Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Biodegradation in water: screening tests

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From November 9, 1979 to November 28, 1979
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 14th edition (1976)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The method was designed to determine biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Modifications to the study guideline included the use of a carbon standard and extension of the usual test period from 5 to 20 d. In addition, re-oxygenation was conducted at intervals to maintain a concentration of >2mg/L dissolved oxygen.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
At the time this study was conducted GLP was not required for chemical testing.
Oxygen conditions:
aerobic
Remarks:
>2mg/L
Inoculum or test system:
sewage, domestic, non-adapted
Details on inoculum:
no information is provided on the innoculum used.
Duration of test (contact time):
20 d
Initial conc.:
> 2 - < 4 other: uL/300ml
Based on:
test mat.
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
other: BOD
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
other: COD
Details on study design:
The study it was conducted in 300 ml BOD bottles. The test substance was evaluated at two concentrations 2 and 4 uL/300 ml and analysed at 5, 10, 15 and 20 days. The results were compare with results obtained from the glucose and the glucose/glutamic acid control. Re-aeration was conducted as necessary to maintain dissolved oxygen concentrations at levels >2 mg/L.
Key result
Parameter:
% degradation (O2 consumption)
Value:
> 3
Sampling time:
5 d
Key result
Parameter:
% degradation (O2 consumption)
Value:
6
Sampling time:
10 d
Key result
Parameter:
% degradation (O2 consumption)
Value:
13
Sampling time:
15 d
Key result
Parameter:
% degradation (O2 consumption)
Value:
32
Sampling time:
20 d
Details on results:
The BOD showed initial slow by bio-oxidation that increased through time to 32 % after 20 days indicating that the unadapted microbial population in the domestic sewage sample used in the study required time to adapt to degrade the test substance.
The COD expressed as mg oxygen/mg was measured at 2.24 which compared well with a calculated value of 3.1.
Key result
Parameter:
COD
Value:
2.24 g O2/g test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: measured
Results with reference substance:
The glucose/glutamic acid control analysed after five days gave 99.1% of the theoretical oxygen demand indicating that the sewage sample used was performing effectively.

Test substance

COD

mg oxygen/mg compound

Measured

Calculated

purity 97%

2.24

3.1

Test substance

Bio-oxidation (BOD x100)

                      ThOD

Day 5

Day 10

Day 15

Day 20

purity 97%

3.0

6.0

13.0

32.0

The results from an earlier study gave the following data.

Test substance

Bio-oxidation (BOD x100)

                      ThOD

Day 5

Day 10

Day 15

Day 20

purity 97%

3.0

24.0

26.0

34.0

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not specified
Interpretation of results:
under test conditions no biodegradation observed
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, unadapted microorganisms therefore could not degrade the test substance within a 28 d period to a level allowing identification as readily biodegradable. Nevertheless, adapted microorganisms present where continuous exposure to the test substance occurs will readily remove the test substance from sewage systems.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) of the test substance according to US Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1976). The method was modified to include analyses at additional time points after inoculation with domestic sewage sludge (10, 15 and 20 d) in order to determine whether the microorganisms required a time interval to adapt to the new food source (test substance). Exposure to the test substance occurred at a concentration of 2 to 4 µL/300 ml. The control groups confirmed that the inoculum was active and the results indicated that adaptation was necessary in order for domestic sludge microorganisms to utilise the test substance as a substrate. Under the study conditions, 13% of test substance was removed in the first 15 d of the sampling period and 32% was degraded from 15 to 20 d. Under the study conditions, unadapted microorganisms therefore could not degrade the test substance within a 28 d period to a level allowing identification as readily biodegradable. Nevertheless, adapted microorganisms present where continuous exposure to the test substance occurs will readily remove the substance from sewage systems (Gezo, 1980).

