |
98.3* |
|
1.0 |
25.4 ± 4.7 |
49.9* |
|
0.5 |
13.2 ± 3.1 |
58.4* |
|
0.25 |
15.6 ± 1.7 |
27.3 |
|
Without S9 Mix |
Negative controlc |
9.6 ± 2.3 |
16.0 |
Positive controld |
142.0 ± 20.3 |
272.0* |
|
Test groups (mg/mL) |
|
|
|
2.0 |
18.6 ± 3.9 |
35.0 |
|
1.0 |
13.6 ± 3.8 |
20.7 |
|
0.5 |
11.0 ± 2.0 |
26.7 |
|
0.25 |
12.8 ± 3.3 |
27.0 |
a Values were expressed as Mean ± S.D., and tests were repeated 5 times.
b Mutation frequency = (average colony numbers of each test groups / the number of seeding) × (1 / Colonies formation frequency).
c Negative control: Ham’s F-12 medium with 1% DMSO and 10% FBS (S9 Mix or not).
d Positive control: 4μg/mL B[a]P for the cell treated with S9 Mix, and 0.25μg/mL 4-NQO for the cells treated without S9 Mix.
* Significantly different from the negative control group (ρ < 0.005).
Table 1. Cell viability test
Processing Time |
Groups |
Absorbance (570 nm)a |
Cell Viability (%)b |
Processed for 3 hours (with S9 Mix) |
Negative controlc |
1.009 ± 0.135 |
100.0 |
Positive controld |
1.038 ± 0.080 |
102.8 ± 7.9 |
|
Test group (mg/mL) |
|
|
|
2.0 |
0.479 ± 0.010 |
47.5 ± 1.0 |
|
1.0 |
1.199 ± 0.020 |
118.8 ± 2.0 |
|
0.5 |
1.045 ± 0.024 |
103.6 ± 2.4 |
|
0.25 |
1.103 ± 0.114 |
109.3 ± 11.2 |
|
0.125 |
1.236 ± 0.063 |
122.5 ± 6.2 |
|
Processed for 3 hours (without S9 Mix) |
Negative control |
1.933 ± 0.183 |
100.0 |
Positive control |
1.209 ± 0.218 |
62.5 ± 11.2 |
|
Test group (mg/mL) |
|
|
|
2.0 |
0.553 ± 0.065 |
28.6 ± 3.4 |
|
1.0 |
1.201 ± 0.197 |
62.1 ± 10.2 |
|
0.5 |
1.175 ± 0.215 |
60.8 ± 11.1 |
|
0.25 |
1.288 ± 0.162 |
66.6 ± 8.4 |
|
0.125 |
1.309 ± 0.242 |
67.7 ± 12.5 |
|
Processed for 20 hours (without S9 Mix) |
Negative control |
1.670 ± 0.130 |
100.0 |
Positive control |
1.192 ± 0.105 |
71.4 ± 6.3 |
|
Test group (mg/mL) |
|
|
|
2.0 |
0.092 ± 0.006 |
5.5 ± 0.4 |
|
1.0 |
0.329 ± 0.037 |
19.7 ± 2.2 |
|
0.5 |
1.168 ± 0.215 |
69.9 ± 12.9 |
|
0.25 |
1.102 ± 0.100 |
66.0 ± 5.9 |
|
0.125 |
1.241 ± 0.063 |
74.3 ± 3.8 |
a Values were expressed as Mean ± S.D., and tests were triplicate.
b Cell viability = each absorbance of the positive control or test groups / the average of absorbance of the negative control × 100%, than calculated the Mean ± S.D..
c Negative control: Ham’s F-12 medium with 1% DMSO and 10% FBS (with or without S9 Mix).
d Positive control: Group included 25μg/mL cyclophosphamide monohydrate for the cells treated with S9 Mix, and 2.5μg/mL mitomycin C for the cells treated without S9 Mix.
Table 2. The cell proportion with abnormal chromosome
Group |
The cell proportion with abnormal chromosome (%) |
||
Processed for 3 hours (with S9 Mix) |
Processed for 3 hours (without S9 Mix) |
Processed for 20 hours (without S9 Mix) |
|
Negative control |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Positive control |
13.3 |
10.3 |
19.3 |
Test group (mg/mL) |
|
|
|
2.0 |
4.0 |
1.3 |
─ |
1.0 |
7.0 |
2.0 |
7.3 |
0.5 |
4.0 |
0.3 |
1.3 |
0.25 |
─ |
─ |
0.7 |
a Tests were repeated triplicate.
b Negative control: Ham’s F-12 medium with 1% DMSO and 10% FBS (with or without S9 Mix).
c Positive control: Group included 25μg/mL cyclophosphamide monohydrate for the cells treated with S9 Mix, and 2.5μg/mL mitomycin C for the cells treated without S9 Mix.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available (further information necessary)
Additional information
Bacterial reverse mutation test (OECD TG471)
Based on the preliminary assay results, 5mg/plate was set as the highest dose in this study. In the mutagenicity assay, five doses of Everlan SL65 at 0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 and 5mg/plate, concurrent negative and strain-specific positive controls were tested in tester strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 in triplicate with or without S9 Mix activation. At least one dose in four tester strains of Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 of test groups, the results showed that the number of revertants increase twice more than negative controls group. Based on the data obtained from this study, it was concluded that under the test condition, Everlan SL65 was mutagenic in the reverse mutation analysis of Salmonella typhimurium.
Mammalian chromosomal aberration test (OECD TG473)
Based on the results of the cell viability test, 2.0 mg/mL as the highest dosage was used to perform the test in 3-hours treatment with or without S9 Mix and 1.0 mg/mL as the highest dosage was used to perform the test in 20-hours treatment without S9 Mix.In the chromosome aberration test, three doses of Everlan SL65, negative and positive controls were tested in triplicate with or without S9 Mix. In test group, the cell proportions with abnormal chromosome in all dosage with S9 Mix for 3 hours and in highest dosage without S9 Mix for 20 hours gave the similar reaction as the positive controls.
Based on the data obtained from this study, it was concluded that under the test condition, Everlan SL65 was positive effect in mammalian chromosome aberration test (in vitro).
Mammalian cell gene mutation test (OECD TG476)
Based on the results of the cell viability test, 2.0mg/mL was set as the highest dose in this study. In the gene mutation test, four doses of Everlan SL65 at 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0mg/mL, negative and positive controls were tested in five repetitions with or without S9 Mix. The mutation frequency was significantly different from the negative control group for 0.5-2.0 mg/mL of the test groups in the presence of S9 Mix. Based on the data obtained from this study, it was concluded that under the test condition, Everlan SL65 was positive effect in mammalian cell gene mutation test (in vitro).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.