Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
The study was performed between 13 November 2006 and 28 November 2006.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2006
Report date:
2006

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Date of inspection: 30/08/05; Date of signature: 14/12/06

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
483-390-9
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
12508-61-1
Molecular formula:
H16Mg6O17S
IUPAC Name:
hexamagnesium(2+) trihydrate decahydroxide sulfate

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Not stated in report.
- Age at study initiation: twelve to twenty weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation: 2.0 to 3.5 kg
- Housing: The animals were individually housed in suspended cages.
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least five days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 to 23°C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): at least fifteen changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.


IN-LIFE DATES: From: Day 1 To: Day 7

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml of the test material, which was found to weigh approximately 30 mg (as measured by gently compacting the required volume into an adapted syringe)
- Concentration (if solution): not applicable


VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): not applicable
- Concentration (if solution): not applicable
- Lot/batch no. (if required): not applicable
- Purity: not applicable
Duration of treatment / exposure:
7 days
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): not stated in report if washing was done.
- Time after start of exposure: not stated in report


SCORING SYSTEM: Kay and Calandra


TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of the light source from a standard ophthalmoscope

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.33
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
: Redness
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days

Any other information on results incl. tables

Individual and group mean scores for ocular irritation are given in Table1and Table2.

White residual test material was noted in all treated eyes at the 1-hour observation.

Scattered or diffuse corneal opacity was noted in one treated eye at the 24-hour observation, in all treated eyes at the 48-hour observation and persisted in one treated eye at the 72‑hour observation.

Iridial inflammation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24-hour observation and in one treated eye at the 48-hour observation.

Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24, 48 and 72-hour observations.

All treated eyes appeared normal at the 7-day observation.

Table1               IndividualScores and Individual Total Scoresfor Ocular Irritation

Rabbit Number and Sex

65132 Male

65198 Male

65191 Male

IPR= 2

IPR = 2

IPR = 2

Time After Treatment

1

Hour

24

Hours

48

Hours

72

Hours

7

Days

1

Hour

24

Hours

48

Hours

72

Hours

7

Days

1

Hour

24

Hours

48

Hours

72

Hours

7

Days

CORNEA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E = Degree of Opacity

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

F = Area of Cornea Involved

0

2

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

2

1

1

0

Score (E x F) x 5

0

10

5

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

10

5

5

0

IRIS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

Score (D x 5)

5

5

0

0

0

5

5

5

0

0

5

5

0

0

0

CONJUNCTIVAE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A = Redness

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

0

B = Chemosis

2

2

1

1

0

2

2

1

1

0

2

2

1

1

0

C = Discharge

2Re

2

1

1

0

2Re

2

1

1

0

2Re

2

1

1

0

Score (A + B + C) x 2

12

12

8

8

0

12

12

8

8

0

12

12

8

8

0

Total Score

17

27

13

8

0

17

17

18

8

0

17

27

13

13

0


IPR= Initial pain reaction

Re= White residual test material in the treated eye

Table2               Individual Total Scores and Group Mean Scoresfor Ocular Irritation

Rabbit Number

and Sex

Individual Total Scores At:

1 Hour

24 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

7 Days

65132 Male

17

27

13

8

0

65198 Male

17

17

18

8

0

65191 Male

17

27

13

13

0

Group Total

51

71

44

29

0

Group Mean Score

17.0

23.7

14.7

9.7

0.0

 


IPR= Initial pain reaction

Re= White residual test material in the treated eye

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 23.7 and was classified as a MODERATE IRRITANT (CLASS 5 ON A 1 TO 8 SCALE) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The substance is classified as an eye irritant (Category 2: Causes serious eye irritation) under the EU CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Executive summary:

Introduction. 

The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbit. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:

§        OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 405 “Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion” (adopted)

§        Method B5 Acute Toxicity (Eye Irritation) of Commission Directive 2004/73/EC

Result. 

A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced scattered or diffuse corneal opacity, iridial inflammation and moderate conjunctival irritation. All treated eyes appeared normal at the 7-day observation.

Conclusion. 

The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 23.7 and was classified as a MODERATE IRRITANT (CLASS 5 ON A 1 TO 8 SCALE) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.

The substance is classified as an eye irritant (Category 2: Causes serious eye irritation) under the EU CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.