Endpoint:
biodegradation in water: screening test, other
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction from an well known and acknowledged tool. See below under 'Overall remarks, attachments' for applicability domain and 'attached background material section' for methodology.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: REACH guidance on QSARs: Chapter R.6. QSARs and grouping of chemicals
GLP compliance:
no
Key result
Parameter:
half-life in days (QSAR/QSPR)
Value:
ca. 3.897
Remarks on result:
readily biodegradable based on QSAR/QSPR prediction

Results

Chemical SMILES Molecular weight BioHCwin results (Half life - days) domain evaluation
p-methylstyrene CC1=CC=C(C=C1)C=C 118.18 3.897 In domain - molecular weight and molecular fragments

BioHCwin

SMILES : Cc1ccc(cc1)C=C

 

 

 

CHEM  :

Domain

 

 

MOL FOR: C9 H10

 

 

 

MOL WT : 118.18

ID

70.14

478.94

-------------------------- BioHCwin v1.01 Results ---------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

 

 

 TYPE | NUM |  LOG Hydrocarbon FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION    | COEFF | VALUE 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

 

 

 Frag | 1 | Aromatic-CH3                             | 0.0369 | 0.0369

ID

4

 

 Frag | 4 | Aromatic-H                               | 0.0419 | 0.1678

ID

14

 

 Frag | 3 | -C=CH [alkenyl hydrogen]                | -0.0066 | -0.0199

ID

6

 

 Frag | 1 | Benzene                                  | -0.0838 | -0.0838

ID

1

 

 Const| * | Equation Constant                        |        | 0.4898

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

  RESULT  |       LOG BioHC Half-Life (days)         |        | 0.5907

 

 

 

  RESULT  |         BioHC Half-Life (days)           |        |  3.897

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not applicable
Interpretation of results:
readily biodegradable
Conclusions:
Based on the BioHCwin model result, the primary biodegradation half-life for the test substance was determined to be 3.897 days and it was considered to be readily biodegradable.
Executive summary:

The biodegradation potential of the test substance, p-methylstyrene, was estimated using the BioHCwin v1.01 program of EPI Suite v4.11. BioHCwin is a new predictive model within EPI Suite, which determines quantitative primary biodegradation half-lives of individual petroleum hydrocarbons. This model uses a fragment-based approach similar to BioWin. Using SMILES code as the input parameter the primary biodegradation half-life for the test substance was determined to be 3.897 days; indicating that the substance can be considered to be readily biodegradable (US EPA, 2018). The prediction for the substance is considered to be reliable, as it falls within of the applicability domain.

 

Endpoint:
biodegradation in water: screening test, other
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction from an well known and acknowledged tool. See below under 'Overall remarks, attachments' for applicability domain and 'attached background material section' for methodology.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: REACH guidance on QSARs: Chapter R.6. QSARs and grouping of chemicals
GLP compliance:
no
Key result
Parameter:
other: Biowin1 (Linear Model Prediction)
Remarks on result:
other: Biodegrades fast
Remarks:
(prediction as per EPISuite BioWin 4.11)
Key result
Parameter:
other: Biowin2 (Non-Linear Model Prediction)
Remarks on result:
other: Biodegrades fast
Remarks:
(prediction as per EPISuite BioWin 4.11)
Key result
Parameter:
other: Biowin3 (Ultimate Biodegradation Timeframe):
Remarks on result:
other: Weeks
Remarks:
(prediction as per EPISuite BioWin 4.11)
Key result
Parameter:
other: Biowin4 (Primary Biodegradation Timeframe):
Remarks on result:
other: Days-Weeks
Remarks:
(prediction as per EPISuite BioWin 4.11)
Key result
Parameter:
other: Biowin5 (MITI Linear Model Prediction)
Remarks on result:
other: Not readily degradable
Remarks:
(prediction as per EPISuite BioWin 4.11)
Key result
Parameter:
other: Biowin6 (MITI Non-Linear Model Prediction):
Remarks on result:
other: Not readily degradable
Remarks:
(prediction as per EPISuite BioWin 4.11)
Key result
Parameter:
other: Biowin7 (Anaerobic Model Prediction):
Remarks on result:
other: Does not biodegrade fast
Remarks:
(prediction as per EPISuite BioWin 4.11)
Key result
Parameter:
other: Ready Biodegradability Prediction
Remarks on result:
other: No
Remarks:
(prediction as per EPISuite BioWin v 4.11)

Results

Chemical

SMILES

Molecular weight

Biowin results

domain evaluation

p -methylstyrene

Cc1cccc(c1)C=C

118.18

Biowin1 (Linear Model Prediction): Biodegrades Fast
Biowin2 (Non-Linear Model Prediction): Biodegrades Fast
Biowin3 (Ultimate Biodegradation Timeframe): Weeks
Biowin4 (Primary
 Biodegradation Timeframe):Days-Weeks
Biowin5 (MITI Linear Model Prediction): Not Readily Degradable
Biowin6 (MITI Non-Linear Model Prediction): Not Readily Degradable
Biowin7 (Anaerobic Model Prediction): Does Not Biodegrade Fast
Ready Biodegradability Prediction: NO

In domain - molecular weight and molecular fragments

BIOWIN

SMILES : Cc1cccc(c1)C=C

 

 

 

CHEM  :

 

 

 

MOL FOR: C9 H10

 

Training set

 

MOL WT : 118.18

ID

30.02

697.65

--------------------------- BIOWIN v4.10 Results ----------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Biowin1 (Linear Model Prediction)   : Biodegrades Fast

 

 

 

  Biowin2 (Non-Linear Model Prediction): Biodegrades Fast

 

 

 

  Biowin3 (Ultimate Biodegradation Timeframe): Weeks

 

 

 

  Biowin4 (Primary Biodegradation Timeframe): Days-Weeks

 

 

 

  Biowin5 (MITI Linear Model Prediction)   : Not Readily Degradable

 

 

 

  Biowin6 (MITI Non-Linear Model Prediction): Not Readily Degradable

 

 

 

  Biowin7 (Anaerobic Model Prediction): Does Not Biodegrade Fast

 

 

 

  Ready Biodegradability Prediction: NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

 

 

 TYPE | NUM |      Biowin1 FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        | COEFF | VALUE 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

Training set

 

 Frag | 1 | Alkyl substituent on aromatic ring       | 0.0547 | 0.0547

ID

3

 

 MolWt| * | Molecular Weight Parameter               |        | -0.0563

 

 

 

 Const| * | Equation Constant                        |        | 0.7475

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

  RESULT  |   Biowin1 (Linear Biodeg Probability)    |        | 0.7460

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

 

 

 TYPE | NUM |      Biowin2 FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        | COEFF | VALUE 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

Training set

 

 Frag | 1 | Alkyl substituent on aromatic ring       | 0.5771 | 0.5771

ID

3

 

 MolWt| * | Molecular Weight Parameter               |        | -1.6782

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

  RESULT  | Biowin2 (Non-Linear Biodeg Probability)  |        | 0.8708

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 A Probability Greater Than or Equal to 0.5 indicates --> Biodegrades Fast

 

 

 

 A Probability Less Than 0.5 indicates --> Does NOT Biodegrade Fast

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

 

 

 TYPE | NUM |      Biowin3 FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        | COEFF | VALUE 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

Training set

 

 Frag | 1 | Alkyl substituent on aromatic ring       | -0.0749 | -0.0749

ID

3

 

 MolWt| * | Molecular Weight Parameter               |        | -0.2612

 

 

 

 Const| * | Equation Constant                        |        | 3.1992

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

  RESULT  | Biowin3 (Survey Model - Ultimate Biodeg) |        | 2.8632

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

 

 

 TYPE | NUM |      Biowin4 FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        | COEFF | VALUE 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

Training set

 

 Frag | 1 | Alkyl substituent on aromatic ring       | -0.0685 | -0.0685

ID

3

 

 MolWt| * | Molecular Weight Parameter               |        | -0.1705

 

 

 

 Const| * | Equation Constant                        |        | 3.8477

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

  RESULT  |  Biowin4 (Survey Model - Primary Biodeg) |        | 3.6087

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Result Classification:  5.00 -> hours    4.00 -> days   3.00 -> weeks

 

 

 

 (Primary & Ultimate)   2.00 -> months   1.00 -> longer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

 

 

 TYPE | NUM |      Biowin5 FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        | COEFF | VALUE 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

Training set

 

 Frag | 1 | Aromatic-CH3                             | 0.0415 | 0.0415

ID

3

 

 Frag | 4 | Aromatic-H                               | 0.0082 | 0.0329

ID

15

 

 Frag | 3 | -C=CH [alkenyl hydrogen]                | 0.0062 | 0.0186

ID

9

 

 MolWt| * | Molecular Weight Parameter               |        | -0.3516

 

 

 

 Const| * | Equation Constant                        |        | 0.7121

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

  RESULT  | Biowin5 (MITI Linear Biodeg Probability) |        | 0.4535

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

 

 

 TYPE | NUM |      Biowin6 FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        | COEFF | VALUE 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

Training set

 

 Frag | 1 | Aromatic-CH3                             | 0.3072 | 0.3072

ID

3

 

 Frag | 4 | Aromatic-H                               | 0.1201 | 0.4806

ID

15

 

 Frag | 3 | -C=CH [alkenyl hydrogen]                | 0.0285 | 0.0855

ID

9

 

 MolWt| * | Molecular Weight Parameter               |        | -3.4117

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

  RESULT  |Biowin6 (MITI Non-Linear Biodeg Probability)|        | 0.4968

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 A Probability Greater Than or Equal to 0.5 indicates --> Readily Degradable

 

 

 

 A Probability Less Than 0.5 indicates --> NOT Readily Degradable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

 

 

 TYPE | NUM |      Biowin7 FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        | COEFF | VALUE 

 

 

 

------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+---------

 

Training set

 

 Frag | 1 | Alkyl substituent on aromatic ring       | -0.1145 | -0.1145

ID

3

 

 Frag | 1 | Aromatic-CH3                             | -0.2573 | -0.2573

ID

3

 

 Frag | 4 | Aromatic-H                               | -0.0954 | -0.3817

ID

13

 

 Frag | 3 | -C=CH [alkenyl hydrogen]                | -0.0735 | -0.2206

ID

11

 

 Const| * | Equation Constant                        |        | 0.8361

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

  RESULT  |  Biowin7 (Anaerobic Linear Biodeg Prob)  |        | -0.1380

 

 

 

============+============================================+=========+=========

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 A Probability Greater Than or Equal to 0.5 indicates --> Biodegrades Fast

 

 

 

 A Probability Less Than 0.5 indicates --> Does NOT Biodegrade Fast

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ready Biodegradability Prediction: (YES or NO)

 

 

 

----------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 Criteria for the YES or NO prediction: If the Biowin3 (ultimate survey

 

 

 

 model) result is "weeks" or faster (i.e. "days", "days to weeks", or

 

 

 

 "weeks" AND the Biowin5 (MITI linear model) probability is >= 0.5, then

 

 

 

 the prediction is YES (readily biodegradable). If this condition is not

 

 

 

 satisfied, the prediction is NO (not readily biodegradable). This method

 

 

 

 is based on application of Bayesian analysis to ready biodegradation data

 

 

 

 (see Help). Biowin5 and 6 also predict ready biodegradability, but for

 

 

 

 degradation in the OECD301C test only; using data from the Chemicals

 

 

 

 Evaluation and Research Institute Japan (CERIJ) database.

 

 

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not applicable
Interpretation of results:
not readily biodegradable
Conclusions:
Based on the BIOWIN v4.11 model estimation, the test substance is predicted to be not readily biodegradable. The individual submodules (i.e., BioWin 2 and 3 or BioWin 3 and 6) however suggest that the substance do not meet the persistence criteria as per Annex XIII criteria as set out in the REACH Technical Guidance Document Chapter R.11 (Table R.11—4).
Executive summary:

The biodegradation potential of the test substance, p-methylstyrene, was estimated using the BioWin v4.11 program of EPI Suite v4.11. BIOWIN contains seven separate models.This version (v4.11) designates the models as Biowin1 (linear probability model), Biowin2 (nonlinear probability model), Biowin3 (expert survey ultimate biodegradation model), Biowin4 (expert survey primary biodegradation model), Biowin5 (MITI linear model), Biowin6 (MITI nonlinear model), Biowin7 (anaerobic biodegradation model). Using SMILES or CAS number as the input parameter, the biodegradability estimates are based upon fragment constants that were developed using multiple linear or non-linear regression analyses, depending upon the model. For p-methylstyrene, the Biowin 1 and Biowin 2 models both predicted 'biodegrades fast, Biowin3 and Biowin 4 predicted 'weeks' and 'days-weeks' respectively, Biowin 5 and Biowin 6 both predicted 'not readily biodegradable' (with probability of biodegradation as 0.36 and 0.387 respectively) and Biowin 7 predicted 'does not biodegrade fast'. As the criteria for overall 'yes' ready biodegradability prediction is based on the 'weeks' or faster and biodegradation probability of >=0.5 predictions by Biowin 3 and Biowin 5 respectively, the overall ready biodegradability prediction for the substance was 'No' (US EPA, 2018). The individual submodules (i.e., BioWin 2 and 3 or BioWin 3 and 6), however suggest that the substance do not meet the persistence criteria as per Annex XIII criteria as set out in the REACH Technical Guidance Document Chapter R.11 (Table R.11—4). Overall, the prediction for the substance is considered to be reliable, as it falls within of the applicability domain.

Description of key information

In accordance with the restricted definition of readily biodegradable in screening tests used in the context of the REACH directive the substance must be considered to be not readily biodegradable as preconditioning of the microorganisms is required as per the experimental study with the test substance. However, the individual submodule prediction from BioWin as well as half-life prediction from BioHCwin model of EPI Suite QSAR program, indicate that the substance is biodegradable and will not be persistent in the environment.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Biodegradation in water:
under test conditions no biodegradation observed
Type of water:
freshwater

Additional information

Experimental study

A study was conducted to determine the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) of the test substance, p -methylstyrene according to US Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1976). The method was modified to include analyses at additional time points after inoculation with domestic sewage sludge (10, 15 and 20 d) in order to determine whether the microorganisms required a time interval to adapt to the new food source (test substance). Exposure to the test substance occurred at a concentration of 2 to 4 µL/300 ml. The control groups confirmed that the inoculum was active and the results indicated that adaptation was necessary in order for domestic sludge microorganisms to utilise the test substance as a substrate. Under the study conditions, 13% of test substance was removed in the first 15 d of the sampling period and 32% was degraded from 15 to 20 d. Under the study conditions, unadapted microorganisms therefore could not degrade the test substance within a 28 d period to a level allowing identification as readily biodegradable. Nevertheless, adapted microorganisms present where continuous exposure to the test substance occurs will readily remove the substance from sewage systems (Gezo, 1980).

QSAR model predictions (BioWin and BioHCwin):

The biodegradation potential of the test substance, p-methylstyrene, was estimated using the BioWin v4.11 program of EPI Suite v4.11. BIOWIN contains seven separate models.This version (v4.11) designates the models as Biowin1 (linear probability model), Biowin2 (nonlinear probability model), Biowin3 (expert survey ultimate biodegradation model), Biowin4 (expert survey primary biodegradation model), Biowin5 (MITI linear model), Biowin6 (MITI nonlinear model), Biowin7 (anaerobic biodegradation model). Using SMILES or CAS number as the input parameter, the biodegradability estimates are based upon fragment constants that were developed using multiple linear or non-linear regression analyses, depending upon the model. For p -methylstyrene, the Biowin 1 and Biowin 2 models both predicted 'biodegrades fast, Biowin3 and Biowin 4 predicted 'weeks' and 'days-weeks' respectively, Biowin 5 and Biowin 6 both predicted 'not readily biodegradable' (with probability of biodegradation as 0.36 and 0.387 respectively) and Biowin 7 predicted 'does not biodegrade fast'. As the criteria for overall 'yes' ready biodegradability prediction is based on the 'weeks' or faster and biodegradation probability of >=0.5 predictions by Biowin 3 and Biowin 5 respectively, the overall ready biodegradability prediction for the substance was 'No' (US EPA, 2018). The individual submodules (i.e., BioWin 2 and 3 or BioWin 3 and 6) however suggest that the substance do not meet the persistence criteria as per Annex XIII criteria as set out in the REACH Technical Guidance Document Chapter R.11 (Table R.11—4). The prediction for the substance is considered to be reliable, as it falls within of the applicability domain.

The biodegradation potential of the test substance, p-methylstyrene, was also estimated using the BioHCwin v1.01 program of EPI Suite v4.11.BioHCwin is a new predictive model within EPI Suite, which determines quantitative primary biodegradation half-lives of individual petroleum hydrocarbons. This model uses a fragment-based approach similar to BioWin.Using SMILES code as the input parameter the primary biodegradation half-life for the test substance was determined to be 3.897 d; indicating that the substance can be classed as readily biodegradable (US EPA, 2018). The prediction for the substance is considered to be reliable, as it falls within of the applicability domain.

Overall,in accordance with the restricted definition of readily biodegradable in screening tests used in the context of the REACH directive, the substance must be considered to be not readily biodegradable as preconditioning of the microorganisms is required as per the experimental study with the test substance. However, the individual submodule prediction from BioWin as well as half-life prediction from BioHCwin model of EPI Suite QSAR program, indicate that the substance is biodegradable and will not be persistent in the environment.